LI Xia,LIU Tingxi,DUAN Limin,et al.Estimation of Reference Crop Evapotranspiration and Analysis of Impact Factors in Horqin Sandy Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(06):153-159.
科尔沁沙地参考作物蒸散发估算及影响因子分析
- Title:
- Estimation of Reference Crop Evapotranspiration and Analysis of Impact Factors in Horqin Sandy Land
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)06-0153-07
- 关键词:
- 参考作物蒸散量; Penman-Monteith模型; 通径分析; 科尔沁沙地
- Keywords:
- reference crop evapotranspiration; Penman-Monteith model; path analysis; Horqin sandy land
- 分类号:
- P426.2
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了准确评估区域气候干湿状况以及保护半干旱区生态环境,基于科尔沁地区草甸地、半流动沙丘、半固定沙丘、水稻地及玉米地5个典型景观类型2015—2018年日气象资料,通过FAO56 Penman-Monteith公式计算参考作物蒸散发(ET0),了解不同时间尺度上ET0变化特征,并利用通径分析与指标敏感性分析相结合剖析了ET0的驱动因素。结果表明:(1)4年的年平均ET0为1 051 mm,不同样地ET0年值在922～1 257 mm波动,最大值出现在2017年;(2)ET0季节变化表现为夏季>春季>秋季>冬季;(3)ET0月际变化呈抛物线型,3—10月贡献最大,占全年ET0的80%以上;(4)通径分析中,气象因子对ET0的通径系数表现为VPD>Rn>u2>Tmax,直接作用系数最大为0.614,即VPD是影响ET0最重要的因子; Tmax对ET0的间接作用最大,间接作用系数为0.936,且主要通过VPD路径对ET0产生作用,间接作用系数为0.554; 指标敏感性分析中,去除VPD后E由0.993减小为0.877,进一步说明ET0对VPD的变化最为敏感。总体而言,VPD为科尔沁沙地参考作物蒸散发变化的主导因子。
- Abstract:
- In order to accurately assess the regional climate condition and protect the ecological environment in semi-arid areas, based on the daily meteorological data of five typical landscape types including meadow land, semi-mobile sand dune, semi-fixed sand dune, rice and maize land from 2015 to 2018 in Horqin area, reference crop evapotranspiration(ET0)was calculated by using FAO56 Penman-Monteith model. Changes in ET0 on different time scales was analyzed, and then causes of ET0 changes were analyzed through path analysis and index sensitivity analysis. The results showed that:(1)the 4-year average ET0 was 1 051 mm, the annual value of ET0 fluctuated between 922 mm and 1 257 mm at different sample plots, and the maximum value appeared in 2017;(2)the seasonal change of ET0 decreased in the order: summer>spring>autumn>winter;(3)inter-monthly changes of ET0 were parabolic, with the largest contribution from March to October and accounting for more than 80% of ET0 in the whole year;(4)In path analysis, the path coefficients of meteorological factors to ET0 decreased in the order: VPD>Rn>u2>Tmax, and the maximum direct action coefficient was 0.614. indicating that VPD was the most important factor to affecting ET0, Tmax had the largest indirect effect on ET0, and the indirect action coefficient was 0.936, and it mainly affected ET0 through VPD path, and the indirect action coefficient was 0.554; in the index sensitivity analysis, E decreased from 0.993 to 0.877 after removing VPD, which further indicated that ET0 was the most sensitive to the change of VPD. In general, VPD was the main factor for evapotranspiration in Horqin sandy land.
参考文献/References:
[1] 曹雯,段春锋,姚筠,等.1961—2010年安徽省参考作物蒸散时空变化特征及成因[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(12):3619-3626.
[2] 曹永强,肖春柳,李元菲,等.河北省春季潜在蒸散量变化特征与成因[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(5):195-201,209.
[3] 刘昌明,孙睿.水循环的生态学方面:土壤—植被—大气系统水分能量平衡研究进展[J].水科学进展,1999(3):251-259.
[4] 吕明权,张磊,吴胜军.嘉陵江流域参考蒸散的年际变化趋势及成因分析[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(3):77-85.
[5] 冯禹,崔宁博,魏新平,等.川中丘陵区参考作物蒸散量时空变化特征与成因分析[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(14):78-86,339.
