FANG Lu,LI Xiaoning,TANG Xiangjun,et al.Research on Water-holding Capacity and Related Factors in Zagunao River Basin in the Upper Reaches of Min River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(05):95-102.
岷江上游杂谷脑河流域林树下线土壤持水性及影响因素
- Title:
- Research on Water-holding Capacity and Related Factors in Zagunao River Basin in the Upper Reaches of Min River
- Keywords:
- upper research of Min River; timberline; soil water characteristic curve; specific water capacity; soil physical properties
- 分类号:
- S152.7+1
- 摘要:
- 在岷江上游杂谷脑河流域特殊的地理环境背景下，土壤水分成了限制林树下线树木生长和分布的关键因子，采用野外定位试验与室内试验相结合的方法，对岷江上游杂谷脑河流域具有代表性的林树下线土壤持水性及物理性质进行了研究，利用Gardner经验方程拟合出其土壤水分特征曲线，研究林树下线土壤持水性及其影响因素。结果表明：（1）典型土壤拟合参数a值大部分在20以上，同一种林地类型，土壤持水能力表现为阴坡 > 阳坡；同一坡向土壤持水能力为天然林阴坡 > 人工林；不同土层深度土壤持水能力为表层 > 下层（人工林阳坡除外）。（2）天然林和人工林的比水容重均表现为：阳坡 > 阴坡；阴坡和阳坡的比水容重在土层剖面上无明显规律。这说明土壤的供水能力受坡向影响大，植被类型、土层深度影响小。（3）岷江上游山区林地土壤以粉粒最多，黏粒最少，砂粒居中，且阳坡林地砂粒含量低于阴坡，粉粒和黏粒含量高于阴坡；阴坡林地土壤容重随海拔的升高而递增，阳坡林地土壤容重随海拔的升高而呈先增后减的规律，阴坡的土壤容重明显低于阳坡；林地土壤孔隙度结构总体阴坡优于阳坡。（4）林地土壤持水性与黏粒、非毛管孔隙度呈极显著正相关，与容重和毛管孔隙度呈显著正相关，退耕还林工程中，大量种植的经果林和生态林能有效改善土壤的质地。因此，在当地进行植被恢复过程中，首先要考虑的就是土壤水分问题，应当从高海拔交错带逐步向下进行，最终达到岷江上游干旱河谷困难地段的植被恢复可以顺利进行的目的。
- Abstract:
- Under the special geographical environment of Zagunao River Basin in the Upper Reaches of Min River, the soil moisture has become a key factor limiting the plant growth and distribution of the timberline. Field experiments and laboratory experiments were conducted to study the soil water-holding capacity and physical properties of typical forest trees in Upper Reaches of the Min River, the Gardner experience equation was utilized to plot a soil water characteristic curve, and the soil water-holding capacity and the influencing factors were investigated. The results showed that:(1) the fitted parameter a value of typical soil reached up to 20; (2) in the same type of woodland, soil water holding capacities of natural forest and plantation in the shady slopes were all better than sunny slopes; and in the same slopes, soil water holding capacities of plantations were better than those of the natural forests; the soil water holding capacities of surface soil were better than the deeper layer (except for artificial forest in the sunny slops), which indicated that the water supply capacity of soil was affected greatly by the slope direction, and the vegetation type and soil depth have little influences; (3) silt content of the mountain forest soil of the upper reaches of the Min River forest soil was the highest, and the contents of clay size and sand contents were the least and middle, respectively; the soil sand content in shady slopes was higher than that of the sunny slope, and the silt content and clay contents were lower in sunny slope; the soil bulk density of forest increased with the increase of the altitude in the shady slope, and the soil bulk density increased first and then decreased with the increase of altitude in the sunny slope; the soil bulk density of the shady slope was significantly lower than that in sunny slope; the soil porosity structure was better than that of the sunny slope; (4) the soil water holding capacity of forest land was most significantly correlated with clay contents and non-capillary porosity and significant correlated with bulk density and capillary porosity, and the economic and ecological forests could improve the soil texture of large planting after the project of returning farmland to forest. Therefore, the soil moisture is the most important limiting factor in the process of local vegetation restoration. Vegetation restoration should be carried out step by step from the high altitude ecotone, and the purpose of vegetation restoration can be achieved ultimately in the difficult valley of the upper reaches of Min River.
参考文献/References:
[1] 刘效东,乔玉娜,周国逸.土壤有机质对土壤水分保持及其有效性的控制作用[J].植物生态学报,2011,35(12):1209-1218.
[2] Ursino N, Contarini S. Stability of banded vegetation patterns under seasonal rainfall and limited soil moisture storage capacity[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2006,29(10):1556-1564.
[3] 翟真,王青.岷江上游林树下线地理分布格局及其空间移动特征[J].地理研究,2015,34(11):2105-2111.
[4] 唐香君,樊敏,赵丽,等.岷江上游干旱河谷区林-农-草地土壤水分特征与数值模拟[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(7):128-133.
