LIU Jigen,ZHANG Xinchuan,LI Li,et al.Research of Effect of Vegetation Coverage on Soil and Water Loss in Purple Soil Slope Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(03):16-20,27.
紫色土坡面植被覆盖度对水土流失影响研究
- Title:
- Research of Effect of Vegetation Coverage on Soil and Water Loss in Purple Soil Slope Land
- Keywords:
- purple soil; vegetation; coverage; soil and water loss
- 分类号:
- S157.1
- 摘要:
- 植被是防止地面水土流失的积极因素，但在三峡库区紫色土关于植被对水土流失的影响还相对比较薄弱。本研究通过人工模拟降雨试验，分析不同草地覆盖度对紫色土坡地径流产沙的影响，定量研究不同草地覆盖度的减水减沙效益。结果表明：流量随草地植被覆盖度的增加而减小，小雨强时表现特别显著。特别是当植被覆盖度 > 60%后，径流量明显低于裸地及20%，40%植被覆盖度；植被覆盖度越高，植被降低径流含沙率的作用也就越明显，径流含沙量就越低；与草地的减沙功能相比，其削减径流作用明显弱于减沙效应，且盖度对坡面的减水特征值影响不太明显；植被覆盖的减流减沙效益在中小雨强时随雨强的增加而增加，在大雨强时，其减流减沙效益反而降低。
- Abstract:
- Vegetation is the positive factor preventing ground soil and water loss, but the research of effect of vegetation on soil and water loss is still very weak in purple soil in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. Artificial rainfall simulation experiment was used to analyze the effects of different grass coverage on runoff and sediment in purple soil slope land, quantitatively study the benefits of reducing runoff and sediment under different grass coverage. The results showed that the runoff flow decreased with increase of grass coverage, and it was particularly significant under small rainfall intensity. Especially when vegetation coverage was greater than 60%, the runoff volumes were significantly lower than those of bare land, the lands with 20% and 40% of vegetation coverage. The higher vegetation coverage is, the more obvious that reducing runoff and sediment yield, and the lower the sediment concentration is. Compared with grass-reduced sediment, it was obviously weaker for reducing runoff, and it was not clear that the effect of vegetation coverage on characteristic value of reducing runoff. The benefits of vegetation-reduced runoff and sediment increased with rise of rainfall under small and medium rainfall intensities, on the contrary, under the big rainfall intensity, the benefits of reduction of runoff and sediment declined.
参考文献/References:
[1] 侯喜禄,曹清玉.陕北黄土丘陵沟壑区植被减沙效益研究[J].水土保持通报,1990,10(2):33-40.
[2] 刘元宝,唐克丽,查轩,等.坡耕地不同地面覆盖的水土流失试验研究[J].水土保持学报,1990,4(1):25-29.
[3] 焦菊英,王万忠.人工草地在黄土高原水土保持中的减水减沙效益与有效盖度[J].草地学报,2001,9(3):176-182.
[4] 吴钦孝,赵鸿雁,韩冰.黄土丘陵区草灌植被的减沙效益及其特征[J].草地学报,2003,11(1):23-26.
[5] 刘斌,罗全华,常文哲,等.不同林草植被覆盖度的水土保持效益及适宜植被覆盖度[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(6):68-73.
[6] 蒋光毅,史东梅,卢喜平,等.紫色土坡地不同种植模式下径流及养分流失研究[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(5):54-58.
[7] 刘刚才,朱波,代华龙,等.四川低山丘陵区紫色土不同土地利用类型的水蚀特征[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(6):96-99.
[8] 刘纪根,李蓉.紫色土区土地利用类型与降水变化对水土流失的影响[J].长江科学院院报,2009,26(8):10-14.
[9] 张光辉,梁一民.模拟降雨条件下人工草地产流产沙过程研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1996,2(3):56-59.
[10] 曾伯庆,马文中,李俊文,等.人工草地植被对产流产沙影响的研究[C]//晋西黄土高原土壤侵蚀规律试验研究文集.北京:水利电力出版社,1990:80-86.
