HUANG Xiaoqiang,ZHAO Yunjie,XIN Zhongbao,et al.Influence of Typical Land Use Types on Soil Physico-chemical Properties and Erodibility in Beijing Mountainous[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(01):5-10.
北京山区典型土地利用方式对土壤理化性质及可蚀性的影响
- Title:
- Influence of Typical Land Use Types on Soil Physico-chemical Properties and Erodibility in Beijing Mountainous
- 分类号:
- S157.1
- 摘要:
- 延庆县地处北京市西北部，作为北京生态环境建设工程的重要组成部分，是北京五大风沙口之一，此区属于生态环境脆弱地带，加之人类对土地资源的不合理利用，导致了严重的土壤侵蚀性问题。针对北京市延庆县山区不同土地利用类型的土壤，通过室内测试分析，并运用统计和相关分析等方法，对研究区农田、果园、苗圃幼林地、山地灌木林和土路5种土地利用类型下土壤可蚀性及其理化性质进行研究，结果表明：各土地利用类型中，山地灌木林的土壤总孔隙、土壤贮水能力、土壤饱和持水量和有机质显著大于其它土地类型（P < 0.05）。不同土地利用方式的土壤可蚀性K值存在差异，由大到小依次表现为：土路（0.047 4） > 农田（0.043 5） > 果园（0.042 1） > 苗圃幼林地（0.040 8） > 山地灌木林（0.034 2）。对土壤可蚀性和土壤理化性质进行相关性分析结果表明：土壤可蚀性与砂粒、粉粒含量、黏粒含量、非毛管孔隙、土壤贮水能力和容重相关性较好（P < 0.05），可作为土壤可蚀性评价的指标。
- Abstract:
- Yanqing County as one of Beijing’s five sand sources is located in the northwest of Beijing. It is an important part of the Beijing ecological environment construction project. This area belongs to fragile zone, which has been influenced by human irrational use of land, leading to the serious soil erosion problems. Through laboratory test and analysis, and using different methods such as statistics and correlation analysis, soil erodibility and its physicochemical properties of five kinds of land use types (Farmland, Orchards, Nurseries of young forest, Mountain shrub forest and Dirt road) in Beijing mountainous of Yanqing County were studied. The results showed that among different land use types, total porosity, water holding capacity of the soil, soil saturated water content and organic matter of mountain shrub forest soil were significantly higher than those of other land types (P < 0.05). Different land use types have the K value differences, which was followed in descending order: Dirt road (0.047 4) > Farmland (0.043 5) > Orchards (0.042 1) > Nurseries of young forest (0.040 8) > Mountain shrub forest (0.034 2). The correlation analysis on soil erodibility and soil physical and chemical properties showed that the soil erodibility K value was closely related to the factors such as silt content, clay content, noncapillary porosity, soil water storage capacity and bulk density correlation (P < 0.05), which can be used as evaluation indices of soil erodibility.
参考文献/References:
[1] 张科利,蔡永明,刘宝元,等.土壤可蚀性动态变化规律研究[J].地理学报,2001,56(6):673-681.
[2] 李月臣,刘春霞,赵纯勇,等.三峡库区(重庆段)土壤侵蚀敏感性评价及其空间分宜特征[J].生态学报,2009,29(2):788-796.
[3] 李春梅,汪美华,王红亚.贵州麦岗水库沉积物的矿物磁性特征及其土壤侵蚀意义[J].地理研究,2010,29(11):1972-1979.
[4] 赵洋毅,周运超,段旭.黔中石灰岩喀斯特表层土壤结构性与土壤抗蚀抗冲性[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(2):42-46.
[5] 李鹏,李占斌,郑郁.不同土地利用方式对干热河谷地区土壤可蚀性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):16-19.
[6] 李鹏,李占斌,郑郁.不同海拔对干热河谷地区土壤理化性质及可蚀性的影响[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(4):103-107.
[7] 张旭贤,高华端,孙利军,等.不同海拔对干热河贵州不同碳酸盐岩坡耕地土壤侵蚀特征研究[J].中国水土保持,2013(9):42-46.
[8] 易扬,信忠保,覃云斌,等.黄土丘陵区不同土地利用类型土壤水分物理性质研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(5):45-48.
[9] 邹碧,王刚,杨富权.黄土丘陵区不同华南热带区不同恢复阶段人工林土壤持水能力研究[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2010,18(4):343-349.
[10] 肖辉杰,丁国栋,贾瑞燕,等.京郊荒滩生态恢复初期植被与土壤环境的变化:以延庆县为例[J].干旱地区农业研究,2005,23(5):202-206.
[11] 吕瑞恒,刘勇,于海群,等.北京山区不同林分类型土壤肥力的研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2009,31(6):159-163.
[12] Wischmeier W H, Johnson C B, Cross B V. A soil erodibility nomograph for farmland and construction sites[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1971,26(6):189-193.
[13] 李庆云,余新晓,信忠保,等.黄土高原典型流域不同土地利用类型土壤物理性质分析[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(6):106-114.
[14] Liu Binhui, Xu Ming, Henderson M, et al. Taking China temperature:Daily range, warming trends, and regional variations, 1955-2000[J]. Journal of Climate,2004,17(22):4453-4462.
[15] 赵世伟,周印东,吴金水.子午岭北部不同植被类型土壤水分特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(4):119-122.
[16] Brejda J J, MoormanT B, Karlen D L, et al. Identification of regional soil quality factors and indicators:I. Central and southern high plains[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,2000,64(6):2115-2124.
[17] 李攀.浅议苗圃土壤改良[J].林业科技情报,2012,44(1):26-27.
