SHAN Zhendong,LUO Han,LIU Dun.Evaporation Model Evaluation Based on Machine Learning Algorithm[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):289-294.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.036]
基于机器学习算法的蒸发量模型评估
- Title:
- Evaporation Model Evaluation Based on Machine Learning Algorithm
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)03-0289-06
- 分类号:
- S161.4
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]探讨合理的气候因子个数,建立蒸发量模型,提出基于特征选择算法筛选最优特征集。[方法]以陕西榆林、泾河和汉中3个气象站16年(2005-01至2021-03)的逐小时观测资料为研究对象,利用特征选择函数和遍历循环方法对模型参数、特征变量个数进行优化。基于最佳参数结合随机森林模型和多元线性回归模型两种机器学习算法建立榆林、汉中和泾河地区蒸发量模型,采用平均绝对误差、均方根误差和平方相关系数三项指标评估模型的预测精度。[结果]特征变量和随机森林模型中的决策树个数分别是8,61时,模型预测效果最佳。采用优化的随机森林模型、多元线性回归模型评估3个地区的平均绝对误差均为0,均方根误差除泾河地区相等外,榆林、汉中地区的均方根误差均小于优化的多元线性回归模型。优化的随机森林模型预测榆林、泾河和汉中地区蒸发量拟合效果分别为0.85,0.90,0.86,优化的多元线性回归模型的拟合效果分别为0.77,0.83,0.79。[结论]整体而言,优化的两种模型都具有良好的预测效果且随机森林模型的预测效果优于多元线性回归模型。
- Abstract:
- [Objective]The optimal feature set was determined in order to explore the reasonable number of climatic factors to establish an evaporation model, based on filtering by feature selection algorithm. [Methods] 16 years(2005-01 to 2021-03)of Yulin, Jinghe and Hanzhong weather stations of hour-by-hour observation data were taken. The model parameters and the number of characteristic variables were optimized by using feature selection and traversal loop methods. Based on the best parameters combined with two machine learning algorithms, the random forest model and the multiple linear regression model, evaporation model suitable for 3 regions was established, and the three indicators of average absolute error, root mean square error and square correlation coefficient were used to evaluate the model accuracy. [Results] The number of feature variables and decision trees are 8 and 61, the prediction effect of the model is the best. The root mean square error was used to evaluate the prediction effects of the optimized random forest model and the multiple linear regression model, and the error size of the two models was 0. Except for the Jinghe area, the root mean square error of Yulin and Hanzhong was smaller than that of the optimized multiple linear regression model. Predict effects of evaporation in Yulin, Jinghe and Hanzhong fitted by the optimized random forest model are 0.85, 0.90 and 0.86, and the optimized multiple linear regression model fitting effects are 0.77, 0.83 and 0.79. The optimized random forest model of the average absolute error and the root mean square error are lower than optimized multiple linear regression model. [Conclusion] On the whole, the optimized two models have good prediction effects and the prediction effect of the random forest model is better than the multiple linear regression model.
参考文献/References:
[1] 陈潮锋,石宇雄,梁锦成,等.基于机器学习算法预测全膝关节置换后住院时长[J].中国组织工程研究,2021,25(27):4300-4306.
[2] 李昊朋.基于机器学习方法的智能机器人探究[J].通讯世界,2019,26(4):241-242.
[3] 陈慧,王庆莉. AG2.0型超声波蒸发传感器遇低温结冰时记录的处理[J].气象水文海洋仪器,2020,37(1):98-101.
[4] 龙亚星,黄勤,李成伟.基于机器学习技术的蒸发皿蒸发量估算模型[J].气象科技,2021,49(2):166-173.
[5] 茅威洋,顾峰豪,张轶南,等.基于红外线成像技术的沥青混合料压实度温度监测研究[J].山东交通科技,2019,32(5):50-52.
[6] 营娜,叶谦,韩战钢,等.全球地表温度大气遥相关路径研究[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2021,57(3):1-10.
[7] 赵春江,杨贵军,薛绪掌,等.基于互补相关模型和IKONOS数据的农田蒸散时空特征分析[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(8):115-126.
[8] 周宁.怀柔水库水面蒸发量及变化特征分析[J].工程技术研究,2021,6(4):247-248.
[9] 刘萌,王善举,樊军,等.利用环刀法快速原位测定土壤蒸发量[J].土壤通报,2021,52(1):55-61.
[10] 张菊,房世波,刘汉湖.基于微波数据与光学数据集成的机器学习技术在作物产量估算中的应用[J].地球信息科学学报,2021,23(6):1082-1091.
[11] 任梅芳,庞博,徐宗学,等.基于随机森林模型的雅鲁藏布江流域气温降尺度研究[J].高原气象,2018,37(5):1241-1253.
