HU Jingxia,YANG Xinbing,ZHU Chenguang,et al.Hydrological Effects of Litter in Four Pure Forests and Soils in Northwest of Hebei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):304-310.
冀西北地区4种纯林枯落物及土壤水文效应
- Title:
- Hydrological Effects of Litter in Four Pure Forests and Soils in Northwest of Hebei Province
- Keywords:
- Winter Olympics Games; Chongli; litter; soil; hydrological effect
- 分类号:
- S715.7
- 摘要:
- 为改善冬奥会赛区（张家口市崇礼区清水河流域）水生态环境，提高（崇礼）赛区森林涵养水源功能，以崇礼区和平林场的云杉、白桦、山杨和华北落叶松4种纯林为研究对象，布设50 m×50 m样地，枯落物水文效应测定采用浸泡法，土壤层水文效应测定采用环刀法。结果表明：（1）枯落物总蓄积量最大为云杉林（38.46 t/hm2），各林分半分解层的蓄积量均大于未分解层；（2）枯落物最大持水量云杉林（3.03 t/hm2）最大，有效拦蓄量云杉林（2.57 t/hm2）最大，最大持水率山杨林（384.22%）最大，枯落物持水量与持水时间呈对数关系，枯落物吸水速率与持水时间呈幂函数关系；（3）土壤容重华北落叶松林（1.00 g/cm3）最大，山杨林（0.67 g/cm3）最小，土壤总孔隙度白桦林（67.14%）最大，山杨林（58.77%）最小。土壤入渗速率与入渗时间呈明显的幂函数关系。（4）林地总持水能力排序为：白桦林（887.45 t/hm2） > 华北落叶松林（840.94 t/hm2） > 云杉林（800.03 t/hm2） > 山杨林（768.58 t/hm2），土壤层的持水能力占99%以上。综合分析得知，阔叶林涵养水源功能优于针叶林，土壤层的持水能力强于枯落物层。
- Abstract:
- For the improvement of the water ecological environment and the ability of water conservation of forest in Chongli area (Qingshui River valley in Zhangjiakou), which is one of venues of Winter Olympic Games, we took four kinds of pure stands in Chongli peace forest, including Picea wilsonii, Betula platyphylla, Pobulus davidiana and Larix principis-rupprechtii, as the research objects. We set up 50 m×50 m sample plots in which litter of plots was adopted by soaking method, and hydrological effects of soil layer by cutting ring method. We carried out quantitative study of litter layer and soil layer hydrological effect. The results showed that: (1) among total amount of litter, the largest was Picea wilsonii(38.46 t/hm2) in which the accumulation amount of the semi decomposed layer of each stand was higher than that of the non decomposed layer; (2) the maximum water holding capacity of litter was Picea wilsonii(3.03 t/hm2) and the maximum effective retaining content was Picea wilsonii (2.57 t/hm2); the maximum water holding capacity of litter was Pobulus davidiana (384.22%) and it showed a logarithmic relation between the water holding capacity and water holding time; water absorption rate and moisture time of litter showed power function relationship; (3) the largest soil bulk density was Larix principis-rupprechtii (1.00 g/cm3)；the smallest was Pobulus davidiana (0.67 g/cm3); the largest total porosity of soil was Betula platyphylla (67.14%) and the smallest was Pobulus davidiana (58.77%). The relationship between soil infiltration rate and infiltration time was power function relationship; (4) the order of total water holding capacity of forest land was Betula platyphylla (887.45 t/hm2) > Larix principis-rupprechtii (840.94 t/hm2) > Picea wilsonii (800.03 t/hm2) > Pobulus davidiana (768.58 t/hm2); the water holding capacity of the soil layer accounted for more than 99 %. In conclusion, the ability of broad leaved forest to conserve water and soil was stronger than that of coniferous forest; the water holding capacity of the soil layer was stronger than that of the litter layer.
参考文献/References:
[1] 王士永,余新晓,贾国栋,等.北京山区主要人工林枯落物水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2011,9(5):42-47.
[2] Gabarrón-Galeote M A, Martínez-Murillo J F, Ruiz-Sinoga J D. Relevant effects of vegetal cover and litter on the soil hydrological response of two contrasting Mediterranean hillslopes at the end of the dry season (south of Spain)[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2012,26(11):1729-1738.
[3] Burrows C R, Appold M S. Hydrology of the Forest City basin, Mid-Continent, USA:implications for CO2 sequestration in the St. Peter Sandstone[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015,73(4):1409-1425.
[4] Ent R J, Coenders A M J, Nikoli R, et al. The importance of proper hydrology in the forest cover-water yield debate:commentary on Ellison et al.[J]. Global Change Biology, 2012,18(9):2677-2680.
[5] 胡淑萍,余新晓,岳永杰.北京百花山森林枯落物层和土壤层水文效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(1):146-150.
[6] Miriti J M, Kironchi G, Esilaba A O, et al. The effects of tillage system on soil physical properties and water conservation in a sandy loam in eastern Kenya[J]. Journal of Science and Environment Management, 2013,4(7):146-154.
[7] Yao S R. Effects of fire disturbance on forest hydrology[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2003,14(4):331-334.
[8] 罗歆,代数,何丙辉,等.缙云山不同植被类型林下土壤养分含量及物理性质研究[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(1):64-69.
[9] 马正锐,程积民,班松涛,等.宁夏森林枯落物储量与持水性能分析[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(4):199-204.
[10] 陈倩,周志立,史琛媛,等.河北太行山丘陵区不同林分类型枯落物与土壤持水效益[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(5):206-211.
[11] 张振明,余新晓,牛健植,等.不同林分枯落物层的水文生态功能[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(3):139-143.
[12] 吴迪,辛学兵,赵明扬,等.北京九龙山不同林分枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].林业科学研究,2014,27(3):417-422.
[13] 陈家林,郭二辉,杨果果,等.太行山低山丘陵区不同水土保持林地土壤渗透性能及其影响因素研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2016,36(10):34-40.
[14] 林代杰,郑子成,张锡洲,等.不同土地利用方式下土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(1):33-36.
[15] 陈波,孟成生,杨新兵,等.冀北山地不同海拔华北落叶松人工林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(3):216-221.
[16] 田超,杨新兵,李军,等.冀北山地不同海拔蒙古栎林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(4):221-226.
[17] 周丽丽,蔡丽平,马祥庆,等.不同发育阶段杉木人工林凋落物的生态水文功能[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(5):249-253.
[18] 苏松锦,刘金福,陈文伟,等.戴云山黄山松林土壤水分物理性质空间变异特征与格局[J].资源科学,2014,36(11):2423-2430.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2016-11-16;改回日期:2016-11-28。
基金项目:国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项“关键支流清水河水环境保护与防治技术集成与示范”（2015ZX07203-005）
通讯作者:杨新兵(1978-),男,河北邯郸人,博士,副教授,研究方向:水土保持,森林生态。E-mail:yangxinbing2001@126.com