[18] 王丽,梦丽,张金池,等.不同植被恢复模式下矿区废弃地土壤水分物理性质研究[J].中国水土保持,2010(3):54-57.
[19] 姜培坤,周国模,钱新标.侵蚀型红壤植被恢复后土壤养分含量与物理性质的变化[J].水土保持通报,2004,18(1):12-14.
[20] 黄昌勇.土壤学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:66-80.
[21] 曹鹤,薛立,谢腾芳,等.华南地区八种人工林的土壤物理性质[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(4):620-625.
[22] 解文艳,樊贵盛.土壤含水量对土壤入渗能力的影响[J].太原理工大学学报,2004,35(3):272-275.
[23] 李天阳,何丙辉,田家乐,等.重庆璧山5种典型农林混作模式土壤理化性质及水分入渗特性[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(4):103-108.
[24] 苏杨,朱健,王平,等.土壤持水能力研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2013,29(14):140-145.
[25] 廖凯华,徐绍辉,程桂福.大沽河流域土壤饱和导水率空间变异特征[J].土壤,2009,41(1):147-151.
[26] 张扬,赵世华,华娟.宁南山区草地植被恢复方式对土壤饱和导水率的影响[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(1):27-30.
[27] 王清奎,汪思龙,冯宗炜,等.杉木人工林土壤有机质研究[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(10):1947-1952.
[28] Bouyoucos G J. The clay ratio as a criterion of susceptibility of soils to erosion[J]. Journal of American Society of Agronomy,1935,27:738-741.
[29] 朱明勇,谭淑端,顾胜利,等.湖北丹江口水库库区小流域土壤可视性特征[J].土壤通报,2010,42(2):434-436.
[30] 杨帆,张洪江,程金花,等.北京市延庆县不同土地利用方式下的土壤可蚀性研究[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(6):19-23.
[31] Aggelopoulou K, Pateras D, Fountas S, et al. Soil spatial variability and site specific fertilization maps in an apple orchard[J]. Precision Agriculture,2011,12(1):118-129.
[32] 吴昌广,曾毅,周志翔,等.三峡库区土壤可蚀性K值研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2010,8(3):8-12.
相似文献/References:
[1]沈艳,傅瓦利,蓝家程,等.岩溶山地不同土地利用方式土壤颗粒有机碳和矿物结合态有机碳的分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):1.
SHEN Yan,FU Wa-li,LAN Jia-cheng,et al.Distribution Characteristics of Soil Particulate Organic Carbon and Mineral-associated Organic Carbon of Different Land Use in Karst Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):1.
[2]李品荣,孟广涛,李国昌.不同土地利用方式下土壤地力变化和水土流失状况研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(03):95.
LI Pin-rong,MENG Guang-tao,LI Guo-chang.Study on Land Capacity Change and Soil Erosion on Different Landuse Types[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(01):95.
[3]阳利永,吴献花,赵斌,等.滇池柴河流域不同土地利用方式土壤养分剖面分异[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):95.
YANG Li-yong,WU Xian-hua,ZHAO Bin,et al.Effects of Different Land Uses on Profile Variability of Soil Nutrients in Chaihe Basin of Dianchi Lake[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):95.
[4]杨芝歌,史宇,余新晓,等.北京山区典型树种树干液流特征及其对环境因子的响应研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):195.
YANG Zhi-ge,SHI Yu,YU Xin-xiao,et al.Characteristic of Stem Sap Flux Velocity of Individual Trees and Its Response to Environmental Factors in the Beijing Mountain Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):195.
[5]吴月照.北京山区土地资源评价及可持续发展研究[J].水土保持研究,1999,6(04):19.
Wu Yuezhao.Evaluation of Land Resource and Study on Development Strategy in Mountain Areas of Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1999,6(01):19.
[6]符素华,张卫国,刘宝元,等.北京山区小流域土壤侵蚀模型[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(04):114.
FU Su-hua,ZHANG Wei-guo,LIU Bao-yuan,et al.Beijing Mountain Area Soil Erosion Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(01):114.
[7]夏江宝,杨吉华,李红云.不同外界条件下土壤入渗性能的研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(02):115.
XIA Jiang-bao,YANG Ji-hua,LI Hong-yun.The Research of Soil Infiltration in Different Outside Factors[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(01):115.
[8]刘梦云,安韶山,常庆瑞,等.宁南山区不同土地利用方式土壤质量评价[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(03):35.
LIU Meng-yun,AN Shao-shan,CHANG Qing-rui,et al.Soil Quality Evaluation Under Different Land Use in Southern Ningxia Mountain Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(01):35.
[9]刘梦云,安韶山,常庆瑞.宁南山区不同土地利用方式土壤有机碳特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(03):47.
LIU Meng-yun,AN Shao-shan,CHANG Qing-rui.Features of Soil Organic Carbon Under Different Land Use in Mountain Area of Southern Ningxia[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(01):47.
[10]李裕元.坡地磷素迁移研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(05):1.
LI Yu-yuan.Review of Study on Phosphorus Transport on Slope Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(01):1.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2014-03-28;改回日期:2014-04-08。
基金项目:北京高等学校“青年英才计划”（YETP0753）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目（TD2011-2）；水利部黄土高原水土流失过程与控制重点实验室开放课题资助项目（201301）
作者简介:黄晓强(1988-),男,山西朔州人,硕士研究生,研究方向:水土保持与荒漠化防治。E-mail:hxqiang2013@126.com
通讯作者:赵云杰(1968-),男,山东潍坊人,实验师,主要从事水土流失治理与规划研究。E-mail:xinzhongbao@126.com