PDF Download

[1]ZHANG Yiqing,ZHAO Xiang,PAN Yupiao,et al.Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Major Ecological Lands in Hubei Province from 2009 to 2019[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(05):417-426.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.001.]

Copy

Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Major Ecological Lands in Hubei Province from 2009 to 2019

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 30 Number of periods: 2023 05 Page number: 417-426 Column: Public date: 2023-08-10

Title:: Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Major Ecological Lands in Hubei Province from 2009 to 2019

Author(s):: ZHANG Yiqing¹, ZHAO Xiang¹, PAN Yupiao¹, LIU Zhongqiu², YIN Feng³; (1.School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China; 2.Wuhan Geoway Institute of Space Information Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430014, China; 3.Spatial Planning Institute of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430070, China)

Keywords:: ecological land; spatial pattern; land transfer; landscape pattern; Geodetector; driving factors; Hubei Province

CLC:: F301.24; Q149

DOI:: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.001.

Abstract:: [Objective] The analysis of the spatial and temporal evolution patterns and drivers of ecological lands is of great significance to optimize the ecological security pattern and enhance the sustainable supply of regional ecosystem services in Hubei Province. [Methods] Based on the land survey data, the area and structure, landscape pattern, spatial and temporal changes and drivers of major ecological lands in Hubei Province during 2009—2019 were analyzed by using the landscape pattern indies and Geodetector model. [Results](1)The total area of ecological lands in Hubei Province showed a rising trend, while the contiguity of major ecological lands decreased during 2009—2019, and the risk of interference and erosion of ecological lands by human activities also increased at the same time.(2)Urbanization and agricultural production activities, such as the development of arable land and orchard, were the main causes of ecological lands loss. On the other hand, forest(lake)rehabilitation and land consolidation project were the main ways to replenish ecological lands in Hubei Province.(3)The major drivers of ecological land change in Hubei Province included average annual precipitation, urbanization rate, per capita arable land area, gross value of primary industry, and edge density and landscape shape index of the ecological land patches. Among them, the interaction between urbanization rate and primary industry output could explain 86.6% of ecological land changes, indicating that the combined effect of urbanization and agricultural development was the main cause of ecological land changes in Hubei Province. [Conclusion] The total amount of ecological land in Hubei Province was improving. However, attention should be focused on the negative impacts of ecological land spatial patterns and human activities, such as living and production, on the ecological land. In the future, it is necessary to optimize the ecological space protection pattern, enhance the utilization efficiency of agricultural and built-up land, and build a solid ecological barrier in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River.

