[1]王颖,杨新兵.冀北山地6种林分类型土壤水分-物理性质变化[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(03):108-112.
　WANG Ying,YANG Xinbing.Soil Water-Physical Properties of Six Forest Types in Northern Mountain of Hebei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(03):108-112.
点击复制

冀北山地6种林分类型土壤水分-物理性质变化

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 24 期数: 2017年03期 页码: 108-112 栏目: 出版日期: 2017-06-28
Title:
Soil Water-Physical Properties of Six Forest Types in Northern Mountain of Hebei Province
作者:
王颖1, 杨新兵2
1. 河北环境工程学院, 河北 秦皇岛 066004;
2. 河北农业大学 林学院, 河北 保定 071000
Author(s):
WANG Ying1, YANG Xinbing2
1. Hebei University of Environmental Engineering, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066004, China;
2. College of Forestry, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding, Hebei 071000, China
关键词:
冀北山地; 林分类型; 土壤水分—物理性质; 土壤入渗
Keywords:
Northern Mountain of Hebei Province; forest types; soil moisture-physical property; soil infiltration
分类号:
S714.7
摘要:
为改善冀北山地林地生态功能，提高该地区森林涵养水源的能力，选取冀北山地6种典型林分为研究对象，采用环刀法对土壤物理性质进行了分析比较。结果表明：（1） 土壤容重与土层深度呈正相关，土壤容重均值排序为：华北落叶松林（1.20 g/cm3） > 蒙古栎林（1.14 g/cm3） > 油松林（1.12 g/cm3） > 黑桦林（1.03 g/cm3） > 白桦林（0.98 g/cm3） > 山杨林（0.81 g/cm3）；（2） 土壤总孔隙度与土层深度呈负相关，土壤总孔隙度均值排序为：山杨林（57.6%） > 白桦林（51.4%） > 黑桦林（51.1%） > 油松林（49.1%） > 华北落叶松林（45.9%） > 蒙古栎林（44.8%）；土壤毛管孔隙度均值山杨林最大（48.9%），油松林最小（35.1%）；非毛管孔隙度均值为油松林最大（14.0%），白桦林最小（3.6%）；（3） 土壤持水量与土层深度之间存在负相关关系，土壤最大持水量均值为山杨林最大，华北落叶松林最小；（4） 土壤入渗速率与入渗时间呈明显幂函数关系，稳渗速率油松林最大（15.00 mm/min），华北落叶松林最小（0.68 mm/min）。研究结果可为森林土壤资源可持续利用提供依据。
Abstract:
In order to make better the ecological function of mountain forest land and improve the ability of forest water conservation in this area, six typical forest stands in Northern Mountain of Hebei Province were selected as the research samples. Meanwhile the author analyzed and compared the soil physical properties by ring knife method. The results showed that: (1) the soil bulk density was positively correlated with soil depth, soil bulk density average decreased in the orger: Larix principis-rupprechti forest (1.20 g/cm3) > Quercus mongolica forest (1.14 g/cm3) > Pinus tabulaeformis forest (1.12 g/cm3) > Betula davurica forest (1.03 g/cm3) > Betula platyphylla forest (0.98 g/cm3) > Populus davidiana forest (0.81 g/cm3); (2) the total soil porosity was negatively correlated with soil depth and the average order of total porosity was: Populus davidiana forest (57.6%) > Betula platyphylla forest (51.4%) > Betula davurica forest (51.1%) > Pinus tabulaeformis forest (49.1%) > Larix gmelinii-rupprechti forest (45.9%) > Quercus mongolica forest (44.8%);Populus davidiana forest’s average soil capillary porosity was maximum(48.9%), Pinus tabulaeformis forest was minimum (35.1%); The maximum non-capillary porosity averages was Pinus tabulaeformis forest (14.0%), the minimum was Betula platyphylla forest (3.6%); (3) there was a negative correlation between soil moisture and soil depth, The maximum water holding capacity of the soil was Populus davidiana forest and the smallest is Larix gmelinii-rupprechti forest; (4) the relationship between soil infiltration rate and infiltration time followed the power function. The largest steady infiltration rate was Pinus tabulaeformis forest (15.00 mm/min) and the minimum was Larix gmelinii-rupprechti forest (0.68 mm/min). The research results can provide the basis for sustainable utilization of forest soil resources.

