[1]Ma Guanyuan,Jiang Xiaojin,Liu Jiaqing,et al.Soil water infiltration characteristics and influencing factors in different types of rubber forests[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2025,32(01):57-65,72.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2025.01.025]
Copy
Soil water infiltration characteristics and influencing factors in different types of rubber forests
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
32
Number of periods:
2025 01
Page number:
57-65,72
Column:
Public date:
2025-01-10
- Title:
- Soil water infiltration characteristics and influencing factors in different types of rubber forests
- CLC:
- S715.3
- DOI:
- 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2025.01.025
- Abstract:
- [Objective]The aims of this study are to explore the soil water infiltration characteristics and influencing factors of different forest types rubber forest, and to provide data support for building of efficient and sustainable rubber forests. [Methods]A single rubber forest(SR), rubber artificial rain forest composite system(AF), rubber-puzzle composite system(AR), rubber-cocoa composite system(RC), rubber-tea tree composite system(RT)were selected as the research objects. Soil physical properties and soil moisture infiltration performance were determined and analyzed. Kostiakov, Philip, Horton model were used to fit and evaluate the infiltration process. [Results]Examination of the 0—100 cm soil profile revealed that SR bulk density was the highest, while porosity, field water holding capacity and saturated water holding capacity were the lowest. The initial infiltration rate(0.03 cm/min), average infiltration rate(0.009 cm/min), and steady infiltration rate(0.005 cm/min)of SR were significantly lower than those of rubber composite forests. The Horton model effectively fitted the infiltration process of rubber composite forests, with the model's parameters holding physical significance. With the exception of capillary porosity, soil physical properties showed significant correlation with the initial infiltration rate(p<0.01), and with the total cumulative infiltration amount and soil saturated water conductivity(p<0.05), but not with the average infiltration rate(p>0.05). The cumulative infiltration before stable infiltration was significantly affected by soil water retention(p<0.01). [Conclusion]Combined with the field infiltration process, the initial infiltration rate, steady infiltration rate and accumulated infiltration before steady infiltration were used to evaluate the soil water infiltration and storage performance of different forest types of rubber plantations. The soil water-holding capacity and permeability of SR were inferior to those of rubber composite forests, with RC demonstrating the highest soil water-holding capacity and permeability. Additionally, RT composite forests exhibit the best soil infiltration performance, highlighting the importance of intercropping tea and cocoa in improving soil structure and hydrological properties.
- References:
-
[1]叶德林,李开云,董寿东,等.勐腊农场环境友好型生态胶园建设初报[J].热带农业科技,2016,39(2):7-9,32.
Ye D L, Li K Y, Dong S D, et al. Preliminary report on the construction of environment friendly rubber plantations in Mengla farm[J]. Tropical Agricultural Science & Technology, 2016,39(2):7-9,32.
[2]刘少军,周广胜,房世波.中国橡胶种植北界[J].生态学报,2016,36(5):1272-1280.
Liu S J, Zhou G S, Fang S B. Apreliminary study of the northern planting boundary of rubber tree cultivation in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016,36(5):1272-1280.
[3]朱钟麟,赵燮京,王昌桃,等.西南地区干旱规律与节水农业发展问题[J].生态环境,2006,15(4):876-880.
Zhu Z L, Zhao X J, Wang C T, et al. The Rules of drought and the development of water-saving agriculture in southwest China[J]. Ecology and Environment Sciences, 2006,15(4):876-880.
[4]Singh A K, Liu W J, Zakari S, et al. A global review of rubber plantations:Impacts on ecosystem functions, mitigations, future directions, and policies for sustainable cultivation[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021,796:148948.
[5]姚平,寇卫利,王秋华,等.近60年来西双版纳气候变化及其与橡胶种植关系研究[J].林业调查规划,2020,45(3):17-23.
Yao P, Kou W L, Wang Q H, et al. Relationship between climate change and rubber planting in Xishuangbanna in recent 60 years[J]. Forest Inventory and Planning, 2020,45(3):17-23.
