PDF Download

[1]Li Yatong,Wang Guan,Ran Xinhao,et al.Influence of Slag Disposal Disturbance on Runoff and Sediment Yield in Mountain Meadow of Eastern Xizang[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(04):105-113.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.024]

Copy

Influence of Slag Disposal Disturbance on Runoff and Sediment Yield in Mountain Meadow of Eastern Xizang

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 31 Number of periods: 2024 04 Page number: 105-113 Column: Public date: 2024-06-30

Title:: Influence of Slag Disposal Disturbance on Runoff and Sediment Yield in Mountain Meadow of Eastern Xizang

Author(s):: Li Yatong, Wang Guan, Ran Xinhao, Xiao Huijie; (School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

Keywords:: process of runoff and sediment; soil and water loss; artificial rainfall simulation; alpine meadow; spoil disposal engineering

CLC:: S157.1

DOI:: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.024

Abstract:: [Objective]The aims of this study are to elucidate the response of soil and water loss resulting from slag dumping engineering disturbances during railway construction, and to unveil the impact of slag accumulation and vegetation restoration on soil and water loss at a slope scale in the ecologically fragile mountain meadow region of eastern Xizang. [Methods]Four slope types such as undisturbed, mildly disturbed, severely disturbed, and disturbed then covered with soil restoration were selected. The in-situ runoff plots were established. The process of sediment production and loss on slope was monitored by artificially simulated rainfall experiment. [Results](1)The quantity of spattering on the slope increased with the intensity of disturbance, with the amount on the downhill side being approximately 1.14 to 2.67 times greater than that on the uphill side.(2)The initial flow generation time for the lightly disturbed slope, heavily disturbed slope, and covered slope reduced from 53.8% to 66.7%, 34.6% to 46.7%, and 86.7% to 92.9%, respectively.(3)The flow production rates for the undisturbed slope, lightly disturbed slope, heavily disturbed slope, and covered slope ranged from 44 to 86 ml/(min·m²), 104 to 147 ml/(min·m²), 200 to 373 ml/(min·m²), and 46 to 95 ml/(min·m²), respectively. The sediment production rates ranged from 0.026 to 0.055 g/(min·m²), 0.05 to 0.098 g/(min·m²), 1.034 to 2.189 g/(min·m²), and 0.047 to 0.077 g/(min·m²), respectively. [Conclusion]The soil and water conservation capacity of the restored slope has been significantly improved in comparison to the lightly disturbed and heavily disturbed slopes. However, there still exists a disparity between the undisturbed slope and the covered slope. Therefore, additional vegetation or engineering measures need to be implemented to restore the disturbed slope effectively.

