TIAN Yaowu,WANG Ning,LIU Jing.Analysis of Simulation Error of Runoff and Sediment for Taowan Watershed in Funiushan Mountain Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):56-62.
伏牛山区陶湾流域径流泥沙模拟误差分析
- Title:
- Analysis of Simulation Error of Runoff and Sediment for Taowan Watershed in Funiushan Mountain Area
- 关键词:
- AnnAGNPS模型; 径流; 泥沙; 伏牛山区; 模拟
- Keywords:
- AnnAGNPS model; runoff; sediment; Funiushan Mountain area; simulation
- 分类号:
- S157;P333
- 摘要:
- 以豫西伏牛山区陶湾流域为研究对象，利用该流域2006—2007年22次径流、泥沙数据对分布式AnnAGNPS（Annualized AGricultural NonPoint Source）模型进行校准，2008—2009年31次径流、泥沙数据对模型进行验证。选取R2（决定系数）、E（效率系数）、VE（误差比）等统计参量评估流域径流、泥沙、氮、磷物质输出的模拟精度。结果表明：（1）SCS-CN值是径流模拟精度的主要影响因素，校准期内径流VE=-7.7%（R2=0.95，p < 0.05），验证期内VE=-6.1%（R2=0.90，p < 0.05），误差值位于可接受的范围之内， < ±15%。径流误差相对较低，径流模拟精度也影响泥沙和氮、磷的模拟精度；（2）泥沙模拟误差影响因素较为复杂，植被覆盖率、曼宁粗糙系数等因素最为敏感，还受流域DEM、土壤、土地利用等空间参数精度的影响。校准期内VE=15.1%（R2=0.55，p < 0.05），验证期内VE=17.0%（R2=0.60，p < 0.05），泥沙模拟误差较径流要大。泥沙和径流模拟误差趋势相同，对小型降雨事件，模拟值偏高，大型降雨事件模拟值偏低。（3）氮、磷模拟值具有更大的不确定性，氮VE=22.0%（R2=0.69，p < 0.05），磷VE=24.0%（R2=0.48，p < 0.05）。AnnAGNPS模型对径流、泥沙、氮、磷模拟均存在有一定的不确定性，模拟误差呈现一定的变化趋势。校准后的AnnAGNPS模型可以用于伏牛山区流域。
- Abstract:
- A typical watershed, Taowan, was selected as the study site, and the main goal was to evaluate the performance of AnnAGNPS Model in simulating runoff, sediment loading and nutrient loadings under the conditions of Funiushan Mountain area, and analyze the influencing factors of the simulation error. The data of 22 events of runoff and sediment in the watershed during the period from 2006 to 2007 were used to calibrate the model and the data of 31 events during the period from 2008 to 2009 were used for validation purposes. The whole evaluation consisted of determining the coefficient of determination (R2), Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient of efficiency (E), and the percentage volume error (VE). Most of model input parameters were sourced from Luoyang Forestry Bureau field observations and experiments. Results showed that: (1) runoff was undersimulated by -7.7% with R2 of 0.95 (p < 0.05) during calibration period (2006—2007) and undersimulated by -6.1% with R2 of 0.90 (p < 0.05) during validation period (2008—2009), factors affecting runoff simulation errors were accuracy of values for the SCS-CN, the results of runoff simulation also affected the other objects, which may be the reason of relatively low error of runoffs, the model simulated runoff within the range of acceptable accuracy (< ±15%); (2) the model oversimulated the event-based sediments by 15.1% with R2 of 0.55 (p < 0.05) during calibration period (2006—2007) and 17.0% oversimulated with R2 of 0.60 (p < 0.05) during validation (2008—2009), factors affecting sediment simulation error are more complex. Vegetation coverage and Manning roughness coefficient were most sensitive to the sediment simulation errors. And it was also affected by the scales of spatial parameter accuracy such as watershed DEM, soil and land uses. The trend of sediment simulation errors was similar to runoff. For the events of small magnitude, the model generally oversimulated them, while the opposite was true for larger events. Nitrogen was oversimulated by 22.0% with R2=0.69 (p < 0.05), and phosphorus was oversimulated by 24.0% with R2=0.48 (p < 0.05). In general, the model performs well in simulating runoff compared to sediment and nutrients. As a watershed management tool, it can be used under the conditions of Funiushan Mountain area after proper calibration.
