YANG Yunfen,FENG Wei,ZHAO Yongjun,et al.The Implementation Effects of a Nationwide Priority Projects for Soil Erosion Control in China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(03):51-56.
国家水土保持重点建设工程实施效果分析
- Title:
- The Implementation Effects of a Nationwide Priority Projects for Soil Erosion Control in China
- Keywords:
- soil and water conservation; implementation effect evaluation; grey correlation analysis method; nationwide priority projects; alleviating poverty
- 分类号:
- S157.2
- 摘要:
- 为了解国家水土保持重点建设工程实施情况，在资料收集、典型调研和专家咨询的基础上，从工程管理、工程建设、实施效益3个方面共选取21个指标，运用层次分析-灰色关联分析法对"十二五"期间"革命老区"工程涉及的20个省区的工程实施效果进行了综合分析评价。结果表明：（1） 绝大部分省区工程管理和工程建设得分>0.6，实施情况良好，实施效益得分多在0.5~0.6，尚未完全发挥效益；（2） 综合评价结果表明，河北、贵州综合得分>0.6，实施效果最好；海南、甘肃、重庆、河南、山西得分在0.4~5.0，实施效果一般；其余各省得分均在0.5~0.6，效果较好；（3） 工程实施后改善了农业生产条件、带动了特色产业发展，增加了农民收入，为项目区精准脱贫起到了积极作用。
- Abstract:
- We examined the implementation effects of a nationwide priority projects for soil erosion control at the provincial scale during the 12th Five-Year Plan. Based on field investigation and expert consultation, 21 indexes were selected from three determinants including project management, engineering construction and implementation benefit to conduct the AHP-grey correlation analysis method. The results revealed that most provinces have good performance from the aspects of project management and engineering construction with a score greater than 0.6. The scores of implementation benefits are mainly between 0.5~0.6, which indicate that the project had not gotten the good effect yet. Furthermore, regions with the scores between 0.63~0.68 indicate the better performance, such as Hebei and Guizhou, and regions with the scores between 0.4~0.5 need to put efforts to improve the implementation at the provincial scales, such as Hainan, Gansu, Chongqin, Henan and Shanxi. The preliminary results suggest that the national soil and water conservation key construction projects have improved the agriculture structure and production, and effectively alleviated the poverty.
参考文献/References:
[1] Cavendish W. Empirical regularities in the poverty-environment relationship of rural households:evidence from Zimbabwe[J]. World Development, 1999,28(11):1979-2003.
[2] Mcshane T O, Hirsch P D, Trung T C, et al. Hard choices:Making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being[J]. Biological Conservation, 2011,144(3):966-972.
[3] Reddy S R C, Chakravarty S P. Forest dependence and income distribution in a subsistence economy:Evidence from India[J]. World Development, 1999,27(7):1141-1149.
[4] 程宝良,高丽.西部脆弱环境分布与贫困关系的研究[J].环境科学与技术,2009(2):198-202.
[5] 李小曼,王刚,李锐.水土流失与贫困的关系[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(1):132-134.
[6] 第宝锋,宁堆虎,鲁胜力.中国水土流失与贫困的关系分析[J].水土保持通报,2006,26(3):67-72.
[7] 吴义泉,郑海金.江西省水土流失与贫困之间的关系[J].中国水土保持,2006(9):3-5.
[8] 史志刚.安徽省大别山项目区国家水土保持重点建设工程实施成效与经验[J].中国水土保持,2013(1):16-18.
[9] 欧阳立志,赖剑华.安远县实施国家水土保持重点建设工程的成效与经验[J].中国水土保持,2016(3):5-6.
[10] 张松松.淮河流域国家水土保持重点建设工程水土流失防治效果及存在问题[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学,2015.
[11] 粟文华,黄锋,向守均,等.宣汉县革命老区水保项目施工组织方式的实践与探索[J].中国水土保持,2016(7):10-12.
