PDF Download

[1]Jia Tianchao,Hu Xiwu.Spatiotemporal Dynamic Evolution Characteristics of Land Use in China's ‘Two Screens and Three Belts' Ecological Barrier Areas from 1985 to 2020[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(04):348-363.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.038]

Copy

Spatiotemporal Dynamic Evolution Characteristics of Land Use in China's ‘Two Screens and Three Belts' Ecological Barrier Areas from 1985 to 2020

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 31 Number of periods: 2024 04 Page number: 348-363 Column: Public date: 2024-06-30

Title:: Spatiotemporal Dynamic Evolution Characteristics of Land Use in China's ‘Two Screens and Three Belts' Ecological Barrier Areas from 1985 to 2020

Author(s):: Jia Tianchao¹, Hu Xiwu^1,2; (1.School of Economics and Management, Qinghai Minzu University, Xining 810007, China; 2.Institute for Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality, Tianjin University-Qinghai Minzu University, Xining 810007, China)

Keywords:: ecological barrier area; land use change; transfer matrix; dynamic degree; spatiotemporal dynamics

CLC:: F301.24

DOI:: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.038

Abstract:: [Objective]The aims of this study are to explore the spatiotemporal dynamic evolution characteristics of land use in the ‘Two Screens and Three Belts' ecological barrier area, to reveal its differentiation rules, and to provide a basis for the integration of land resources in the study area and the construction of a national ecological security barrier. [Methods]Based on 8 periods of land use data from 1985 to 2020 in the ‘Two Screens and Three Belts' ecological barrier area, methods such as single land use dynamic degree, comprehensive land use dynamic degree and transfer matrix, three models were used to comprehensively analyze the spatiotemporal dynamic evolution characteristics and differentiation rules of land use change from the aspects of land use structure, dynamic degree and spatial transfer. [Results](1)In the ‘Two Screens and Three Belts' ecological barrier area from 1985 to 2020, except for the northern sand control belt whose grassland area increased by 20 618.03 km², the other four major barrier areas had decreased. Among them, the northeastern forest belt's grassland area had decreased the most, reaching up to 18 031.03 km². The area of construction land in the five major ecological barrier areas all increased, with the northern sand control belt increasing the most, reaching up to 7 280.79 km². The ecological land in the northeastern forest belt significantly decreased, and the non-ecological land increased significantly, which was consistent with the ecological barrier area contrary to the development requirements.(2)From 1985 to 2020, the land use type change rate in the south-central hilly and mountainous areas of the ‘Two Screens and Three Belts' ecological barrier area was the highest(the average comprehensive dynamic degree was 24.27%), and the difference in change rates among each stage was the largest(the comprehensive dynamic degree range was 31.23%). Except for the decrease in the dynamic degree of comprehensive land use in the northeastern forest belt, other barrier areas were on the rise.(3)The degree of land use conversion in the ‘two screens and three belts' ecological barrier areas had increased from 1985 to 2020. Among them, the Sichuan-Yunnan-Loess Plateau barrier and the northern sand control belt had increased significantly, with increases of 3.89% and 3.82%, respectively. The main types of land converted in each barrier area were cultivated land and grassland, and unused land accounted for a large proportion of the ecological barrier conversion in the northern sand control belt and Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. [Conclusion]From 1985 to 2020, the land use in the ‘two screens and three belts' ecological barrier area showed uneven evolution characteristics, land use planning and management should be carried out according to local conditions to further build the national ecological security barrier.

