[1]高冠龙,张小由,朱平,等.极端干旱条件下苦豆子蒸散量日变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(05):279-283.
　GAO Guanlong,ZHANG Xiaoyou,ZHU Ping,et al.Diurnal Variation of Evapotranspiration of Sophora alopecuroides L. Under Extreme Dry Condition[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(05):279-283.
点击复制

极端干旱条件下苦豆子蒸散量日变化研究

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 22 期数: 2015年05期 页码: 279-283 栏目: 出版日期: 2015-10-28
Title:
Diurnal Variation of Evapotranspiration of Sophora alopecuroides L. Under Extreme Dry Condition
作者:
高冠龙1,2, 张小由1, 朱平1,2, 赵虹3
1. 中国科学院 寒区旱区环境与工程研究所, 兰州 730000;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
3. 浙江瑞启检测技术有限公司, 杭州 310000
Author(s):
GAO Guanlong1,2, ZHANG Xiaoyou1, ZHU Ping1,2, ZHAO Hong3
1. Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. Zhejiang Ruiqi Testing Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310000, China
关键词:
极端干旱; 苦豆子; 蒸散量; 日变化
Keywords:
extreme dry condition; Sophora alopecuroides L.; evapotranspiration; diurnal variation
分类号:
Q948
摘要:
基于波文比—能量平衡法的实测资料，对极端干旱条件下苦豆子地的蒸散量及能量通量进行了连续测定，并针对蒸散量与能量平衡的日变化特点进行了分析与探讨，结果表明：（1）蒸散速率在苦豆子不同的生长阶段具有不同的变化趋势，7月份为双峰型，其余的月份为单峰型；（2）在晴朗无云的天气条件下，苦豆子蒸散速率的日变化表现出明显的昼夜差异，即单峰或双峰曲线趋势，夜间水汽凝结，蒸散速率为负值；（3）在晴朗无云的天气条件下，苦豆子蒸散速率的变化趋势与净辐射、热通量的日变化都具有相同的峰型；（4）随着太阳辐射的逐渐增强，气温和水汽压均升高，蒸散作用增强。风速增大的同时，蒸散速率也随着升高。土壤温度升高值的变化趋势与蒸散速率的变化趋势基本一致。各环境因子对蒸散速率影响程度依次为：土壤温度升高值 > 冠层上方水汽压 > 气温 > 风速。
Abstract:
We made use of the data which were measured by the Bowen Ratio-equilibrium Energy Method and measured the evapotranspiration and energy flux of Sophora alopecuroides L., analyzed the features of diurnal variation of evapotranspiration and energy equilibrium. The results showed that: (1) at different stages of growth of sophora alopecuroides L. and in different seasons, the evapotranspiration rate varied widely, the diurnal variation showed a bimodal type in July, while it was a unimodal type in the rest months; (2) the diurnal variation of evapotranspiration rate of Sophora alopecuroides L. was obvious under the clear and cloudless term, the curve trend was bimodal or unimodal, the evapotranspiration rate in the evening was negative and the atmospheric condensation process proceeded; (3) under the clear and cloudless term, the peak types of diurnal variations of evapotranspiration rate were the same as net radiation and heat flux; (4) with the increase of solar radiation, the temperature and the vapor pressure rose, the evapotranspiration enhanced. It also enhanced when the wind speed increased. The variation trend of diurnal variation of evapotranspiration was the same as the variation of soil temperature. The influence of environmental factors on evapotranspiration rate in turn is the order: variation of soil temperature > vapor pressure above canopy > temperature > wind speed.

参考文献/References:

[1] 李艳艳,冯俊涛,张兴,等.苦豆子化学成分及其生物活性研究进展[J].西北农业学报,2005,14(2):133-136.
[2] 杨家新,喻志芳.苦豆子的研究进展[J].天津药学,1998,10(1):43-46.
[3] 陈晓丽,吴艳,郑雷,等.苦豆子不同生育时期矿质元素分析[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2012,32(10):2831-2833.
[4] 李爱华,孙兆军.苦豆子资源开发现状及前景初探[J].宁夏大学学报,2001,25(4):354-356.
[5] 郑祥霖,赵传燕,彭守璋.黑河下游绿洲苦豆子种群的空间分布及特征[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版,2010,46(S1):20-24.
[6] 赵雪,明永飞.黑河分水后额济纳绿洲柽柳(Tamarixspp.)和苦豆子(Sophora alopecuroides)群落的恢复[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(6):1684-1691.
[7] 高晓原,贝盏临,刘方超,等.水分对苦豆子的生长及其有效成分积累的影响[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版,2008,46(S1):119-121.
[8] 司建华,冯起,张小由,等.极端干旱条件下柽柳种群蒸散量的日变化研究[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(3):380-385.
[9] 马铃,赵平,饶兴权,等.乔木蒸腾作用的主要测定方法[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(1):88-96.
[10] Grace J, Lloyd J, McIntyre J, et al. Fluxes of carbon dioxide and water vapour over an undisturbed tropical forest in south-west Amazonia[J]. Global Change Biology,1995,1(1):1-12.
[11] Garratt J R. Sensitivity of climate simulations to land-surface and atmospheric boundary-layer treatments:A review[J]. Journal of Climate,1993,6(3):419-448.
[12] 周国逸,潘维俦.森林生态系统蒸发散计算方法的研究[J].中南林学院学报,1988,8(1):22-27.
[13] 魏天兴,朱金兆.林分蒸散耗水量测定方法述评[J].北京林业大学学报,1999,21(3):85-91.
[14] Pereira L S, Perrier A, Allen R G, et al. Evapotranspiration:Concepts and future trends[J]. American Society of Civil Engineers,1999,125(2):45-51.
[15] 蔡锡安,任海,彭少麟,等.鹤山南亚热带草坡生态系统的热量平衡[J].热带亚热带植物学报,1997,5(1):27-32.
[16] 张小由,康尔泗,司建华,等.额济纳绿洲柽柳灌丛辐射特征与热量平衡研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2007,21(4):142-145.
[17] 张小由,龚家栋,周茂先,等.柽柳灌丛热量收支特性与蒸散研究[J].高原气象,2004,23(2):228-232.
[18] 吴锦奎,丁永建,魏智,等.干旱区天然低湿牧草地参考作物蒸散量研究:以黑河中游为例[J].干旱区研究,2005,22(4):514-519.
[19] 李新,周宏飞.干旱区农田蒸散量的日间变化分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2000,14(3):82-88.
[20] 马伟强,马耀明.西北干旱区地表能量初步分析[J].干旱区研究,2006,23(1):76-82.
[21] 张强,卫国安,黄荣辉,等.西北干旱区荒漠戈壁动量和感热总体输送系数[J].中国科学:D辑,2001,31(9):783-792.
[22] 王旭,尹光彩,周国逸,等.鼎湖山针阔混交林旱季能量平衡研究[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2005,13(3):205-210.
[23] 张强,胡隐樵,王喜红.黑河地区绿洲内农田微气象特征[J].高原气象,1992,11(4):361-370.
[24] 张强,王胜.夏季绿洲生态环境对荒漠背景地表能量过程的扰动[J].生态学报,2005,25(10):2459-2466.
[25] 马伟强,马耀明,胡泽勇,等.藏北高原地区辐射收支和季节变化与卫星遥感的对比分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2005,19(1):109-115.
[26] 杨兴国,张强,王润元,等.陇中黄土高原夏季地表能量平衡观测研究[J].高原气象,2004,23(6):828-834.
[27] 关德新,吴家兵,王安志,等.长白山阔叶红松林生长季热量平衡变化特征[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(10):1828-1832.
[28] 张小由.额济纳绿洲生态耗水与水量平衡研究[D].兰州:中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所,2006.
[29] 于文颖,迟道才,何奇瑾,等.盘锦芦苇湿地蒸发散特征研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2007,37(5):758-762.

相似文献/References:

[1]白艳莹,闵庆文,李静.哈尼梯田生态系统森林土壤水源涵养功能分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(02):166.
　BAI Yanying,MIN Qingwen,LI Jing.Water Conservation Function of Forest Soil in Honghe Hani Rice Terrace System[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):166.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2014-11-24;改回日期:2014-12-05。
基金项目:国家自然科学资助项目（41271037）；国家科技计划课题（2012BAD16B00）
作者简介:高冠龙(1988-),男,山西晋中人,博士生,研究方向为旱区生态学研究。E-mail:guanlong_gao@163.com
通讯作者:张小由(1963-),男,甘肃临洮人,博士生导师,研究员,主要从事旱区生态学研究。E-mail:zhangxy@lzb.ac.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01