[1]张 益,林毅雁,张杰铭,等.北京山区典型植被枯落物和土壤层水文功能[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(04):160-168.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.054.]
　ZHANG Yi,LIN Yiyan,ZHANG Jieming,et al.Hydrological Function of Litter and Soil Layer of Typical Vegetation in Beijing Mountainous Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(04):160-168.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.054.]
点击复制

北京山区典型植被枯落物和土壤层水文功能

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 30 期数: 2023年04期 页码: 160-168 栏目: 出版日期: 2023-06-10
Title:
Hydrological Function of Litter and Soil Layer of Typical Vegetation in Beijing Mountainous Area
文章编号:
1005-3409(2023)04-0160-09
作者:
张 益1,2,3, 林毅雁4, 张杰铭5, 贾国栋1,2,3, 樊登星1,2,3, 余新晓1,2,3
(1.北京林业大学 水土保持学院, 北京 100083; 2.北京林业大学 国家林业与草原局水土保持重点实验室, 北京 100083; 3.北京林业大学 水土保持学院 首都圈森林生态系统教育部野外科学观测研究站, 北京 100083; 4.福建农业职业技术学院 园艺园林学院, 福州 350119; 5.南京水利科学研究院 水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室, 南京 210029)
Author(s):
ZHANG Yi1,2,3, LIN Yiyan4, ZHANG Jieming5, JIA Guodong1,2,3, FAN Dengxing1,2,3, YU Xinxiao1,2,3
(1.School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; 2.Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; 3.Metropolitan Area Field Scientific Observation Research Station, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; 4.College of Horticulture and Forestry, Fujian Vocational College of Agriculture, Fuzhou......)
关键词:
水土保持;  水文功能;  北京山区;  枯落物;  土壤层
Keywords:
soil and water conservation;  hydrological function;  Beijing mountainous area;  litter;  soil layer
分类号:
S718.5
DOI:
10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.054.
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[目的]研究枯落物和土壤层水文功能,从而明晰北京山区不同植被的水源涵养能力,可为当地植被建设提供借鉴。[方法]使用室内浸泡法、环刀法、定水头法等对北京山区不同植被的枯落物与土壤层水文功能进行了定量分析,并通过相关性分析明确了有机碳与土壤层水文功能之间的关系。[结果](1)枯落物最大持水率、最大拦蓄率、有效拦蓄率为侧柏(Platycladus orientalis)×灌木混交林>五角枫(Acer elegantulum)纯林>五角枫×侧柏混交林>侧柏纯林。最大持水量、最大拦蓄量、有效拦蓄量均为五角枫纯林>侧柏×灌木混交林>五角枫×侧柏混交林>侧柏纯林,且均为半分解层大于未分解层。(2)土壤饱和持水量和毛管持水量排序为侧柏纯林>五角枫纯林>侧柏×灌木混交林>五角枫×侧柏混交林。土壤非毛管持水量大小排序为五角枫×侧柏混交林>五角枫纯林>侧柏×灌木混交林>侧柏纯林。土壤饱和导水率沿剖面向下逐渐减小,平均饱和导水率最大的植被类型为侧柏×灌木混交林。(3)土壤有机碳含量表现为沿剖面向下逐渐减小,且土壤有机碳含量与容重、总孔隙度、非毛管孔隙度、饱和导水率均呈显著相关(p<0.05)。[结论]纯林土壤层的持水能力整体优于混交林,且都远超枯落物的持水能力。而混交林土壤导水能力整体优于纯林。有机碳可以显著影响土壤物理性质与导水能力,对于改良土壤水文功能具有积极意义。
Abstract:
[Objective] The water conservation capacity of different vegetation in Beijing mountainous area can be clarified through studying the hydrological function of litter and soil layer, which can provide reference for local vegetation construction. [Methods] The hydrological functions of litters and soil layers of different vegetation types in the Mountains of Beijing were quantitatively analyzed by the methods of indoor immersion, circumferential knife cutting and water head fixing. The relationship between organic carbon and hydrological function of soil layer was clarified by correlation analysis. [Results](1)The maximum water holding rate, maximum retention rate and effective retention rate of litter decreased in the order: the mixed forest of Platycladus orientalis×shrub>the pure forest of Acer elegantulum>the mixed forest of Acer elegantulum×Platycladus orientalis>the pure forest of Platycladus orientalis. The maximum water holding capacity, the maximum holding capacity and the effective holding capacity of litter decreased in the order: the pure forest of Acer elegantulum>the mixed forest of Platycladus orientalis×Shrub>the mixed forest of Acer elegantulum×Platycladus orientalis>the pure forest of Platycladus orientalis, and these parameters of semi-decomposed layers were greater than those of the undecomposed layers.(2)The order of soil saturated water holding capacity and capillary water holding capacity were the pure forest of Platycladus orientalis>the pure forest of Acer elegantulum>the mixed forest of Platycladus orientalis×Shrub>the mixed forest of Acer elegantulum×Platycladus orientalis. The order of non-capillary water holding capacity of different vegetation type were the mixed forest of Acer elegantulum×Platycladus orientalis>the pure forest of Acer elegantulum>the mixed forest of Platycladus orientalis×Shrub>the pure forest of Platycladus orientalis. The soil saturated hydraulic conductivity decreased gradually along the profile, and the maximum value of average saturated hydraulic conductivity was observed in the mixed forest of Platycladus orientalis×shrub.(3)Soil organic carbon content decreased gradually along the profile, and was significantly correlated with bulk density, total porosity, non-capillary porosity and saturated hydraulic conductivity(p<0.05). [Conclusion] The water holding capacity of soil layer of pure forest was better than mixed forest on the whole, and exceeded that of litter. The soil water storage capacity of mixed forest was better than pure forest. Organic carbon can significantly affect soil physical properties and water conductivity, which is of positive significance for improving soil hydrological function.

