[1]王举位,邹伟,林积泉,等.砒砂岩区沙棘人工林生态系统服务功能变化探究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(05):203-209.
　WANG Ju-wei,ZOU Wei,LIN Ji-quan,et al.Research for Dynamic Change of Seabuckthorn Plantation Ecosystem Services in the Soft Rock Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(05):203-209.
点击复制

砒砂岩区沙棘人工林生态系统服务功能变化探究

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 20 期数: 2013年05期 页码: 203-209 栏目: 出版日期: 2013-10-28
Title:
Research for Dynamic Change of Seabuckthorn Plantation Ecosystem Services in the Soft Rock Area
作者:
王举位1, 邹伟1, 林积泉1, 张征2, 安宝利3
1. 海南省环境科学研究院, 海口 570206;
2. 北京林业大学 环境科学与工程学院, 北京 100083;
3. 水利部水土保持植物开发管理中心, 北京 100038
Author(s):
WANG Ju-wei1, ZOU Wei1, LIN Ji-quan1, ZHANG Zheng2, AN Bao-li3
1. Hainan Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Haikou 570206, China;
2. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;
3. Administration Center for Soil and Water Conservation Plant Development and Management, Ministry of Water Resources, Beijing 100038, China
关键词:
生态系统服务功能; AHP—模糊综合评价; TOPSIS法; 灰色关联投影法; 沙棘人工林
Keywords:
ecosystem services; AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation; TOPSIS; gray relation projection; seabuckthorn plantation
分类号:
X821;S793.6
摘要:
沙棘人工林是晋陕蒙砒砂岩区主要的退耕还林树种之一，在砒砂岩区生态环境治理中发挥着重要作用。通过理论分析、频度分析、专家咨询法构建了砒砂岩区沙棘人工林生态系统服务功能评价指标体系，应用博弈论综合赋权法将主、客观权重进行组合，得到综合权重。采用AHP—模糊综合评价、TOPSIS法、灰色关联投影法对砒砂岩区沙棘人工林生态系统服务功能进行了动态评价。结果表明：砒砂岩区沙棘人工林生态系统服务功能2010年、2007年、2004年、2001年综合评价结果分别为良好、一般、较差、较差，砒砂岩区沙棘人工林生态系统服务功能呈逐年改善的趋势，退耕还林营造沙棘人工林生态措施的实施对砒砂岩区生态环境的改善起到了积极的促进作用。
Abstract:
Seabuckthorn plantation is one of the main plant species for returning farmland to forestland in the soft rock area in Shanxi, Shaanxi and Inner Mongolia. It plays an important role in the eco-environmental governance in the soft rock area. Through theoretical analysis, frequency statistics, expert consulting the ecosystem service evaluation index system of seabuckthorn plantation was established. Subjective and objective weights were combined to obtain the comprehensive weight by the application of Game Theory. We used the method of AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution, Gray Relation Projection to evaluate the quality of seabuckthorn plantation ecosystem services in the soft rock area. The results showed that seabuckthorn plantation ecosystem services in 2010, 2007, 2004 and 2001 were good, general, relatively poor and relatively poor respectively. The quality trend of seabuckthorn plantation ecosystem services was improving year by year. The implementation of returning farmland to seabuckthorn plantation had played a positive role in promoting the improvement of the ecological environment in soft rock area.

参考文献/References:

