CHEN Fengfeng,ZHAO Jiangping,CHEN Yunming.Characteristics of Soil Moisture in Typical Young Plantations in Loess Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(01):190-196.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.20220511.001]
黄土丘陵区典型人工幼林土壤水分特征
- Title:
- Characteristics of Soil Moisture in Typical Young Plantations in Loess Hilly Region
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)01-0190-07
- Keywords:
- Pinus tabulaeformis; Robinia pseudoacacia; Syzygium aromaticum; soil moisture; temporal and spatial changes; temporal stability; loess hilly area
- 分类号:
- S152.7+5
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为明确黄土丘陵区典型人工幼林土壤水分时空变化特征,采用ECH2O土壤水分监测系统,基于标准径流小区坡面土壤水分观测方法,收集土壤水分及气象数据,分析了撂荒地与不同类型人工幼林土壤水分状况及时间稳定性。结果表明:(1)与撂荒地相比,人工幼林土壤含水量整体较低,且具有明显的季节性变化特征,变化趋势基本一致,均随降水量的增加(减少)而升高(降低);(2)不同类型人工林土壤水分垂直分布差异较大,相较于撂荒地,刺槐和油松在50 cm深度土层土壤含水量较低,在80—120 cm深度土层土壤含水量较高,丁香幼林土壤水分整体偏低;(3)油松和撂荒地土壤水分代表深度分别为:120 cm和80 cm,决定系数(R2≥0.9)和纳什系数(NSE≥-0.1)对该结果的评价显示土壤水分代表深度的选择均是可接受的,刺槐和丁香不同深度土层土壤水分差异较大。研究认为,在黄土丘陵区,人工幼林显著影响土壤水分垂直分布规律,土壤含水量整体呈低态势,相较于撂荒地,刺槐和丁香土壤水分变异性较大,油松较为稳定。
- Abstract:
- In order to clarify the temporal and spatial changes of soil moisture in typical young plantations in loess hilly areas, soil moisture and meteorological data were collected through using the ECH2O soil moisture monitoring system and the standard runoff plot slope surface soil moisture observation method, and the soil moisture status and time stability of abandoned land and different types of young plantations were analyzed. The results show that:(1)compared with abandoned land, the soil moisture content of young plantation is generally lower, and has obvious seasonal change characteristics, and the change trend is basically the same, all of which increase or decrease with the increase or decrease of precipitation;(2)the vertical distribution of soil moisture in different types of plantations is quite different; compared with abandoned land, Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus tabulaeformis forests have lower soil moisture at a depth of 50 cm, and high soil moisture at a depth of 80—120 cm; the soil moisture of young lilac forest is relatively low as a whole;(3)the representative depths of soil moisture of Pinus tabulaeformis and abandoned land are 120 cm and 80 cm, respectively; the evaluation of the results based on the coefficient of determination(R2≥0.9)and the Nash coefficient(NSE≥-0.1)show that the selection of the representative depth of soil moisture is acceptable, and the soil moisture of different depths of Robinia pseudoacacia and Syzygium aromaticum is quite different. These research results suggest that in loess hilly areas, young plantations significantly affect the vertical distribution of soil moisture, and the overall soil moisture content is low. Compared with abandoned land, the soil moisture variability of Robinia pseudoacacia and Syzygium aromaticum is greater, whereas the soil moisture variability of Pinus tabulaeformis is more stable.
参考文献/References:
[1] 马婧怡,贾宁凤和程曼.黄土丘陵区不同土地利用方式下土壤水分变化特征[J].生态学报,2018,38(10):3471-3481.
[2] Berndtsson R, Nodomi K, Yasuda H, et al. Soil water and temperature patterns in an arid desert dune sand[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1996,185(1/4):221-240.
[3] 常译方,毕华兴,高路博,等.晋西黄土区刺槐和油松林地土壤水分动态变化[J].中国水土保持科学,2014,12(4):21-27.
[4] 张建军,李慧敏和徐佳佳.黄土高原水土保持林对土壤水分的影响[J].生态学报,2011,31(23):72-82.
[5] Liu S L, Dong Y H, Li D, et al. Effects of different terrace protection measures in a sloping land consolidation project targeting soil erosion at the slope scale[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2013,53:46-53.
[6] 邵明安,贾小旭,王云强,等.黄土高原土壤干层研究进展与展望[J].地球科学进展,2016,31(1):14-22.
[7] 刘庚,牛俊杰,朱炜歆,等.晋西北黄土丘陵区人工林地土壤水分亏缺评价[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(5):309-314.