[12] 费智聪.熵权-层次分析法与灰色-层次分析法研究[D].天津:天津大学,2009.
[13] 薛念涛,张国臣,陈坚,等.层次分析-灰色关联分析法评价黄姜皂素生产工艺[J].环境科学研究,2014(1):99-105.
[14] 华娟,熊明彪,张贝克,等.川东丘陵区水土保持综合效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(2):152-156.
[15] 贺祥.基于熵权灰色关联法的贵州岩溶山区人地耦合系统脆弱性分析[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(1):283-289.
相似文献/References:
[1]白桦,穆兴民,王双银.水土保持措施对秃尾河径流的影响[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(01):40.
BAI Hua,MU Xing-min,WANG Shuang-yin.Impact of Soil and Water Conservation on River Flow of Tuwei River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):40.
[2]王星,李占斌,李鹏.陕西省丹汉江流域水土保持工程投资情况分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):43.
WANG Xing,LI Zhan-bin,LI Peng.Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation Project Investment Status of Dan-Han River Watershed in Shaanxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):43.
[3]宋凤军,穆兴民,白桦.嘉陵江流域输沙量演变规律分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):65.
SONG Feng-jun,MU Xing-min,BAI Hua.Variation of Sediment Discharge in the Jialingjiang River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):65.
[4]熊康宁,王恒松,刘云.毕节石桥小流域水土保持综合治理生态监测与效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):10.
XIONG Kang-ning,WANG Heng-song,LIU Yun.Ecological Monitoring and the Evaluation on the Benefits of Comprehensive Management for Soil and Water Conservation in Shiqiao Watershed of Bijie City, Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):10.
[5]贺振伟,郭东罡,白中科,等.两种水土生态恢复模式下刺槐种群数量特征与空间格局研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):48.
HE Zhen-wei,GUO Dong-gang,BAI Zhong-ke,et al.Numeric Character and Spatial Pattern of Robinia pseudoacacia L. Population at Two Kinds of Recovery Modes[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):48.
[6]吴启蒙,朱志玲,吴咏梅,等.宁夏水土保持的产业结构影响评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):116.
WU Qi-meng,ZHU Zhi-ling,WU Yong-mei,et al.Impact Evaluation on Industrial Structure of Soil and Water Conservation in Ningxia Hui Automonous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):116.
[7]康万利,揭雨成,邢虎成.南方坡耕地种植苎麻水土保持效果和经济效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):86.
KANG Wan-li,JIE Yu-cheng,XING Hu-cheng.Study of Soil-Water Conservation Effects and Economic Benefit of Ramie in South Slope Crop Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):86.
[8]郭兰勤,杨勤科.藉河流域水土保持效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):139.
GUO Lan-qin,YANG Qin-ke.Evaluation on the Benefit of the Soil and Water Conservation in Jihe Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):139.
[9]汪有科,李立,傅左,等.薪炭林水土保持效益的研究[J].水土保持研究,1992,(01):70.
Wang Yuke,Li Li,Fu Zuo,et al.A STUDY ON THE BENEFIT OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION FOR ENERGY FOREST[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1992,(03):70.
[10]刘向东,吴钦孝,赵鸿雁.森林植被垂直截留作用与水土保持[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(03):8.
Liu Xiangdong,Wu Qinxiao,Zhao Hongyan.The Vertical Interception Function of Forest Vegetation and Soil and Water Conservation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(03):8.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2017-07-03;改回日期:2017-08-18。
基金项目:国家财政预算项目“水土保持业务”（126216229000150001）
作者简介:杨云芬(1993-),女,云南大理人,硕士研究生,研究方向为水土保持规划与评价。E-mail:yunfenyang@126.com
通讯作者:第宝锋(1978-),男,甘肃庆阳人,博士,副教授,研究方向为水土保持及环境遥感。E-mail:dibaofeng@scu.edu.cn