PDF Download

[1]LU Jinxin,GAO Fei,ZHOU Ronglei,et al.Relationship Between Herbaceous Communities and Soil Nutrients Under Different Vegetation Types[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):310-317,326.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.032]

Copy

Relationship Between Herbaceous Communities and Soil Nutrients Under Different Vegetation Types

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 30 Number of periods: 2023 03 Page number: 310-317,326 Column: Public date: 2023-04-10

Title:: Relationship Between Herbaceous Communities and Soil Nutrients Under Different Vegetation Types

Author(s):: LU Jinxin^1,2, GAO Fei¹, ZHOU Ronglei², LIU Yangyang², WEN Zhongming²; (1.Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, CAS & MWR, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China; 2.College of Grassland and Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China)

Keywords:: vegetation restoration; community diversity; Xindian watershed; soil nutrients; biomass

CLC:: Q948.113

DOI:: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.032

Abstract:: [Objective]In the context of large-scale revegetation of the Loess Plateau, it is essential for the sustainability of the revegetation to reveal the synergistic development and interrelationship between the physical and chemical properties of the adjacent herbaceous communities and the soil in the cultivated layer. [Methods] Herbaceous communities in Xindian watershed of Suide in northern Shaanxi were examined under different types of plant restoration. Soil samples were collected by establishing field plots, measuring community cover, species information, and other indicators. Herbaceous community characteristics, soil factors, and their response relationships under various vegetation types were examined through indoor experiments and statistical analysis. [Results](1)The Margalef richness index, Simpson dominance index, Shannon-Wiener diversity index, and Pielou evenness index of the herbaceous layer under various vegetation restoration types in the northern Shaanxi sub-basin differed significantly, with wasteland and scrubland>mixed tree and shrub forest>planted grassland and tree forest(p<0.05).(2)Soil parameters had significant associations with herbaceous community biomass, community coverage, and leaf functional characteristics(p<0.05), and grassland samples were more responsive to different vegetation types on southern slopes than on northern slopes.(3)The RDA ranking analysis revealed that soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, total phosphorus content, soil bulk, and maximum soil water holding capacity were the most influential factors in herbaceous community growth and development. [Conclusion] The ecological stability and soil and water conservation functions of grassland in scrubland, mixed tree and irrigation forest, and wasteland were superior to those of other methods of restoring vegetation.

