LI Baojie,GU Hehe,JI Yazhou.Effects of Spatial Grain Size on Landscape Pattern in Reclaimed Mining Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(04):253-257,264.
复垦矿区景观格局指数的粒度效应研究
- Title:
- Effects of Spatial Grain Size on Landscape Pattern in Reclaimed Mining Area
- 分类号:
- F301.24
- 摘要:
- 以徐州市九里矿区复垦前（2000年）后（2013年）1：1万的矿区土地利用数据为数据源，采用基于GIS的景观格局分析方法，研究了九里矿区复垦前后17个景观格局指数在10~300 m范围内的粒度效应，并对复垦前后景观格局指数的变化规律、拟合函数、变异系数和最佳景观粒度范围进行了分析。结果表明：17个景观指数随着景观粒度的增加呈现出：逐渐降低型、逐步增加型、局部尺度效应型和随机变化型共4种变化类型，其中，10个景观指数随景观粒度的变化趋势可以用不同的函数模型进行拟合（R2 > 0.94）。从复垦前后景观格局指数的变化来看，复垦前后景观格局指数的变化趋势基本趋于一致，但拟合函数和变异系数均有一定的变化，如拟合函数不一致，变异系数降低等；适宜徐州九里矿区1：1万土地利用数据进行景观指数分析的最佳景观粒度范围为20~40 m。
- Abstract:
- The grain effect of 17 landscape indices and the change characteristics, fitting functions, variation coefficient and the optimal grain size range of landscape indices with a scale 10~300 m were analyzed using GIS and method of landscape ecology based on the land use data of Jiuli coal mining area, Xuzhou at 1:10 000 scale from 2000(before reclamation) to 2013(after reclamation). The results showed that the grain effects had 5 types, such as gradually decreasing, gradually increasing, part scale effect type and randomly changing with increasing grain, and the trend of 10 landscape pattern indices could be simulated by different function models(R2>0.94). The trend of the landscape pattern indices was uniform in pre and post reclamation,while the fitting functions and variation coefficient changed a bit, such as inconsistent of fitting functions and decreasing of variation coefficient. The range of 20~40 meters was selected as the optimal landscape granularity suit to landscape index analysis in Jiuli coal mining area, Xuzhou at 1:10 000 scale.
参考文献/References:
[1] 邬建国.景观生态学-格局、过程、尺度与等级[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2007.
[2] Schneider D C. The rise of t he concept of scale in ecology[J]. BioScience,2001,51(7):545-553.
[3] 吕一河,傅伯杰.生态学中的尺度及尺度转换方法[J].生态学报,2001,21(12):2096-2105.
[4] 邬建国.景观生态学:概念与理论[J].生态学杂志,2000,19(1):42-52.
[5] Wu Jianguo, Hobbs R. Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology:An idiosyncratic synthesis[J]. Landscape Ecology,2002,17(4):355-365.
[6] 申卫军,邬建国,任海,等.空间幅度变化对景观格局分析的影响[J].生态学报,2003,23(11):2219-2231.
[7] 杨丽,甄霖,谢高地.泾河流域景观指数的粒度效应分析[J].资源科学,2007,29(2):183-187.
[8] 赵文武,傅伯杰,陈利顶.景观指数的粒度变化效应[J].第四纪研究,2003,23(3):326-333.
[9] Qi Y, Wu J G. Effects of changing spatial resolution on the results of landscape pattern analysis using spatial autocorrelation indices[J]. Landscape Ecology,1996,11(1):39-49.
[10] Wu J, Shen W, Sun W, et al. Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics[J]. Landscape Ecology,2002,17(8):761-782.
[11] 李秀珍,布仁仓,常禹,等.景观格局指标对不同景观格局的反应[J].生态学报,2004,24(1):123-134.
[12] 周伟,钟星,袁春.1:10000比例尺土地利用景观指数的粒度效应分析[J].中国土地科学,2010,24(11):20-26.
[13] 李小马,刘常富.景观格局指数的粒度效应:以沈阳城市森林为例[J].西北林学院学报,2009,24(2):166-170.
[14] 于磊,赵彦伟,张远,等.基于最佳分析粒度的大辽河流域湿地景观格局分析[J].环境科学学报,2011,31(4):873-879.
[15] 曹银贵,周伟,王静,袁春.三峡库区30a间土地利用景观特征的粒度效应[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(6):315-321.
[16] 徐丽,卞晓庆,秦小林,等.空间粒度变化对合肥市景观格局指数的影响[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(5):1167-1173.
[17] 朱开群,金晓斌,周寅康.土地整理项目区景观格局粒度效应初探[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(3):45-51.
[18] 陈端吕,宋涛.西洞庭湖区森林景观指数适宜转换粒度[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(10):110-114.
[19] 申卫军,邬建国,林永标,等.空间粒度变化对景观格局分析的影响[J].生态学报,2003,23(12):2506-2519.
相似文献/References:
[1]单勇兵,李志江,马晓冬.基于GIS的徐州生态敏感性分析[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(04):244.
SHAN Yong-bing,LI Zhi-jiang,MA Xiao-dong.GIS-Based Ecological Sensitivity Analysis in Xuzhou[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(04):244.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2014-09-02;改回日期:2014-10-10。
基金项目:江苏省高校自然科学研究项目（14KJB170004）；江省社科应用研究精品工程（14SWC-117）；徐州市社会科学研究课题（15XSZ-096）
作者简介:李保杰(1979-),男,江苏丰县人,博士,讲师,主要从事GIS应用与景观生态方面的研究。E-mail:liboje@126.com