PDF Download

[1]WANG Tao,ZHOU Qigang,MAO Yongfa,et al.Study on Ecological Compensation Zoning and Measurement in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area Based on Carbon Revenue and Expenditure[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(04):394-403.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.017.]

Copy

Study on Ecological Compensation Zoning and Measurement in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area Based on Carbon Revenue and Expenditure

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 30 Number of periods: 2023 04 Page number: 394-403 Column: Public date: 2023-06-10

Title:: Study on Ecological Compensation Zoning and Measurement in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area Based on Carbon Revenue and Expenditure

Author(s):: WANG Tao^1,3, ZHOU Qigang^2,3, MAO Yongfa^1,3, WU Longjiang^1,3, LUO Hongran^1,3, XIANG Yufeng⁴; (1.College of Environment and Resources, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China; 2.College of Tourism and Land Resources, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China; 3.Chongqing Key Laboratory of Spatial Data Mining and Big Data Integration for Ecology and Environment, Chongqing 401320, China; 4.Shizhu Tujia Autonomous County Precision Survey Corporation, Chongqing 409100, China)

Keywords:: ecological compensation; carbon revenue and expenditure; compensation zoning; compensation measurement; Three Gorges Reservoir Area

CLC:: X321

DOI:: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.017.

Abstract:: [Objective] The aims of this study are to reveal the dynamic changes of carbon revenue and expenditure in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, delineate the ecological compensation zones of carbon revenue and expenditure, enrich the quantitative measurement basis of ecological compensation, improve the ecological compensation standard, and then provide theoretical reference for the relevant departments in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area to formulate ecological compensation policies. [Methods] This study takes 26 districts and counties in the Three Gorges Reservoir area as the research samples, and uses the standard dominant comparative advantage index method, K-means cluster analysis and spatial overlay analysis to divide ecological payment areas and compensation areas based on the differences in carbon revenue and expenditure accounting in the Three Gorges Reservoir area and the geographical location of the reservoir area, and to measure the ecological compensation amount in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. [Results](1)The overall results of carbon revenue and expenditure in the Three Gorges Reservoir area from 2010 to 2017 were all positive, showing a ‘√' type fluctuating upward trend of first decreasing and then increasing.(2)The ecological compensation zoning of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area was reconstructed into eight types, divided into four general compensation-receiving zones, 11 key compensation-receiving zones, 10 general payment zones and one key payment zone.(3)The total amount of ecological compensation in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area in 2010, 2012, 2014 and 2017 was RMB 2.026 billion, RMB 1.674 billion, RMB 2.117 billion and RMB 2.520 billion, respectively, showing an overall upward trend, with ecological compensation being dominated by compensation within the area, with compensation within the area accounting for over 80%. [Conclusion] From 2010 to 2017, the carbon revenue and expenditure in the Three Gorges Reservoir area were positive and showed an upward trend. The study takes carbon revenue and expenditure as the basis, combines all-round and multi-faceted factors to construct an ecological compensation system, realizes ecological compensation zoning, and provides a quantitative basis for horizontal ecological compensation in each district and county of the study area, which is of great significance for promoting coordinated and sustainable regional development.