References:: [1] Fu B, Chen L, Ma K, et al. The relationships between land use and soil conditions in the hilly area of the loess plateau in northern Shaanxi, China[J]. Catena, 2000,39(1):69-78.
[2] Wen X. Temporal and spatial relationships between soil erosion and ecological restoration in semi-arid regions:a case study in northern Shaanxi, China[J]. Giscience & Remote Sensing, 2020,57(2):1-19.
[3] Wang T. Impacts of the grain for green project on soil erosion:A case study in the Wuding river and Luohe river basins in the Shaanxi Province of China[J]. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2018,16(4):4165-4181.
[4] 王雅舒,李小雁,石芳忠,等.退耕还林还草工程加剧黄土高原退耕区蒸散发[J].科学通报,2019,64(5):588-599.
[5] 叶柳欣,库伟鹏,刘军,等.封育年限对毛竹林群落结构和林下植物多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2020,40(3):921-930.
[6] 余杭,罗清虎,李松阳,等.灾害干扰受损森林土壤的碳、氮、磷初期恢复特征与变异性[J].山地学报,2020,38(4):532-541.
[7] 雷婉宁,温仲明.基于TM遥感影像的陕北黄土区结构化植被因子指数提取[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(11):2736-2742.
[8] 汪有科,吴钦孝,韩冰,等.森林植被水土保持功能评价[J].水土保持研究,1994,0(3):24-30.
[9] 王晗生,刘国彬,王青宁.防蚀有效植被的结构特征探讨[J].中国生态农业学报,2001,9(2):54-56.
[10] 焦菊英,王万中,李靖.黄土高原林草水土保持有效盖度分析[J].植物生态学报,2000,24(5):608-612.
[11] 施晶晶,赵鸣飞,王宇航,等.黄土高原腹地人工林下草本层群落构建机制[J].植物生态学报,2019,43(9):834-842.
[12] Jia X, Shao M, Wei X. Richness and composition of herbaceous species in restored shrubland and grassland ecosystems in the northern Loess Plateau of China[J]. Biodiversity & Conservation, 2011,20(14):3435-3452.
[13] 赵满兴,余光美,白二磊,等.陕北黄土高原植被恢复对土壤理化性状的影响[J].中国农学通报,2020,36(25):86-94.
[14] 郝志远,李素清.阳泉矿区煤矸石山复垦地不同植被下草本植物群落生态关系[J].应用与环境生物学报,2018,24(5):1158-1164.
[15] 郭茹茹,杨磊,李宗善,等.半干旱黄土高原苜蓿草地撂荒过程土壤水分变化特征[J].生态学报,2020,40(23):1-9.
[16] 岩晓莹,马理辉,刘铮,等.降水增加对黄土高原深层土壤水分的影响[J].土壤通报,2020,51(3):614-620.
[17] 王伟伟,杨海龙,贺康宁,等.青海高寒区不同人工林配置下草本群落生态位研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(3):156-160,165.
[18] 靳茗茗,徐增让,成升魁.藏北高寒草地植被和土壤对不同放牧强度的响应[J].生态学报,2020,40(23):1-10.
[19] 张永旺,王俊,屈亚潭,等.黄土高原植被恢复过程中土壤水分有效性评价[J].灌溉排水学报,2020,39(6):79-85.
[20] 周萍,刘国彬,侯喜禄.黄土丘陵区不同坡向及坡位草本群落生物量及多样性研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2009,7(1):67-73.
[21] 张鑫,谷会岩,刘强.植被自然恢复对表层土壤磷有效性的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2020,48(7):75-80.
[22] 丁威,王玉冰,向官海.小叶锦鸡儿灌丛化对典型草原群落结构与生态系统功能的影响[J].植物生态学报,2020,44(1):33-43.
[23] 郑江坤,宫渊波,刘金鑫.岷江上游山地牧道对林下草本群落分布特征的影响[J].草业学报,2015,24(2):1-10.
[24] Zhang Q, Jia X, Zhao C, et al. Vegetation with artificial plants improves topsoil hydrological properties but intensifies deep-soil drying in northern Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2018,10(3):335-346.
[25] 李松阳,余杭,罗清虎,等.灾害干扰受损区自然恢复初期土壤物理性质的变化特征[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(5):162-168.
[26] 王博,段玉玺,王伟峰,等.人工固沙区植被演替过程中土壤水分时空分异特征[J].干旱区研究,2020,37(4):881-889.
[27] 王晶,赵文武,刘月,等.植物功能性状对土壤保持的影响研究述评[J].生态学报,2019,39(9):3355-3364.
[28] 万芳,蒙仲举,党晓宏,等.封育措施下荒漠草原针茅植物—土壤C, N, P化学计量特征[J].草业学报,2020,29(9):49-55.
[29] 汝海丽,张海东,焦峰,等.黄土丘陵区微地形条件下草本群落特征与土壤水分及养分关系分析[J].草地学报,2016,24(4):776-782.
[30] 郑颖,温仲明,宋光,等.延河流域森林草原区不同植物功能型适应策略及功能型物种数量随退耕年限的变化[J].生态学报,2015,35(17):5834-5845.
[31] 刘敏,张潇月,李晓丽,等.黄土高原林下草地对模拟增温的短期响应[J].生态学报,2020,40(17):6009-6024.
[32] 杨玉婷,石玉林,李战刚,等.陕北“三北”防护林下草本群落特征及其与林分结构和土壤养分的关系[J].生态学报,2020,40(18):6542-6551.
[33] 海龙,曾楠,刘洋,等.不同造林模式林下草本植物群落和土壤养分特征[J].生态环境学报,2019,28(11):2141-2148.
[34] 郝宝宝,艾宁,刘广全,等.陕北风沙区不同植被类型土壤养分特征与肥力评价[J].福建农林大学学报:自然科学版,2020,49(5):678-682.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2023-04-10