References:: [1] 吴英迪,蒙吉军.中国自然资源生态服务重要性评价与空间格局分析[J].自然资源学报,2022,37(1):17-33.
[2] 方露露,许德华,王伦澈,等.长江、黄河流域生态系统服务变化及权衡协同关系研究[J].地理研究,2021,40(3):821-838.
[3] Termorshuizen J W, Opdam P. Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2009,24:1037-1052.
[4] Tian C, Cheng L L, Yin T T. Impacts of anthropogenic and biophysical factors on ecological land using logistic regression and random forest:A case study in Mentougou District, Beijing, China[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2022,19(2):433-445.
[5] Yao G, Li H, Wang N, et al. Spatiotemporal variations and driving factors of ecological land during urbanization: A case study in the Yangtze River's lower reaches[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(7): 4256.
[6] 陈万旭,李江风,曾杰,等.中国土地利用变化生态环境效应的空间分异性与形成机理[J].地理研究,2019,38(9):2173-2187.
[7] 高吉喜,刘晓曼,王超,等.中国重要生态空间生态用地变化与保护成效评估[J].地理学报,2021,76(7):1708-1721.
[8] 冯琰玮,甄江红,马晨阳.内蒙古生态承载力评价及生态安全格局优化[J].地理研究,2021,40(4):1096-1110.
[9] 崔家兴,顾江,孙建伟,等.湖北省三生空间格局演化特征分析[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(8):67-73.
[10] 董雅文,周雯,周岚,等.城市化地区生态防护研究:以江苏省,南京市为例[J].城市研究,1999,2(2):6-10.
[11] 谭永忠,赵越,曹宇,等.中国区域生态用地分类的研究进展[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(9):28-36.
[12] 邓红兵,陈春娣,刘昕,等.区域生态用地的概念及分类[J].生态学报,2009,29(3):1519-1524.
[13] 龙花楼,刘永强,李婷婷,等.生态用地分类初步研究[J].生态环境学报,2015,24(1):1-7.
[14] 喻锋,李晓波,张丽君,等.中国生态用地研究:内涵、分类与时空格局[J].生态学报,2015,35(14):4931-4943.
[15] 王静,王雯,祁元,等.中国生态用地分类体系及其1996—2012年时空分布[J].地理研究,2017,36(3):453-470.
[16] 卫新东,张健,王筛妮,等.黄河流域2000—2020年生态用地格局变化与分异趋势[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(11):3424-3435.
[17] 周婷,戚佳玲,徐之寒,等.长江经济带生态用地变化类型识别及驱动因素分析(英文)[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2021,12(2):175-191.
[18] 岳健,张雪梅.关于我国土地利用分类问题的讨论[J].干旱区地理,2003,26(1):78-88.
[19] 陈婧,史培军.土地利用功能分类探讨[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2005,41(5):536-540.
[20] 金贵,王占岐,姚小薇,等.国土空间分区的概念与方法探讨[J].中国土地科学,2013,27(5):48-53.
[21] 邢晓露,郭岚,杨梅焕,等.低山丘陵区县域生态用地演变及生态服务价值响应[J].农业资源与环境学报,2021,38(5):900-908.
[22] 王旭,马伯文,李丹,等.基于FLUS模型的湖北省生态空间多情景模拟预测[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(1):230-242.
[23] 蒋好雨,陈荣蓉,杨朝现,等.西部平原区生态用地时空动态特征及环境效应[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(2):203-209.
[24] 刘彦文,刘成武,何宗宜,等.基于地理加权回归模型的武汉城市圈生态用地时空演变及影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(3):987-998.
[25] 尹娟,资本飞,阳利永,等.抚仙湖流域生态用地时空演变及其驱动因素[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(6):228-235.
[26] 安国强,秦晓敏,许霄霄,等.山东省生态用地变化及驱动因素影响评价[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(9):45-54.
[27] 管青春,郝晋珉,石雪洁,等.中国生态用地及生态系统服务价值变化研究[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(2):195-207.
[28] 陈瑜琦,张智杰,郭旭东,等.中国重点生态功能区生态用地时空格局变化研究[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(2):19-26.
[29] 徐建英,樊斐斐,刘焱序,等.汶川县生态系统服务对景观格局及其变化的响应[J].生态学报,2020,40(14):4724-4736.
[30] 张月,张飞,王娟,等.近40年艾比湖湿地自然保护区生态干扰度时空动态及景观格局变化[J].生态学报,2017,37(21):7082-7097.
[31] 罗红,陈磊,姜运力,等.自然保护地整合优化的景观格局变化分析:以贵州省思南县为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(20):8076-8086.
[32] 吴健生,罗可雨,赵宇豪.深圳市近20年城市景观格局演变及其驱动因素[J].地理研究,2020,39(8):1725-1738.
[33] 王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.
[34] 张华玉,秦年秀,汪军能,等.广西海岸带土地利用时空格局及其驱动因子[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(3):367-374.
[35] 李颖,冯玉,彭飞,等.基于地理探测器的天津市生态用地格局演变[J].经济地理,2017,37(12):180-189.
[36] 黄木易,岳文泽,方斌,等.1970—2015年大别山区生态服务价值尺度响应特征及地理探测机制[J].地理学报,2019,74(9):1904-1920.
[37] Zhang W, Wang L, Xiang F, et al. Vegetation dynamics and the relations with climate change at multiple time scales in the Yangtze River and Yellow River Basin, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 110: 105892.
[38] 赖国华,胡宝清,李敏,等.桂西南—北部湾地区“三生”用地演变及其驱动力的地理探测[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(4):236-243.
[39] Feng R, Wang F, Wang K, et al. Quantifying influences of anthropogenic-natural factors on ecological land evolution in mega-urban agglomeration: A case study of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao greater Bay area[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 283: 125304.
[40] Ruan W Q, Li Y Q, Zhang S N, et al. Evaluation and drive mechanism of tourism ecological security based on the DPSIR-DEA model[J]. Tourism Management, 2019,75:609-625.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2023-08-10