[1]Duan Jiqi,Li Jianxing,Wang Bo,et al.Relationship Between Tensile Properties and Microstructures of Four Kinds of Herbaceous Root in the Water-Level-Fluctuating Zone[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(06):130-138.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.06.026]
Copy
Relationship Between Tensile Properties and Microstructures of Four Kinds of Herbaceous Root in the Water-Level-Fluctuating Zone
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
31
Number of periods:
2024 06
Page number:
130-138
Column:
Public date:
2024-12-10
- Title:
- Relationship Between Tensile Properties and Microstructures of Four Kinds of Herbaceous Root in the Water-Level-Fluctuating Zone
- CLC:
- S157
- DOI:
- 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.06.026
- Abstract:
- [Objective]The aims of this study are to examine the effect of the anatomical structure of herbaceous root systems on the mechanical properties of single roots, and to provide a basis for elucidating the micromechanical mechanism of soil consolidation by herbaceous root systems in water-level-fluctuating zone. [Methods]Four species of water-level-fluctuating zone herbs(Acorus calamus L.; Cynodon dactylon (Linn.)Pers.; Cyperus involucratus Rottb.; Arundo donax ‘Versicolor')were selected as research objects, and the single tensile test and microstructure determination test was carried out. [Results](1)The tensile force and tensile strength of the root system increased and decreased as a power function of diameter, respectively. The average tensile force of the root system of the four species of herbs was the largest in Arundo donax ‘Versicolor'(13.02 N), the smallest in Acorus calamus L.(5.90 N), which was significantly larger than the other three species of herbs(p<0.05). The tensile strength was greatest for Cynodon dactylon (Linn.)Pers.(42.79 MPa)and smallest for Arundo donax ‘Versicolor'(24.16 MPa), with Acorus calamus L. and Cynodon dactylon (Linn.)Pers. being highly significantly greater than the other two herbs(p<0.01).(2)The average ultimate elongation of the root systems of the four herbs was the largest for Cyperus involucratus Rottb.(36.18%)and the smallest for Cynodon dactylon (Linn.)Pers.(23.38%), which was significantly larger than that of the remaining herbs(p<0.05). The modulus of elasticity of the root system decreased as a power function with increasing diameter, and the average modulus of elasticity was the largest for Cynodon dactylon (Linn.)Pers.(195.85 MPa)and the smallest for Cyperus involucratus Rottb.(72.00 MPa), Acorus calamus L. and Cynodon dactylon (Linn.)Pers. were significantly greater than Cyperus involucratus Rottb.(p<0.05).(3)Except for Arundo donax ‘Versicolor', the basic structure with the cortical thickness was the largest, and the thickness of vascular bundle was the smallest. Except for Acorus calamus L., the microstructural organization ratio with the area of the cortex accounted for the largest percentage, the area of the stele was the second largest, and the area of the phloem accounted for the smallest percentage.(4)The tensile performance of Acorus calamus L. was influenced by the surface area of the epidermis and pulp. The tensile performance of Cynodon dactylon (Linn.)Pers. was influenced by the surface area of the epidermis, xylem and phloem. The tensile performance of Arundo donax ‘Versicolor' was influenced by the surface area of the cortex and pulp. [Conclusion]Each of the four water-level-fluctuating zone herbs has its own advantages in terms of root sequestration capacity. Acorus calamus L. and Cyperus involucratus Rottb. mainly play the role in slowing down the deformation and damage of the slope in the subsidence zone. Arundo donax ‘Versicolor' mainly plays the role in consolidating soil. Cynodon dactylon (Linn.)Pers. can both buffer soil sliding and play the anchoring role.
- References:
-
[1]李姗泽,邓玥,施凤宁,等.水库消落带研究进展[J].湿地科学,2019,17(6):689-696.
Li S Z, Deng Y, Shi F N, et al. Research progress on water-level-fluctuation zones of reservoirs: A review[J]. Wetland Science, 2019,17(6):689-696.
[2]饶洁,唐强,冯韫,等.三峡水库消落带生境特征与植被恢复模式[J].水土保持学报,2024,38(1):310-318.