[6]吴骏恩,刘文杰.西双版纳地区不同胶农(林)复合系统的植物水分利用效率比较[J].广西植物,2016,36(7):859-867.
WU J E, Liu W J. Comparing the water use efficiency of plants in different types of rubber-based agroforestry ecosystem in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China[J]. Guihaia, 2016,36(7):859-867.
[7]庞家平,陈明勇,唐建维,等.橡胶-大叶千斤拔复合生态系统中的植物生长与土壤水分养分动态[J].山地学报,2009,27(4):433-441.
Pang J P, Chen M Y, Tang J W, et al. The dynamics of plant growth and soil moisture and nutrient in the rubber plantation and rubber-Flemingia macrophylla agroforestry system in Xishuangbanna, southwest China[J]. Mountain Research, 2009,27(4):433-441.
[8]王浩飞,王黎,朱习爱,等.橡胶-益智复合林土壤饱和导水率空间分布格局及其影响因子[J].生态学杂志,2023,42(9):2113-2120.
Wang H F, Wang L, Zhu X A, et al. Spatial distribution pattern and impact factors of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity in Hevea brasiliensis-Alpinia oxyphylla agroforestry[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2023,42(9):2113-2120.
[9]Jiang X J, Liu W J, Wu J N, et al. Land degradation controlled and mitigated by rubber-based agroforestry systems through optimizing soil physical conditions and water supply mechanisms:a case study in Xishuangbanna, China[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2017,28(7):2277-2289.
[10]刘小林,李惠萍,郑子龙,等.小陇山林区主要林地类型土壤入渗特征[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2016,51(6):89-94.
Liu X L, Li H P, Zheng Z L, et al. Soil infiltration characteristics of main forest lands in Xiaolongshan Region[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2016,51(6):89-94.
[11]张金武,王立.白龙江上游不同演替阶段森林土壤入渗和持水特征[J].西北林学院学报,2021,36(4):41-47.
Zhang J W, Wang L. Characteristics of forest soil infiltration and water holding capacity in different succession stages in the upper reaches of the bailong river[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2021,36(4):41-47.
[12]杨源峰,韦慧,王建羽,等.喀斯特区两种岩性发育土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].农业现代化研究,2023,44(6):1103-1116.
Yang Y F, Wei H, Wang J Y, et al. Infiltration characteristics and influencing factors of two types of lithological soils in Karst regions[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2023,44(6):1103-1116.
[13]Hervé-Fernández P, Muñoz-Arriagada R, Glucevic-Almonacid C, et al. Influence of rangeland land cover on infiltration rates, field-saturated hydraulic conductivity, and soil water repellency in southern Patagonia[J]. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2023,90:92-100.
[14]Zhang W X, Furtado K, Wu P L, et al. Increasing precipitation variability on daily-to-multiyear time scales in a warmer world[J]. Science Advances, 2021,7(31):eabf8021.
[15]李雨晨,平原,澹腾辉,等.红壤丘陵区不同盖度生物结皮对水分入渗的影响[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(5):71-77.
Li Y C, Ping Y, Tan T H, et al. Effects of biocrust with different coverage on water infiltration in red soil hilly region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,37(5):71-77.
[16]康文蓉,张勇勇,赵文智,等.荒漠绿洲过渡带土壤饱和导水率的空间变异特征[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):137-143.
Kang W R, Zhang Y Y, Zhao W Z, et al. Spatial variation characteristics of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity in a desert-oasis ecotone[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,35(5):137-143.
[17]卢洪健,刘文杰,罗亲普.西双版纳山地橡胶林凋落物的生态水文效应[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(10):2129-2136.
Lu H J, Liu W J, Luo Q P. Eco-hydrological effects of litter layer in a mountainous rubber plantation in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2011,30(10):2129-2136.
[18]曾欢欢,刘文杰,吴骏恩,等.西双版纳地区丛林式橡胶林内植物的水分利用策略[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(2):394-403.
