PDF Download

[1]Cao Changjing,Zhang Lu,Liang Tong,et al.Response to the Value of Land Use Ecosystem Services in the Sandstone Area of the Yellow River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(05):337-343.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.036]

Copy

Response to the Value of Land Use Ecosystem Services in the Sandstone Area of the Yellow River

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 31 Number of periods: 2024 05 Page number: 337-343 Column: Public date: 2024-08-10

Title:: Response to the Value of Land Use Ecosystem Services in the Sandstone Area of the Yellow River

Author(s):: Cao Changjing¹, Zhang Lu, Liang Tong¹, Zhang Pan², Han Jiaqi¹, Yang Wenjie¹; (1.North China University of Water Resources and Hydropower, Zhengzhou 450046, China; 2.Yellow River Water Conservancy Research Institute, Yellow River Water Conservancy Commission, Zhengzhou 450003, China)

Keywords:: Ssoft sandstone; land use/cover change; value of ecosystem services

CLC:: S157.1

DOI:: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.036

Abstract:: [Objective]The aims of this study are to explore the response of ecosystem service value to land use change and predicting future trends, and to provide scientific reference for land use pattern planning in the arsenic sandstone area. [Methods]Based on the remote sensing images of the four phases of sandstone area from 2000 to 2020, the change characteristics of LUCC and ESV in the past 20 years were analyzed based on GIS technology and ESV evaluation methods. The response of LUCC induced by ESV was revealed. The development trend of LUCC and ESV was predicted by using Markov model. [Results](1)In 2000—2020, the total area of LUCC remained unchanged, and the increase of construction land was the most obvious, with a total increase of 762.73 km² and a growth rate of 4.57%. The grassland decreased by 548.79 km² in total, with a reduction rate of 3.28%.(2)The overall level of ESV showed a downward trend, from 19 949.65 million yuan to 18 997.19 million yuan, a decrease of 4.78%, of which grassland ESV changed the most, decreasing by 746.29 million yuan, accounting for 78.35% of the overall decline rate.(3)ESV was positively correlated with the changes in grassland, woodland, cultivated land, water area and construction land, and negatively correlated with unused land.(4)It is predicted that the area of cultivated land, forest land, grassland and water area will decrease to 96.69%, 98.94%, 94.27% and 99.12% of those in 2020 in the next 10 years. Construction land and unused land will increase to 150.03% and 121.61%, and the overall ESV level in sandstone area will continue to decrease to 92.81%. [Conclusion]The areas of cultivated land, forest land, grassland, and water are decreasing, while the area of construction land and unused land will increase. ESV will continue to decrease, and there is a linear relationship between ESV changes and land use changes. In the future, the area of construction land will increase, and ESV will continue to decrease. Reasonably adjusting the area of construction land is beneficial for ecological construction and vegetation restoration and reconstruction in the sandstone area of the Yellow River Basin.