References:: [1] 贾卓,陈兴鹏,善孝玺.草地生态系统生态补偿标准和优先度研究:以甘肃省玛曲县为例[J].资源科学,2012,34(10):1951-1958.
[2] 郑苗壮,刘岩,彭本荣,等.海洋生态补偿的理论及内涵解析[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(11):1911-1915.
[3] 刘菊,傅斌,张成虎,等.基于InVEST模型的岷江上游生态系统水源涵养量与价值评估[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(3):577-585.
[4] 赖敏,陈凤桂.基于机会成本法的海洋保护区生态保护补偿标准[J].生态学报,2020,40(6):1901-1909.
[5] 宋蕾,李峰.矿山修复治理保证金的标准核算模型[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(1):78-83.
[6] 王怀毅,李忠魁,俞燕琴.中国生态补偿:理论与研究述评[J].生态经济,2022,38(3):164-170.
[7] 朱媛媛,文一惠,谢婧,等.京津冀跨区域生态补偿机制探讨[J].环境保护,2021,49(15):21-26.
[8] 顾丹丹,彭鹏,赵椿溪,等.纳入健康损失的生态补偿额度测算:基于省域尺度[J].经济地理,2021,41(9):193-203.
[9] 张宜红.集中连片特困地区农户对生态补偿扶贫的满意度及其影响因素研究:基于罗霄山片区3县的调研[J].生态经济,2021,37(12):128-134,169.
[10] 杨欣,尚光引,李研,等.农户农田生态补偿方式选择偏好及其影响因素研究:基于农户分化视角的实证[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(10):131-137.
[11] 谢慧明,毛狄,沈满洪.流域上游居民接受生态补偿意愿及其偏好研究:以新安江流域为例[J].生态学报,2022,42(16):6633-6643.
[12] 李国志,张景然.矿产资源开发生态补偿文献综述及实践进展[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(2):525-540.
[13] 蔡志坚,华国栋.对我国发展森林碳补偿贸易市场的相关问题探讨[J].林业经济问题,2005,25(2):68-71,76.
[14] 戴洁,黄蕾,胡静,等.基于区域一体化背景下的长三角环境经济政策优化研究[J].中国环境管理,2019,11(3):77-81.
[15] 赵荣钦,刘英,丁明磊,等.区域二元碳收支的理论方法研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2016,35(5):554-568.
[16] 余光辉,耿军军,周佩纯,等.基于碳平衡的区域生态补偿量化研究:以长株潭绿心昭山示范区为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2012,21(4):454-458.
[17] 费芩芳.旅游者碳补偿支付意愿及碳补偿模式研究:以杭州西湖风景区为例[J].江苏商论,2012(12):89-91.
[18] 周嘉,王钰萱,刘学荣,等.基于土地利用变化的中国省域碳排放时空差异及碳补偿研究[J].地理科学,2019,39(12):1955-1961.
[19] 曹俊文,陶强强.长江经济带农业碳补偿修正测算及分析[J].农业资源与环境学报,2021,38(4):693-698.
[20] 陈儒,邓悦,姜志德.基于修正碳计量的区域农业碳补偿时空格局[J].经济地理,2018,38(6):168-177.
[21] 夏四友,杨宇.基于主体功能区的京津冀城市群碳收支时空分异与碳补偿分区[J].地理学报,2022,77(3):679-696.
[22] 赵荣钦,张帅,黄贤金,等.中原经济区县域碳收支空间分异及碳平衡分区[J].地理学报,2014,69(10):1425-1437.
[23] 张巍.陕西省重点生态功能区碳汇/碳源核算与生态补偿研究[J].生态经济,2018,34(10):191-194.
[24] 沈田华.三峡水库重庆库区生态公益林补偿机制研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2013.
[25] 陈儒,姜志德.中国省域低碳农业横向空间生态补偿研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(4):87-97.
[26] 万伦来,林春鑫,陈艺.基于相对碳赤字的中国省际碳补偿时空格局研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(12):2572-2583.
[27] 茹凯丽.基于土地利用的福建省碳排放与县域碳补偿研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2020.
[28] 孟浩斌,周启刚,李明慧,等.三峡库区生态系统服务时空变化及权衡与协同关系研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2021,37(5):566-575.
[29] 黄磊,吴传清,文传浩.三峡库区环境:经济—社会复合生态系统耦合协调发展研究[J].西部论坛,2017,27(4):83-92.
[30] 王刚,张华兵,薛菲,等.成都市县域土地利用碳收支与经济发展关系研究[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(7):1170-1182.
[31] 高奇,师学义,王子凌,等.深圳市碳收支与土地利用变化的协整分析[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(6):277-283.
[32] 杨俊闯,赵超. k-means聚类算法研究综述[J].计算机工程与应用,2019,55(23):7-14,63.
[33] Yu R, Cai J C, Leung P S. The normalized revealed comparative advantage index[J]. The Annals of Regional Science, 2009,43(1):267-282.
[34] Balassa B. Trade liberalization and revealed comparative advantage[J]. Manchester School, 1965,33(2):99-123.
[35] Zhai T, Wang J, Fang Y, et al. Integrating ecosystem services supply, demand and flow in ecological compensation: a case study of carbon sequestration services[J]. Sustainability, 2021,13(4)1-19.
[36] 周健,官冬杰,周李磊.基于生态足迹的三峡库区重庆段后续发展生态补偿标准量化研究[J].环境科学学报,2018,38(11):4539-4553.
[37] 丁佳佳,蔡庆,丁磊,等.基于生态价值核算的重庆市区域生态补偿策略研究[J].环境生态学,2022,4(2/3):23-30.
[38] 官冬杰,龚巧灵,刘慧敏,等.重庆三峡库区生态补偿标准差别化模型构建及应用研究[J].环境科学学报,2016,36(11):4218-4227.
[39] 孙盼盼,尹珂.基于农户意愿的三峡库区消落带弃耕经济补贴标准估算及影响因素分析[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(29):115-119.
[40] 赵旭,池辰,何伟军.基于选择试验法的三峡屏障区居民生态补偿支付意愿研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(1):101-112.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2023-06-10