PENG Shun-lei,LIANG Ya-hong,CHEN Chang-dong,et al.Prediction of Soil Infiltration Capacity and Runoff under Different Restored Vegetation Types on the Eastern Side of Funiu Mountains[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(04):29-33.
伏牛山东麓不同植被恢复类型土壤入渗性能及产流预测
- Title:
- Prediction of Soil Infiltration Capacity and Runoff under Different Restored Vegetation Types on the Eastern Side of Funiu Mountains
- 分类号:
- S152.7+2
- 摘要:
- 为了研究不同植被恢复类型对土壤入渗与产流的影响，采用双环入渗法测定了伏牛山东麓六种植被恢复类型土壤水分入渗过程，通过对比稳渗率与不同重现期的暴雨强度，判断不同植被类型地表径流产生的可能性。结果表明：（1）不同植被类型土壤初渗率、稳渗率和前60 min入渗量均表现出栓皮栎次生林 > 栓皮栎人工林 > 刺槐人工林 > 侧柏人工林 > 灌丛 > 裸地的规律；（2）土壤入渗特征参数与土壤容重、总孔隙度、非毛管孔隙度、有机质含量、细根生物量和团聚体含量显著相关（p<0.05），其中土壤容重、总孔隙度是影响土壤入渗的主导因子；（3）栓皮栎次生林能抵御10 a一遇的暴雨，栓皮栎人工林能抵御1 a一遇的暴雨，而其它植被类型均不能低御1 a一遇的暴雨，易产生暴雨径流。说明封育天然次生林和运用乡土树种造林进行植被恢复，有利于提高土壤的入渗性能。
- Abstract:
- Aimed to test the effect of different restored vegetation types on soil infiltration capacity and runoff generation. Infiltration processes were measured with double-ring infiltration method in the six restored vegetation types on the eastern side of Funiu Mountains. The likelihood of runoff was inferred by comparing stable infiltration (Ks) at the top soil with prevailing storm intensities in the six restored vegetation types. The results indicated that: (1) the values of soil infiltration variables, including the initial infiltration, stable infiltration, and total amounts of infiltration before 60 minutes were in the sequences of Quercus variabilis secondary forest > Quercus variabilis plantation > Black Locust plantation > Platycladus orientalis plantation > Shrub > abandoned land; (2) soil bulk density, total porosity, non-capillary porosity, soil organic matter, fine root biomass, and water stable aggregate were significantly correlated with the variables of soil infiltration (p<0.05), soil bulk density and total porosity were the main factors affecting soil infiltration; (3) Quercus variabilis secondary forest could resist storm with 10 year recurrence, and Quercus variabilis plantation could overcome storm with 1 year recurrence. On the contrary, runoff was most likely to occur in the shrub land and abandoned land. It is suggested forest conversion and forest plantation with native tree species benefit for increasing soil infiltration capacity.
参考文献/References:
[1] 肖登攀,韩淑敏,杨艳敏,等.太行山低山丘陵区不同地表类型降雨入渗产流规律研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(5):35-39.
[2] 陈洪松,邵明安,张兴昌,等.野外模拟降雨条件下坡面降雨入渗、产流试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(2):5-8.
[3] Price K, Jackson C R, Parker A J. Variation of surficial soil hydraulic properties across land uses in the southern Blue Ridge Mountains, North Carolina, USA[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2010,383(3/4):256-268.
[4] Zimmermann B, Elsenbeer H. Spatial and temporal variability of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity in gradients of disturbance[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2008,361(1/2):78-95.
[5] 李玉山.黄土高原森林植被对陆地水循环影响的研究[J].自然资源学报,2001,16(5):427-432.
[6] 杨永辉,赵世伟,雷廷武,等.宁南黄土丘陵区不同植被下土壤入渗性能[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(5):1040-1045.
[7] 张治伟,朱章雄,王燕,等.岩溶坡地不同利用类型土壤入渗性能及其影响因素[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(6):71-76.
[8] 闫东锋,杨喜田.豫南山区典型林地土壤入渗特征及影响因素分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(6):43-50.
[9] 赵锦梅,张德罡,刘长仲.东祁连山土地利用方式对土壤持水能力和渗透性的影响[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(3):422-429.
[10] 刘洁,李贤伟,纪中华,等.元谋干热河谷三种植被恢复模式土壤贮水及入渗特性[J].生态学报,2011,31(8):2331-2340.
[11] Hassler S K, Zimmermann B, van Breugel M, et al. Recovery of saturated hydraulic conductivity under secondary succession on former pasture in the humid tropics[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2011,261(5):1634-1642.
[12] 杨三平,李志华.鲁山县荒山治理开发模式及成效[J].中国水土保持,2006(12):54-54.
[13] Ren L, Lai J. Assessing the size dependency of measured hydraulic conductivity using double-ring infiltrometers and numerical simulation[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,2007,71(6):1667-1675.
