[1]WEN Dan,CHEN Meiqiu,KUANG Foyuan,et al.Impact of Resources Endowment on Farmers Ecological Farming Behavioral Decision[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(02):320-325.
Copy
Impact of Resources Endowment on Farmers Ecological Farming Behavioral Decision
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
26
Number of periods:
2019 02
Page number:
320-325
Column:
Public date:
2019-04-28
- Title:
- Impact of Resources Endowment on Farmers Ecological Farming Behavioral Decision
- Keywords:
- resource endowment; farmers; ecological farming practices; influencing factors; Tobit model
- CLC:
- F323.3
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- With respect to increasing differentiation of farmer resource endowment social background, to explore the resources endowment of farmer regularity of ecological farming behavior decision-making has important reference value for cultivated land conservation policy. Based on the field investigation of 2 068 households in Jiangxi Province, we used the Tobit model to empirically analyze the influence of resource endowment on farmers’ ecological farming behavior decision-making. The results showed that the ecological farming behavioral decision resources endowment significantly affected farmers, farmers level of education, family population, farming population, joining the cooperatives at home all the year round, the identified family farm, ratio of income from cultivated land to family income proportion, cultivated land area showed the significant positive influence, labor force has the significant negative impact. On this basis, it was proposed to strengthen the knowledge and skill training of farmers’ farmland ecological protection and improve their scientific and cultural quality. The specialized agricultural cooperatives should be developed and the organization of farmers should be improved. Family farms should be cultivated and modern ecological agriculture should be developed. On the basis of ’three-power division’, the transfer of contracted land management rights should be promoted in order to realize moderate extensive operation.
- References:
-
[1] 陈美球,刘桃菊.新时期提升我国耕地保护实效的思考[J].农业现代化研究,2018,39(1):1-8.
[2] 孔祥斌,刘灵伟,秦静,等.基于农户行为的耕地质量评价指标体系构建的理论与方法[J].地理科学进展,2007,26(4):75-85.
[3] 冯艳芬,王芳,杨木壮.基于农户行为的耕地利用影响评价方案设计[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(9):4729-4730,4780.
[4] 石智雷,谭宇,吴海涛.返乡农民工创业行为与创业意愿分析[J].中国农村观察,2010(5):25-37.
[5] 李卫,薛彩霞,姚顺波,等.农户保护性耕作技术采用行为及其影响因素:基于黄土高原476户农户的分析[J].中国农村经济,2017(1):44-57.
[6] 李然嫣,陈印军.东北典型黑土区农户耕地保护利用行为研究:基于黑龙江省绥化市农户调查的实证分析[J].农业技术经济,2017(11):80-91.
[7] 高瑛,王娜,李向菲,等.农户生态友好型农田土壤管理技术采纳决策分析:以山东省为例[J].农业经济问题,2017,38(1):38-47,110-111.
[8] 文长存,吴敬学.农户"两型农业"技术采用行为的影响因素分析:基于辽宁省玉米水稻种植户的调查数据[J].中国农业大学学报,2016,21(9):179-187.
[9] 骆世明.农业生态转型态势与中国生态农业建设路径[J].中国生态农业学报,2017,25(1):1-7.
[10] 罗小娟,冯淑怡,石晓平,等.太湖流域农户环境友好型技术采纳行为及其环境和经济效应评价:以测土配方施肥技术为例[J].自然资源学报,2013,28(11):1891-1902.
[11] 邝佛缘,陈美球,李志朋,等.农户生态环境认知与保护行为的差异分析:以农药化肥使用为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(1):321-326.
[12] 蒋磊,张俊飚,何可.基于农户兼业视角的农业废弃物资源循环利用意愿及其影响因素比较:以湖北省为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(10):1432-1439.
[13] 任淑荣.基于熵值法的企业技术创新能力区域差异研究[J].统计与决策,2014(16):178-181.
[14] 孔祥智,方松海,庞晓鹏,等.西部地区农户禀赋对农业技术采纳的影响分析[J].经济研究,2004(12):85-95.
[15] 樊翔,张军,王红,等.农户禀赋对农户低碳农业生产行为的影响:基于山东省大盛镇农户调查[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(1):265-271.
[16] 朱月季,周德翼,游良志.非洲农户资源禀赋、内在感知对技术采纳的影响:基于埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚州的农户调查[J].资源科学,2015,37(8):1629-1638.
[17] 石智雷,杨云彦.家庭禀赋、家庭决策与农村迁移劳动力回流[J].社会学研究,2012,27(3):157-181,245.
[18] 张郁,齐振宏,孟祥海,等.生态补偿政策情境下家庭资源禀赋对养猪户环境行为影响:基于湖北省248个专业养殖户(场)的调查研究[J].农业经济问题,2015,36(6):82-91,112.
[19] 朱萌,齐振宏,邬兰娅,等.种稻大户资源禀赋对其环境友好型技术采用行为的影响:基于苏南微观数据的分析[J].生态与农村环境学报,2016,32(5):735-742.
[20] 李尚蒲,郑茱馨.禀赋特征、选择偏好与农地流转:来自广东省的农户问卷调查[J].学术研究,2012(7):78-84.
[21] 林清泉.经济计量学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009.
[22] 施秧秧.DEA方法与Tobit模型相结合的工业用地效率研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2009.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
1900-01-01