参考文献/References:
[1] Silburn D M, Loch R J. Evaluation of the CREAMS model:I. Sensitivity analysis of the soil erosion sedimentation component for aggregated clay soils[J]. Soil Research,1989,27(3):545-561.
[2] Young R A, Onstad C A, Bosch D D, et al. AGNPS:A nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1989,44(2):168-173.
[3] Arnold J G, Srinivasan R, Muttiah R S, et al. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I:Model development1[J]. Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1998, 34(1):73-89.
[4] Yuan Y, Locke M A, Bingner R L. Annualized agricultural non-point source model application for Mississippi Delta Beasley Lake watershed conservation practices assessment[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,63(6):542-551.
[5] Baginska B, Milne-Home W, Cornish P S. Modelling nutrient transport in Currency Creek, NSW with AnnAGNPS and PEST[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software,2003,18(8):801-808.
[6] Tsou M S. Estimation of runoff and sediment yield in the Redrock Creek watershed using AnnAGNPS and GIS[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences,2004,16(5):865-867.
[7] 王晓利,姜德娟,张华.基于AnnAGNPS模型的胶东半岛大沽河流域非点源污染模拟研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2014,33(7):1379-1387.
[8] 李开明,任秀文,黄国如,等.基于AnnAGNPS模型泗合水流域非点源污染模拟研究[J].中国环境科学,2013,33(S):54-59.
[9] 黄志霖,田耀武,肖文发,等.非点源污染模型AnnAGNPS在三峡库区林农复合小流域模拟效果评定[J].环境科学,2009,30(10):2872-2878.
[10] Xiao B, Wang Q H, FAN J, et al. Application of the SCS-CN model to runoff estimation in a small watershed with high spatial heterogeneity[J]. Pedosphere,2011,21(6):738-749.
[11] Sharpley A N, Williams J R. EPIC-erosion/productivity impact calculator:1. Model documentation.[J]. Technical Bulletin-United States Department of Agriculture,1990,4(4):206-207.
[12] 汤国安,赵牡丹,李天文,等.DEM提取黄土高原地面坡度的不确定性[J].地理学报,2003,58(6):824-830
[13] Nash J E, Sutcliffe J V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I:A discussion of principles[J]. Journal of Hydrology,1970,10(3):282-290.
[14] Cheng H, Ouyang W, Hao F, et al. The non-point source pollution in livestock-breeding areas of the Heihe River basin in Yellow River[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment,2007,21(3):213-221.
[15] Chiew F H S, Stewardson M J, McMahon T A. Comparison of six rainfall-runoff modelling approaches[J]. Journal of Hydrology,1993,147(1):1-36.
[16] Krause P, Boyle D P, B?se F. Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment[J]. Advances in Geosciences,2005,5(5):89-97.
[17] Shamshad A, Leow C S, Ramlah A, et al. Applications of AnnAGNPS model for soil loss estimation and nutrient loading for Malaysian conditions[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation,2008,10(3):239-252.
[18] Haregeweyn N, Yohannes F. Testing and evaluation of the agricultural non-point source pollution model (AGNPS) on Augucho catchment, western Hararghe, Ethiopia[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment,2003,99(S1/3):201-212.
[19] Rode M, Frede H G. Testing AGNPS for soil erosion and water quality modelling in agricultural catchments in Hesse (Germany)[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth:Part B, 1999, 24(4):297-301.
[20] Lenzi M A, Di Luzio M. Surface runoff, soil erosion and water quality modelling in the Alpone watershed using AGNPS integrated with a Geographic Information System[J]. European Journal of Agronomy,1997,6(1):1-14.
[21] Polyakov V, Fares A, Kubo D, et al. Evaluation of a non-point source pollution model, AnnAGNPS, in a tropical watershed[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software,2007,22(11):1617-1627.
[22] Shrestha S, Babel M S, Gupta A D, et al. Evaluation of annualized agricultural nonpoint source model for a watershed in the Siwalik Hills of Nepal[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software,2006,21(7):961-975.
[23] Haregeweyn N, Yohannes F. Testing and evaluation of the agricultural non-point source pollution model (AGNPS) on Augucho catchment, western Hararghe, Ethiopia[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment,2003,99(1):201-212.
[24] Grunwald S, Norton L D. Calibration and validation of a non-point source pollution model[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2000,45(1):17-39.
