[1]Dong Wenzhuo,Su Weici,Gou Rong,et al.Integrated evaluation of ecological sensitivity and its spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of karst mountainous cities[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2025,32(02):276-285.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2025.02.001]
Copy
Integrated evaluation of ecological sensitivity and its spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of karst mountainous cities
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
32
Number of periods:
2025 02
Page number:
276-285
Column:
Public date:
2025-01-20
- Title:
- Integrated evaluation of ecological sensitivity and its spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of karst mountainous cities
- Keywords:
- ecological sensitivity; spatiotemporal evolution; spatial autocorrelation; karst mountainous city; Guiyang City
- CLC:
- X826
- DOI:
- 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2025.02.001
- Abstract:
- [Objective]This study aims to reveal the ecological sensitivity and spatiotemporal evolution characteristics in Guiyang from 2000 to 2020, to enrich the systematic research framework of the ecological sensitivity, and to provide scientific evidence for the ‘ecological city' and the construction of an ecological civilization city in Guiyang. [Methods]Based on the ecological and environmental issues of karst ecosystems in Guiyang and the strategic development needs of a strong provincial capital city, an integrated ecological sensitivity evaluation system was constructed using four dimensions:soil erosion sensitivity, desertification sensitivity, biodiversity sensitivity and human disturbance sensitivity. GIS technology and spatial autocorrelation analysis were employed to reveal their spatiotemporal evolution characteristics. [Results](1)The overall ecological sensitivity of Guiyang was primarily mild, with the area of mild sensitivity increasing from 65.19% in 2000 to 75.65% in 2020, showing an overall upward trend, while the proportion of moderately sensitive and higher-grade areas had decreased, indicating an improvement in Guiyang's ecological environment.(2)The majority of moderately sensitive and higher-grade areas were located in the southeastern and southwestern parts of Huaxi District, the eastern and northeastern parts of Kaiyang County, the central part of Xifeng County, and the western parts of Xiuwen County and Qingzhen City, with a fluctuating and narrowing trend in distribution, while other areas had relatively lower sensitivity.(3)During the study period, the sensitivity levels of various dimensions in Guiyang varied and did not change synchronously. Desertification sensitivity was high and showed a decreasing trend, soil erosion sensitivity was relatively high with significant variability, human disturbance sensitivity was generally increasing, and biodiversity sensitivity was low with relatively slow changes.(4)The global Moran's I indices of the comprehensive ecological sensitivity for five time points from 2000 to 2020 in Guiyang were 0.737, 0.799, 0.773, 0.733 and 0.680, respectively. Ecological sensitivity showed a positive spatial autocorrelation and the correlation had weakened over time. The distribution characteristics were dominated by high-high and low-low clustering, but the degree of aggregation was weakening, indicating a trend towards spatial dispersion in the distribution of ecological sensitivity. [Conclusion]The ecological sensitivity in Guiyang was primarily mild and the proportion of this level was increasing, while the area of moderately sensitive and higher-grade areas were decreasing, suggesting that the ecological condition of Guiyang had been well maintained and the ecological environment in moderately sensitive and higher-grade areas had been improved.
- References:
-
[1]熊善高,秦昌波,于雷,等.基于生态系统服务功能和生态敏感性的生态空间划定研究:以南宁市为例[J].生态学报,2018,38(22):7899-7911.
Xiong S G, Qin C B, Yu L, et al. Methods to identify the boundary of ecological space based on ecosystem service functions and ecological sensitivity:a case study of Nanning City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(22):7899-7911.
[2]李振亚,魏伟,周亮,等.基于空间距离指数的中国西北干旱内陆河流域生态敏感性时空演变特征:以石羊河流域为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(20):7463-7475.
Li Z Y, Wei W, Zhou L, et al. Temporal and spatial evolution of ecological sensitivity in arid inland river basins of northwest China based on spatial distance index:a case study of Shiyang River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(20):7463-7475.
[3]Yilmaz F C, Zengin M, Tekin Cure C. Determination of ecologically sensitive areas in Denizli Province using geographic information systems(GIS)and analytical hierarchy process(AHP)[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2020,192(9):589.