参考文献/References:

[1] Tiemann A, Ring I. Towards ecosystem service assessment: Developing biophysical indicators for forest ecosystem services[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022,137:108704.
[2] Dunkerley D. Percolation through leaf litter: What happens during rainfall events of varying intensity[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015,525:737-746.
[3] Pereira L C, Balbinot L, Lima M T, et al. Aspects of forest restoration and hydrology: The hydrological function of litter[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2021,33:543-552.
[4] 郑凯利,邓东周.若尔盖湿地土壤入渗性能及其影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(3):179-184,191.
[5] Liu B, Fan H M, Han W, et al. Linking soil water retention capacity to pore structure characteristics based on X-ray computed tomography: Chinese Mollisol under freeze-thaw effect[J]. Geoderma, 2021,203:105322.
[6] 李阳,万福绪.黄浦江中游5种典型林分枯落物和土壤水源涵养能力研究[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(2):264-271.
[7] Jourgholami M, Sohrabi H, Venanzi R, et al. Hydrologic responses of undecomposed litter mulch on compacted soil: Litter water holding capacity, runoff, and sediment[J]. Catena, 2022,210:105875.
[8] 朱万泽,盛哲良,舒树淼.川西亚高山次生林恢复过程中土壤物理性质及水源涵养效应[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(6):205-212.
[9] 赵阳,王飞,齐瑞,等.白龙江、洮河林区5种典型森林枯落物与土壤层水源涵养效应[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(3):118-125.
[10] 孙立博,余新晓,陈丽华,等.坝上高原杨树人工林的枯落物及土壤水源涵养功能退化[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(1):104-110.
[11] 侯瑞萍,张克斌,郝智如.造林密度对樟子松人工林枯落物和土壤持水能力的影响[J].生态环境学报,2015,24(4):624-630.
[12] Chang Z Q, Ye X Y, Zhang J H. Soil water infiltration of Subalpine Shrub Forest in Qilian Mountains, Northwest of China[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2021,113:829-839.
[13] Qin Y W, Xiao X M, Wigneron J P, et al. Carbon loss from forest degradation exceeds that from deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2021,11:442-448.
[14] Farooqi T J A, Li X H, Yu Z, et al. Reconciliation of research on forest carbon sequestration and water conservation[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2021,32:7-14.
[15] 孙拥康,汤景明,王怡.亚热带日本落叶松人工林枯落物及土壤层水文效应[J].北京林业大学学报,2021,43(8):60-69.
[16] 王金悦,邓羽松,林立文,等.南亚热带5种典型人工林凋落物水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(5):169-175.
[17] 杨振奇,秦富仓,李晓琴,等.砒砂岩区主要造林树种枯落物及林下土壤持水特性[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):118-122.
[18] 张宇恒,张莉,张秀娟,等.退化程度对玛沁高寒草甸植物群落及土壤持水能力的影响[J].草业科学,2022,39(2):235-246.
[19] 许艺馨,康扬眉,韩翠,等.降水量对荒漠草原凋落物—土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量学特征的影响[J].中国草地学报,2022,44(4):21-31.
[20] 陈倩,周志立,史琛媛,等.河北太行山丘陵区不同林分类型枯落物与土壤持水效益[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(5):206-211.
[21] 赵鹏,马佳明,李艳茹,等.太行山典型区域不同林分类型枯落物水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(5):176-185.
[22] 李娜,赵传燕,郝虎,等.不同海拔条件下祁连山青海云杉林叶凋落物分解过程及养分的动态变化[J].生态学报,2021,41(11):4493-4502.
[23] 公博,师忱,何会宾,等.冀北山区6种人工林的林地水源涵养能力[J].干旱区资源与环境,2019,33(3):165-170.
[24] 许小明,邹亚东,孙景梅,等.黄土高原北洛河流域林地枯落物特征及水分吸持效应[J].生态学报,2021,41(13):5153-5165.
[25] 胡静霞,杨新兵,朱辰光,等.冀西北地区4种纯林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(4):304-310.
[26] 刘目兴,吴丹,吴四平,等.三峡库区森林土壤大孔隙特征及对饱和导水率的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(11):3189-3196.
[27] 张晓梅,邸利,王彦辉,等.黄土高原典型林分土壤水文物理性质及持水性能[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2019,54(3):117-124,133.
[28] 娄淑兰,刘目兴,易军,等.三峡山地不同类型植被和坡位对土壤水文功能的影响[J].生态学报,2019,39(13):4844-4854.
[29] 王子龙,赵勇钢,赵世伟,等.退耕典型草地土壤饱和导水率及其影响因素研究[J].草地学报,2016,24(6):1254-1262.
[30] 毛娜,黄来明,邵明安.黄土区坡面尺度不同植被类型土壤饱和导水率剖面分布及影响因素[J].土壤,2019,51(2):381-389.
[31] 王艳丽,字洪标,程瑞希,等.青海省森林土壤有机碳氮储量及其垂直分布特征[J].生态学报,2019,39(11):4096-4105.
[32] Bengough A G. Water dynamics of the root zone: rhizosphere biophysics and its control on soil hydrology[J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2012,11:vzj2011,0111, doi:10,2136/vzj2011.0111.
[33] 郭月峰,祁伟,姚云峰,等.小流域梯田土壤有机碳与土壤物理性质的关系研究[J].生态环境学报,2020,29(4):748-756.
[34] 祖元刚,李冉,王文杰,等.我国东北土壤有机碳、无机碳含量与土壤理化性质的相关性[J].生态学报,2011,31(18):5207-5216.
[35] 王修康,戚兴超,刘艳丽,等.泰山山前平原3种土地利用方式下土壤结构特征及其对土壤持水性的影响[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(1):63-74.
[36] Zhu P Z, Zhang G H, Zhang B J. Soil saturated hydraulic conductivity of typical revegetated plants on steep gully slopes of Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Geoderma, 2022,412:115717.