[6] 娄忠秋,李桢.不同简化算法模型模拟都江堰灌区参考作物蒸散量[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(5):272-277,286.
[7] Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements[R]. Rome: FAO,1998.
[8] Mcvicar T R, Roderick M L, Donohue R J, et al. Global review and synthesis of trends in observed terrestrial near-surface wind speeds: Implications for evaporation[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2012,416/417:182-205.
[9] Um M J, Kim Y, Park D. Spatial and temporal variations in reference crop evapotranspiration in a mountainous island, Jeju, in South Korea[J]. Water, 2017,9(4).DOI:10.3390/w9040261.
[10] 曹雯,申双和,段春锋.中国西北潜在蒸散时空演变特征及其定量化成因[J].生态学报,2012,32(11):3394-3403.
[11] 安彬,肖薇薇.1955—2015年陕西省潜在蒸散量时空变化特征及成因[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(4):146-151.
[12] 符娜,宋孝玉,夏露,等.云南省不同生态水文分区参考作物蒸散量算法适用性评价[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(5):208-217.
[13] 严坤,王玉宽,徐佩,等.岷江源区Hargreaves法适用性与未来参考作物蒸散量预测[J].农业机械学报,2018,49(4):273-281.
[14] 刘梦,罗玉峰,汪文超,等.基于天气预报的漳河灌区参考作物腾发量预报方法比较[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(19):156-162.
[15] Valipour, Mohammad. Analysis of potential evapotranspiration using limited weather data[J]. Applied Water Science, 2017,7(1):187-197.
[16] 刘昌明,张丹.中国地表潜在蒸散发敏感性的时空变化特征分析[J].地理学报,2011,66(5):579-588.
[17] 曹永强,高璐,袁立婷,等.辽宁省潜在蒸散发量及其敏感性规律分析[J].地理科学,2017,37(9):1422-1429.
[18] 粟晓玲,宋悦,牛纪苹,等.泾惠渠灌区潜在蒸散发量的敏感性及变化成因[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(1):115-123.
[19] 吕明权,张磊,吴胜军.嘉陵江流域参考蒸散的年际变化趋势及成因分析[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(3):77-85.
[20] 包永志,刘廷玺,段利民,等.科尔沁沙地混生小叶锦鸡儿和人工杨树光合特性及其对气候的响应[J].干旱区研究,2019,36(2):420-429.
[21] 宋小园,朱仲元,刘艳伟,等.通径分析在SPSS逐步线性回归中的实现[J].干旱区研究,2016,33(1):108-113.
[22] 蔡甲冰,许迪,刘钰,等.冬小麦返青后腾发量时空尺度效应的通径分析[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(8):69-76.
[23] 钱多,查天山,吴斌,等.毛乌素沙地参考作物蒸散量变化特征与成因分析[J].生态学报,2017,37(6):1966-1974.
[24] 曹永强,李维佳.辽宁省潜在蒸散时空变化特征与成因[J].生态学报,2018,38(20):7276-7287.
[25] Zhao L L, Xia J, Sobkowiak L, et al. Climatic characteristics of reference evapotranspiration in the Hai River Basin and their attribution[J]. Water, 2014,6:1482-1499.
[26] 汪精海,齐广平,康燕霞,等.黑河流域潜在蒸散及其影响因素的不确定性分析[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(1):172-180.
[27] 张雪松,闫艺兰,胡正华.不同时间尺度农田蒸散影响因子的通径分析[J].中国农业气象,2017,38(4):201-210.
[28] 陈胜楠,孔喆,陈立欣,等.半干旱区城市环境下油松林分蒸腾特征及其影响因子[J].生态学报,2020,40(4):1269-1280.
[29] 张红梅,吴炳方,闫娜娜.饱和水汽压差的卫星遥感研究综述[J].地球科学进展,2014,29(5):559-568.
[30] 牛忠恩,胡克梅,何洪林,等.2000—2015年中国陆地生态系统蒸散时空变化及其影响因素[J].生态学报,2019,39(13):4697-4709.
[31] 康丽娟,巴特尔?巴克,罗那那,等.阿勒泰地区不同时间尺度参考作物蒸散量的时空变化及影响[J].中国农业气象,2018,39(8):502-511.