References:: [1]李聪慧,马彩虹,滑雨琪,等.黄河上游荒漠绿洲生态系统服务对三生用地变化的响应:以银川市为例[J].资源科学,2023,45(1):190-203.
Li C H, Ma C H, Hua Y Q, et al. Response of desert oasis ecosystem services to the production-living-ecological land change in the upper reaches of the Yellow River:A case study in Yinchuan City[J]. Resources Science, 2023,45(1):190-203.
[2]Veldkamp A, Lambin E F. Predicting land-use change[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2001,85(1/3):1-6.
[3]de Koning G H J, Verburg P H, Veldkamp A, et al. Multi-scale modelling of land use change dynamics in Ecuador[J]. Agricultural Systems, 1999,61(2):77-93.
[4]陈相标,丁文荣.滇中高原湖泊流域土地利用变化及生态系统服务功能[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(3):205-212.
Chen X B, Ding W R. Land use change and ecosystem service function in lake basin of central Yunnan Plateau[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,29(3):205-212.
[5]彭焕智,周国华,崔树强,等.湘江流域土地利用多功能性评价及障碍因子识别[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(4):308-315.
Peng H Z, Zhou G H, Cui S Q, et al. Evaluation and obstacle factor identification of multifunctionality of land use in Xiangjiang River Basin[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,29(4):308-315.
[6]许丽婷.乌江流域土地利用变化的自然因子[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(5):319-326.
Xu L T. Natural factors of land use change in Wujiang River Basin[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,29(5):319-326.
[7]夏春华,李阳兵,陈爽,等.三峡库区腹地土地利用动态演变路径分析:以奉节县为例[J].地理科学,2022,42(11):1975-1985.
Xia C H, Li Y B, Chen S, et al. Dynamic evolution path of land use in the hinterland of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area:A case study of Fengjie County[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2022,42(11):1975-1985.
[8]匡文慧,张树文,杜国明,等.2015—2020年中国土地利用变化遥感制图及时空特征分析[J].地理学报,2022,77(5):1056-1071.
Kuang W H, Zhang S W, Du G M, et al. Remotely sensed mapping and analysis of spatio-temporal patterns of land use change across China in 2015—2020[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022,77(5):1056-1071.
[9]张兴榆,黄贤金,赵小风,等.快速城市化地区土地利用动态变化及结构效率分析:以江苏省为例[J].中国土地科学,2008,22(10):24-30.
Zhang X Y, Huang X J, Zhao X F, et al. Analysis on dynamic changes and structural efficiency of land use in rapid urbanization regions:A case of Jiangsu Province[J]. China Land Science, 2008,22(10):24-30.
[10]陈磊,孙佳新,姜海,等.南京市土地利用结构时空格局及驱动因素[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(1):197-206.
Chen L, Sun J X, Jiang H, et al. Spatiotemporal pattern and driving factors of land use structure in Nanjing City[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020,27(1):197-206.
[11]王阳,魏建兵,程雨露,等.浑河上游新宾县土地利用演变对水源涵养能力影响评价[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(4):169-176.
Wang Y, Wei J B, Cheng Y L, et al. Evaluation of the impact of land use evolution on water conservation capacity in Xinbin County, upper reaches of Hunhe River[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,30(4):169-176.
[12]王力,牛铮,尹君,等.基于遥感技术的小城镇土地利用变化分析:以黄骅镇为例[J].资源科学,2006,28(5):68-75.
Wang L, Niu Z, Yin J, et al. Analyzing land use change of small towns based on RS technology:A case study in Huanghua Town[J]. Resources Science, 2006,28(5):68-75.
[13]吴菲,吴俊锋,凌虹,等.太湖流域土地利用变化研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(S1):143-145.
Wu F, Wu J F, Ling H, et al. Analysis on land use change of Taihu Basin[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2018,28(S1):143-145.
[14]武爱彬,刘欣,赵艳霞,等.浅山丘陵区土地利用格局的地形梯度特征与变化研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(1):181-185.
Wu A B, Liu X, Zhao Y X, et al. The distribution and change of the land use types in hilly region based on terrain features[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2015,29(1):181-185.
[15]樊杰.中国主体功能区划方案[J].地理学报,2015,70(2):186-201.
Fan J. Draft of major function oriented zoning of China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(2):186-201.
[16]尹礼唱,王晓峰,张琨,等.国家屏障区生态系统服务权衡与协同[J].地理研究,2019,38(9):2162-2172.
