[1]赵云,穆兴民,王飞,等.保护性耕作对农田土壤风蚀影响的室内风洞实验研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):16-19.
　ZHAO Yun,MU Xing-min,WANG Fei,et al.Impact of Conservation Tillage on Soil Wind Erosion of Farmland Based on Wind Tunnel Test[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):16-19.
点击复制

保护性耕作对农田土壤风蚀影响的室内风洞实验研究

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 19 期数: 2012年03期 页码: 16-19 栏目: 出版日期: 2012-06-20
Title:
Impact of Conservation Tillage on Soil Wind Erosion of Farmland Based on Wind Tunnel Test
作者:
赵云1, 穆兴民1,2,3, 王飞1,2,3, 蒋冲1, 刘振东1, 李锐1,2,3
1. 西北农林科技大学 资源与环境学院, 陕西 杨凌 712100;
2. 中国科学院 水利部 水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌 712100;
3. 中国科学院 研究生院, 北京 100049
Author(s):
ZHAO Yun1, MU Xing-min1,2,3, WANG Fei1,2,3, JIANG Chong1, LIU Zhen-dong1, LI Rui1,2,3
1. College of Resources and Environment, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;
2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;
3. Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
关键词:
保护性耕作; 土壤风蚀; 抗风蚀效率; 室内风洞模拟
Keywords:
conservation tillage; soil erosion; anti-erosion efficiency; wind tunnel simulation
分类号:
S157.1
摘要:
保护性耕作能够有效减少农田土壤风蚀。通过室内风洞实验，定量分析不同作物留茬、不同秸秆覆盖量对安塞黄绵土风蚀作用的影响。结果表明：（1）小麦留茬、玉米留茬以及秸秆覆盖都可以有效的减少风蚀。小麦秸秆覆盖量为4 210 kg/hm2时土壤抗风蚀效率最高，达到95.9%；（2）风蚀量与风速成正相关关系，风蚀量随风速的变化均存在突然增大的转折点且30 cm小麦留茬的转折点会明显滞后于30 cm玉米留茬和裸土，30 cm小麦留茬的抗风蚀效率要好于30 cm玉米留茬；小麦秸秆覆盖量越大，抗风蚀效率越好；（3）随着高度的增加风蚀量逐渐减小，超过90%的风蚀量都集中在0～36 cm高度范围内。随着风速的增大，0～10 cm风蚀量所占比例会逐渐增加。
Abstract:
Conservation tillage can reduce soil wind erosion effectively on farmland. Quantitative analysis of the impact of different crop stubble and different straw mulch on wind erosion of loessial soil of Ansai was carried out by wind tunnel experiments in the laboratory. The results indicated that: (1) wheat stubble, corn stubble and straw mulch could reduce soil wind erosion effectively, and anti-erosion efficiency under straw mulch with 4 210 kg/hm2 was 95.9% which was the best; (2) the amount of wind erosion had a positive correlation with wind velocity, soil wind erosion increased with the increase of wind velocity, having a sudden increase of the turning point, and the turning point of 30 cm wheat stubble will be significantly lag behind the 30 cm corn stubble and bare soil. The greater coverage of wheat mulch was, the better the efficiency of anti-erosion was; (3) the amount of wind erosion will reduce gradually with the increase of the height, and over 90% of the amount of wind erosion concentrated in the range of 0～36 cm height. The proportion of wind erosion at the height of 0~10 cm would gradually rise with increasing in wind velocity.

参考文献/References:

[1] 朱朝云,丁国栋,杨明远.风沙物理学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1992.
[2] 刘玉璋,董光荣,李长治.影响土壤风蚀主要因素的风洞实验研究[J].中国沙漠,1992,12(4):41-49.
[3] 国家林业局.中国荒漠化和沙化状况公告[M].北京:中国绿色,2005.
[4] 刘秉正,吴发启.土壤侵蚀[M].西安:陕西人民出版社,1996:216-233.
[5] 董治宝,陈渭南,李振山,等.植被对土壤风蚀影响作用的实验研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1996,10(2):1-8.
[6] Wolfe S A,Nickling W G.The protective role of sparsevegetation in wind erosion[J].Progress in Physical Geography,1993,17(1):50-68.
[7] 孙悦超,麻硕士,陈智,等.阴山北麓干旱半干旱区地表土壤风蚀测试与分析[J].农业工程学报,2007,27(12):1-5.
[8] 冯晓静,高焕文,王丽洁,等.北京周边典型农田风蚀风洞试验与防治分析[J].农业机械学报,2008,39(7):64-67.
[9] 陈智.阴山北麓农牧交错区地表土壤抗风蚀能力测试研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2006.
[10] 孙悦超.内蒙古后山地区不同地表覆盖条件下土壤抗风蚀效应测试研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2008.
[11] 陈智,麻硕士,赵永来,等.保护性耕作农田地表风沙流特性[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(1):118-122.
[12] 吕甚悟,陈谦,袁绍良,等.紫色土坡耕地水土流失试验分析[J].山地学报,2000,18(6):520-525.
[13] 贺宝根,周乃晟,等.农田非点源污染研究中的降雨径流关系-SCS法的修正[J].环境科学研究,2001,14(3):49-51.

相似文献/References:

[1]申陆,田美荣,高吉喜.基于RWEQ模型的浑善达克沙漠化防治生态功能区土壤风蚀与主要影响因子分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(06):90.
　SHEN Lu,TIAN Meirong,GAO Jixi.Analysis on Wind Erosion and Main Factors in Desertification Control Ecologincal Function Area of Hunshandake Using the Revised Wind Erosio Equation Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(03):90.
[2]杜鹏飞,刘孝盈.中国土壤风蚀速率实测研究述评[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):275.
　DU Peng-fei,LIU Xiao-ying.A Review of Measurement of Wind Erosion Rate in China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):275.
[3]李振山.地形起伏对气流速度影响的风洞实验研究[J].水土保持研究,1999,6(04):75.
　Li Zhenshan.Wind Tunnel Simulation of Flow Velocity on the Windward Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1999,6(03):75.
[4]廖超英,李靖,郑粉莉,等.国外土壤风蚀预报的研究历史与动向[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(04):50.
　LIAO Chao-ying,LI Jing,ZHENG Fen-li,et al.Research History and Trend of Wind Erosion Prediction Abroad[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(03):50.
[5]尚润阳,祁有祥,赵廷宁,等.植被对风及土壤风蚀影响的野外观测研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(04):37.
　SHANG Run-yang,QI You-xiang,ZHAO Ting-ning,et al.Field Investigation on the Influence of Vegetation on Wind and Soil Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(03):37.
[6]李玉宝.中国土壤风蚀灾害发生的范围[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(02):37.
　LI Yu-bao.Areas of Wind Erosion in China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(03):37.
[7]王翔宇,原鹏飞,丁国栋,等.不同植被覆盖防治土壤风蚀对比研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(05):38.
　WANG Xiang-yu,YUAN Peng-fei,DING Guo-dong,et al.Study on Mechanism Between Natural Shrub-grass and Soil Wind Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(03):38.
[8]封建民,赵敏宁,王涛.沙漠化对土壤风蚀的影响——以青海共和盆地为例[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(06):10.
　FENG Jian-min,ZHAO Min-ning,WANG Tao.Influence of Desertification on Soil Wind Erosion—A Case Study of Gonghe Basin，Qinhai Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(03):10.
[9]张金鑫,穆兴民,王飞,等.基于土壤质量的保护性农业技术及其政策取向[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):264.
　ZHANG Jin-xin,MU Xing-min,WANG Fei,et al.Technology and Policy Orientation of Conservation Agriculture Based on Soil Quality[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):264.
[10]姬生勋,刘玉涛,董智,等.黄泛平原风沙区不同造林年限林地土壤风蚀与理化性质的变化[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(03):158.
　JI Sheng-xun,LIU Yu-tao,DONG Zhi,et al.Variations of Wind Erosion and Soil Physicochemical Properties in Artificial Afforestation with Different Years in Yellow River Flood Plain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(03):158.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2011-11-21;改回日期:2011-12-22。
基金项目:“十一五”国家科技支撑计划项目（2006BAD09B00）；欧盟第六框架计划DESIRE（037046）项目
作者简介:赵云（1988- ），男，四川绵阳人，硕士研究生，主要从事保护性耕作研究。E-mail：zhaoyun2744527@126.com
通讯作者:穆兴民（1961- ），男，陕西华阴人，博士，研究员，主要从事水土保持与生态水文研究。E-mail：xmmu@ms.iswc.ac.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01