[1]李鹏,李占斌,郑郁.不同土地利用方式对干热河谷地区土壤可蚀性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(04):16-19.
　LI Peng,LI Zhan-bin,ZHENG Yu.Influence of Land Utilization Types on Soil Erodiblity in Dry-hot Valley in Jinsha River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(04):16-19.
点击复制

不同土地利用方式对干热河谷地区土壤可蚀性的影响

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 18 期数: 2011年04期 页码: 16-19 栏目: 出版日期: 2011-08-20
Title:
Influence of Land Utilization Types on Soil Erodiblity in Dry-hot Valley in Jinsha River
作者:
李鹏1, 李占斌1,2, 郑郁1
1. 西安理工大学 西北水资源与环境生态教育部重点实验室, 西安 710048;
2. 西北农林科技大学 中国科学院 水利部 水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100
Author(s):
LI Peng1, LI Zhan-bin1,2, ZHENG Yu1
1. Key Laboratory of Northwest Water Resources and Environment Ecology, Ministry of Education, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China;
2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
关键词:
干热河谷地区; 土地利用方式; 土壤可蚀性
Keywords:
dry-hot valley; land use; soil erodibility
分类号:
S157;F301.24
摘要:
以四川宁南县金沙江下游的河谷地带为研究区域，选择相同海拔下7种主要的土地利用方式为研究对象，通过室内测试分析，并运用统计和相关分析等方法，研究不同土地利用方式下的土壤可蚀性变异特征。结果表明：在干热河谷区，天然植被水桐树林破坏改为其它土地利用方式后，土壤有机质、全氮、全磷和碱解氮含量显著降低，速效磷和容重没有显著变化，速效钾有一定程度升高，不同利用方式对其影响作用不同，但总体来说改造为合欢林和撂荒草地对土壤理化属性的影响相对较少。相对于天然水桐林，其它土地利用方式土壤可蚀性明显增加，其大小依次为：花椒地<撂荒地<草地<新银合欢地<桑地<甘蔗地。相比较而言，无论是天然林地还是人工经济林地，其土壤可蚀性都处于较低的水平；受人为活动影响强烈的农业用地，其土壤可蚀性水平一般较高。说明该地区农业耕作措施可导致土壤对侵蚀营力分离和搬运作用敏感性增强，抗蚀性能较低，更加容易遭受侵蚀，因此在金沙江干热河谷区，从水土保持角度出发，应该尽可能地减少人为活动对土地的干扰，提高土地抵抗侵蚀的能力。
Abstract:
Based on field sampling and indoor determination, together with statistical analysis, soil erodobility of 7 land utilization types in dry-hot valley in Jinsha River was studied. Results indicated that in dry-hot valley, after the forest land of Camptotheca acuminate was changed to other land types, content of soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP) and available nitrogen (AN) in soil on the other lands decreased obviously, available phosphorus (AP) and soil bulk density changed little, while available potassium increased a little. Generally, the impact on soil physic-chemical properties was relatively small after transforming to leucocephala land and abandoned grassland. Compared to the forest land of Camptotheca acuminate, soil erodibility on the other land types increased obviously, which was followed in the order:pepper land Leucaenaland

参考文献/References:

[1] 杨万勤, 宫阿都, 何毓蓉, 等.金沙江干热河谷生态环境退化成因与治理途径探讨:以元谋段为例[J].世界科技研究与发展, 2001(4):37-39.
[2] Cui Peng, Wei Fangqiang, Li Yong.Sediment transported by debris flow to the lower Jinsha river[J].International Journal of Sediment Research, 1999, 14(4):67-71.
[3] 拜得珍, 潘志贤, 纪中华, 等.浅议金沙江干热河谷生态环境问题及治理措施[J].国土与自然资源研究, 2006, (4):50-51.
[4] Wischmeier W H, Mannering J V.Relation of soil properties to its erodibility[J].Soil Society of American Proceeding, 1969, 33(1):131-137.
[5] 宋阳, 刘连友, 严平, 等.土壤可蚀性研究评述[J].干旱区地理, 2006, 29(1):124-131.
[6] 陈明华, 周伏建, 黄炎和, 等.土壤可蚀性因子的研究[J].水土保持学报, 1995, 9(1):19-24.
[7] 海春兴, 赵烨, 陈志凡, 等.河北省坝上不同土地利用方式土壤可蚀性研究:以河北省丰宁县大滩乡三道河为例[J].中国生态农业学报, 2005, 13(1):146-147.
[8] 徐燕, 龙健.贵州喀斯特山区土壤物理性质对土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2005, 19(1):157-159.
[9] Zhanga K L, Shub A P, Xu X L, et al.Soil erodibility and its estimation for ag r icultural soils in China[J].Journal of Arid Environments, 2008, 72:1002-1011.
[10] 郑海金, 杨洁, 喻荣岗, 等.红壤坡地土壤可蚀性K值研究[J].土壤通报, 2010, 42(2):425-428.
[11] 张科利, 彭文英, 杨红.中国土壤可蚀性值及其估算[J].土壤学报, 2007, 44(1):7-13.
[12] 唐国勇, 李昆, 孙永玉, 等.干热河谷不同利用方式下土壤活性有机碳含量及其分配特征[J].环境科学, 2010, 31(5):1365-1371.
[13] 张兵, 蒋光毅, 陈正, 等.紫色丘陵区土壤可蚀性因子研究[J].土壤学报, 2010, 47(2):354-358.
[14] 何永彬, 卢培泽, 朱彤.横断山-云南高原干热河谷形成原因研究[J].资源科学, 2000, 22(5):69-72.
[15] 唐国勇, 李昆, 张昌顺.施肥对干热河谷生态恢复区林木生长及土壤碳氮含量的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2009, 23(4):185-189.
[16] 方海东, 纪中华, 杨艳, 等.金沙江干热河谷新银合欢人工林枯落物层持水特性研究[J].水土保持学报, 2005, 19(5):52-55.
[17] 张春华, 李昆, 崔永忠.金沙江干热河谷上段退耕还林区造林树种选择[J].西南林学院学报, 2005, 25(1):20-23.
[18] 穆军, 李占斌, 李鹏.干热河谷水电站弃渣场植被恢复技术研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报, 2010, 18(2):245-252.
[19] 杨振寅.元谋干热河谷植被景观动态与植被恢复研究[D].北京:中国林科院, 2007.
[20] 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社, 1999:13-169.
[21] Sharply A N, Williams J R.EPIC-Erosion Productivity Impact Calculator:1 Model Documentation[C]//US Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin No.1768.US Department of Agriculture, Temple, TX.1990.
[22] Zhu Bingbing, Li Zhanbin, Li Peng.Soil erodibility, microbial biomass, and physical-chemical property changes during long-term natural vegetation restoration:a case study in the Loess Plateau, China[J].Eco-logical Research, 2010, 25:531-541.