[5] 蒋勇军,王青,俞音,等.岷江上游杂谷脑河流域农业综合生产潜力研究[J].江苏农业科学,2012,40(4):419-421.
[6] 唐香君.岷江上游杂谷脑河流域林树下线土壤水分研究[D].四川绵阳:西南科技大学,2017.
[7] 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.
[8] Genuchten M T V. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1980,44(44):892-898.
[9] 刘小宁,隆瑞红,罗珠珠,等.甘肃省典型土壤持水特性及影响因素研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2017,35(1):143-151.
[10] 姚其华,邓银霞.土壤水分特征曲线模型及其预测方法的研究进展[J].土壤通报,1992,23(3):142-144.
[11] 刘恩斌,董水丽.黄土高原主要土壤持水性能及抗旱性的评价[J].水土保持通报,1997,17(7):21-26.
[12] 窦建德,王绪芳,熊伟,等.宁夏六盘山北侧5种典型植被的土壤持水性能研究[J].林业科学研究,2006,19(3):301-306.
[13] 吴文强,李吉跃,张志明,等.北京西山地区人工林土壤水分特性的研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2002,24(4):51-55.
[14] 马爱生,刘思春,吕家珑,等.黄土高原地区几种土壤的水分状况与能量水平[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2005,33(11):117-120.
[15] Diiwu J Y, Rudra R P, Dickinson W T, et al. Tillage and heterogeneity effects on the performance of soil water characteristic models[J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1998,71(3):307-313.
[16] 李红,范素芳,张光灿,等.黄土丘陵区退耕还林后不同林地土壤孔隙与贮水特性[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(1):27-30.
[17] 程光庆.渭北旱塬区土地利用类型及坡向对土壤质量的影响[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2016.
相似文献/References:
[1]蔡劲松,万新南.岷江上游生态环境地质概况及其质量的模糊评价[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(02):113.
CAI Jin-song,WAN Xin-nan.Status and Quality Fuzzy Evaluation on Eco-environmental Geology in the Upper Reaches of Minjiang River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(05):113.
[2]刘兴亮,苏春江,徐云,等.岷江上游水资源问题及可持续利用[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(03):189.
LIU Xing-liang,SU Chun-jiang,XU Yun,et al.Water Resource Problem and Sustainable Utilization in the Upper Reaches of Minjiang River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(05):189.
[3]曾超,赵景峰,李旭娇.GIS支持下岷江上游水文特征空间分析[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(03):5.
ZENG Chao,ZHAO Jing-feng,LI Xu-jiao.Spatial Analysis of Hydrological Characteristics of the Upper Reaches of Minjiang River Based on GIS Technology[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(05):5.
[4]冶民生,吴斌,关文彬,等.岷江上游植物群落稳定性研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):259.
YE Min-sheng,WU Bin,GUAN Wen-bin,et al.Plant Community Stability in the Upper Reaches of Minjiang River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(05):259.
[5]满正闯,苏春江,徐云,等.岷江上游森林涵养水源的能力变化分析[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(03):223.
MAN Zheng-chuang,SU Chun-jiang,XU Yun,et al.An Analysis on Water Conservation Capacity Variation of Forest in the Upper Reaches of Minjiang River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(05):223.
[6]郭兵,姜琳,孙彩红,等.基于多源数据的岷江上游生态系统服务价值动态评估[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):131.
GUO Bing,JIANG Lin,SUN Caihong,et al.Dynamic Evaluation on Ecosystem Service Value of the Upper Reaches of Minjiang River Based on Multi-Source Data[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(05):131.
[7]李刚,卢晓宁,边金虎,等.岷江上游土地资源承载力评价[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(01):262.
LI Gang,LU Xiaoning,BIAN Jinhu,et al.Evaluation of Land Carrying Capacity in Upper Reaches of Minjiang River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(05):262.
[8]李炫,杨本勇,范建容,等.基于流域单元的岷江上游泥石流危险性评价[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(06):335.
LI Xuan,YANG Benyong,FAN Jianrong,et al.Assessment on the Hazard of Debris Flows in the Upper Min River Based on the Watershed Catchment-Unit[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(05):335.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2017-09-29;改回日期:2017-11-29。
基金项目:四川省教育厅项目“岷江上游土壤环境质量对退耕还林驱动的林树下线下移的响应”（16ZB0139）；研究生创新基金“冻融作用下川西北高寒土壤水热运移研究”（17ycx038）；本科生创新基金“岷江上游土壤质量对退耕还林驱动的林树下线下移的响应”（cx17-043）
作者简介:方露(1996-),女,四川泸州人,本科在读,主要从事土壤生态环境质量与变化方面的研究。E-mail:164872747@qq.com
通讯作者:赵丽(1981-),女,四川南充人,博士,主要从事土壤生态环境质量与变化方面的研究。E-mail:zhaoli@163.com