References:: [1]谢高地,张钇锂,鲁春霞,等.中国自然草地生态系统服务价值[J].自然资源学报,2001,16(1):47-53.
Xie G D, Zhang Y L, Lu C X, et al. Study on valuation of rangeland ecosystem services of China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2001,16(1):47-53.
[2]孙鸿烈,郑度,姚檀栋,等.青藏高原国家生态安全屏障保护与建设[J].地理学报,2012,67(1):3-12.
Sun H L, Zheng D, Yao T D, et al. Protection and construction of the national ecological security shelter zone on Tibetan Plateau[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012,67(1):3-12.
[3]田悦,赵正武,刘艳.西藏东部高寒草甸苔藓植物群落数量分类与排序[J].生态学报,2022,42(2):755-765.
Tian Y, Zhao Z W, Liu Y. Classification and ordination of bryophyte communities in alpine meadow of eastern Tibet[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(2):755-765.
[4]Yuan Y, Zhao Z Q, Niu S Y, et al. The reclaimed coal mine ecosystem diverges from the surrounding ecosystem and reaches a new self-sustaining state after 20～23 years of succession in the Loess Plateau area, China[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2020,727:138739.
[5]魏远,顾红波,薛亮,等.矿山废弃地土地复垦与生态恢复研究进展[J].中国水土保持科学,2012,10(2):107-114.
Wei Y, Gu H B, Xue L, et al. Review of studies on reclamation and ecological restoration of abandoned land of mine[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012,10(2):107-114.
[6]陈奇伯,黎建强,王克勤,等.水电站弃渣场岩土侵蚀人工模拟降雨试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(5):1-4,10.
Chen Q B, Li J Q, Wang K Q, et al. Artificial rainfall research of rock and soil erosion on dumpling pile in the hydropower station[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008,22(5):1-4,10.
[7]张荣华,荆莎莎,张洪达,等.胶东铁路弃土弃渣体产流产沙特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):80-85.
Zhang R H, Jing S S, Zhang H D, et al. Runoff and sediment yield characteristics on waste soil and slag formed from railway construction in Jiaodong peninsula region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018,32(3):80-85.
[8]张乐涛,高照良,李永红,等.模拟径流条件下工程堆积体陡坡土壤侵蚀过程[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(8):145-153.
Zhang L T, Gao Z L, Li Y H, et al. Soil erosion process of engineering accumulation in steep slope under simulated runoff conditions[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013,29(8):145-153.
[9]Dong J Z, Zhang K L, Guo Z L. Runoff and soil erosion from highway construction spoil deposits:A rainfall simulation study[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2012,17(1):8-14.
[10]郭雒敏,李晓丽,王文,等.坡度对紫红色砒砂岩击溅侵蚀的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(1):1-9.
Guo L M, Li X L, Wang W, et al. Influence of slope on the splash erosion of mauve Pisha-sandstone in bare areas[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,17(1):1-9.
[11]王葆,马俊明,程金花,等.华北土石山区砾石覆盖对土壤溅蚀的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(5):93-98.
Wang B, Ma J M, Cheng J H, et al. Effects of gravel coverage on splash erosion in the mountainous region of Northern China[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015,13(5):93-98.
[12]程金花,秦越,张洪江,等.华北土石山区模拟降雨下土壤溅蚀研究[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(2):153-161.
Cheng J H, Qin Y, Zhang H J, et al. Splash erosion under artificial rainfall in rocky mountain area of northern China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2015,46(2):153-161.
[13]相莹敏,张洪江,程金花,等.华北土石山区土壤溅蚀影响因素分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2016,14(2):120-126.
Xiang Y M, Zhang H J, Cheng J H, et al. Factors influencing soil splash erosion in rocky mountain area of Northern China[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016,14(2):120-126.
[14]丛月,张洪江,程金花,等.草本植物对雨滴动能的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(3):114-118.
Cong Y, Zhang H J, Cheng J H, et al. Effect of herbaceous plant effects on raindrop kinetic energy[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014,28(3):114-118.
[15]李晓丽,郭雒敏.降雨击溅下鄂尔多斯松散砒砂岩粒径分选特性及其敏感性分析[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文),2022,20(6):25-33.
Li X L, Guo L M. Grain size sorting characteristics of loose Pisha-sandstone in Ordos under rainfall splash and its sensitivity analysis[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,20(6):25-33.
[16]常松涛,黄少燕,查轩,等.雨强和植被覆盖度对红壤坡面产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):58-63.
Chang S T, Huang S Y, Zha X, et al. Effects of rainfall intensity and vegetation coverage on runoff and sediment yield on red soil slope[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,33(3):58-63.
[17]白永会,查轩,吴伟成,等.不同植被恢复模式对退化花岗岩红壤渗透性和持水量的影响[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(2):9-15.
Bai Y H, Zha X, Wu W C, et al. Effects of different vegetation restoration types on permeability and water holding capacity of degraded granite red soil[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,43(2):9-15.
[18]戎玉博,白玉洁,王森,等.含砾石锥状工程堆积体坡面径流侵蚀特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):109-115.
Rong Y B, Bai Y J, Wang S, et al. Characteristics of slope runoff erosion on the cone shaped engineering accumulation with gravel[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018,32(1):109-115.
[19]奚成刚,杨成永,许兆义.铁路工程施工期路堑边坡面产流产沙规律研究[J].中国环境科学,2002,22(2):174-178.
Xi C G, Yang C Y, Xu Z Y. Studies on rules of runoff and sediment yield on the road cutting slope during construction of the railway[J]. China Environmental Science, 2002,22(2):174-178.
[20]史倩华,王文龙,郭明明,等.模拟降雨条件下含砾石红壤工程堆积体产流产沙过程[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(9):2673-2680.
Shi Q H, Wang W L, Guo M M, et al. Runoff and sediment yielding processes on red soil engineering accumulation containing gravels by a simulated rainfall experiment[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015,26(9):2673-2680.
[21]Wang G Y, Innes J, Yang Y S, et al. Extent of soil erosion and surface runoff associated with large-scale infrastructure development in Fujian Province, China[J]. Catena, 2012,89(1):22-30.
[22]陈卓,高照良,李永红,等.2种扰动土壤工程堆积体坡面泥沙运移特征比对研究[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(1):34-40.
Chen Z, Gao Z L, Li Y H, et al. Comparative study of sediment particle transport on slopes of two disturbed soil engineering accumulations[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020,34(1):34-40.
[23]王保一,张荣华,荆莎莎,等.降雨和坡度对路基边坡产流产沙的影响[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2019,43(2):114-120.
Wang B Y, Zhang R H, Jing S S, et al. Effects of rainfall and slope gradient on runoff and sediment yield of subgrade slope[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2019,43(2):114-120.
[24]魏小燕,毕华兴,霍云梅.不同土壤坡面产流产沙特征对比分析[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(4):44-48.
Wei X Y, Bi H X, Huo Y M. Comparative analysis of the features of runoff and sediment yield on the different soil slopes[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016,30(4):44-48.
[25]李建明,王文龙,王贞,等.神府东胜煤田弃土弃渣体径流产沙过程的野外试验[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(12):3537-3545.
Li J M, Wang W L, Wang Z, et al. A field experiment of runoff and sediment yielding processes from residues in Shenfu-Dong-sheng Coalfield[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013,24(12):3537-3545.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2024-06-30