Yin L C, Wang X F, Zhang K, et al. Trade-offs and synergy between ecosystem services in National Barrier Zone[J]. Geographical Research, 2019,38(9):2162-2172.
[17]武燕,吴映梅,李琛,等.基于MAUP下川滇生态屏障区生态系统服务价值多尺度空间分异及地理探测响应[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(2):333-342.
Wu Y, Wu Y M, Li C, et al. Multi-scale spatial differentiation and geographic detection response of ecosystem service value in Sichuan-Yunnan ecological barrier based on the modifiable areal unit problem[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,30(2):333-342.
[18]孙鸿烈,郑度,姚檀栋,等.青藏高原国家生态安全屏障保护与建设[J].地理学报,2012,67(1):3-12.
Sun H L, Zheng D, Yao T D, et al. Protection and construction of the national ecological security shelter zone on Tibetan Plateau[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012,67(1):3-12.
[19]傅伯杰,欧阳志云,施鹏,等.青藏高原生态安全屏障状况与保护对策[J].中国科学院院刊,2021,36(11):1298-1306.
Fu B J, Ouyang Z Y, Shi P, et al. Current condition and protection strategies of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau ecological security barrier[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021,36(11):1298-1306.
[20]高彬嫔,李琛,吴映梅,等.川滇生态屏障区景观生态风险评价及影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(5):1603-1613.
Gao B P, Li C, Wu Y M, et al. Landscape ecological risk assessment and influencing factors in ecological conservation area in Sichuan-Yunnan Provinces, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021,32(5):1603-1613.
[21]傅伯杰.北方生态安全屏障建设的四大科学问题[J].人与生物圈,2021(1):8-11.
Fu B J. Four scientific problems in the construction of ecological security barrier in Northern China[J]. Man and the Biosphere, 2021(1):8-11.
[22]傅伯杰,王晓峰,冯晓明.国家屏障区生态系统评估[M].北京:科学出版社,2016.
Fu B J, Wang X F, Feng X M. Ecosystem Assessment of National Ecological Barrier[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2016.
[23]王晓峰,勒斯木初,张明明.“两屏三带”生态系统格局变化及其影响因素[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(7):2138-2148.
Wang X F, Lesi M C, Zhang M M. Ecosystem pattern change and its influencing factors of “two barriers and three belts”[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019,38(7):2138-2148.
[24]张静白.中国生态屏障区的土地利用/土地覆盖分类、评估与预测[D].兰州:西北师范大学,2023.
Zhang J B. Land Use/Land Cover Classification, Assessment and Prediction of Ecological Barrier Areas in China[D]. Lanzhou:Northwest Normal University, 2023.
[25]Yang J, Huang X. The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019[J]. Earth System Science Data, 2021,13(8):3907-3925.
[26]张瑞华,金钊,杨思齐,等.1985—2015年洛川塬土地利用/覆被变化及人类活动影响:以陕西省洛川县为例[J].地球环境学报,2023,14(1):74-85.
Zhang R H, Jin Z, Yang S Q, et al. Land use/land cover change and impacts of human activities in Luochuan tableland in 1985—2015:A case study of the Luochuan County of Shaanxi Province, China[J]. Journal of Earth Environment, 2023,14(1):74-85.
[27]王晓峰,尹礼唱,张园.关于生态屏障若干问题的探讨[J].生态环境学报,2016,25(12):2035-2040.
Wang X F, Yin L C, Zhang Y. Discussion on some issues of ecological barrier[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2016,25(12):2035-2040.
[28]刘卫林,李香,吴滨,等.修河中上游流域土地利用变化对径流的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(3):111-120.
Liu W L, Li X, Wu B, et al. Impact of land use change on runoff in the middle and upper reaches of Xiuhe River Basin[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,30(3):111-120.
[29]韩会然,杨成凤,宋金平.北京市土地利用变化特征及驱动机制[J].经济地理,2015,35(5):148-154,197.
Han H R, Yang C F, Song J P. The spatial-temporal characteristic of land use change in Beijing and its driving mechanism[J]. Economic Geography, 2015,35(5):148-154,197.
[30]吴琳娜,杨胜天,刘晓燕,等.1976年以来北洛河流域土地利用变化对人类活动程度的响应[J].地理学报,2014,69(1):54-63.
Wu L N, Yang S T, Liu X Y, et al. Response analysis of land use change to the degree of human activities in Beiluo River Basin since 1976[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(1):54-63.
[31]李细归,吴清,周勇.中国省域旅游生态安全时空格局与空间效应[J].经济地理,2017,37(3):210-217.
Li X G, Wu Q, Zhou Y. Spatio-temporal pattern and spatial effect of Chinese provincial tourism eco-security[J]. Economic Geography, 2017,37(3):210-217.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2024-06-30