[1]Lin Xiaoyan,Wang Jingjing,Wubing Sun,et al.Soil Water Characteristics Curves and Model Optimization of Tropical Latosol Rubber Planting Area Under Different Fertilization[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(01):105-116.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.01.003]
Copy
Soil Water Characteristics Curves and Model Optimization of Tropical Latosol Rubber Planting Area Under Different Fertilization
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
31
Number of periods:
2024 01
Page number:
105-116
Column:
Public date:
2024-02-20
- Title:
- Soil Water Characteristics Curves and Model Optimization of Tropical Latosol Rubber Planting Area Under Different Fertilization
- Keywords:
- soil water characteristics curves; fertilization treatments; rubber plantation; soil pore distribution; soil water-holding capacity
- CLC:
- S273
- DOI:
- 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.01.003
- Abstract:
- [Objective] The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of fertilization measures on soil water-holding capacity and pore characteristics in tropical rubber plantations and to optimize the simulation model for describing soil moisture characteristic curves of latosol rubber plantations. [Methods] of the soil water characteristics curves of five conventional fertilization treatments(organic fertilizer mixed with chemical fertilizer(H), chemical fertilizer(C), planting green manure(G), special fertilizer(S)and no fertilization(CK))in rubber plantations were determined in full suction section by using sandbox drainage method combining with pressure film instrument method. Four empirical models, Brooks-Corey(BC), van Genuchten(VG), Gardner and Log-Normal Distribution(LND)were used for fitting and the applicability, and fitting accuracies of different models were analyzed. [Results] In the low suction section(pF≤3.01), the change of soil water content in the 0—5 cm soil layer was the largest in the C treatment(0.44 cm3/cm3). In the high suction stage(3.01<pF≤4.18), the soil moisture content in the 0—5 cm soil layer decreased slightly, and the decrease in H treatment was the largest(0.05 cm3/cm3). In the low suction section of 5—10 cm soil layer, C treatment had the largest decrease(0.52 cm3/cm3). In the high suction section, the moisture content of the 5—10 cm soil layer has the largest decrease in C treatment(0.03 cm3/cm3). In the 0—5 cm soil layer, the available soil moisture content of the CK treatment was the largest(0.19 cm3/cm3). In the 5—10 cm soil layer, the soil available water content of the C treatment was the largest(0.11 cm3/cm3). In the 0—5 cm soil layer, the proportion of soil voids(5.2%)and macropores(0.8%)in the CK treatment was the smallest, the proportion of medium voids(48.7%)was the highest. In the 5—10 cm soil layer, it could be seen that the proportion of soil voids and macropores in the C treatment was the smallest among all treatments, and the soil pore type was relatively simple, and the soil water holding capacity was strong.(4)Four models of BC, VG, Gardner and LND could be used to fit the soil moisture characteristic curves of different fertilization treatments in latosol planting rubber gardens. The fitting accuracies of different models were BC, VG, LND and Gardner models in descending order. In addition, the VG model had high accuracy in fitting residual water content and saturated water content. [Conclusion] CK treatment was the optimal fertilization management method among all fertilization treatments in the 0—5 cm soil layer, and C treatment was the optimal fertilization management method among all the fertilization treatments in the 5—10 cm soil layer(R2≥0.84). These research results can provide the reference for the optimization of fertilization management measures in tropical latosol rubber plantations.
- References:
-
[1] 祁栋灵,杨小波,谢贵水,等.以橡胶为主的农林复合生态系统对调控资源利用和生态服务功能的影响[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(11):3844-3852.
Qi D L, Yang X B, Xie G S, et al. The influence of rubber-based agroforestry system on regulating resource use and ecological services[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2020,39(11):3844-3852.
[2] Gerhard L, Georg C, Konrad M, et al. Rubber intercropping:A viable concept for the 21st century[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2017,91(3):577-596.
[3] 海南省统计局.海南省统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2021.
Hainan Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Hainan statistical yearbook[M]. Beijing, China Statistics Press, 2021.
[4] Wu J E, Liu W J, Chen C F. How do plants share water sources in a rubber-tea agroforestry system during the pronounced dry season?[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2017,236:69-77.
[5] 陈印平,夏江宝,刘俊华.不同农田防护林下盐碱地土壤水分特征曲线差异对比[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(5):18-24.