[1] Daily G E. Nature’s Services:Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M].Washington D C:Island Press,1997.
[2] 欧阳志云,王如松,赵景柱.生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(5):635-640.
[3] 李小燕.区域生态系统服务价值量与环境压力分析:以渭南市为例[J].干旱区研究,2008,25(5):729-734.
[4] 张浩,赵智杰,谢金开.近20年来乌鲁木齐河下游地区生态系统服务价值的动态变化[J].干旱区研究,2011,28(2):341-348.
[5] Costanza R, Voinov A, Boumans R, et al. Integrated ecological economic modeling of the Patuxent River Watershed, Maryland[J]. Ecological Monographs,2002,72(2):203-231.
[6] Howarth R B, Farber S. Accounting for the value of ecosystem services[J]. Ecological Economics,2002,41(3):421-429.
[7] Turner R K, Paavola J, Cooper P, et al. Valuing nature:Lessons learned and future research directions[J]. Ecological Economies,2003,46(3):493-510.
[8] Millennium Ecosystems Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being Synthesis[M]. Washington D C:Island Press,2005.
[9] 赵景柱,肖寒,吴钢.生态系统物与价值量评价方法的比较分析[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(2):290-292.
[10] 赵军,杨凯.生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J].生态学报,2007,27(1):346-356.
[11] 李文华.生态系统服务功能价值评估的理论、方法与应用[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[12] 李文华,张彪,谢高地.中国生态系统服务研究的回顾与展望[J].自然资源学报,2009,24(1):1-10.
[13] 胡建忠.砒砂岩沟谷种植沙棘林防止土壤重力侵蚀的实践[J].中国水土保持,2011(5):36-39.
[14] 王愿昌,吴永红,寇权,等.砒砂岩分布范围界定与类型区划分[J].中国水土保持科学,2007,5(1):14-18.
[15] 胡建忠.砒砂岩区种植沙棘后景观格局变化预测[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(4):31-35.
[16] 李代琼,梁一民,侯喜禄,等.沙棘改善环境的生态功能及效益试验研究[J].国际沙棘研究与开发,2004,2(2):6-11.
[17] 李少宁.江西省暨大岗山森林生态系统服务功能研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2007.
[18] 苏永红,冯起,刘蔚,等.应用模糊综合评判方法评价石羊河流域水资源承载力[J].干旱区研究,2009,26(2):169-174.
[19] Liao H C. Using PCR-TOPSIS to optimise taguchi’s multi-response problem[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2003,22(9):649-655.
[20] Taniguchi E, Noritake M, Yamada T, et al. Optimal size and location planning of public logistics terminals[J].Transportation Research:Part E,1999,35(3):207-222.
[21] 吕锋,崔晓辉.多目标决策灰色关联投影法及其应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2002,22(1):103-107.
[22] 于相毅,尚金城,张研.模糊关联分析法及其应用[J].中国环境监测,2005,21(1):68-72.
[23] 钱家欢,殷宗泽.土工原理与计算[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,1996.
[24] 莫宏伟,任志远,王欣.植被生态系统防风固沙功能价值动态变化研究:以榆阳区为例[J].干旱区研究,2006,23(1):56-59.
[25] 曹全意.砒砂岩地区林草植被建设途径的研究[J].水土保持通报,1997,17(7):1-4.
[26] 王颖.基于TOPSIS法的多元质量特性优化方法研究[D].天津:天津大学,2007.

相似文献/References:

[1]吴启蒙,朱志玲,吴咏梅,等.宁夏水土保持的产业结构影响评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):116.
　WU Qi-meng,ZHU Zhi-ling,WU Yong-mei,et al.Impact Evaluation on Industrial Structure of Soil and Water Conservation in Ningxia Hui Automonous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):116.
[2]周林飞,许士国,孙勇.扎龙湿地生态系统服务功能及恢复的研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(04):167.
　ZHOU Lin-fei,XU Shi-guo,SUN Yong.Study on Ecosystem Services and Restoration of Zhalong Wetland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(05):167.
[3]张素珍,李晓粤,李贵宝.湿地生态系统服务功能及价值评估[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(06):125.
　ZHANG Su-zhen,LI Xiao-yue,Li Gui-bao.The Wetland Ecosystem Service Function and Value Estimation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(05):125.
[4]任燕,郑昭佩.东平湖生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(03):131.
　REN Yan,ZHENG Zhao-pei.Evaluation of the Ecosystem Services Value of Dongping Lake[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(05):131.
[5]陈志平,熊汉锋,黄世宽,等.梁子湖湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(02):231.
　CHEN Zhi-ping,XIONG Han-feng,HUANG Shi-kuan,et al.The Evaluation of the Ecosystem Services Value in Liangzi Lake Wetland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(05):231.
[6]冯朝阳,高吉喜,韩永伟,等.京西门头沟区典型生态系统服务功能及其价值评估[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(03):230.
　FENG Chao-yang,GAO Ji-xi,HAN Yong-wei,et al.Representative Ecosystem Services and Their Valuation of Mentougou District, Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(05):230.
[7]周忠学.城市化对生态系统服务功能的影响机制探讨与实证研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(05):32.
　ZHOU Zhong-xue.Conceptual Mechanism Model of Impact of Urbanization on Ecosystem Service and Case Study[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(05):32.
[8]姚卫浩,苏纯华,陈彬.湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(03):245.
　YAO Wei-hao,SU Chun-hua,CHEN Bin.Progress of Wetlands Ecosystem Service Evaluation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(05):245.
[9]曹新向,翟秋敏,郭志永.城市湿地生态系统服务功能及其保护[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(01):145.
　CAO Xin-xiang,Zhai Qiu-min,Guo Zhi-yong.Ecosystem Services of Urban Wetland and Its Conservation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(05):145.
[10]杨伟州,邱硕,付喜厅,等.河北省生态功能区划研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(04):269.
　YANG Weizhou,QIU Shuo,FU Xiting,et al.Research for the Ecological Function Regionalization of Hebei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):269.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2012-12-28;改回日期:2013-03-03。
基金项目:晋陕蒙砒砂岩区沙棘生态工程（水规划[1998]111号）
作者简介:王举位(1985-),男,海南澄迈人,硕士研究生,工程师,研究方向为环境影响评价。E-mail:wjw0836@163.com
通讯作者:邹伟(1965-),男,海南陵水人,副研究员,高级工程师,研究方向为环境影响评价。E-mail:zouwei899@163.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01