[1]ZHONG Shaozhuo,SUN Haoyuan.Assessment on Spatiotemporal Variation and Synergies/Tradeoffs Relationships of Ecosystem Services in Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve Under Different Scenarios[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(05):358-369.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.032.]
Copy
Assessment on Spatiotemporal Variation and Synergies/Tradeoffs Relationships of Ecosystem Services in Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve Under Different Scenarios
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
30
Number of periods:
2023 05
Page number:
358-369
Column:
Public date:
2023-08-10
- Title:
- Assessment on Spatiotemporal Variation and Synergies/Tradeoffs Relationships of Ecosystem Services in Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve Under Different Scenarios
- Keywords:
- Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve; ecosystem services; synergies and tradeoffs; scenario simulation
- CLC:
- X826
- DOI:
- 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.032.
- Abstract:
- [Objective] The aims of this study are to analyze the spatiotemporal characteristics of ecosystem services in Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve, and explore synergies and tradeoffs between ecosystem services, thus providing scientific support for future management. [Methods] Based on historical data and scenarios of Logistic-CA-Markov approach, InVEST model was employed to evaluate four ecosystem services, i. e. water yield, carbon storage, habitat quality and soil conservation, in Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve from 2000 to 2050, and then synergies and tradeoffs between ecosystem services were analyzed by spearman correlation analysis and spatial autocorrelation analysis. [Results] Grassland was the main land type in the study area. From 2000 to 2020, the areas of grassland, cultivated land and construction land increased, while the area of forest land decreased. In 2050, the natural-based scenario will continue such a trend, but the ecological protection scenario will show an inverse change. From 2000 to 2020, carbon storage and habitat quality increased, while water yield and soil conservation decreased obviously. The high values of four ecosystem services almost appeared in the south and the low ones in the north. Compared with 2020, the values of all ecosystem services will increase in 2050, especially in the ecological protection scenario. Ecosystem services were generally synergetic, while their local trade-offs/synergies relationship expressed significant spatial heterogeneity. Particularly, the strongest synergistic effects occurred between carbon storage and water yield. [Conclusion] Meaningful spatial-temporal heterogeneity between ecosystem services in Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve is discovered, which will need partition management in the future.
- References:
-
[1] 范振林,李娜,李维明.甘肃省祁连山国家公园生态系统服务价值评估[J].当代经济,2021(12):70-77.
[2] 郑德凤,郝帅,吕乐婷,等.三江源国家公园生态系统服务时空变化及权衡与协同关系[J].地理研究,2020,39(1):64-78.
[3] Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387(6630):253-260.
[4] Rodriguez J P, Beard Jr T D, Bennett E M, et al. Trade-offs across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Service[J]. Ecology and Society, 2006,11(1):28,Doi:org/10.5751/ES-01667-110128.
[5] 李鹏,姜鲁光,封志明,等.生态系统服务竞争与协同研究进展[J].生态学报,2012,32(16):5219-5229.
[6] 戴尔阜,王晓莉,朱建佳,等.生态系统服务权衡:方法、模型与研究框架[J].地理研究,2016,35(6):1005-1016.
[7] 李双成,张才玉,刘金龙,等.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题[J].地理研究,2013,32(8):1379-1390.
[8] 傅伯杰,于丹丹.生态系统服务权衡与集成方法[J].资源科学,2016,38(1):1-9.
[9] Haase D, Schwarz N, Strohbach M, et al. Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: an integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany[J]. Ecology and Society, 2012,17(3):102-123.
[10] Onaindia M, de Manuel B F, Madariaga I, et al. Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013,289:1-9.
[11] 王蓓,赵军,胡秀芳.石羊河流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系研究[J].生态学报,2018,38(21):7582-7595.
[12] 钱彩云,巩杰,张金茜,等.甘肃白龙江流域生态系统服务变化及权衡与协同关系[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):868-879.
[13] Thompson J R, Lambert K F, Foster D R, et al. The consequences of four land-use scenarios for forest ecosystems and the services they provide[J]. Ecosphere, 2016,7(10):e01469.
[14] 林媚珍,刘汉仪,周汝波,等.多情景模拟下粤港澳大湾区生态系统服务评估与权衡研究[J].地理研究,2021,40(9):2657-2669.
[15] 钱大文,曹广民,杜岩功,等.2000—2015年祁连山南坡生态系统服务价值时空变化[J].生态学报,2020,40(4):1392-1404.
[16] 焦亮,赵成章.祁连山国家自然保护区山丹马场草地生态系统服务功能价值分析及评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(12):47-52.
[17] 张恒玮.基于InVEST模型的石羊河流域生态系统服务评估[D].兰州:西北师范大学,2016.
[18] 孙飞翔,吕一河,胡健.祁连山大野口小流域生态系统水文调节服务的尺度特征[J].生态与农村环境学报,2015,31(3):273-279.
[19] 王琼琳.基于InVEST模型的祁连山东部主要生态系统服务功能评价[D].北京:北京林业大学,2021.
[20] 陈童尧.基于InVEST模型的土壤保持生态服务功能研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2019.
[21] 赵文斐.气候变化背景下生态系统服务功能特征研究[D].南京:南京信息工程大学硕士论文,2021.
[22] 何丹,金凤君,周璟.基于Logistic-CA-Markov的土地利用景观格局变化:以京津冀都市圈为例[J].地理科学,2011,31(8):903-910.