[14] Li Y Y, Shao M A. Change of soil physical properties under long-term natural vegetation restoration in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Journal of Arid Environments,2006,64(1):77-96.
[15] Silver W L, Thompson A W, McGroddy M E, et al. Fine root dynamics and trace gas fluxes in two lowland tropical forest soils[J]. Global Change Biology,2005,11(2):290-306.
[16] 邵明安,王全九,黄明斌.土壤物理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006:126-128.
[17] 李卓,吴普特,冯浩,等.容重对土壤水分入渗能力影响模拟试验[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(6):40-45.
[18] 彭亿,李裕元,李忠武,等.红壤坡地生态系统土壤入渗特征比较研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(6):205-209.
[19] 刘建立,王彦辉,程丽莉,等.六盘山北侧不同立地土壤的蓄水性能和渗透性研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(3):61-64.
[20] 喻明美,谢正生.广州市白云山五种森林类型的土壤渗透性研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(1):153-156.
相似文献/References:
[1]胡作龙,高 鹏,李双江,等.渭河径流输沙变化及其对降水和人类活动的响应[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(04):28.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.037]
Hu Zuolong,Gao Peng,Li Shuangjiang,et al.Changes of Runoff and Sediment Load and Its Response to Precipitation and Human Activities in the Weihe River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(04):28.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.037]
[2]孙保平,孙立达.西吉县黄家二岔小流域地表径流和土壤渗透性能的研究[J].水土保持研究,1990,(02):16.
Sun Baoping,Sun Lida.A Research For Soil Permeability and Surface Runoff in Huangjia-Ercha Small Watershed in Xiji County, Ningxia[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1990,(04):16.
[3]侯喜禄,梁一民,曹清玉.黄土丘陵沟壑区主要水保林类型及草地水保效益的研究[J].水土保持研究,1991,(02):96.
Hou Xilu,Liang Yimin,Cao Qingyu.A STUDY ON BENEFITS OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION BY MAIN WOODLAND AND GRASSLAND TYPES IN LOESS HILLY REGION[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(04):96.
[4]吴钦孝,刘向东,赵鸿雁,等.宜川县油松人工林集水区水文状况分析[J].水土保持研究,1991,(02):116.
Wu Qinxiao,Liu Xiangdong,Zhao Hongyan,et al.AN ANALYSIS ON HYDROSTATUS OF CATCHMENT IN ARTIFICIAL CHINESE PINE FOREST IN YICHUAN COUNTY[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(04):116.
[5]汪有科,李立,傅左,等.薪炭林水土保持效益的研究[J].水土保持研究,1992,(01):70.
Wang Yuke,Li Li,Fu Zuo,et al.A STUDY ON THE BENEFIT OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION FOR ENERGY FOREST[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1992,(04):70.
[6]石生新,蒋定生.几种水土保持措施对强化降水入渗和减沙的影响试验研究[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(01):82.
Shi Shengxin,Jiang Dingsheng.Impacts of Several Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Strengthening Rainfall infiltration and Reducing Sediment Yield[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(04):82.
[7]许彦,潘文斌.基于ArcView的SCS模型在流域径流计算中的应用[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(04):176.
XU Yan,PAN Wen-bin.SCS Model for Watershed Runoff Calculation in ArcView[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(04):176.
[8]陈奇伯,王克勤,刘芝芹,等.金沙江干热河谷封禁管护坡面的产流产沙特征[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(04):217.
CHEN Qi-bo,WANG Ke-qin,LIU Zhi-qin,et al.Characteristic of Runoff and Sediment Production on Slope Land of Enclosure for Recovering Vegetation in Dry-hot Valley of Jinsha River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(04):217.
[9]李华坦,赵玉娇,李国荣,等.寒旱环境黄土区植物护坡原位模拟降雨试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(06):304.
LI Hua-tan,ZHAO Yu-jiao,LI Guo-rong,et al.Experimental Research on Slope Protection with Vegetation under Situ Rainfall Simulation in Cold and Arid Environment of Loess Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(04):304.
[10]刘旭辉,余新晓,赵阳.北京山区典型小流域景观格局变化对径流的影响[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(05):39.
LIU Xu-hui,YU Xin-xiao,ZHAO Yang.Impact of Landscape Pattern on Runoff in Small Watershed of Beijing Mountainous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(04):39.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2013-01-12;改回日期:2013-03-24。
基金项目:国家林业公益性行业科研专项（201004044）；河南省教育厅科学技术研究重点项目（12B180023）
作者简介:彭舜磊(1974-),男,河南驻马店人,副教授,博士,主要研究方向:生态水文学。E-mail:pengshunlei@163.com
通讯作者:文祯中(1957-),男,河南南阳人,教授,博士,主要研究方向:生态学与动物学。E-mail:wzz168@sina.com.cn