[8] 高思远.晋西黄土区典型人工林地土壤水分动态及对降雨的响应[D].北京:北京林业大学,2019.
[9] 李菲.典型喀斯特山区不同植被类型土壤水分动态变化及其对植物光合作用的响应[D].贵州:贵州师范大学,2016.
[10] 丁聪,王冬梅,贺康宁,等.黄土高寒区坡面土壤水分的时间稳定性[J].生态学报,2020,40(1):155-164.
[11] 王舒,马岚,张栋,等.晋西黄土区不同林龄人工刺槐林下植被及土壤水分特征[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2016,52(3):253-258.
[12] Vachaud G A, Silans A, Balabanis P, et al. Temporal stability of spatially measured soil water probability density function1[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1985,49(4):822-828.
[13] Zhao D Y, Peth S, Wang X Y, et al. Controls of surface soil moisture spatial patterns and their temporal stability in a semi-arid steppe[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2010,24(18):2507-2519.
[14] Dari J, Morbidelli R, Saltalippi C, et al. Spatial-temporal variability of soil moisture:Addressing the monitoring at the catchment scale[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2019,570:436-444.
[15] 马文,韩晓阳,刘文兆,等.黄土塬区深剖面土壤水分垂直分布特征及其时间稳定性[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(2):430-438.
[16] 尚爱军,卜耀军,艾海舰,等.榆林沙区土壤水分时空格局及动态变化规律研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(4):86-89.
[17] 王俊,刘文兆和胡梦珺.黄土丘陵区小流域土壤水分时空变异[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(6):71-77.
[18] 殷地迟,王立,蔡国军,等.半干旱黄土丘陵区不同植被类型的土壤水分特征及其稳定性[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(1):65-71.
[19] 陈维梁,王树学,齐统祥,等.黄土丘陵区不同恢复年限人工刺槐林土壤水分时空动态及其时间稳定性[J].生态学报,2021,41(14):5643-5657.
[20] 张川, 张伟, 陈洪松,等.喀斯特典型坡地旱季表层土壤水分时空变异性[J].生态学报,2015,35(19):6326-6334.
[21] 杜波. WEPP模型在岩溶石漠化地区适用性评价:以关岭享乐小流域为例[D].贵州:贵州大学,2017.
[22] 孔凌霄,毕华兴,周巧稚,等.晋西黄土区不同立地刺槐林土壤水分动态特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(5):163-169.
[23] 王艳莉,刘立超,高艳红,等.人工固沙植被区土壤水分动态及空间分布[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(4):942-950.
[24] 杨启红,陈丽华,张富,等.土壤水分变异对降雨和植被的响应[J].北京林业大学学报,2008,30(S2):88-94.
[25] 马文.黄土丘陵区典型人工林土壤水分补给与消耗特征研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2017.
[26] 张晶晶和王力.黄土高原高塬沟壑区坡面表层土壤水分研究[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(1):93-97.
[27] 赵刚,樊廷录,李尚中,等.黄土旱塬区苹果园土壤水分动态[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(4):1199-1204.
[28] 席本野,张瑞娜,邸楠,等.树木吸收利用深层土壤水的特征与机制:对人工林培育的启示[J].植物生态学报,2018,42(9):885-905.
[29] 赵亚楠,周玉蓉和王红梅.宁夏东部荒漠草原灌丛引入下土壤水分空间异质性[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(11):3577-3586.
[30] 丁聪,王冬梅,贺康宁,等.黄土高寒区坡面土壤水分的时间稳定性[J].生态学报,2020,40(1):155-164.
[31] Percy M S, Riveros-Iregui D A, Mirus B B, et al. Temporal and spatial variability of shallow soil moisture across four planar hillslopes on a tropical ocean island, San Cristóbal, Galápagos[J]. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2020,30:100692.
[32] Jacobs J M, Mohanty B P, Hsu E C, et al. SMEX02: Field scale variability, time stability and similarity of soil moisture[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004,92(4):436-446.
[33] Qiu Y, Fu B, Wang J, et al. Spatial variability of soil moisture content and its relation to environmental indices in a semi-arid gully catchment of the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2001,49(4):723-750.
[34] 宋坤,潘晓星和穆立蔷.6种草本植物根系土壤抗冲性[J].国土与自然资源研究,2013,28(3):84-85.
[35] 陈晓莹,陈林,宋乃平,等.荒漠草原两种类型土壤的水分动态对比[J].应用生态学报2020,31(5):1560-1570.
[36] Hu W, Shao M, Reichardt K. Using a new criterion to identify sites for mean soil water storage evaluation[J]. Soil Ence Society of America Journal, 2010,74(3):762-773.