[23] 武丹,李欢,艾宁,等.基于CA-Markov的土地利用时空变化与生境质量预测:以宁夏中部干旱区为例[J].中国生态农业学报,2020,28(12):1969-1978.
[24] 金贵,邓祥征,陈冬冬,等.黄淮海平原农地流转空间分布与格局特征[J].资源科学,2016,38(8):1515-1524.
[25] Yang S Q, Zhao W W, Liu Y X, et al. Influence of land use change on the ecosystem service trade-offs in the ecological restoration area:Dynamics and scenarios in the Yanhe watershed, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018,644:556-566.
[26] Pontius R G, Schneider L C. Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2001,8(5):239-248.
[27] 褚琳,张欣然,王天巍,等.基于CA-Markov和InVEST模型的城市景观格局与生境质量时空演变及预测[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(12):4106-4118.
[28] 陈泽怡,余珮珩,陈奕云,等.汉江流域水源涵养和水质净化服务时空分析[J].生态经济,2022,38(4):193-200.
[29] 刘洋,张军,周冬梅,等.基于InVEST模型的疏勒河流域碳储量时空变化研究[J].生态学报,2021,41(10):4052-4065.
[30] 孔君洽,杜泽玉,杨荣,等.黑河中游土地利用/覆被变化及其对碳储量影响的预测[J].中国沙漠,2019,39(3):87-97.
[31] 吕荣芳,赵文鹏,田晓磊,等.祁连山地区生态系统服务间权衡的社会—生态环境响应机制研究[J].冰川冻土,2021,43(3):928-938.
[32] 许宝荣,刘一川,董莹,等.基于InVEST模型的兰州地区生境质量评价[J].中国沙漠,2021,41(5):120-129.
[33] 张华,韩武宏,宋金岳,等.祁连山国家公园生境质量时空演变[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(5):1419-1430.
[34] 薛晓玉,王晓云,段含明,等.基于土地利用变化的祁连山地区生境质量时空演变分析[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(2):278-284,325.
[35] Zhang L, Hickel K, Dawes W R, et al. A rational function approach for estimating mean annual evapotranspiration[J]. Water Resources Research, 2004,40(2):89-97.
[36] 刘越,李雨珊,单姝瑶,等.甘肃祁连山国家级自然保护区水源涵养量的时空变化[J].草业科学,2021,38(8):1420-1431.
[37] 章文波,付金生.不同类型雨量资料估算降雨侵蚀力[J].资源科学,2003,25(1):35-41.
[38] Williams J R, Renard K G, Dyke P T. Epic-A new method for assessing erosions effect on soil productivity[J]. Lournal of Soil and Water Consevation, 1983,38(5):381-383.
[39] Sharp R, Tallis H T, Ricketts T, et al. InVEST 3.2. 0 user's guide[R]. The Natural Capital Project, 2018.
[40] 陈童尧,贾燕锋,王佳楠,等.基于InVEST模型的祁连山国家级自然保护区土壤保持现状与功能[J].干旱区研究,2020,37(1):150-159.
[41] 刘洋.基于InVEST模型的疏勒河流域生态系统服务功能时空演变[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2020.
[42] 陈童尧.基于InVEST模型的土壤保持生态服务功能研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2019.
[43] 杨洁,谢保鹏,张德罡.黄河流域生态系统服务权衡协同关系时空异质性[J].中国沙漠,2021,41(6):78-87.
[44] 巩杰,柳冬青,高秉丽,等.西部山区流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系:以甘肃白龙江流域为例[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(4):1278-1288.
[45] Wartenberg D. Multivariate spatial correlation:A method for exploratory geographical analysis[J]. Geographical Analysis, 1985,17(4):263-283.
[46] 王秋红,王勇,李维杰,等.喀斯特山地城市生态系统服务变化及关系研究:以贵阳市为例[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2022,44(5):158-168.
[47] 杨强强,徐光来,李爱娟,等.青弋江流域生态系统服务评估与权衡研究[J].生态学报,2021,41(23):9315-9327.
[48] 徐新良,庄大方,贾绍凤,等. GIS环境下基于DEM的中国流域自动提取方法[J].长江流域资源与环境,2004,13(4):343-348.
[49] 尚二萍,许尔琪.黔桂喀斯特山地主要生态系统服务时空变化[J].资源科学,2017,39(10):2000-2015.
[50] 陈妍,乔飞,江磊.基于InVEST模型的土地利用格局变化对区域尺度生境质量的影响研究:以北京为例[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,2016,52(3):553-562.
[51] 张学儒,周杰,李梦梅.基于土地利用格局重建的区域生境质量时空变化分析[J].地理学报,2020,75(1):160-178.
[52] 李屹峰,罗跃初,刘纲,等.土地利用变化对生态系统服务功能的影响:以密云水库流域为例[J].生态学报,2013,33(3):726-736.
[53] 李鸿健,任志远,刘焱序,等.西北河谷盆地生态系统服务的权衡与协同分析:以银川盆地为例[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(6):1731-1738.
[54] 胡秀芳,赵军,王蓓,等.黑河流域生态系统服务空间协同与权衡变化[J].生态学杂志,2022,41(3):580-588.
[55] 陈健.激活“海洋绿肺”守护“最美红树林”[N].广西法治日报,2023-01-31(B01). DOI:10,28239/n.cnki.nfzkb.2023.000143.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2023-08-10