[32] 吴丽萍,陈洪松,连晋姣,等.喀斯特与非喀斯特地区参考作物蒸散量时空变化分析:以广西壮族自治区为例[J].中国生态农业学报,2017,25(10):1508-1517.
相似文献/References:
[1]张丽,吴金亮,杨国范.基于BP神经网络的东港灌区作物需水量预测研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):207.
ZHANG Li,WU Jin-liang,YANG Guo-fan.Prediction Research for Crop Water Requirement Based on BP Neural Network in Donggang Irrigation District[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):207.
[2]黄娟,申双和,李新建,等.1961-2010年中国参考作物蒸散量变化趋势与时空格局[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(05):240.
HUANG Juan,SHEN Shuanghe,LI Xinjian,et al.Research of Variation Trend and Spatial Pattern of Reference Crop Evapotranspiration During the Period from 1961 to 2010 in China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(06):240.
[3]罗那那,巴特尔·巴克,吴燕锋.石河子地区参考作物蒸散量变化特征及气候因子的定量分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(05):251.
LUO Nana,Batur·Bake,WU Yanfeng.Correlation Analysis of Potential Evapotranspiration and Key Climatic Factors in Shihezi City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(06):251.
[4]董煜,胡江玲,王瑾杰,等.新疆1961-2013年参考作物蒸散量时空变异[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(03):304.
DONG Yu,HU Jiangling,WANG Jinjie,et al.Study of Temporal and Spatial Variation of the Reference Crop Evapotranspiration in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region During the Period from 1961 to 2013[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(06):304.
[5]徐羽,徐刚,吴艳飞,等.重庆市参考作物蒸散量及湿润指数变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(03):176.
XU Yu,XU Gang,WU Yanfei,et al.Reference Crop Evapotranspiration and Surface Humidity Index in Chongqing City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(06):176.
[6]吴燕锋,巴特尔·巴克,李维,等.阿勒泰地区参考作物蒸散量时空变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(05):260.
WU Yanfeng,Bake·Batur,LI Wei,et al.Spatiotemporal Variation of Reference Crop Evapotranspiration in Altay Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(06):260.
[7]王杰,吴灏,黄英,等.滇中地区参考作物蒸散量时空变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(04):41.
WANG Jie,WU Hao,HUANG Ying,et al.Spatiotemporal Variations of Reference Crop Evapotranspiration in Central Yunnan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(06):41.
[8]娄忠秋,李桢.不同简化算法模型模拟都江堰灌区参考作物蒸散量[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(05):272.
LOU Zhongqiu,Li zhen.Different Simplified Algorithm Models Simulate Reference Crop Evapotranspiration in Dujiangyan Irrigation District[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(06):272.
[9]王亚蕾,董 晔.1968—2018年辽河流域生长季潜散量变化及主控气象因素[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(06):162.
WANG Yalei,DONG Ye.Spatiotemporal Distribution of Potential Evapotranspiration and Its Main Meteorological Factors in Liaohe River Basin During Growing Season from 1968 to 2018[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(06):162.
[10]肖 杨,周 旭,罗 雪,等.黔中地区近60年潜在蒸散量时空变化特征及主导因素识别[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(06):190.
XIAO Yang,ZHOU Xu,LUO Xue,et al.Spatiotemporal Variation Characteristics of Potential Evapotranspiration and Identification of Leading Factors in Central Guizhou in Recent 60 Years[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(06):190.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2020-01-20 修回日期:2020-02-28
资助项目:国家自然科学基金(51620105003,51139002,51869017,51669017); 内蒙古自然科学基金重点项目(2018ZD05); 教育部创新团队发展计划(IRT_17R60)、科技部重点领域科技创新团队(2015RA4013)、内蒙古自治区草原英才产业创新创业人才团队、内蒙古农业大学寒旱区水资源利用创新团队(NDTD2010-6); 内蒙古自治区高等学校“青年科技英才支持计划”(NJYT-18-B11)
第一作者:李霞(1994—),女,内蒙古乌海人,硕士,研究方向为寒旱区蒸散发。E-mail:2929306405@qq.com
通信作者:刘廷玺(1966—),男,内蒙古赤峰人,教授,主要从事干旱区生态水文研究。E-mail:txliu1966@163.com