[1]安韶山,黄懿梅,刘梦云,等.宁南宽谷丘陵区植被恢复中土壤酶活性的响应及其评价[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(03):31-34.
　AN Shao-shan,HUANG Yi-mei,LIU Meng-yun,et al.The Responses and Evaluation of Soil Enzymatic Activities to Plant Rehabilitation in Ningxia Loess Hilly-gully Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(03):31-34.
点击复制

宁南宽谷丘陵区植被恢复中土壤酶活性的响应及其评价

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 12 期数: 2005年03期 页码: 31-34 栏目: 出版日期: 1900-01-01
Title:
The Responses and Evaluation of Soil Enzymatic Activities to Plant Rehabilitation in Ningxia Loess Hilly-gully Region
作者:
安韶山1,2, 黄懿梅2, 刘梦云2, 李壁成1
1. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所;
2. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西杨陵 712100
Author(s):
AN Shao-shan1,2, HUANG Yi-mei2, LIU Meng-yun2, LI Bi-cheng1
1. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, CAS & MWR;
2. Northwest Sci-tech University of Agriculture and Forestry, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
关键词:
土壤酶活性; 植被恢复; 宁南宽谷丘陵区; 主成分分析
Keywords:
soil enzymatic activity; plant rehabilitation; loess hilly-gully area of Ningxia; principle component analysis
分类号:
S154.2
摘要:
就宁南宽谷丘陵区不同植被恢复措施、自然恢复不同演替阶段条件下土壤脲酶、蔗糖酶、中性磷酸酶和过氧化氢酶活性的变化特征及其在土壤质量评价指标体系的作用进行了研究。结果表明天然草地和灌木林地土壤脲酶、蔗糖酶、碱性磷酸酶活性较高，农地和果园土壤酶活性较低，而且变异性较大。土壤过氧化氢酶在不同的土地利用类型之间变化不大，在各用地类型内部及各土样剖面层次上差异也不明显。封禁条件下各种酶活性均表现为表层0～20cm大于表下层20～40cm，表层0～20cm脲酶、蔗糖酶、中性磷酸酶活性表现长芒草+大针茅>铁杆蒿>长芒草>百里香，过氧化氢酶活性大小为铁杆蒿>长芒草+大针茅>长芒草>百里香。长芒草群落两种土地利用方式下，脲酶活性为开垦地>封禁地，中性磷酸酶则表现为封禁地>开垦地，蔗糖酶与过氧化氢酶差别不大。铁杆蒿群落放牧地的土壤脲酶、蔗糖酶和中性磷酸酶含量均高于封禁和开垦的同土层土壤，封禁的脲酶和蔗糖酶次之，开垦地的脲酶和蔗糖酶最小，开垦地的中性磷酸酶高于封禁地。
Abstract:
Soil quality restoration and soil management is the key factor for vegetation construction and eco-environment sustainable development in Loess Plateau. The activity of soil urease, sucrase, neutral phosphatase and catalase in different soil layers, vegetation community and land use on loess hilly-gully area of Ningxia were studied. The result shows that:Natural meadow and bush forest land had the higher enzyme activity than artificial meadow, orchard and farmland. For bush forest land, it was higher enzyme activity in longer planted year than shorter, but orchard has no remarkable differences. Under the enclosure, four different enzymatic activity of surface layer soil (0~20 cm) is greater than sub-layer (20~40 cm). The activities of soil urease, sucrase, neutral phosphatase are Stipa gradiss. +Stipa bungana Trin Community>Artemisia sacrorum Ledeb community>Stipa bungana Trin Community>Thymus mongolicus Ronn community in the surface layer (0~20 cm). The activity of soil catalaseis Artemisia sacrorum Ledeb community Stipa gradiss. +Stipa bungana Trin Community>Stipa bungana Trin Community>Thymus mongolicus Ronn community. Under the two different land use of Stipa bungana community, the activity of soil urease shows that the farmland is greater than enclosure land, butthe activity of soil sucrase is enclosure land greater than farmland. There is no obvious erosion and enzymatic activity difference between farmland and enclosure land in the study area.

参考文献/References:

[1] 周礼恺.土壤酶学[M].北京:科学出版社,1987.
[2] Abdul K S,Katayama A,Kimura.Activities of some soil enzymes in different land use system after deforestation in hilly areas of west Lampung,South Sumatra,Indonesia[J].Soil Sci.,2000,80:91-97.
[3] Badiane NNY,Chotte JL,Pate E,et al.Use of soil enzyme activities to monitor soil quality in natural and improved fallows in semi-arid tropical regions[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2001,18(3):229-238.
[4] Acosta-Martinez V,Zobeck TM,Gill TE,et al.Enzyme activities and microbial community structure in semiarid agricultural soils[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2003,3:216-227.
[5] 张成娥,陈小利.林地砍伐开垦对土壤酶活性及养分的影响[J].生态学报,1998,17(6):18-21.
[6] 侯扶江,南志标,肖金玉.重牧退化草地的植被、土壤及其耦合特征[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(8):915-922.
[7] 张成娥,刘国彬,陈小利.坡地不同利用方式下土壤微生物和酶活性以及生物量特征[J].土壤通报,1999,30(3):101-103.
[8] 邹厚远,关秀琦,张信.云雾山草原自然保护区的管理途径探讨[J].草业科学,1997,14(1):3-4.
[9] 张映瑞,古晓林,王富裕.云雾山草原自然保护区的社会化技术服务体系建设[J].中国生物保护区,1998,1:20-22.
[10] 李阜棣,喻子牛,何绍江.农业微生物学实验设计[J].北京:中国农业出版社,1996.136-137.
[11] 关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[J].北京:中国农业出版社,1986.274-277,308-313.
[12] 中科院南京土壤研究所微生物室.土壤微生物学研究法[M].北京:科学出版社,1985.263-264.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨秉珣,刘泉,王彬.嘉陵江流域不同类型植被多样性与土壤养分和酶活性的关系[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(06):45.
　YANG Bingxun,LIU Quan,WANG Bin.Relationships Between Soil Nutrients, Soil Enzyme Activity and Plant Diversity of Different Types of in Jialing River Basin, Sichuan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(03):45.
[2]何学敏,吕光辉,秦璐,等.艾比湖地区典型乔灌群落水盐胁迫下土壤重金属对酶活性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):94.
　HE Xue-min,LV Guang-hui,QIN Lu,et al.Effects of Heavy Metals on Soil Enzyme Activities in Typical Arbor-shrub Communities under the Different Water and Salt Conditions in Ebinur Lake Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):94.
[3]李晶,高照良,张小娟,等.宝牛高速公路路域植被恢复效果调查分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):100.
　LI Jing,GAO Zhao-liang,ZHANG Xiao-juan,et al.Investigation and Assessment on Vegetation Restoration along the Baoniu Highway[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):100.
[4]李凤霞,王学琴,郭永忠,等.不同改良措施对银川平原盐碱地土壤性质及酶活性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):13.
　LI Feng-xia,WANG Xue-qin,GUO Yong-zhong,et al.Effect of Soil Properties and Soil Enzyme Activity in Different Improvement Measures of Saline-alkali Soil in Yinchuan Plain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):13.
[5]查轩,唐克丽,白红英.植被恢复对土壤抗侵蚀特性影响的研究[J].水土保持研究,1993,(01):37.
　Zha Xuan,Tang Keli,Bai Hongying.The Effect of Vegetation Restoration on Properties of Soil Resistance in Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1993,(03):37.
[6]郑粉莉,张科利,唐克丽,等.植被破坏与恢复对坡面浅沟侵蚀影响的研究[J].水土保持研究,1993,(01):54.
　Zheng Fenli,Zhang Keli,Tang Keli,et al.Impact of Vegetation Destruction and Restoration on Shallow Gully Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1993,(03):54.
[7]郭晓敏,牛德奎,刘苑秋,等.江西省红壤侵蚀劣地植被恢复技术及综合治理效果研究[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(02):108.
　Guo Xiaomin,Niu Dekui,Liu Yuanqiu,et al.Restoring Technique of Vegetation on Eroded Red Soil in Jiangxi and Benefits From Its Comprehensive Harnessing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(03):108.
[8]曹正梅,时东倩,万利军,等.播期及覆膜处理对不同玉米杂交种养分吸收及土壤养分供应影响的研究[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(03):40.
　CAO Zheng-mei,SHI Dong-qian,Wan Li-jun,et al.Study on the Influence of Sowing Dates and Plastic Sheeting on Maize Hybrids Nutrient Uptake and Soil Nutrient Supply[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(03):40.
[9]王改玲,白中科.安太堡露天煤矿排土场植被恢复的主要限制因子及对策[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(01):38.
　WANG Gai-ling,BAI Zhong-ke.Main Limiting Factors for Re-vegetation and Measures of Dumping Site in Antaibao Opencast Mine[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(03):38.
[10]徐福利,梁银丽,张成娥,等.日光温室土壤生物学特性与施肥的关系[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(01):20.
　XU Fu-li,LIANG Yin-li,ZHANG Cheng-e,et al.Relationship Between Soil Microbial Biomass and Soil Enzyme Activities and Fertilization in Sunlight Greenhouse[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(03):20.
[11]李晋川,王翔,岳建英,等.安太堡露天矿植被恢复过程中土壤生态肥力评价[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(01):66.
　LI Jinchuan,WANG Xiang,YUE Jianying,et al.Evaluation on Soil Ecologic Fertility during Vegetation Succession in Antaibao Open Pit[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(03):66.
[12]钱洲,俞元春,俞小鹏,等.毛乌素沙地飞播造林植被恢复过程土壤酶活性的变化[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(06):95.
　QIAN Zhou,YU Yuan-chun,YU Xiao-peng,et al.Changes of Soil Enzyme Activities in Mu Us Sandy Land with Aerial Seeding Afforestation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(03):95.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2004-12-20;改回日期:。
基金项目:国家“十五”重大科技攻关课题（2001BA606A-04）；国家自然科学基金（40461006）；西北农林科技大学科研专项基金（04ZX011）
作者简介:安韶山（1972- ），男，宁夏人，博士，助研，从事土壤学与流域生态与管理研究工作。

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01