Chen Y P, Xia J B, Liu J H. Comparison of soil water characteristic curves of saline-alkali land under different farmland shelterbelts[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,17(5):18-24.
[6] 来剑斌,王全九.土壤水分特征曲线模型比较分析[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(1):137-140.
Lai J B, Wang Q J. Comparison of soil water retention curve model[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2003,17(1):137-140.
[7] 吕殿青,王宏,王玲.离心机法测定持水特征中的土壤收缩变化研究[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(3):209-212,216.
Lv D Q, Wang H, Wang L. Soil shrinking change during measuring retention characteristics by centrifugal method[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010,24(3):209-212,216.
[8] 王红兰,唐翔宇,鲜青松,等.紫色土水分特征曲线室内测定方法的对比[J].水科学进展,2016,27(2):240-248.
Wang H L, Tang X Y, Xian Q S, et al. Comparison of laboratory methods for determining water retention curves in purple soil[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2016,27(2):240-248.
[9] Cresswell H P, Green T W, Mckenzie N J. The adequacy of pressure plate apparatus for determining soil water retention[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2008,72:41-49.
[10] Brooks R H, Corey A T. Hydraulic properties of porous media[J]. International Series of Numerical Mathematics, 1964,114:37-50.
[11] Gardner W R, Hillel D, Benyamini Y. Post-irrigation movement of soil water:1. redistribution[J]. Water Resources Research, 1970,6(3):851-861.
[12] Van Genuchten M T. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1980,44(5):892-898.
[13] Kosugi K. Lognormal distribution model for unsaturated soil hydraulic properties[J]. Water Resources Research, 1996,32(9):2697-2703.
[14] Tian Z C, Gao W D, Ren T S, et al. Approaches for estimating soil water retention curves at various bulk densities with the extended van genuchten model[J]. Water Resources Research, 2018,54(8):719-731.
[15] Seyedeh Z M, Ebrahim P, Fariborz A, et al. Estimation of soil water retention curve using fractal dimension[J]. Environmental Management, 2018,22(2):173-178.
[16] 兰志龙, Muhammad N K, Tanveer A S,等.25年长期定位不同施肥措施对关中塿土水力学性质的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(24):100-106.
Lan Z L, Muhammad N K, Tanveer A S, et al. Effects of 25-yr located different fertilization measures on soil hydraulic properties of lou soil in Guanzhong area[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018,34(24):100-106.
[17] Lu S G, Yu X L, Zong Y T. Nano-microscale porosity and pore size distribution in aggregates of paddy soil as affected by long-term mineral and organic fertilization under rice-wheat cropping system[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2019(186):191-199.
[18] 丁新原,周智彬,雷加强,等.塔里木沙漠公路防护林土壤水分特征曲线模型分析与比较[J].干旱区地理,2015,38(5):985-993.
Ding X Y, Zhou Z B, Lei J Q, et al. Analysis and comparison of models for soil water characteristic curves of Tarim Desert Highway Shelterbelt[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2015,38(5):985-993.
[19] 王子龙,常广义,姜秋香,等.黑土区土壤水分特征曲线模拟及模型优选[J].东北农业大学学报,2018,49(9):36-43.
Wang Z L, Chang G Y, Jiang Q X, et al. Simulation and models optimization of soil water characteristic curve in black soil region[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2018,49(9):36-43,60.
[20] 张强,孙向阳,黄利江,等.毛乌素沙地土壤水分特征曲线和入渗性能的研究[J].林业科学研究,2004(S1):9-14.
Zhang Q, Sun X Y, Huang L J, et al. Studies on soil water characteristic curves and infiltration capability of maowusu sandy soil[J]. Forest Research, 2004(S1):9-14.
[21] 郑博文,胡顺军,周智彬,等.古尔班通古特沙漠南缘风沙土土壤水分特征与毛管水最大上升高度[J].干旱区地理,2020,43(4):1059-1066.
Zheng B W, Hu S J, Zhou Z B, et al. maximum height of capillary rising water and characteristic of soil moisture in the southern edge of Gurbantunggut Desert[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020,43(4):1059-1066.
[22] 石浩楠,陈植华,胡成,等.江汉平原北部黏土层土壤水分特征曲线的测定与模拟[J].安全与环境工程,2019,26(5):25-32.