参考文献/References:

[1] 李灵,张玉,孔丽娜,等.武夷山风景区不同林地类型土壤水分物理性质及土壤水库特性[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(3):60-65.
[2] 易扬,信忠保,覃云斌,等.黄土丘陵区不同土地利用类型土壤水分物理性质研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,23(5):45-49,56.
[3] 田月亮,张金池,李海东,等.不同林分类型土壤水分物理性质及其海拔效应:以浙江省凤阳山为例[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(1):53-57.
[4] 剪文灏,李淑春,陈波,等.冀北山区三种典型森林类型枯落物水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(5):144-147.
[5] 张爱军,岳艳杰,田龙,等.冀北山地森林土壤水分物理性质和入渗规律研究[J].河北林果研究,2015,30(2):108-112.
[6] 陈波,杨新兵,赵心苗,等.冀北山地6种天然纯林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(2):196-202.
[7] 易志军,吴晓芙,胡曰利.人工林地土壤质量指标及评价[J].林业资源管理,2002,4:31-34.
[8] 田超,杨新兵,李军,等.冀北山地阴坡枯落物层和土壤层水文效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(2):97-103.
[9] 张宁,郭宾良,于士涛,等.冀北山地四种典型落叶松林分生态功能研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(2):320-327.
[10] 孙向阳.土壤学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2005.
[11] 韩雪成,赵雨森,辛颖,等.大兴安岭北部火烧迹地兴安落叶松人工林土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(4):183-188.
[12] 刘斌,鲁绍伟,李少宁,等.北京西山6种天然纯林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(4):73-78.

相似文献/References:

[1]霍小鹏,张兴华,李贤伟,等.川西米亚罗林区不同林分类型土壤养分性质研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):58.
　HUO Xiao-peng,ZHANG Xing-hua,LI Xian-wei,et al.Study on the Soil Nutrient in Different Forest Types in Miyaluo Forest Area of Western Sichuan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):58.
[2]田育新,李锡泉,袁正科,等.湘南红壤区不同林分类型涵水保土效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(04):80.
　TIAN Yu-xin,LI Xi-quan,YUAN Zheng-ke,et al.Studies on Benefit of Soil and Water Conservation of Different Forest Area Types in Red Soil Regions of South Hunan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(03):80.
[3]李淑芬,于法展,李保杰.苏北低山丘陵区典型性森林土壤健康评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(04):264.
　LI Shu-fen,YU Fa-zhan,LI Bao-jie.Health Evaluation of Typical Forest Soils in Low Mountainous and Hilly Area of Northern Jiangsu Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):264.
[4]李淑春,张伟,姚卫星,等.冀北山地不同林分类型林冠层降水分配研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(05):124.
　LI Shu-chun,ZHANG Wei,YAO Wei-xing,et al.Precipitation Distribution Laws of Different Forest Stands in North Mountain of Hebei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(03):124.
[5]王亮,彭琦云,耿少波.长白山露水河林区乔木层生物量及生产力研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(04):277.
　WANG Liang,PENG Qiyun,GEN Shaobo.Study on Tree Layer Biomass and Productivity in Forest in Lushihe Forest Bureau of Changbai Mountains[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(03):277.
[6]赵川,和丽萍,李贵祥,等.植被恢复对昆阳磷矿土壤有机碳储量的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(05):168.
　ZHAO Chuan,HE Liping,LI Guixiang,et al.Impacts of Vegetation Restoration on the Soil Organic Carbon Storage in Kunyang Phosphorite Mine[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(03):168.
[7]张宁,郭宾良,张楠,等.冀北山地落叶松四种典型林分生长发育比较研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(03):269.
　ZHANG Ning,GUO Binliang,ZHANG Nan,et al.Comparative Study on Growth and Development of Four Typical Larch Stands in Mountain Area of Northern Hebei[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(03):269.
[8]赵建生,王永明,杨新兵.冀北山地森林土壤水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(03):201.
　ZHAO Jian-sheng,WANG Yong-ming,YANG Xin-bing.Hydrological Effects of Forest Soil in Mountain Area of Northern Hebei[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(03):201.
[9]于法展,张忠启,沈正平,等.庐山不同林分类型土壤活性有机碳及其组分与土壤酶的相关性[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(06):78.
　YU Fazhan,ZHANG Zhongqi,SHEN Zhengping,et al.Correlation of Soil Active Organic Carbon and Its Components as Well as Soil Enzyme Under Different Forests in Lushan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(03):78.
[10]于法展,张忠启,陈龙乾,等.江西庐山自然保护区不同林地水源涵养功能研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(05):255.
　YU Fa-zhan,ZHANG Zhong-qi,CHEN Long-qian,et al.Study on Water Conservation Function of Different Forestlands in Lushan Nature Reserve, Jiangxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(03):255.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2016-05-20;改回日期:2016-06-13。
基金项目:河北省林业厅科技项目“冀北山区森林生态系统健康评价技术研究”（1403451）；林业公益性行业科研专项子课题“冀北山区典型森林生态系统健康经营技术研究与示范”（200804022F）
作者简介:王颖(1977-),女,河北唐山人,硕士,副教授,主要从事园林生态学研究。E-mail:wangying0651@126.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01