[1]吕刚,班小峰,雷泽勇,等.东北黑土区坡耕地治理过程中的水土保持效应[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(06):51-55.
　LV Gang,BAN Xiao-feng,LEI Ze-yong,et al.Benefit of Soil and Water Conservation in the Process of Harnessing a Sloping Farmland in the Black Soil Region, Northeast China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(06):51-55.
点击复制

东北黑土区坡耕地治理过程中的水土保持效应

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 16 期数: 2009年06期 页码: 51-55 栏目: 出版日期: 2009-12-20
Title:
Benefit of Soil and Water Conservation in the Process of Harnessing a Sloping Farmland in the Black Soil Region, Northeast China
作者:
吕刚1, 班小峰2, 雷泽勇1, 吴祥云1
1. 辽宁工程技术大学 资源与环境工程学院, 辽宁 阜新 123000;
2. 辽宁省阜新蒙古族自治县 水土保持总站, 辽宁 阜新 123100
Author(s):
LV Gang1, BAN Xiao-feng2, LEI Ze-yong1, WU Xiang-yun1
1. College of Resources and Environment Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning 123000, China;
2. Fuxin Mongolian Autonomous County General Station of Soil and Water Conservation, Fuxin, Liaoning 123100, China
关键词:
水土保持; 土壤水源涵养; 坡耕地治理; 东北黑土区
Keywords:
soil and water conservation; water conservation functions of soil; harnessing; a sloping farmland; the Black Soil region of Northeast China
分类号:
S152.5;S157.2
摘要:
以传统顺垄耕作为对照，研究了东北黑土区坡耕地治理过程中的水土保持效应。结果表明：坡耕地不同治理措施的保水效应和保土效应以水平梯田最佳，效应值分别为70.64%和77.61%，大小顺序为水平梯田>地埂植物地>横垄>对照，保土效应要优于保水效应，对照和横垄的土壤侵蚀程度表现为轻度，地埂植物带和水平梯田表现为微度；容重、蓄水容量、有效蓄容和稳定入渗率表征坡耕地治理措施土壤水源涵养效应指标的大小顺序为地埂植物带>水平梯田>横垄>对照。
Abstract:
In comparison with traditional the ridge along slope, benefit of soil and water conservation in the process of harnessing a sloping farmland in the Black Soil region of Northeast China was carried out. The results indicate that benefity of soil and water conservation was the best in the level terrace of different measures, and the value were 70.64% and 77.61%. We can put the following items as such orders: level terrace>buffer strip>contour cultivation>the ridge along slope, and effects on soil conservation was better than water conservation, the degree of soil erosion on contour cultivation and the ridge along slope were mild, level terrace and buffer strip were weak. Soil bulk density, soil water storage effective capacity, and steady infiltration rate were indicators of the size of water conservation functions of soil, we can put the following items as such orders: buffer strip>level terrace>contour cultivation>the ridge along slope.

参考文献/References:

[1]刘宝元,阎百兴,沈波,等.东北黑土区农地水土流失现状与综合治理对策[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(1):1-8.
[2]杨文文,张学培,王洪英.东北黑土区坡耕地水土流失及防治技术研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(5):232-236.
[3]范昊明,蔡强国,王红闪.中国东北黑土区土壤侵蚀环境[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(2):66-70.
[4]郝云庆,王金锡,李力.北川退耕还林农林复合经营模式的水土保持效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(4):16-19.
[5]水利部.土壤侵蚀分类分级标准SL 190-2007[S].2008.
[6]郑纪勇,邵明安,张兴昌.黄土区坡面表层土壤容重和饱和导水率空间变异特征[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(3):53-56.
[7]史东梅,吕刚,蒋光毅,等.马尾松林地土壤物理性质变化及抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(6):35-39.
[8]吴发启,赵西宁,佘雕.坡耕地土壤水分入渗影响因素分析[J].水土保持通报,2003,23(1):16-18,78.
[9]张永涛,杨吉华,夏江宝,等.石质山地不同条件的土壤入渗特性研究[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(4):123-126.
[10]勃海锋,刘国彬,王国梁.黄土丘陵区退耕地植被恢复过程中土壤入渗特征的变化[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(3):1-5,31.

相似文献/References:

[1]白桦,穆兴民,王双银.水土保持措施对秃尾河径流的影响[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(01):40.
　BAI Hua,MU Xing-min,WANG Shuang-yin.Impact of Soil and Water Conservation on River Flow of Tuwei River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(06):40.
[2]王星,李占斌,李鹏.陕西省丹汉江流域水土保持工程投资情况分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):43.
　WANG Xing,LI Zhan-bin,LI Peng.Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation Project Investment Status of Dan-Han River Watershed in Shaanxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):43.
[3]宋凤军,穆兴民,白桦.嘉陵江流域输沙量演变规律分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):65.
　SONG Feng-jun,MU Xing-min,BAI Hua.Variation of Sediment Discharge in the Jialingjiang River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):65.
[4]熊康宁,王恒松,刘云.毕节石桥小流域水土保持综合治理生态监测与效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):10.
　XIONG Kang-ning,WANG Heng-song,LIU Yun.Ecological Monitoring and the Evaluation on the Benefits of Comprehensive Management for Soil and Water Conservation in Shiqiao Watershed of Bijie City, Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):10.
[5]贺振伟,郭东罡,白中科,等.两种水土生态恢复模式下刺槐种群数量特征与空间格局研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):48.
　HE Zhen-wei,GUO Dong-gang,BAI Zhong-ke,et al.Numeric Character and Spatial Pattern of Robinia pseudoacacia L. Population at Two Kinds of Recovery Modes[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):48.
[6]吴启蒙,朱志玲,吴咏梅,等.宁夏水土保持的产业结构影响评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):116.
　WU Qi-meng,ZHU Zhi-ling,WU Yong-mei,et al.Impact Evaluation on Industrial Structure of Soil and Water Conservation in Ningxia Hui Automonous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):116.
[7]康万利,揭雨成,邢虎成.南方坡耕地种植苎麻水土保持效果和经济效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):86.
　KANG Wan-li,JIE Yu-cheng,XING Hu-cheng.Study of Soil-Water Conservation Effects and Economic Benefit of Ramie in South Slope Crop Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):86.
[8]郭兰勤,杨勤科.藉河流域水土保持效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):139.
　GUO Lan-qin,YANG Qin-ke.Evaluation on the Benefit of the Soil and Water Conservation in Jihe Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):139.
[9]汪有科,李立,傅左,等.薪炭林水土保持效益的研究[J].水土保持研究,1992,(01):70.
　Wang Yuke,Li Li,Fu Zuo,et al.A STUDY ON THE BENEFIT OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION FOR ENERGY FOREST[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1992,(06):70.
[10]刘向东,吴钦孝,赵鸿雁.森林植被垂直截留作用与水土保持[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(03):8.
　Liu Xiangdong,Wu Qinxiao,Zhao Hongyan.The Vertical Interception Function of Forest Vegetation and Soil and Water Conservation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(06):8.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2009-5-15;改回日期:。
基金项目:国家十一五科技支撑项目（2006BAD03A0203）；辽宁省教育厅项目（20060381，2008289）
作者简介:吕刚（1979- ），男，吉林九台人，讲师，主要从事土壤侵蚀与流域治理的教学和科研工作。E-mail：lvgang2637@126.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01