Zeng H H, Liu W J, WU J E, et al. Plant water use strategies in jungle rubber in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019,38(2):394-403.
[19]马作豪,唐昊冶,李文红,等.吸管法和比重计法测定土壤机械组成的比对研究[J].中国无机分析化学,2023,13(6):645-651.
Ma Z H, Tang H Y, Li W H, et al. Comparative study on the determination method of soil mechanical composition between pipette method and hydrometer method[J]. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Analytical Chemistry, 2023,13(6):645-651.
[20]Jiang X J, Chen C F, Zhu X A, et al. Use of dye infiltration experiments and HYDRUS-3D to interpret preferential flow in soil in a rubber-based agroforestry systems in Xishuangbanna, China[J]. CATENA,2019,178:120-131.
[21]赵炯昌,潘岱立,卫伟,等.植被格局对土壤入渗和水沙过程影响的模拟试验研究[J].生态学报,2021,41(4):1373-1380.
Zhao J C, Pan D L, Wei W, et al. Simulation experiment on the influence of vegetation pattern on soil infiltration and water and sediment process[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(4):1373-1380.
[22]朱凯,刘文杰,刘佳庆.西双版纳地区胶农复合系统的土壤斥水特性[J].云南大学学报:自然科学版,2017,39(1):137-146.
Zhu K, Liu W J, Liu J Q. Water repellency of soil in different types of rubber-based agroforestry ecosystems in Xishuangbanna[J]. Journal of Yunnan University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2017,39(1):137-146.
[23]李民义,张建军,郭宝妮,等.晋西黄土区不同密度油松人工林林下植物多样性及水文效应[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(5):1083-1090.
Li M Y, Zhang J J, Guo B N, et al. Understory plant species diversity and hydrological effect of Pinus tabulaeformis plantations with different stand densities in Loess Plateau of Western Shanxi, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013,32(5):1083-1090.
[24]Felix R W, Dias A T C, Bevilacqua M S, et al. Litter addition as a tool for restoring hydrological processes and controlling erosion in riparian forests disturbed by fine sediment deposition[J]. Restoration Ecology, 2023,31(5):13895.
[25]梁磊,孙浩田,徐高明,等.田间原位试验分析长期机械作业下稻麦轮作地块土壤入渗性能[J].农业工程学报,2023,39(7):110-118.
Liang L, Sun H T, Xu G M, et al. Soil infiltration of rice-wheat rotation field under long-term mechanical treatment based on field in situ experiments[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023,39(7):110-118.
[26]郁耀闯,杨树瑶,王长燕,等.宝鸡地区L1-S5黄土和古土壤水分入渗及影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(6):78-85.
Yu Y C, Yang S Y, Wang C Y, et al. Water infiltration and influencing factors of L1-S5 loess-paleosol in Baoji Region[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,30(6):78-85.
[27]刘卓昕,高鹏,穆兴民,等.黄土区植被恢复对土壤水文物理性质的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(6):206-213.
Liu Z X, Gao P, Mu X M, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration on soil hydrophysical properties in loess region[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,30(6):206-213.
[28]赵恩辉,吴磊,赵生华.黄河三角洲不同植被类型土壤水源涵养功能综合评价[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(6):255-263.
Zhao E H, Wu L, Zhao S H. Comprehensive evaluation of soil water conservation function of different vegetation types in the Yellow River Delta[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,30(6):255-263.
[29]简永旗,吴家森,盛卫星,等.间伐和林分类型对森林凋落物储量和土壤持水性能的影响[J].浙江农林大学学报,2021,38(2):320-328.
Jian Y Q, Wu J S, Sheng W X, et al. Effects of thinning and stand types on litter stock and soil water-holding capacity[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2021,38(2):320-328.
[30]刘汗,雷廷武,赵军.土壤初始含水率和降雨强度对黏黄土入渗性能的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2009,7(2):1-6.
Liu H, Lei T W, Zhao J. Effects of initial soil water content and rainfall intensity on Loess infiltration capacity[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009,7(2):1-6.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2025-01-10