[37] Zhang B, Cadotte M W, Chen S, et al. Plants alter their vertical root distribution rather than biomass allocation in response to changing precipitation[J]. Ecology, 2019,100(11):1-10.
[38] Cassel D K, Wendroth O, Nielsen D R. Assessing spatial variability in an agricultural experiment station field:Opportunities arising from spatial dependence[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2000,92(4):706-714.
相似文献/References:
[1]刘向东,吴钦孝,赵鸿雁,等.黄土丘陵区油松人工林和山杨林林冠对降水的再分配及其对土壤水分的影响[J].水土保持研究,1991,(02):9.
Liu Xiangdong,Wu Qinxiao,Zhao Hongyan,et al.REDISTRIBUTION OF PRECIPITATION BY CANOPIES OF ARTIFICIAL CHINESE PINES AND MOUNTAIN POPLARS AND ITS INFLUENCE ON SOIL MOISTURE IN LOESS HILLY REGION[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(01):9.
[2]吴钦孝,刘向东,赵鸿雁.油松、山杨林枯枝落叶层蓄积动态的研究[J].水土保持研究,1991,(02):51.
Wu Qinxiao,Liu Xiangdong,Zhao Hongyan.A STUDY ON DYNAMICS OF LITTER AMOUNT IN FOREST STANDS OF CHINESE PINE AND MOUNTAIN POPLAR[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(01):51.
[3]赵鸿雁,刘向东,吴钦孝.枯枝落叶层阻延径流速度研究[J].水土保持研究,1991,(02):64.
Zhao Hongyan,Liu Xiangdong,Wu Qinxiao.A STUDY ON RETARDATION OF RUNOFF VELOCITY BY LITTER[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(01):64.
[4]鲁绍伟,陈波,潘青华,等.北京山地不同海拔人工油松林枯落物及其土壤水文效应[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(06):54.
LU Shao-wei,CHEN Bo,PAN Qing-hua,et al.Hydrological Effects of Forest Litters and Soil in Pinus Tabuliformis Plantations at the Different Altitudes of Mountains of Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(01):54.
[5]丁晓纲,何茜,李吉跃,等.毛乌素沙地樟子松和油松人工林光合生理特性[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(01):215.
DING Xiao-gang,HE Qian,LI Ji-yue,et al.The Photosynthetic Characteristics of Pinus Sylvestris var. Mongolica and Pinus Tabulaeformis in Mu Us Sandland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(01):215.
[6]张建华,郭宾良,张宁,等.滦河上游不同密度油松林水源涵养功能研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(06):47.
ZHANG Jianhua,GUO Binliang,ZHANG Ning,et al.Research on Water Conservation Function of Different Densities of Pinus Tabulaeformis in Upper Luanhe River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(01):47.
[7]范媛媛,李懿,李启迪.不同林龄油松土壤微生物、酶活性和养分特征[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(06):58.
FAN Yuanyuan,LI Yi,LI Qidi.Microbe, Enzymatic Activity and Nutrient Contents of Soils in Different Stand Ages of Pinus tabuliformis[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(01):58.
[8]薄颖生,韩恩贤,杨培华,等.GGR6号在油松容器育苗上的应用[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(06):23.
BUO Ying-sheng,HAN En-xian,YANG Pei-hua,et al.Application of Growth Regulators of Plant on Growing Seedlings of Pinus tablaefomis Carr with Container[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(01):23.
[9]胡振华,王电龙,呼起跃.山西省雁北地区沙地樟子松和油松生长及蒸腾特性对比研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(01):69.
HU Zhen-hua,WANG Dian-long,HU Qi-yue.Comparative Study on Growth and Transpiration of Pinus sylvestris var.Mongolica and Pinus tabulaeformis in North Shanxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(01):69.
[10]王宁,张有利,王百田,等.山西省油松林生态系统碳氮磷化学计量特征[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(01):72.
WANG Ning,ZHANG Youli,WANG Baitian,et al.Stoichiometry of Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. Forest Ecosystems in Shanxi Province, China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(01):72.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2021-10-19 修回日期:2021-11-18
资助项目:国家自然科学基金(41771556); 国家重点研发计划课题(2016YFC0501703); 陕西省水保研发项目(2017SBKJ-01)
第一作者:陈峰峰(1994—),男,山西乡宁人,硕士研究生,研究方向为流域管理。E-mail:cfsryx@126.com
通信作者:陈云明(1967—),男,陕西渭南人,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事植被生态与水土保持研究。E-mail:ymchen@ms.iswc.ac.cn