[12] 孙英,周金龙,齐子萱,等.日尺度和小时尺度下干旱区潜水蒸发变化特征及成因[J].灌溉排水学报,2020,39(S2):14-19.
[13] Ali Rahimi Khoob. Artificial neural network estimation of reference evapotranspiration from pan evaporation in a semi-arid environment[J]. Irrigation Science, 2008,27(1):35-39.
[14] Ghorbani M A, Ravinesh C. Deo, Zaher Mundher Yaseen, etc. Pan evaporation prediction using a hybrid multilayer perceptron-firefly algorithm(MLP-FFA)model:case study in North Iran[J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2018,133(3):1119-1131.
[15] 段志昌,王建有,王特,等.基于贝叶斯网络的水面蒸发评估模型研究[J].水电能源科学,2021,39(3):1-4.
[16] 马寰宇.数据挖掘在精准扶贫中的研究及应用[D].哈尔滨:黑龙江大学,2019.
[17] 李丹.基于规模视角下山东省粮食经营主体种植行为及持续意愿研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2019.
[18] 张建航,牛博威,张祥,等.基于深度信念极限学习机的入侵检测模型[C].2019互联网安全与治理论坛论文集,2019:111-115.
[19] 成浩科,沈菲.基于随机森林的河流总磷预测模型及影响因素分析[J].环境保护科学,2021,47(3):62-68.
[20] 石文兵,苏树智.基于优化随机森林算法的高校餐饮企业营业额预测模型[J].通化师范学院学报,2021,42(2):88-94.
[21] 夏江流云.基于Stacking融合算法的企业贷款违约风险预警模型设计与应用[D].南昌:江西财经大学,2021.
[22] 张巍,张圳彬.联合图嵌入与特征加权的无监督特征选择[J].广东工业大学学报,2021,38(5):16-23.
[23] 黄烈佳,杨鹏.基于机器学习的武汉城市圈土地生态安全格局识别与优化策略[J].生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(7):862-869.
[24] 刘金翰.基于回归分析的汽车测试时间预测[D].兰州:兰州大学,2021.
[25] 武冠芳.基于大数据的用户特征及活跃度分析[D].北京市:北京邮电大学,2017.
[26] 刘经纬,陈佳明.创新创业+新工科教学质量提升研究—零基础学会Python人工智能[M].北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社,2020.
[27] 陈建东.多元回归模型在基坑地下水位预测中的应用[J].矿山测量,2021,49(1):52-56.
[28] 姬正一,陈阳,沈培志,等.决策树集成方法在反舰导弹效能评估中的应用[J].现代防御技术,2021,49(4):15-24.
[29] Mao S, Zhang X, Han Y, et al. Random forest algorithm for the relationship between negative air ions and environmental factors in an urban park[J]. Atmosphere, 2018,9(12):463.
[30] 王彤,刘九良,朱劭璇,等.基于随机森林的电力系统暂态稳定评估与紧急控制策略[J].电网技术,2020,44(12):4694-4701.
[31] 崔云浩,朱军,孟浩.神经网络在农产品销量预测中的应用[J].现代农业科技,2021,28(17):262-266.
[32] 张蓓蓓,胡敏.基于网格搜索改进随机森林的顾客满意度预测[J].北京信息科技大学学报:自然科学版,2021,36(4):50-54.
[33] 徐佳,刘峰,吴华勇,等.基于人工神经网络和随机森林学习模型从土壤属性推测关键成土环境要素的研究[J].土壤通报,2021,52(2):269-278.
相似文献/References:
[1]胡伟,姚磊.新疆库车县近40 a来气温与蒸发量变化趋势分析[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(03):93.
HU Wei,YAO Lei.The Trend Analysis on Air Temperature and Evaporation in Kuche County During Recent 40 Years[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(03):93.
[2]赵恒和,郭连云,刘运华,等.青海三江源同德地区1961-2000年蒸发量变化特征及原因分析[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(04):203.
ZHAO Heng-he,GUO Lian-yun,LIU Yun-hua,et al.Analysis on Change Characteristic of Evaporation from Evaporating Dish and Its Affecting Factors in Tongde Area of Three Rivers Qinghai Province During 1961-2000[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(03):203.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-03-07 修回日期:2022-05-24
资助项目:陕西省科技重大专项“果园地力提升及有机替代化肥减肥增效关键技术研究与示范”(2020zdzx03-02-01)
第一作者:单振东(1994—),男,甘肃省定西市人,硕士研究生,研究方向水土保持与荒漠化防治。E-mail:shan18794940428@163.com
通信作者:骆汉(1985—),男,山东省淄博市人,博士,博士生导师,从事水土保持工程研究。E-mail:hanl@ms.iswc.ac.cn