[11] 侯喜禄,梁一民,曹清玉.黄土丘陵区主要水保林类型及草地水保效益的研究[J].中国科学院水利部西北水土保持研究所集刊,1991,14:96-103.
[12] 彭文英,张科利.不同土地利用产流产沙与降雨特征的关系[J].水土保持通报,2001,21(4):4-8.
[13] 朱冰冰,李占斌,李鹏,等.草本植被覆盖对坡面降雨径流侵蚀影响的试验研究[J].土壤学报,2010,47(3):401-407.
相似文献/References:
[1]张 蒙,胡桂清,张文太,等.长期植被覆盖对紫色土坡面减流减沙能力的影响[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(05):164.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.029]
Zhang Meng,Hu Guiqing,Zhang Wentai,et al.Effect of Long-Term Vegetation Coverage on Runoff and Sediment Reducing Ability of Purple Soil Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(03):164.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.029]
[2]张清春,刘宝元,翟刚.植被与水土流失研究综述[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(04):96.
ZHANG Qing-chun,LIU Bao-yuan,ZHAI Gang.Review on Relationship Between Vegetation and Soil and Water Loss[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(03):96.
[3]熊文成,刘运明,李有利.天山中段北麓盐渍化现状与成因[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(03):97.
XIONG Wen-cheng,LIU Yun-ming,LI You-li.Situation and Origin of Soil Salinization in the North Front of the Central Tianshan Mountains[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(03):97.
[4]张源润,蔡进军,李振永,等.宁南半干旱退化山区林草植被快速恢复技术研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(04):12.
ZHANG Yuan-run,CAI Jin-jun,LI Zhen-yong,et al.Research on Vegetation Recovery Technology in Semi-arid Degenerated Mountainous Area in South Ningxia[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(03):12.
[5]杨树,温雨金,刘鸿雁.内蒙古中部地区退耕还林还草后植被与土壤性状的变化[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(04):143.
YANG Shu,WEN YU-jin,LIU Hong-yan.Ecological Effects of Mandatory Conversion of Marginal Farmland to Forestland and Grassland in Central Inner Mongolia[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(03):143.
[6]王礼先.植被生态建设与生态用水——以西北地区为例[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(03):5.
WANG Li-xian.Vegetative Eco-environment Construction and Water Use of Eco-environment——Taking Northwestern Area for An Example[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2000,7(03):5.
[7]周建勤,贾宏涛,朱金兆.北京西山残次林改造工程生态评价指标体系构建[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(01):248.
ZHOU Jian-qin,JIA Hong-tao,ZHU Jin-zhao.Establishment of Ecological Assessment Indexes System for Reconstruction Project for Deteriorated Forest in Western Hills of Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(03):248.
[8]汪洪旭.农业旅游开发对内蒙呼伦贝尔草原生态环境的影响[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(02):290.
WANG Hongxu.Effect of Agriculture Tourism Development on Eco-environment of Hulunbuir[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(03):290.
[9]朱芳,白卓灵.旅游干扰对鄱阳湖国家湿地公园植被及土壤特性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(03):33.
ZHU Fang,BAI Zhuoling.Impacts of Tourist Disturbance on Soil and Plant Properties of Poyang Lake National Wetland Park[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(03):33.
[10]高珍萍,徐祥明,邱秀亮,等.赣南地区不同植被覆盖下红壤抗冲性动态研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(05):1.
GAO Zhenping,XU Xiangming,QIU Xiuliang,et al.Research on the Dynamic Change of Anti-Scourability of Red Soils Under Different Vegetation Covers in Gannan Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(03):1.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2014-05-30;改回日期:2014-09-02。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金“三峡库区坡面多尺度植被格局对水土流失的影响机制”（41001166）；国家自然科学基金“紫色土细沟侵蚀研究”（41101260）；长江科学院创新团队“南水北调水源区小流域水土流失、非点源污染过程与调控研究”（CKSF2012052/TB）
作者简介:刘纪根(1975-),男,湖北汉川人,博士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事土壤侵蚀机理、流域侵蚀产沙研究。E-mail:jigenliu@163.com