[1]贺尧,苏芳莉,郭成久,等.基于主成分分析法的煤矸石山植被水土保持功能评价[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):74-77.
　HE Yao,SU Fang-li,GUO Cheng-jiu,et al.Evaluation of Vegetation Soil and Water Conservation Function in Coal Waste Piles Based on Principal Component Analysis[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(01):74-77.
点击复制

基于主成分分析法的煤矸石山植被水土保持功能评价

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 16 期数: 2009年01期 页码: 74-77 栏目: 出版日期: 2009-02-20
Title:
Evaluation of Vegetation Soil and Water Conservation Function in Coal Waste Piles Based on Principal Component Analysis
作者:
贺尧1, 苏芳莉1, 郭成久1, 周月杰1, 张才厚2
1. 沈阳农业大学 水利学院, 沈阳 110161;
2. 抚顺市矿务局林场, 辽宁 抚顺 113107
Author(s):
HE Yao1, SU Fang-li1, GUO Cheng-jiu1, ZHOU Yue-jie1, ZHANG Cai-hou2
1. School of Water Conservancy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China;
2. Mining Bureau of Forest Farm in Fushun, Fushun, Liaoning 113107, China
关键词:
煤矸石山; 水土保持功能; 植被恢复; 主成分分析
Keywords:
coal waste piles; soil and water conservation function; the restoration of vegetation; principal component analysis
分类号:
S157
摘要:
运用主成分分析方法对抚顺西排土场植被水土保持功能进行评价。遴选植被冠层截留量、植被冠层高度、乔灌郁闭度、基部盖度、枯枝落叶层截留量、枯枝落叶层厚度和有效根密度7个指标建立评价体系，选取5种植被为研究对象，选择栽植后恢复3 a和恢复5 a的植被分别进行研究。对各植被水土保持功能指标进行计算和比较，运用SPSS 13.0统计软件得出各植被水土保持功能的综合值。结果为恢复3 a的植被水土保持功能排序为沙棘、紫穗槐、刺槐、小叶杨、油松；恢复5 a的植被水土保持功能排名为刺槐、沙棘、紫穗槐、小叶杨、油松。研究表明：灌木在植被恢复早期所具有的水土保持功能较好，随着恢复时间的增加，阔叶乔木的水土保持功能逐渐增强。建议煤矸石山生态修复中采取阔叶乔木和灌木混交的模式。
Abstract:
The evaluation of soil and water conservation function to vegetation effect on coal waste piles of 5 restored vegetations in Fushun West waste-dump are calculated and compared through principle component analysis by setting up a series of indexes, including canopy interception, canopy height, canopy density, coverage, litter of weeds interception amount, litter of weeds thickness, effective density of roots. With the statistical software SPSS 13.0, the evaluation of soil and water conservation function is calculated. From high to slow, the restoration of 3 years are shrubby falseindigo, Sea-buckthorn, Locust, Simon poplar, Chinese pine, the restoration of 5 years are shrubby Locust, falseindigo, Sea-buckthorn, Simon poplar, Chinese pine. Research shows that the evaluation of soil and water conservation function of shrubs is better in early restoration of vegetation. As time passes the evaluation of soil and better conservation function of broad-leaved trees become better and better.The authors advise that the broad-leaved trees and shrubs mixing apply to coal waste piles to reconstruct ecological.

参考文献/References:

[1] 卞正富.我国煤矿区土地复垦与生态重建研究[J].资源·产业, 2005, 7(2):18-24.
[2] 杨社锋, 方维耸, 胡瑞忠.中国煤矿废弃物环境效应研究进展[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2004, 23(3):264-269.
[3] 韦红波, 李锐, 杨勤科.我国植被水土保持功能研究进展[J].植物生态学报, 2002, 26(4):489-494.
[4] 胡建忠, 李文忠, 郑佳丽, 等.祁连山南麓退耕地主要植物群落植冠层的截留性能[J].山地学报, 2004, 22(4):492-501.
[5] 张清春, 刘宝元, 翟刚.植被与水土流失研究综述[J].水土保持研究, 2002, 9(4):96-101.
[6] 胡良军, 邵明安.论水土流失研究中的植被覆盖度量指标[J].西北林学院学报, 2001, 16(1):40-43.
[7] 李永宁, 张宾兰, 秦淑英.郁闭度及其测定方法研究与应用[J].世界林业研究, 2008, 21(1):40-45.
[8] 秦伟, 朱清科, 张学霞, 等.植被覆盖度及其测算方法研究进展[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2006, 24(9):163-170.
[9] 郭亚军.综合评价理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社, 2002.

相似文献/References:

[1]张彩霞,许丽,周心澄.阜新矿区煤矸石山植被恢复土地适宜性评价[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(03):246.
　ZHANG Cai-xia,XU Li,ZHOU Xin-cheng.Land Suitability Assessment of Vegetation Restoration of the Coal Gangue Pile of Fuxin Mine Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(01):246.
[2]张婷,王曰鑫.煤矸石山生态恢复研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(05):412.
　ZHANG Ting,WANG Yue-xin.Research Progress of Coal Waste Piles’ Ecology Restoration[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(01):412.
[3]魏忠义,王秋兵.大型煤矸石山植被重建的土壤限制性因子分析[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):179.
　WEI Zhong-yi,WANG Qiu-bing.Research on Limited Factors of Reclaimed Soil in the Large Coal Wastes Pile in Fushun West Opencast Coal Mine[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(01):179.
[4]黄进,张晓勉,张金池.开化生态公益林主要森林类型水土保持功能综合评价[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(03):87.
　HUANG Jin,ZHANG Xia-mian,ZHANG Jin-chi.Comprehensive Evaluation on Soil and Water Conservation Function of Main Forest Types of Ecological Protection Forest in Kaihua County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(01):87.
[5]刘艳,刘学全,崔鸿侠,等.低丘黄壤区不同植被恢复模式水土保持功能分析[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(06):48.
　LIU Yan,LIU Xue-quan,CUI Hong-xia,et al.Analysis on Function of Water and Soil Conservation of Different Vegetation Restoration Patterns in Yellow Soil Area of Low Hill[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(01):48.
[6]赵晓亮,李瑞锋,齐庆杰.河南平顶山煤矸石山植被恢复的适宜性评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(06):264.
　ZHAO Xiao-liang,LI Rui-feng,QI Qing-jie.Research on Suitability Assessment of Vegetation Restoration for Pingdingshan Coal Vague Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(01):264.
[7]贾爱冬,张鹏冲,张创峰,等.林地水土保持功能持续提高的机制及对策[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(06):283.
　JIA Ai-dong,ZHANG Peng-chong,ZHANG Chuang-feng,et al.Study on Mechanism and Strategies for Sustainable Development of Soil and Water Conservation Function of Woodland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(01):283.
[8]徐文秀,王海燕,鲍玉海,等.湖南省永顺县水土保持功能服务价值评价[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(05):243.
　XU Wenxiu,WANG Haiyan,BAO Yuhai,et al.Evaluation of Service Value of Soil and Water Conservation Function in Yongshun County, Hunan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(01):243.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2008-8-5。
基金项目:辽宁省博士启动基金（基金编号20081070）；辽宁省水利厅2008年度水利工程；沈阳农业大学青年基金
作者简介:贺尧（1983- ），男，辽宁鞍山人，硕士研究生，从事土壤侵蚀规律及其治理研究。E-mail：heyao83216@163.com
通讯作者:郭成久（1964- ），男，辽宁沈阳人，教授，从事土壤侵蚀规律及其治理研究。E-mail：chengjiuguo11@163.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01