相似文献/References:

[1]白桦,穆兴民,王双银.水土保持措施对秃尾河径流的影响[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(01):40.
　BAI Hua,MU Xing-min,WANG Shuang-yin.Impact of Soil and Water Conservation on River Flow of Tuwei River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(04):40.
[2]王星,李占斌,李鹏.陕西省丹汉江流域水土保持工程投资情况分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):43.
　WANG Xing,LI Zhan-bin,LI Peng.Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation Project Investment Status of Dan-Han River Watershed in Shaanxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):43.
[3]宋凤军,穆兴民,白桦.嘉陵江流域输沙量演变规律分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):65.
　SONG Feng-jun,MU Xing-min,BAI Hua.Variation of Sediment Discharge in the Jialingjiang River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):65.
[4]熊康宁,王恒松,刘云.毕节石桥小流域水土保持综合治理生态监测与效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):10.
　XIONG Kang-ning,WANG Heng-song,LIU Yun.Ecological Monitoring and the Evaluation on the Benefits of Comprehensive Management for Soil and Water Conservation in Shiqiao Watershed of Bijie City, Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):10.
[5]贺振伟,郭东罡,白中科,等.两种水土生态恢复模式下刺槐种群数量特征与空间格局研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):48.
　HE Zhen-wei,GUO Dong-gang,BAI Zhong-ke,et al.Numeric Character and Spatial Pattern of Robinia pseudoacacia L. Population at Two Kinds of Recovery Modes[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):48.
[6]吴启蒙,朱志玲,吴咏梅,等.宁夏水土保持的产业结构影响评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):116.
　WU Qi-meng,ZHU Zhi-ling,WU Yong-mei,et al.Impact Evaluation on Industrial Structure of Soil and Water Conservation in Ningxia Hui Automonous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):116.
[7]康万利,揭雨成,邢虎成.南方坡耕地种植苎麻水土保持效果和经济效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):86.
　KANG Wan-li,JIE Yu-cheng,XING Hu-cheng.Study of Soil-Water Conservation Effects and Economic Benefit of Ramie in South Slope Crop Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):86.
[8]郭兰勤,杨勤科.藉河流域水土保持效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):139.
　GUO Lan-qin,YANG Qin-ke.Evaluation on the Benefit of the Soil and Water Conservation in Jihe Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):139.
[9]汪有科,李立,傅左,等.薪炭林水土保持效益的研究[J].水土保持研究,1992,(01):70.
　Wang Yuke,Li Li,Fu Zuo,et al.A STUDY ON THE BENEFIT OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION FOR ENERGY FOREST[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1992,(04):70.
[10]刘向东,吴钦孝,赵鸿雁.森林植被垂直截留作用与水土保持[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(03):8.
　Liu Xiangdong,Wu Qinxiao,Zhao Hongyan.The Vertical Interception Function of Forest Vegetation and Soil and Water Conservation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(04):8.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2022-05-24 修回日期:2022-06-05
资助项目:国家自然科学基金“季节性干旱的树木水分利用适应机制研究”(41877152)
第一作者:张益(1998—),男,江西九江人,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤水文学、水土保持研究。E-mail:1491329925@qq.com
通信作者:余新晓(1961—),男,甘肃平凉人,博士,教授,主要从事水土保持研究。E-mail:yuxinxiao111@126.com

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-06-10