Shi H N, Chen Z H, Hu C, et al. Measurement and simulation of soil water characteristic curve of clay layer in the northern jianghan plain[J]. Safety and Environment Engineering, 2019,26(5):25-32.
[23] 廖海.基于孔隙结构的盐渍化土壤水分特征曲线模型[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2021.
Liao H. Characteristic curve model of salinized soil based on pore structure[D]. Yang Ling,Shaanxi:Northwest A&F University, 2021.
[24] 鲁建荣,张奇,李云良,等.鄱阳湖典型洲滩湿地植物根系对水分垂向通量的影响[J].中国环境科学,2020,40(5):2180-2189.
Lu J R, Zhang Q, Li Y L, et al. Impact of typical plant roots on vertical soil water movement in Poyang Lake Wetland:a numerical study[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020,40(5):2180-2189.
[25] 夏天,田军仓.基于黏粒量的土壤水分特征曲线预测模型[J].灌溉排水学报,2021,40(3):9-14.
Xia T, Tian J C. Using clay content to estimate soil water characteristic curve[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2021,40(3):9-14.
[26] 罗丽澎,王辉,朱晋斌,等.温度对南方红壤和水稻土水分特征曲线影响差异性分析[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(5):72-78,84.
Luo L P, Wang H, Zhu J B, et al. Difference analysis of temperature effect on water characteristic curves red soil and paddy soil in south china[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,33(5):72-78,84.
[27] 张强,谢君毅,牛芸,等.不同施肥处理对杉木林土壤水源涵养功能的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2021,41(2):112-122.
Zhang Q, Xie J Y, Niu Y, et al. Effects of different fertilization treatments on soil's water conservation function of Chinese fir plantation[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2021,41(2):112-122.
[28] 黎丽娜.长期不同施肥及施肥措施改变后红壤性水稻土孔隙变化特征[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2020.
Li L N. Pore variation of red paddy soil after long-term different fertilization and revised fertilization measures[D]. Hunan Agricultural University, 2020.
[29] Cameron K C, Buchan G D. Porosity and pore size distribution[M]. Florida:Chemical Rubber Company, 2006:1350-1353..
[30] 雷志栋,杨诗华,谢森传.土壤水动力学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1988:18-24.
Lei Z D, Yang S H, Xie S H. Soil hydrodynamics[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 1988:18-24.
[31] 冯天骄,卫伟,陈利顶,等.黄土丘陵区小流域不同整地措施长期影响下的土壤水力学特性[J].环境科学,2017,38(9):3860-3870.
Feng T J, Wei W, Chen L D, et al. Comparison of soil hydraulic characteristics under the conditions of long-term land preparation and natural slope in longtan catchment of the loess hilly region[J]. Environmental Science, 2017,38(9):3860-3870.
[32] 牛晓彤,刘目兴,易军,等.三峡山地土壤水分特征曲线及模型拟合[J].灌溉排水学报,2017,36(9):75-80.
Niu X T, Liu M X, Yi J, et al. Water release curves and their fitting for soils in the hills of the three gorges reservoir[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2017,36(9):75-80.
[33] 秦文静,樊贵盛.原状黄土土壤水分特征曲线预测模型优选[J].节水灌溉,2020(3):17-20.
Qin W J, Fan G S. Comparison and selection of prediction models for soil water characteristic curves of undisturbed loess[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2020(3):17-20.
[34] 王愿斌,王佳铭,樊媛媛,等.土壤水分特征曲线模型模拟性能评价[J].冰川冻土,2019,41(6):1448-1455.
Wang Y B, Wang J M, Fan Y Y, et al. Performance evaluation of 12 models describing the soil water retention characteristic[J]. Journal of Claciology and Geocryology, 2019,41(6):1448-1455.
[35] 宋孝玉,李亚娟,李怀有,等.土壤水分特征曲线单一参数模型的建立及应用[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(12):12-15.
Song X Y, Li Y J, Li H Y, et al. Establishment and application of one-parameter model of soil water characteristic curve[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008,24(12):12-15.
[36] Ning S R, Chen C, Zhou B B, et al. Evaluation of normalized root length density distribution models[J]. Field Crops Research, 2019,242:107604.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2024-02-20