[1]ZHANG Bin,LI Lu,XIA Qiuyue,et al.Trade off/Synergy Analysis of Ecosystem Services in Wuhan City Circle Based on Land Use[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(04):377-386+393.
Copy
Trade off/Synergy Analysis of Ecosystem Services in Wuhan City Circle Based on Land Use
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
29
Number of periods:
2022 04
Page number:
377-386+393
Column:
Public date:
2022-06-20
- Title:
- Trade off/Synergy Analysis of Ecosystem Services in Wuhan City Circle Based on Land Use
- Keywords:
- land use change; ecosystem services; trade off and coordination; Wuhan city circle; scenario simulation analysis
- CLC:
- X171.1
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- To explore the trade-off/synergy between ecosystem services to provide decision-making reference for regional sustainable development, based on the analysis and simulation of land use change, the food supply service, carbon storage service and habitat quality service of 39 districts and counties in Wuhan city circle were evaluated to explore their temporal and spatial evolution characteristics and trade-off/synergy. The results show that:(1)from 2005 to 2018, the construction land and water area of Wuhan City circle continued to increase, while the cultivated land, forestland, grassland and unused land continued to decrease; under the comprehensive development scenario in 2035, the decreasing trend of cultivated land will be alleviated, the area of forestland will increase, and the construction land will expand orderly;(2)the food supply service in Wuhan City circle continues to improve, the carbon storage service continues to decline, and the habitat quality also shows a downward trend on the whole; the identification of multiple service important areas shows that the area of moderately important areas is the largest and the area of extremely important areas is the smallest in each year;(3)both correlation coefficient method and bivariate spatial autocorrelation method show that the trade-off/synergy relationship between ecosystem services in different scenarios is consistent at multiple scales, but the degree is different. It can be seen that the trade-off relationship is dominant among the three ecosystem services in the region, and the degree of trade-off/synergy relationships are different in different scenarios.
- References:
-
[1] Wang C, Tang C, Fu B, et al. Determining critical thresholds of ecological restoration based on ecosystem service index: A case study in the Pingjiang catchment in southern China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022,303(2):114-125.
[2] Yee S H. Contributions of ecosystem services to human well-being in Puerto Rico[J]. Sustainability, 2020,12(22):96-112.
[3] Rolo V, Roces-Diaz J V, Torralba M, et al. Mixtures of forest and agroforestry alleviate trade-offs between ecosystem services in European rural landscapes[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2021,50(8):101-113.
[4] Cabral P, Campos F S, David J, et al. Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders: An integrative assessment based on land cover[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021,126(7):107-116.
[5] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis[R]. Washington DC: Island Press,2005.
[6] 王川,刘春芳,乌亚汗,等.黄土丘陵区生态系统服务空间格局及权衡与协同关系:以榆中县为例[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(2):521-531.
[7] Adelisardou F, Jafari H R, Malekmohammadi B, et al. Impacts of land use and land cover change on the interactions among multiple soil-dependent ecosystem services(case study: Jiroft plain, Iran)[J]. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2021,43(3):1-20.
[8] 巩杰,柳冬青,高秉丽,等.西部山区流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系:以甘肃白龙江流域为例[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(4):1278-1288.
[9] 徐建英,陈吉星,刘焱序,等.“一带一路”地区生态系统服务关系的时空分异与区域响应[J].生态学报,2020,40(10):3258-3270.
[10] Gao J, Yu Z, Wang L, et al. Suitability of regional development based on ecosystem service benefits and losses: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, China[J]. Ecological Indicators,2019,107(11):105-116.
[11] 张静静,朱文博,朱连奇,等.伏牛山地区森林生态系统服务权衡/协同效应多尺度分析[J].地理学报,2020,75(5):975-988.
[12] 李龙,吴大放,王芳,等.中国快速城市化区域生态系统服务价值预测及权衡研究:以佛山市为例[J].生态学报,2020,40(24):9023-9036.
[13] Liu Y, Hou X, Li X, et al. Assessing and predicting changes in ecosystem service values based on land use/cover change in the Bohai Rim coastal zone[J]. Ecological Indicators,2020,111(4):106-119.
[14] 陈心盟,王晓峰,冯晓明,等.青藏高原生态系统服务权衡与协同关系[J].地理研究,2021,40(1):18-34.
[15] 祁宁,赵君,杨延征,等.基于服务簇的东北地区生态系统服务权衡与协同[J].生态学报,2020,40(9):2827-2837.
[16] 高艳丽,李红波,侯蕊.汉江流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系演变[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(7):1619-1630.
[17] 赵育恒,曾晨.武汉城市圈生态服务价值时空演变分析及影响因素[J].生态学报,2019,39(4):1426-1440.
[18] 姚小薇,曾杰,李旺君.武汉城市圈城镇化与土地生态系统服务价值空间相关特征[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(9):249-256.
[19] Peng K, Jiang W, Ling Z, et al. Evaluating the potential impacts of land use changes on ecosystem service value under multiple scenarios in support of SDG reporting: A case study of the Wuhan urban agglomeration[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,307(7):127-140.
[20] 王晓萌,潘佩佩,王晓旭,等.基于土地利用的河北省生态系统服务权衡/协同关系研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2021,37(1):80-88.
[21] 曹世雄,刘玉洁,苏蔚,等.中国陆地生态系统服务净价值评估[J].中国科学:地球科学,2018,48(3):331-339.
[22] 陈洪波.协同推进长江经济带生态优先与绿色发展:基于生物多样性视角[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2020,10(3):79-87.
[23] 郝梦雅,任志远,孙艺杰,等.关中盆地生态系统服务的权衡与协同关系动态分析[J].地理研究,2017,36(3):592-602.
[24] 于媛,韩玲,李明玉,等.哈长城市群生态系统服务时空特征及其权衡/协同关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(2):293-300.
[25] 吴佩君,刘小平,黎夏,等.基于InVEST模型和元胞自动机的城市扩张对陆地生态系统碳储量影响评估:以广东省为例[J].地理与地理信息科学,2016,32(5):22-28.
[26] 申嘉澍,梁泽,刘来保,等.雄安新区生态系统服务簇权衡与协同[J].地理研究,2020,39(1):79-91.
[27] Jopke C, Kreyling J, Maes J, et al. Interactions among ecosystem services across Europe: Bagplots and cumulative correlation coefficients reveal synergies, trade-offs, and regional patterns[J]. Ecological Indicators,2015,49(2):46-52.
[28] 郑德凤,郝帅,吕乐婷,等.三江源国家公园生态系统服务时空变化及权衡-协同关系[J].地理研究,2020,39(1):64-78.
[29] 吴晶晶,田永中,许文轩,等.基于CA-Markov模型的乌江下游地区土地利用变化情景分析[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(4):133-139.
[30] 徐彩仙,巩杰,李焱,等.基于地形梯度的甘肃白龙江流域典型生态系统服务分布特征[J].生态学报,2020,40(13):4291-4301.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2022-06-20