[4]Raupach M R, Haverd V, Briggs P R. Sensitivities of the Australian terrestrial water and carbon balances to climate change and variability[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2013,182/183:277-291.
[5]Williams J W, Huntley B, Seddon A W R. Climate sensitivity and ecoclimate sensitivity:theory, usage, and past implications for future biospheric responses[J]. Current Climate Change Reports, 2022,8(1):1-16.
[6]Albo-Puigserver M, Bueno-Pardo J, Pinto M, et al. Ecological sensitivity and vulnerability of fishing fleet landings to climate change across regions[J]. Scientific Reports, 2022,12:17360.
[7]郭泽呈,魏伟,石培基,等.中国西北干旱区土地沙漠化敏感性时空格局[J].地理学报,2020,75(9):1948-1965.
Guo Z C, Wei W, Shi P J, et al. Spatiotemporal changes of land desertification sensitivity in the arid region of Northwest China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020,75(9):1948-1965.
[8]张广创,王杰,刘东伟,等.基于GIS的锡尔河中游生态敏感性分析与评价[J].干旱区研究,2020,37(2):506-513.
Zhang G C, Wang J, Liu D W, et al. Analysis and evaluation of the ecological sensitivity in the middle reaches of the Syr Darya River based on GIS[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020,37(2):506-513.
[9]刘海龙,王炜桥,王跃飞,等.汾河流域生态敏感性综合评价及时空演变特征[J].生态学报,2021,41(10):3952-3964.
Liu H L, Wang W Q, Wang Y F, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of ecological sensitivity and the characteristics of spatiotemporal variations in Fenhe River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(10):3952-3964.
[10]丁徽,赵小敏,郭熙,等.江西省鄱阳湖区生态敏感性评价[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(1):257-264.
Ding H, Zhao X M, Guo X, et al. Evaluation of ecological sensitivity in Poyang Lake area of Jiangxi Province[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020,27(1):257-264.
[11]杨柳,索萌萌,柴娇娇,等.2000—2020年喀斯特地区煤矿资源城市生态敏感性的时空演变[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(4):338-346.
Yang L, Suo M M, Chai J J, et al. Temporal and spatial evolution of ecological sensitivity at coal mining cities in a Karst region during 2000—2020[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,42(4):338-346.
[12]Yang Y P, Chen J J, Huang R J, et al. Construction of ecological security pattern based on the importance of ecological protection:a case study of Guangxi, a Karst region in China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022,19(9):5699.
[13]Jin X X, Wei L Y, Wang Y, et al. Construction of ecological security pattern based on the importance of ecosystem service functions and ecological sensitivity assessment:a case study in Fengxian County of Jiangsu Province, China[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2021,23(1):563-590.
[14]董晓媛,胥德泽,施小斌,等.黄河流域甘肃段生态敏感性评价研究:以广河县为例[J].干旱区地理,2024,47(4):599-611.
Dong X Y, Xu D Z, Shi X B, et al. Ecological sensitivity evaluation of the Gansu section of the Yellow River:a case study of Guanghe County[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024,47(4):599-611.
[15]张伟,王家卓,任希岩,等.基于GIS的山地城市生态敏感性分析研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(3):44-47,54.
Zhang W, Wang J Z, Ren X Y, et al. GIS-based ecological sensitivity analysis of mountainous areas[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013,20(3):44-47,54.
[16]王贝贝,丁明军,管琪卉,等.基于格网的南昌市生态环境脆弱性评价[J].生态学报,2019,39(15):5460-5472.
Wang B B, Ding M J, Guan Q H, et al. Gridded assessment of eco-environmental vulnerability in Nanchang city[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(15):5460-5472.
[17]邓晓红,宋玉琳,李宗省,等.河西地区生态敏感性演变格局及分区治理[J].中国沙漠,2023,43(5):232-240.
Deng X H, Song Y L, Li Z X, et al. Evolution pattern of terrestrial ecological sensitivity in the Hexi region and its zoning governance[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2023,43(5):232-240.
