[1]刘艳萍,荣浩,邢恩德.不同措施对退化草地土壤和植被的影响[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(06):345-347.
LIU Yan-ping,RONG Hao,XIN En-de.Impact on Grasslands Soil and Vegetation of Different Measures[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(06):345-347.
点击复制
《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P]
卷:
14
期数:
2007年06期
页码:
345-347
栏目:
出版日期:
1900-01-01
- Title:
-
Impact on Grasslands Soil and Vegetation of Different Measures
- 作者:
-
刘艳萍, 荣浩, 邢恩德
-
水利部 牧区水利科学研究所, 呼和浩特 010020
- Author(s):
-
LIU Yan-ping, RONG Hao, XIN En-de
-
Department of Water Resources for Pastoral Areas of the Ministry of Water Resources, Huhhot 010010, China
-
- 关键词:
-
荒漠草场; 恢复措施; 土壤水分; 土壤养分; 草场植被
- Keywords:
-
desertification grasslands; recovering measures; soil moisture; soil nutrient; grasslands vegetation
- 分类号:
-
S812.2
- 摘要:
-
在我国干旱、半干旱草原区,草场沙化、退化和水土流失等现象十分严重,要解决这一问题,首先应搞好水土保持生态环境监测。为了客观地分析和评价各项水土保持措施实施后给生态环境带来的效应,在京津风沙源科技支撑项目实施过程中,建立草地水土保持生态技术试验基地,对各项措施实施前后的生态指标进行连续4 a的动态监测。主要研究退化草地围封前后及围栏内不同恢复措施对土壤水分与养分及草场植被的影响。结果表明:围栏前后土壤水分、养分和草场植被都发生了变化,尤其对草场植被的影响极其明显,封育草场的植被盖度较未封育的天然草场植被盖度平均增加58.66%。围栏内不同恢复措施对土壤水分、养分和草场植被也都有明显的影响。
- Abstract:
-
Grasslands desertization and desertification and soil and water loss is very serious in arid and semi-arid grasslands in China.For resolving this problem, we should do well in soil and water conservation and ecology monitoring in the first.In order to analyze and evaluate every soil and water conservation measure effects objectively, we dynamically monitored each ecological index for 4 years before and after implementing every measures in our test base, studied the impacts on soil moisture and soil nutrient and grasslands vegetation of enclosure and different recovering measures.Results indicate that the impact on soil moisture and soil nutrient and grasslands vegetation of enclosure is obvious, especially the impact on grasslands vegetation.Vegetation coverage degree increases 58.66% after enclosing.Different recovering measures in the enclosure also influence soil moisture and soil nutrient and grasslands vegetation distinctly.
参考文献/References:
[1] 白玉刚.对天然草原围栏效益的研究[J].草原与饲料, 2004 (8):58-59.
[2] 许毅红, 赵钢, 等.天然草地改良效果的研究[J].草原与饲料, 2004 (8):59-60.
[3] 安渊, 徐柱, 等.不同退化梯度草地植物和土壤的差异[J].中国草地, 1999 (4):31-36.
[4] 周华荣, 马小明.荒漠生态环境监测刍议[J].干旱环境监测, 2000, 14 (2):88-91.
[5] 刘晓强, 申田, 连兵生.生态态环境监测的关键问题研究[J].环境保护, 2000 (12):18-19.
相似文献/References:
[1]李生宝,季波,王月玲,等.宁南山区不同恢复措施对土壤环境效应的综合评价[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(01):51.
LI Sheng-bao,JI Bo,WANG Yue-ling,et al.Comprehensive Assessment on Different Restoration Measures to Soil Environmental Effect in Ningnan Hilly Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(06):51.
[2]王彦丽.不同植被恢复措施下剖面根系与SOC的分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(06):19.
WANG Yan-li.Profile Distribution Characteristics of Root Biomass and Soil Organic Carbon under Different Vegetation Restoration Measures[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(06):19.
更新日期/Last Update:
1900-01-01