[1]王国重,李中原,屈建钢,等.模拟降雨条件下豫西南山区农地径流污染物变化规律[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(04):311-314,323.
　WANG Guozhong,LI Zhongyuan,QU Jiangang,et al.Under Artificial Rainfall the Changing Law of Pollutants in Runoff in Farmland in Southwest Mountains of Henan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):311-314,323.
点击复制

模拟降雨条件下豫西南山区农地径流污染物变化规律

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 24 期数: 2017年04期 页码: 311-314,323 栏目: 出版日期: 2017-08-28
Title:
Under Artificial Rainfall the Changing Law of Pollutants in Runoff in Farmland in Southwest Mountains of Henan Province
作者:
王国重1, 李中原2, 屈建钢3, 徐建昭3, 闫东锋4
1. 黄河水文水资源科学研究院, 郑州 450004;
2. 河南省水文水资源局, 郑州 450002;
3. 河南省水土保持监督监测总站, 郑州 450008;
4. 河南农业大学 林学院, 郑州 450002
Author(s):
WANG Guozhong1, LI Zhongyuan2, QU Jiangang3, XU Jianzhao3, YAN Dongfeng4
1. Hydrology and water resources of Yellow River scientific research institute, Zhengzhou 450004, China;
2. Hydrology and water resources bureau in He’nan Province, Zhengzhou 450003, China;
3. Soil and water conservation supervision and inspection station in He’nan Province, Zhengzhou 450008, China;
4. Forestry college of Henan agricultural university, Zhengzhou 450002, China
关键词:
人工降雨; 径流; 农地; 养分; 雨强
Keywords:
artificial rainfall;  runoff; farmland; nutrient; rainfall intensity
分类号:
X14
摘要:
坡耕地和梯田是丹江口水库水源区常见的农地类型，为了减少养分和水土流失、改进农作措施，采用人工模拟降雨方法，研究了不同雨强下这两种用地径流中养分变化规律。结果表明：（1）两种土壤径流中TN，TP，COD随降雨时间均呈波状变化，不同雨强下梯田径流中TN的含量为：3.36 mg/L（0.5 mm/min时），5.18 mg/L（2.5 mm/min时），4.27 mg/L（3.0 mm/min时），坡耕地中相应为2.66 mg/L，4.56 mg/L，4.18 mg/L；不同雨强下梯田径流中TP的含量为：0.81 mg/L（0.5 mm/min时），0.92 mg/L（2.0 mm/min时），1.56 mg/L（2.5 mm/min时），2.53 mg/L（3.0 mm/min时），坡耕地中的值依次为0.59 mg/L，1.03 mg/L，0.62 mg/L，2.04 mg/L。说明梯田中TN，TP的含量要高于坡耕地。（2）不同雨强下梯田径流中COD含量为：303.56 mg/L（1.0 mm/min时），685.16 mg/L（2.0 mm/min时），617.66 mg/L（3.0 mm/min时），坡耕地中则为419.63 mg/L，644.62 mg/L，721.17 mg/L，研究表明坡耕地更易发生有机质的流失。因此，对坡耕地进行梯田化治理可减少养分和水土流失、提高作物产量。
Abstract:
Slope cropland and terrace are common land use types in Danjiangkou reservoir catchment areas and indoor artificial rainfall simulation methods are employed to study nutrients’ changing law of the two soils under different rainfall intensities, so as to prevent nutrients， soil and water erosion, improving farming practices. The results are as follows: (1) the nutrients of TN, TP and COD all have wavily changed in the two kind soils runoff with rainfall time, the TN content are respectively 3.36 mg/L (0.5 mm/min), 5.18 mg/L (2.5 mm/min), 4.27 mg/L (3.0 mm/min) in terrace in different rainfall intensity and the relevant values in hilly land are 2.66 mg/L, 4.56 mg/L, 4.18 mg/L; the TP content are respectively 0.81 mg/L (0.5 mm/min), 0.92 mg/L (2) / 0 mm/min), 1.56 mg/L (2.5 mm/min), 2.53 mg/L (3.0 mm/min) in terrace in different rainfall intensity and the relevant values in hilly land are 0.59 mg/L, 1.03 mg/L, 0.62 mg/L, 2.04 mg/L, which shows TN and TP content in terrace are higher than the one in hilly land. (2) the COD content are respectively 303.56 mg/L (1.0 mm/min), 685.16 mg/L (2.0 mm/min), 617.66 mg/L (3.0 mm/min) in terrace in different rainfall intensity and the relevant values in hilly land are 419.63 mg/L, 644.62 mg/L, 721.17 mg/L, which indicates it’s more likely to happen the loss of organic matter in hilly land. Therefore， terrance engineering to hilly land can reduce nutrients loss, water and soil erosion, increase crop yield.

参考文献/References:

[1] Walther G R, Post E, Convey P, et al. Ecological responses to recent climate change[J]. Nature, 2002,416:389-395.
[2] 孟红旗,赵同谦.降雨侵蚀力对河岸滩区耕地土壤养分流失的影响[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(1):28-31.
[3] 徐红灯,王京刚,席北斗,等.降雨径流时农田沟渠水体中氮、磷迁移转化规律研究[J].环境污染与防治,2007,29(1):18-21.
[4] Ventura M, Scandellari F, Ventura F, et al. Nitrogen balance and losses through drainage waters in an agricultural watershed of the Po Valley(Italy)[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2008,29(2):108-115.
[5] Olarewaju O E, Adetunji M T, Adeofun C O, et al. Nitrate and phosphorus loss from agricultural land:Implications for nonpoint pollution[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2009,85(1):79-85.
[6] 焦金平,王少丽,许迪,等.次暴雨下作物植被类型对农田氮磷径流流失的影响[J].水利学报,2009,40(3):296-302.
[7] 李俊波,华珞,冯琰.坡地土壤养分流失研究概况[J].土壤通报,2005,36(5):753-759.
[8] 李广,黄高宝.雨强和土地利用方式对黄土丘陵区水土流失的影响[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(11):85-90.
[9] 向速林.赣江流域农田地表径流氮磷迁移与流失研究[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(7):1204-1207.
[10] 黄河仙,谢小立,王凯荣,等.不同覆被下红壤坡地地表径流及其养分流失特征[J].生态环境学报,2008,17(4):1645-1649.
[11] 白丹,王玮,孙健,等.南水北调中线水源区水土保持生态建设探析[J].西北大学学报:自然科学版,2010,40(2):348-350.
[12] 尹炜,史志华,雷阿林.丹江口水库水环境问题分析研究[J].人民长江,2011,42(13):90-94.
[13] 高杨,宋付朋,马富亮,等.模拟降雨条件下3种类型土壤氮磷钾养分流失量的比较[J].水土保持学报,2011,(2):15-18.
[14] 王洁,胡少伟,周跃.人工模拟降雨装置在水土保持方面的应用[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(4):188-190,194.
[15] 李广,黄高宝.模拟降雨与水土流失试验研究[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2008,24(4):443-445.
[16] 史银志,雷晓.基于人工模拟降雨的土壤侵蚀特性试验研究[J].石河子大学学报,2008,26(4):487-490.
[17] 王辉,王全九,邵明安.人工降雨条件下黄土坡面养分随径流迁移试验[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(6):39-44.
[18] 梁斐斐,蒋先军,袁俊吉,等.降雨强度对三峡库区坡耕地土壤氮、磷流失主要形态的影响[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(4):81-85.
[19] 苏慧敏.不同水土保持措施下土壤养分流失的研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2012.
[20] 王晓燕,王一峋,王晓峰.密云水库小流域土地利用方式与氮磷流失规律[J].环境科学研究,2003,16(1):30-36.
[21] 杨胜天,程红光,步青松,等.全国土壤侵蚀量估算及其在吸附态氮磷流失量匡算中的应用[J].环境科学学报,2006,26(3):366-374.
[22] 张展羽,张卫,杨洁,等.不同尺度下梯田果园地表径流养分流失特征分析[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(11):105-108.
[23] 梁爱珍,张晓平,杨学明,等.土壤细颗粒对有机质的保护能力研究[J].土壤通报,2005,36(5):748-752.

相似文献/References:

[1]宋玥,张忠学.不同耕作措施对黑土坡耕地土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(02):14.
　SONG Yue,ZHANG Zhong-xue.The Effect of Different Tillage Measures on Soil Erosion in Slope Farmland in Black Soil Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(04):14.
[2]白桦,穆兴民,王双银.水土保持措施对秃尾河径流的影响[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(01):40.
　BAI Hua,MU Xing-min,WANG Shuang-yin.Impact of Soil and Water Conservation on River Flow of Tuwei River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(04):40.
[3]杨巍,汤洁,李昭阳,等.基于SWAT模型的大伙房水库汇水区径流与泥沙模拟[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):77.
　YANG Wei,TANG Jie,LI Zhao-yang,et al.Streamflow and Sediment Simulation Based on SWAT Model in Dahuofang Reservoir Catchment[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):77.
[4]刘士余,章俊霞,罗志军,等.近50年赣西北大坑小流域径流对降雨的响应[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):19.
　LIU Shi-yu,ZHANG Jun-xia,LUO Zhi-jun,et al.Response of Runoff to Rainfall in Dakeng Small Watershed in Northwestern Jiangxi Province over the Last 50 Years[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):19.
[5]白桦,穆兴民,高鹏,等.嘉陵江流域降水及径流演变规律分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):102.
　BAI Hua,MU Xing-min,GAO Peng,et al.Analysis on Spatio-temporal Variation of Precipitation and Streamflow in the Jialingjiang River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):102.
[6]吴钦孝,刘向东,赵鸿雁,等.宜川县油松人工林集水区水文状况分析[J].水土保持研究,1991,(02):116.
　Wu Qinxiao,Liu Xiangdong,Zhao Hongyan,et al.AN ANALYSIS ON HYDROSTATUS OF CATCHMENT IN ARTIFICIAL CHINESE PINE FOREST IN YICHUAN COUNTY[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(04):116.
[7]汪有科,李立,傅左,等.薪炭林水土保持效益的研究[J].水土保持研究,1992,(01):70.
　Wang Yuke,Li Li,Fu Zuo,et al.A STUDY ON THE BENEFIT OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION FOR ENERGY FOREST[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1992,(04):70.
[8]石生新,蒋定生.几种水土保持措施对强化降水入渗和减沙的影响试验研究[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(01):82.
　Shi Shengxin,Jiang Dingsheng.Impacts of Several Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Strengthening Rainfall infiltration and Reducing Sediment Yield[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(04):82.
[9]曹全意.黄土高原地区提高山坡地径流利用率的有效途径[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(04):31.
　Cao Quanyi.The Effective Way to Raise the Runoff Use Ratein Slope Land of Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(04):31.
[10]赵晓光,吴发启.坡面水蚀过程的力能体系及研究思路[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(01):23.
　ZHAO Xiao-guang,WU Fa-qi.Research Frame for Force and Energy System in Water Erosion Process in Slopes of Gully[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2000,7(04):23.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2016-07-11;改回日期:2016-08-04。
基金项目:河南省科技攻关计划“基于分形理论的丹江口水库水源区农业面源污染研究及防治措施”（GG201412）；“河南省丹江口水库水源区水土保持与非点源污染特征研究”（GG200901）

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01