[18]凡非得,王克林,熊鹰,等.西南喀斯特区域水土流失敏感性评价及其空间分异特征[J].生态学报,2011,31(21):6353-6362.
Fan F D, Wang K L, Xiong Y, et al. Assessment and spatial distribution of water and soil loss in karst regions, southwest China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011,31(21):6353-6362.
[19]蒙吉军,王雅,王晓东,等.基于最小累积阻力模型的贵阳市景观生态安全格局构建[J].长江流域资源与环境,2016,25(7):1052-1061.
Meng J J, Wang Y, Wang X D, et al. Construction of landscape ecological security pattern in Guiyang based on MCR model[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2016,25(7):1052-1061.
[20]程玉卓,王志杰,班先娅,等.城市化和生态文明建设对喀斯特山地城市景观生态风险的影响评价:以贵阳市花溪区为例[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(5):351-357.
Cheng Y Z, Wang Z J, Ban X Y, et al. Evaluation of the impact of urbanization and ecological civilization construction on landscape ecological risk in Huaxi district of Guiyang characterized as karst mountain city[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,30(5):351-357.
[21]高梦雯,胡业翠,李向,等.基于生态系统服务重要性和环境敏感性的喀斯特山区生态安全格局构建:以广西河池为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(7):2596-2608.
Gao M W, Hu Y C, Li X, et al. Construction of ecological security pattern based on the importance of ecosystem services and environmental sensitivity in karst mountainous areas:a case study in Hechi, Guangxi[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(7):2596-2608.
[22]杨远琴,任平,洪步庭.基于生态安全格局的三峡库区腹地低丘缓坡土地开发利用[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(3):305-310,317.
Yang Y Q, Ren P, Hong B T. Development and utilization of gentle-slope hilly land based on ecological security pattern theory of Three Gores Reservoir Area[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,26(3):305-310,317.
[23]李青圃,张正栋,万露文,等.基于景观生态风险评价的宁江流域景观格局优化[J].地理学报,2019,74(7):1420-1437.
Li Q P, Zhang Z D, Wan L W, et al. Landscape pattern optimization in Ningjiang River Basin based on landscape ecological risk assessment[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(7):1420-1437.
[24]翟香,兰安军,廖艳梅,等.基于生态安全格局的国土空间生态修复关键区域定量识别:以贵州省为例[J].水土保持究,2022,29(6):322-329.
Zhai X, Lan A J, Liao Y M, et al. Quantitative identification of key areas of land space ecological restoration based on the ecological security pattern:a case study of Guizhou Province[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,29(6):322-329.
[25]李振亚,魏伟,周亮,等.中国陆地生态敏感性时空演变特征[J].地理学报,2022,77(1):150-163.
Li Z Y, Wei W, Zhou L, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of terrestrial ecological sensitivity in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022,77(1):150-163.
[26]Luo Q Y, Bao Y, Wang Z T, et al. Vulnerability assessment of urban remnant mountain ecosystems based on ecological sensitivity and ecosystem services[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023,151:110314.
[27]李帆,贾夏,赵永华,等.基于DPSIR模型的黄土高原生态敏感性演变格局及驱动力分析[J].农业工程学报,2023,39(9):241-251.
Li F, Jia X, Zhao Y H, et al. Evolutionary pattern and driving forces of ecological sensitivity in the Loess Plateau using DPSIR model[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023,39(9):241-251.
[28]张晨,王清,陈剑平,等.金沙江流域泥石流的组合赋权法危险度评价[J].岩土力学,2011,32(3):831-836.
Zhang C, Wang Q, Chen J P, et al. Evaluation of debris flow risk in Jinsha River based on combined weight process[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011,32(3):831-836.
[29]辛亮,苏维词.基于景观格局的FAST宁静区生态风险时空演变分析[J].中国环境科学,2023,43(10):5475-5487.
Xin L, Su W C. Spatial and temporal evolution of ecological risk in FAST Radio Quiet Zone based on landscape pattern[J]. China Environmental Science, 2023,43(10):5475-5487.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2025-01-20