相似文献/References:

[1]沈艳,傅瓦利,蓝家程,等.岩溶山地不同土地利用方式土壤颗粒有机碳和矿物结合态有机碳的分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):1.
　SHEN Yan,FU Wa-li,LAN Jia-cheng,et al.Distribution Characteristics of Soil Particulate Organic Carbon and Mineral-associated Organic Carbon of Different Land Use in Karst Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):1.
[2]李品荣,孟广涛,李国昌.不同土地利用方式下土壤地力变化和水土流失状况研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(03):95.
　LI Pin-rong,MENG Guang-tao,LI Guo-chang.Study on Land Capacity Change and Soil Erosion on Different Landuse Types[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(04):95.
[3]阳利永,吴献花,赵斌,等.滇池柴河流域不同土地利用方式土壤养分剖面分异[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):95.
　YANG Li-yong,WU Xian-hua,ZHAO Bin,et al.Effects of Different Land Uses on Profile Variability of Soil Nutrients in Chaihe Basin of Dianchi Lake[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):95.
[4]夏江宝,杨吉华,李红云.不同外界条件下土壤入渗性能的研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(02):115.
　XIA Jiang-bao,YANG Ji-hua,LI Hong-yun.The Research of Soil Infiltration in Different Outside Factors[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(04):115.
[5]刘梦云,安韶山,常庆瑞,等.宁南山区不同土地利用方式土壤质量评价[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(03):35.
　LIU Meng-yun,AN Shao-shan,CHANG Qing-rui,et al.Soil Quality Evaluation Under Different Land Use in Southern Ningxia Mountain Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(04):35.
[6]刘梦云,安韶山,常庆瑞.宁南山区不同土地利用方式土壤有机碳特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(03):47.
　LIU Meng-yun,AN Shao-shan,CHANG Qing-rui.Features of Soil Organic Carbon Under Different Land Use in Mountain Area of Southern Ningxia[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(04):47.
[7]李裕元.坡地磷素迁移研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(05):1.
　LI Yu-yuan.Review of Study on Phosphorus Transport on Slope Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(04):1.
[8]温明霞,邵明安,周蓓蓓.马家塔露天煤矿复垦区不同土地利用类型的土壤水分入渗过程研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(04):170.
　WEN Ming-xia,SHAO Ming-an,ZHOU Bei-bei.Study on Soil Water Infiltration Processes in Different Land Use Types in Majiata Reclaimed Regions[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(04):170.
[9]满建利,姜成,彭红霞,等.降雨因素和不同土地利用方式对水土流失的影响[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(01):31.
　MAN Jian-li,JIANG Cheng,PENG Hong-xia,et al.Effect of Rainfall Factors and Different Ways of Using Land on Soil Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(04):31.
[10]蓝家程,傅瓦利,段正峰,等.岩溶山区土壤溶解性有机碳对土地利用方式的响应及其与土壤养分的关系[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(05):76.
　LAN Jia-cheng,FU Wa-li,DUAN Zheng-feng,et al.Response of Soil Dissolved Organic Carbon to the Land Use and the Relations With Soil Nutrients in Karst Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(04):76.
[11]郑郁,李占斌,李鹏,等.金沙江干热河谷区不同土地利用方式下的土壤特性分异特征[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(01):174.
　ZHENG Yu,LI Zhan-bin,LI Peng,et al.Features of Land Use Type on Soil Properties in the Dry-hot Valley of Jinsha River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(04):174.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2011-1-10;改回日期:2011-3-6。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目（41071182，40971161）；陕西省自然科学基金重点项目（2009JZ008，SJ08-ZD02）
作者简介:李鹏（1974- ），男，副教授，主要从事水土资源与环境方面研究。E-mail：lipeng74@163.com
通讯作者:李占斌（1962- ），男，教授，博导，从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail：zbli@xaut.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01