References:: [1]肖建设,乔斌,陈国茜,等.黄河源区玛多县土地利用和生态系统服务价值的演变[J].生态学报,2020,40(2):510-521.
Xiao J S, Qiao B, Chen G Q, et al. Land use change and evolution of ecosystem service value in Maduo County of source region of the Yellow River[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(2):510-521.
[2]欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(5):607-613.
Ouyang Z Y, Wang X K, Miao H. A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economic values[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999,19(5):607-613.
[3]谢高地,张彩霞,张昌顺,等.中国生态系统服务的价值[J].资源科学,2015,37(9):1740-1746.
Xie G D, Zhang C X, Zhang C S, et al. The value of ecosystem services in China[J]. Resources Science, 2015,37(9):1740-1746.
[4]任胤铭,刘小平,许晓聪,等.基于FLUS-InVEST模型的京津冀多情景土地利用变化模拟及其对生态系统服务功能的影响[J].生态学报,2023,43(11):4473-4487.
Ren Y M, Liu X P, Xu X C, et al. Multi-scenario simulation of land use change and its impact on ecosystem services in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region based on the FLUS-InVEST Model[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023,43(11):4473-4487.
[5]张思颖,陈荣蓉,程先.重庆龙溪河流域水生态系统服务时空演变及对土地利用变化响应[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(4):173-183.
Zhang S Y, Chen R R, Cheng X. Spatiotemporal changes of water-related ecosystem services and the responses to land use changes of the Longxi River Basin, Chongqing[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,37(4):173-183.
[6]谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919.
Xie G D, Zhen L, Lu C X, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008,23(5):911-919.
[7]谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
Xie G D, Zhang C X, Zhang L M, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015,30(8):1243-1254.
[8]谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
Xie G D, Lu C X, Leng Y F, et al. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2003,18(2):189-196.
[9]徐丽芬,许学工,罗涛,等.基于土地利用的生态系统服务价值当量修订方法:以渤海湾沿岸为例[J].地理研究,2012,31(10):1775-1784.
Xu L F, Xu X G, Luo T, et al. Services based on land use:A case study of Bohai Rim[J]. Geographical Research, 2012,31(10):1775-1784.
[10]雷金睿,陈宗铸,陈小花,等.1980—2018年海南岛土地利用与生态系统服务价值时空变化[J].生态学报,2020,40(14):4760-4773.
Lei J R, Chen Z Z, Chen X H, et al. Spatio-temporal changes of land use and ecosystem services value in Hainan Island from 1980 to 2018[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(14):4760-4773.
[11]程琳,李锋,邓华锋.中国超大城市土地利用状况及其生态系统服务动态演变[J].生态学报,2011,31(20):6194-6203.
Cheng L, Li F, Deng H F. Dynamics of land use and its ecosystem services in China's megacities[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011,31(20):6194-6203.
[12]刘桂林,张落成,张倩.长三角地区土地利用时空变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态学报,2014,34(12):3311-3319.
Liu G L, Zhang L C, Zhang Q. Spatial and temporal dynamics of land use and its influence on ecosystem service value in Yangtze River Delta[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014,34(12):3311-3319.
[13]孙慧兰,李卫红,陈亚鹏,等.新疆伊犁河流域生态服务价值对土地利用变化的响应[J].生态学报,2010,30(4):887-894.
Sun H L, Li W H, Chen Y P, et al. Response of ecological services value to land use change in the Ili River Basin, Xinjiang, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010,30(4):887-894.
[14]刘金巍,靳甜甜,刘国华,等.黑河中上游地区2000—2010年土地利用变化及水土保持服务功能[J].生态学报,2014,34(23):7013-7025.
Liu J W, Jin T T, Liu G H, et al. Changes in land use and soil and water conservation of the upper and middle reaches of Heihe River Basin during 2000 to 2010[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014,34(23):7013-7025.
[15]欧维新,王宏宁,陶宇.基于土地利用与土地覆被的长三角生态系统服务供需空间格局及热点区变化[J].生态学报,2018,38(17):6337-6347.
Ou W X, Wang H N, Tao Y. A land cover-based assessment of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics in the Yangtze River Delta Region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(17):6337-6347.
[16]许小亮,李鑫,肖长江,等.基于CLUE-S模型的不同情景下区域土地利用布局优化[J].生态学报,2016,36(17):5401-5410.
Xu X L, Li X, Xiao C J, et al. Land use layout optimization under different scenarios by using the CLUE-S model[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016,36(17):5401-5410.
[17]戚丽萍,栾兆擎,魏勉,等.基于土地利用的江苏省各市生态系统服务价值时空变化研究[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2023,47(4):200-208.
Qi L P, Luan Z Q, Wei M, et al. Spatial and temporal variations of ecosystem service values in Jiangsu Province based on land-use change[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition,2023,47(4):200-208.
[18]姚文艺,焦鹏.黄河流域水土保持综合治理空间均衡性分析[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(1):1-7,22.
Yao W Y, Jiao P. Spatial equilibrium analysis of comprehensive control of soil and water conservation in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,37(1):1-7,22.
[19]张攀,姚文艺,肖培青,等.黄河流域砒砂岩区多动力侵蚀交互叠加效应研究[J].水利学报,2022,53(1):109-116.
Zhang P, Yao W Y, Xiao P Q, et al. Interactive superposition effect of multi-dynamic erosion in the Pisha sandstone area of the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2022,53(1):109-116.
[20]姚文艺,李长明,张攀,等.砒砂岩侵蚀机理研究与展望[J].人民黄河,2018,40(6):1-7,65.
Yao W Y, Li C M, Zhang P, et al. Prospect and research on the erosion mechanism of pisha sandstone[J]. Yellow River, 2018,40(6):1-7,65.
[21]王宗明,张树清,张柏.土地利用变化对三江平原生态系统服务价值的影响[J].中国环境科学,2004(1):126-129.
Wang Z M, Zhang S Q, Zhang B. Effects of land use change on values of ecosystem services of Sanjiang Plain, China[J]. China Environmental Science, 2004(1):126-129.
[22]张天海,田野,徐舒,等.滨海城市土地利用格局演变及对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态学报,2018,38(21):7572-7581.
Zhang T H, Tian Y, Xu S, et al. The evolvement of land use patterns in coastal cities and its influence on ecosystem service values[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(21):7572-7581.
[23]张建,雷刚,漆良华,等.2003—2018年土地利用变化对丹江口市景观格局与生态服务价值的影响[J].生态学报,2021,41(4):1280-1290.
Zhang J, Lei G, Qi L H, et al. The landscape pattern and ecological service value in Danjiangkou City under land use change from 2003 to 2018[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(4):1280-1290.
[24]谢高地,肖玉,甄霖,等.我国粮食生产的生态服务价值研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2005,13(3):10-13.
Xie G D, Xiao Y, Zhen L, et al. Study on ecosystem services value of food production in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2005,13(3):10-13.
[25]李晓赛,朱永明,赵丽,等.基于价值系数动态调整的青龙县生态系统服务价值变化研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2015,23(3):373-381.
Li X S, Zhu Y M, Zhao L, et al. Ecosystem services value change in Qinglong County from dynamically adjusted value coefficients[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015,23(3):373-381.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2024-08-10