Rao J, Tang Q, Feng Y, et al. Habitat condition and vegetation restoration patterns in the water level fluctuation zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024,38(1):310-318.
[3]鲍玉海,贺秀斌,钟荣华,等.三峡水库消落带植被重建途径及其固土护岸效应[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(6):171-174,180.
Bao Y H, He X B, Zhong R H, et al. Revegetation and its effects on soil reinforcement in the riparian zone of Three-Gorge Reservoir[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014,21(6):171-174,180.
[4]Li J L, Bao Y H, Wei J, et al. Fractal characterization of sediment particle size distribution in the water-level fluctuation zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2019,16(9):2028-2038.
[5]邓华锋,肖瑶,方景成,等.干湿循环作用下岸坡消落带土体抗剪强度劣化规律及其对岸坡稳定性影响研究[J].岩土力学,2017,38(9):2629-2638.
Deng H F, Xiao Y, Fang J C, et al. Shear strength degradation and slope stability of soils at hydro-fluctuation belt of river bank slope during drying-wetting cycle[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017,38(9):2629-2638.
[6]窦文清,贾伟涛,张久红,等.三峡水库消落带植被现状、适生策略及生态修复研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2023,42(1):208-218.
Dou W Q, Jia W T, Zhang J H, et al. Research progress of vegetation status, adaptive strategies and ecological restoration in the water-level fluctuation zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2023,42(1):208-218.
[7]李建兴,黄广杰,熊寿德,等.4种乔木在三江并流区水库消落带生态修复中的适应性[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(6):182-189.
Li J X, Huang G J, Xiong S D, et al. Adaptability of four tree species in ecological restoration of reservoir fluctuating zone in parallel flow area of Three Rivers[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,42(6):182-189.
[8]Polzin M L, Herbison B, Tien K M, et al. Environmental determinants of vegetation in the drawdown zones of a Columbia River Treaty reservoir: A template for ecosystem enhancement[J]. Environmental Management, 2023,72(3):488-504.
[9]徐文秀.三峡水库消落带草本根-土复合体抗冲性能研究[D].重庆:重庆师范大学,2019.
Xu W X. Anti-scourability of the Herbaceous Root-Soil System in the Riparian Zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Normal University, 2019.
[10]Hashim A M, Catherine S M P. A laboratory study on wave reduction by mangrove forests[J]. APCBEE Procedia, 2013,5:27-32.
[11]段青松,保锐琴,黄广杰,等.澜沧江黄登水电站库周土壤的崩解特性[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(4):195-202.
Duan Q S, Bao R Q, Huang G J, et al. Soil disintegration characteristics around Huangdeng hydropower station reservoir on Lancang River[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,43(4):195-202.
[12]肖海,彭逗逗,邵艳艳,等.狗牙根根系对三峡库区消落带紫色土崩解性能的作用机理分析[J].土壤通报,2019,50(5):1116-1122.
Xiao H, Peng D D, Shao Y Y, et al. Mechanism of soil disintegration by Cynodon Dactylon root in the purple soil from water-level fluctuation zone in the Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2019,50(5):1116-1122.
[13]熊寿德,段青松,方雪峰,等.三江并流区水电站消落带适生草本植物根系固土能力[J].生态学报,2022,42(17):7210-7221.
Xiong S D, Duan Q S, Fang X F, et al. Soil-fixing capacity of suitable herbaceous plant roots in the water-level-fluctuating zone of hydropower station in the Three Parallel Rivers[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(17):7210-7221.
[14]黄广杰,段青松,李建兴,等.三江并流区水库消落带5种草本根系形态及抗拉特性[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(3):389-395.
Huang G J, Duan Q S, Li J X, et al. Root morphology and tensile characteristics of five kinds of herbs in reservoir fluctuating zone of Three Parallel Rivers[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,29(3):389-395.
[15]夏振尧,闫茹冰,张伦,等.狗牙根根系抗拉性能对水淹时长的响应[J].农业工程学报,2023,39(6):103-110.
Xia Z Y, Yan R B, Zhang L, et al. Response of tensile properties in Cynodon dactylon root to submersion duration[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023,39(6):103-110.
[16]李可,朱海丽,宋路,等.青藏高原两种典型植物根系抗拉特性与其微观结构的关系[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(2):240-249.
