ZHANG Lin,XUE Bing,LU Chen-yu,et al.Study on the Spatial Comparison and Measurement of Urban Sustainability Based on AHP & GIS Approach—A Case of 35 Municipalities in Northeast China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(02):86-91.
基于AHP与GIS的城市可持续性测度与空间比较研究——以东北地区35市(州)为例
- Title:
- Study on the Spatial Comparison and Measurement of Urban Sustainability Based on AHP & GIS Approach—A Case of 35 Municipalities in Northeast China
- Keywords:
- human-natural relationship; sustainability assessment; spatial analysis model; Northeast China
- 分类号:
- F592
- 摘要:
- 以东北地区35市（州）为案例，根据数据源条件，从经济、社会、生态3个子系统构建了包含12项指标在内的城市可持续性空间测度评价指标体系，基于可持续发展指标校正模型，采用AHP分别计算了东北三省35市（州）经济、社会、生态子系统的发展指数及综合发展度与协调度，通过可持续性空间测度与比较，阐析了东北地区35市（州）在可持续发展上的空间关联特征及其基本规律。研究结果表明：城市可持续性具有地理空间差异与地域分异规律，以沈阳为代表的转型成功的老工业区和以大连为代表的现代新型城市可持续发展度较高，而边远地区及处于转型中的老工业城市则相对较低；中心城市的辐射作用明显，对其周边城市的可持续性影响较大；经济、社会、生态子系统之间存在着较为紧密的耦合与转换关系，因此，在制定城市可持续发展政策中必须因地制宜，并且要从城市群或经济区等视角推进城市可持续发展。
- Abstract:
- By taking the 35 municipalities in Northeast China as studied cases, an principles-oriented index system was firstly proposed which contained 12 indicators categorized as 3 subsystems named as economic-, social- and ecological-subsystem, and then the developmental indices were calculated by employing the modified sustainability assessment model and analytic hierarchy process method, followed by index’ visual and exploring analysis, finally the spatial relationship and basic phenomenon into municipal scale sustainability measurement were concluded. The results showed that the successful transited industrial and new-emerging cities such as Shenyang and Dalian had higher sustainability, while lower sustainability was found in the outland and transiting cities, the effectiveness of the central city was significance which meant they had obvious influences on its satellite and surrounding cities, coupling and dual-shifting relationship existed among economic-, social- and ecological-subsystem. It is suggested that policies towards for sustainable development must closely combine with the local conditions and made appropriate methods in respect of macro level such as urban clusters and economic zone.
参考文献/References:
[1] Edwin Z. Over two decades in pursuit of sustainable development: influence, transformations, limits[J]. Environmental Development,2012,1(1):79-90.
[2] Charikleia K, Dimitris A. Developing countries’ energy needs and priorities under a sustainable development perspective: a linguistic decision support approach[J]. Energy for Sustainable Development,2010,14(4):330-338.
[3] 诸大建.可持续发展研究的3个关键课题与中国转型发展[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(10):35-39.
[4] 郭滨,李铁松.南充城市生态可持续发展水平对比评价[J]水土保持研究,2005,12(1):193-198.
[5] Muhammet Y, Levent A, Peter B, et al. Politics and sustainable tourism development-can they coexist? voices from North Cyprus[J]. Tourism Management,2010,31(3):345-356.
[6] Volker M. 3-D sustainability: an approach for priority setting in situation of conflicting interests towards a sustainable development[J]. Ecological Economics,2008,64(3):496-506.
[7] Joseph M, Andrew G. Environmental policy and industrial innovation: integrating environment and economy through ecological modernization[J]. Geoforum,2000,31(1):33-44.
[8] 官冬杰,苏维词.城市生态系统健康及其评价指标体系研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(5):70-73.
[9] 薛冰,陈兴鹏,张伟伟,等.区域循环经济调控机制研究[J].软科学,2010,24(8):74-77.
[10] 曾贤刚,周海林.全球可持续发展面临的挑战与对策[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(5):32-39.
[11] 杨雪梅,石培基,潘竟虎,等.甘肃省城市经济低碳度综合评价及其空间差异分析[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(5):52-58.
[12] 张新营,韩良,佟连军.吉林省生态经济区竞争力评价[J].地理研究,2004,24(16):975-980.
[13] 薛冰,李春荣,刘竹,等.全球1970—2007年碳排放与城市化关联机理分析[J].气候变化研究进展,2011,7(6):423-427.
[14] 鹿晨昱,马忠,张子龙,等.基于元指标理论的庆阳区域可持续发展研究[J].生态科学,2012,31(1):62-68.
[15] 鹿晨昱,陈兴鹏,薛冰.可持续发展评价中元指标的判定与拓展[J].统计与决策,2009(12):4-6.
[16] 薛冰,陈兴鹏,张伟伟,等.关于社区循环经济发展的理论探讨[J].华东经济管理,2011,170(2):28-32.
[17] 黑龙江省统计局.黑龙江统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2010.
[18] 吉林省统计局.吉林统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2010.
[19] 辽宁省统计局.辽宁统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2010.
[20] 杨冕,陈兴鹏,薛冰.中国西北地区可持续发展测度的比较[J].兰州大学学报,2009,45(5):49-51.
相似文献/References:
[1]胡春元,桂呈森,闫琳,等.沙漠化本质原因分析及防治策略探讨[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(03):130.
HU Chunyuan,GUI Chengsen,YAN Lin,et al.Discussion on the Causes of Desertification Process and Countermeasures[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(02):130.
[2]刘成武,黄利民,吴斌祥.论人地关系对湖北省自然灾害的影响[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(01):177.
LIU Cheng-wu,HUANG Li-min,WU Bin-xiang.Discussion on Impacts of Man-land Relationship on Natural Disaster in Hubei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(02):177.
[3]郭腾云,徐勇,杨国安.延安市土地利用变化与人地关系状态演变[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(03):61.
GUO Teng-yun,XU Yong,YANG Guo-an.Land Use Change and Man-Land Relationship Evolution in Yan’an Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(02):61.
[4]张桂宾,王安周,耿秀丽.河南省耕地变化及其人文驱动力研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(04):65.
GENG Xiu-li,WANG An-zhou,GENG Xiu-li.Study on Cultivated Land Changes and Its Human Driving Forces in He’nan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(02):65.
[5]王辉,莫多闻,苏成.土壤侵蚀研究中有关的人地关系问题探讨[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(02):56.
WANG Hui,MO Duo-wen,SU Cheng.Study on the Man-land Relationship in Soil Erosion Research[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(02):56.
[6]陈强强,赵荣芳.甘南黄河水源补给生态功能区人地关系协调发展时空演变及影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(05):387.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.022.]
CHEN Qiangqiang,ZHAO Rongfang.Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Human-Environment Interaction in the Yellow River Water Catchment Ecological Function Area of Gannan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(02):387.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.022.]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2012-09-03;改回日期:2012-10-18。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金（41101126，41261112，71033004）；国家科技支撑计划（2011BAJ06B01）；国家科技部国际合作专项（2011DFA91810）；中国科学院“百人计划”（318-08YBR111SS）；西北师范大学青年教师科研能力提升计划项目（NWNU-LKQN-10-20）
作者简介:张琳(1988-),女,河北衡水人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为人地关系与区域可持续发展。E-mail:zhanglin880902@163.com
通讯作者:薛冰(1982-),男,理学博士(后),副研究员,主要从事人地关系、区域可持续发展、应对气候变化与环境政策研究。E-mail:xuebing@iae.ac.cn