LI Haiyan,CAI Yinying.Agricultural Land Ecological Compensation Standard Estimate Based on Farmers’ Willingness to Accept—A Case Study of Hubei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(04):245-250,256.
基于帕累托改进的农田生态补偿农户受偿意愿——以湖北省武汉市、荆门市和黄冈市典型地区为例
- Title:
- Agricultural Land Ecological Compensation Standard Estimate Based on Farmers’ Willingness to Accept—A Case Study of Hubei Province
- Keywords:
- agricultural land ecological compensation; compensation policy standard; farmers’ willingness to accept; Pareto improvement; Tobit model
- 分类号:
- F062.2
- 摘要:
- 以“保护者受益”原则为基础，从维护和改善农田生态环境角度出发，通过建立不确定状态下政府对农田生态补偿的支付意愿函数和农户对农田生态补偿的受偿意愿函数，得到符合帕累托改进的农田生态补偿标准的取值区间；再以湖北省为例证，利用条件价值法估算农户参与农田生态补偿政策的受偿意愿，分析了影响农户受偿意愿的相关因素。研究结果显示：（1）政府制定的农田生态补偿标准应不低于农户的平均受偿意愿，对应湖北省农田生态补偿标准应不低于5 541.15~6 778.20元/hm2，低于这一标准的农田生态补偿政策在推行过程中不足以对农户形成有效的补偿激励，从而导致整个社会福利水平的损失；（2）受访者家庭农业收入比重、农田生态环境改善的心理期望对于农户参与农田生态补偿政策的受偿意愿具有显著正向影响，而受访者年龄、家庭劳动力比例和家庭承包地流转情况对农户参与农田生态补偿政策的受偿意愿具有显著负向影响。
- Abstract:
- Based on the principle of ‘protector to get compensation’, and aiming at retarding agricultural land ecological environment damage and transforming agricultural negative externalities, we built agricultural land ecological compensation policy with a hypothetical market conditions. Taking Hubei Province as an example, we establish governor’ willingness to pay and farmers’ willingness to accept functions under uncertain condition and analyzed the agricultural land ecological compensation standard with social welfare to achieve the maximum. Then, we get to take value interval of agricultural land ecological compensation standard which conforms to Pareto improvement. Through contingent valuation method and Tobit model, farmers’ average willingness to accept and influencing factors were analyzed. The results are shown as follows. (1) Agricultural land ecological compensation standard could exceed farmers’ average willingness to accept, for example, agricultural land ecological compensation standard in Hubei Province should be higher 5 541.15~6 778.20 yuan/(hm2·a). (2) Agricultural income proportion, famers’ expectation on an improvement in the ecological environment of farmland have a positive impact on farmers’ willingness to accept to protect farmland ecological environment; Age, family labor ratio, family farmland circulation ratio have a negative impact on it.
参考文献/References:
[1] 蔡银莺,张安录.基于农户受偿意愿的农田生态补偿额度测算[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(2):177-189.
[2] 臧玉珠,彭慧,周生路,等.苏南地区土地生态质量空间分异及其与经济发展协调性评价[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(3):187-197.
[3] Chamberlain J F, Miller S A. Policy incentives for switch grass production using valuation of non-market ecosystem services[J]. Energy Policy,2012,48(9):526-536.
[4] Beharry-Borg N, Smart J C R, Termansen M, et al. Evaluating farmers’ likely participation in a payment programme for water quality protection in the UK uplands[J]. Regional Environmental Change,2013,13(3):633-647.
[5] Christensen T, Pedersen A B, Nielsenb H O, et al. Determinants of farmers’willingness to participate in subsidy schemes for pesticide-free buffer zones:A choice experiment study[J]. Ecological Economics,2011,70(8):1558-1564.
[6] Broch S W, Strange N, Jacobsen J B, et al. Farmers’ willingness to provide ecosystem services and effects of their spatial distribution[J]. Ecological Economics,2013,92(8):78-86.
[7] Mettepenningen E, Verspecht A, Van Huylenbroeck G. Measuring private transaction costs of European agri-environmental schemes[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,2009,52(5):649-667.
[8] Kaczan D, Swallow B M, Adamowicz W L. Designing a payments for ecosystem services(PES)program to reduce deforestation in Tanzania:An assessment of payment approaches[J]. Ecological Economics,2013,95(11):20-30.
[9] 蔡银莺,余亮亮.重点开发区域农田生态补偿的农户受偿意愿分析:武汉市的例证[J].资源科学,2014,36(8):1660-1669.
[10] 施翠仙,郭先华,祖艳群,等.基于CVM意愿调查的洱海流域上游农业生态补偿研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2014,33(4):730-736.
[11] 杨欣,蔡银莺.基于农户受偿意愿的武汉市农田生态补偿标准估算[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(1):212-216.
[12] 刘军弟,霍学喜,黄玉祥,等.基于农户受偿意愿的节水灌溉补贴标准研究[J].农业技术经济,2012(11):29-40.
[13] 姜宏瑶,温亚利.基于WTA的湿地周边农户受偿意愿及影响因素研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2011,20(4):489-494.
[14] 冯琳,徐建英,邸敬涵.三峡生态屏障区农户退耕受偿意愿的调查分析[J].中国环境科学,2013,33(5):938-944.
[15] 韩鹏,黄河清,甄霖,等.基于农户意愿的脆弱生态区生态补偿模式研究:以鄱阳湖区为例[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(4):625-642.
[16] 许恒周.基于农户受偿意愿的宅基地退出补偿及影响因素分析:以山东省临清市为例[J].中国土地科学,2012,26(10):75-81.
[17] 李国平,李潇,萧代基.生态补偿的理论标准与测算方法探讨[J].经济学家,2013(2):42-49.
[18] 姜亮亮,包安明,刘海隆,等.玛纳斯流域生态需水变化与景观格局的响应关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(3):144-149.
相似文献/References:
[1]宋成舜,匡兵,罗丽,等.耕地综合价值视角下武汉城市圈耕地保护补偿标准[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(02):330.
SONG Chengshun,KUANG Bing,LUO Li,et al.Compensation Standard for Cultivated Land Protection From the Perspective of Cultivated Land Comprehensive Value in Wuhan Metropolitan Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):330.
[2]刘鑫,孔祥斌,吴芳芳,等.农户休耕意愿与不同模式的补偿标准——以太行山北麓平原、黑龙港地区为例[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(05):328.
LIU Xin,KONG Xiangbin,WU Fangfang,et al.Farmers’ Fallow Willingness and Compensation Standard of Different Models—A Case Study in the Northern Foothills Plain of Taihang Mountain and Heilonggang District[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(04):328.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2015-06-29;改回日期:2015-08-18。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目（41371519）；中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目（2013T60729）；华中农业大学博士研究生创新研究工程项目（2014bs42）
作者简介:李海燕(1988-),女,内蒙古赤峰人,博士研究生,主要从事土地资源经济与管理研究。E-mail:haiyan2011@163.com
通讯作者:蔡银莺(1979-),女,广东潮州人,教授,博导,研究方向为土地资源经济与管理。E-mail:caiyinying@mail.hzau.edu.cn