Li K, Zhu H L, Song L, et al. Relationship between tensile properties and microstructure of two typical plant roots in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018,25(2):240-249.
[17]李思诗.崩岗侵蚀劣地草本植物根系抗拉特性与微观性质的关系[D].福州:福建农林大学,2018.
Li S S. Relationship Between Tensile Properties and Microscopic Sroperties of Herbaceous Plant Roots in Benggang Area[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2018.
[18]蒋坤云.植物根系抗拉特性的单根微观结构作用机制[D].北京:北京林业大学,2013.
Jiang K Y. Mechanism of the Microstructure of a Single Root to the Tensile Properties of Plant Root System[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2013.
[19]张玉,朱海丽,张珂,等.3种滨河植物单根抗拉特性与其微观结构关系[J].干旱区研究,2022,39(2):572-583.
Zhang Y, Zhu H L, Zhang K, et al. Relationship between tensile properties and microstructure of single root of three riparian plants[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022,39(2):572-583.
[20]Luo F L, Matsubara S, Chen Y, et al. Consecutive submergence and de-submergence both impede growth of a riparian plant during water level fluctuations with different frequencies[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2018,155:641-649.
[21]雷相科,张雪彪,杨启红,等.植物根系抗拉力学性能研究进展[J].浙江农林大学学报,2016,33(4):703-711.
Lei X K, Zhang X B, Yang Q H, et al. Research progress on the tensile mechanical properties of plant roots[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2016,33(4):703-711.
[22]叶兴,杨启红,张超波,等.长江河岸边坡狗牙根根系力学性能研究[J].人民长江,2022,53(4):195-200.
Ye X, Yang Q H, Zhang C B, et al. Analysis of mechanical properties of bermudagrass root system on riparian slopes of Yangtze River[J]. Yangtze River, 2022,53(4):195-200.
[23]吕春娟,陈丽华.华北典型植被根系抗拉力学特性及其与主要化学成分关系[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(23):69-78.
Lü C J, Chen L H. Relationship between root tensile mechanical properties and its main chemical components of typical tree species in North China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013,29(23):69-78.
[24]潘露.护坡灌木根系形态对根系力学特性影响研究[D].贵阳:贵州大学,2021.
Pan L. Study on the Influence of Root Morphology of Slope Protection Shrub on Root Mechanical Characteristics[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2021.
[25]刘亚斌,李淑霞,余冬梅,等.西宁盆地黄土区典型草本植物单根抗拉力学特性试验[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(15):157-166.
Liu Y B, Li S X, Yu D M, et al. Experiment on single root tensile mechanical properties of typical herb species in loess region of Xining Basin[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018,34(15):157-166.
[26]石川,梁燊,刘亚斌,等.青藏高原东北部黄土区灌木柠条锦鸡儿单根抗拉力学特性研究[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(5):184-192.
Shi C, Liang S, Liu Y B, et al. Research on tensile resistance characteristics of single root of Caragana korshinskii Kom. in loess region of northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,30(5):184-192.
[27]张乔艳,唐丽霞,潘露,等.基于根系化学组成的抗拉力学特性分析[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2020,44(1):186-192.
Zhang Q Y, Tang L X, Pan L, et al. Tensile mechanical properties of roots based on chemical composition[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University: Natural Sciences Edition, 2020,44(1):186-192.
[28]金银根.植物学[M].3版.北京:科学出版社,2017
Jin Y G. Botany [M].3rd ed. Beijing: Science Press, 2017.
[29]朱海丽,胡夏嵩,毛小青,等.护坡植物根系力学特性与其解剖结构关系[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(5):40-46.
Zhu H L, Hu X S, Mao X Q, et al. Relationship between mechanical characteristics and anatomical structures of slope protection plant root[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2009,25(5):40-46.
[30]徐文秀,杨玲,鲍玉海,等.大型水库消落带2种典型耐淹草本植物单根抗拉力学特性[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(5):259-264,272.
Xu W X, Yang L, Bao Y H, et al. Tensile mechanical properties single root of two typical flood-tolerant herbs in the reservoir riparian zone[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020,27(5):259-264,272.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2024-12-10