[25] Kalin L, Govindaraju R S, Hantush M M. Effect of geomorphologic resolution on modeling of runoff hydrograph and sedimentograph over small watersheds[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2003,276(1):89-111.
[26] 郝芳华,杨胜天,程红光,等.大尺度区域非点源污染负荷估算方法研究的意义、难点和关键技术[J].环境科学学报,2006,26(3):362-365.
[27] 田耀武,黄志霖,曾立雄.DEM格网尺度对AnnAGNPS预测山地小流域径流和物质输出的影响[J].环境科学学报,2009,29(4):846-853.
[28] 黄志霖,田耀武,肖文发,等.三峡库区黑沟流域AnnAGNPS参数空间聚合效应[J].生态学报,2009,29(12):6681-6690.
[29] Rode M, Frede H G. Testing AGNPS for soil erosion and water quality mode11ing in agricultural catchments in Hesse (Germany)[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth:Part B,1999,24(4):297-301.
[30] Haregeweyn N, Yohannes F. Testing and evaluation of the agricultural non-point source pollution model (AGNPS) on Augucho catchment, western Hararghe, Ethiopia[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment,2003,99(1):201-212.
相似文献/References:
[1]杨巍,汤洁,李昭阳,等.基于SWAT模型的大伙房水库汇水区径流与泥沙模拟[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):77.
YANG Wei,TANG Jie,LI Zhao-yang,et al.Streamflow and Sediment Simulation Based on SWAT Model in Dahuofang Reservoir Catchment[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):77.
[2]刘士余,章俊霞,罗志军,等.近50年赣西北大坑小流域径流对降雨的响应[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):19.
LIU Shi-yu,ZHANG Jun-xia,LUO Zhi-jun,et al.Response of Runoff to Rainfall in Dakeng Small Watershed in Northwestern Jiangxi Province over the Last 50 Years[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):19.
[3]白桦,穆兴民,高鹏,等.嘉陵江流域降水及径流演变规律分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):102.
BAI Hua,MU Xing-min,GAO Peng,et al.Analysis on Spatio-temporal Variation of Precipitation and Streamflow in the Jialingjiang River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):102.
[4]侯喜禄,梁一民,曹清玉.黄土丘陵沟壑区主要水保林类型及草地水保效益的研究[J].水土保持研究,1991,(02):96.
Hou Xilu,Liang Yimin,Cao Qingyu.A STUDY ON BENEFITS OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION BY MAIN WOODLAND AND GRASSLAND TYPES IN LOESS HILLY REGION[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(05):96.
[5]吴钦孝,刘向东,赵鸿雁,等.宜川县油松人工林集水区水文状况分析[J].水土保持研究,1991,(02):116.
Wu Qinxiao,Liu Xiangdong,Zhao Hongyan,et al.AN ANALYSIS ON HYDROSTATUS OF CATCHMENT IN ARTIFICIAL CHINESE PINE FOREST IN YICHUAN COUNTY[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(05):116.
[6]汪有科,李立,傅左,等.薪炭林水土保持效益的研究[J].水土保持研究,1992,(01):70.
Wang Yuke,Li Li,Fu Zuo,et al.A STUDY ON THE BENEFIT OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION FOR ENERGY FOREST[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1992,(05):70.
[7]石生新,蒋定生.几种水土保持措施对强化降水入渗和减沙的影响试验研究[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(01):82.
Shi Shengxin,Jiang Dingsheng.Impacts of Several Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Strengthening Rainfall infiltration and Reducing Sediment Yield[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(05):82.
[8]曹全意.黄土高原地区提高山坡地径流利用率的有效途径[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(04):31.
Cao Quanyi.The Effective Way to Raise the Runoff Use Ratein Slope Land of Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(05):31.
[9]赵晓光,吴发启.坡面水蚀过程的力能体系及研究思路[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(01):23.
ZHAO Xiao-guang,WU Fa-qi.Research Frame for Force and Energy System in Water Erosion Process in Slopes of Gully[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2000,7(05):23.
[10]卢光辉.低度冲击径流抑制技术之功能与应用[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(04):91.
LU Guang-hui.Function and Application of Runoff Restraint Technique of Lowering Impact[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(05):91.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2015-09-15;改回日期:2015-10-15。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金“森林土壤激发效应对土壤有机碳库平衡的影响”（U1404322）
作者简介:田耀武(1975-),男,河南许昌人,博士,副教授,主要从事森林生态学研究。E-mail:tian_yaowu@qq.com