[1]LIANG Xiuqin,FENG Qiang,DUAN Baoling.Research on Well-Being Effect of Ecosystem Services in Mining Area of Western Shanxi Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(04):431-437.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.040.]
Copy
Research on Well-Being Effect of Ecosystem Services in Mining Area of Western Shanxi Loess Plateau
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
30
Number of periods:
2023 04
Page number:
431-437
Column:
Public date:
2023-06-10
- Title:
- Research on Well-Being Effect of Ecosystem Services in Mining Area of Western Shanxi Loess Plateau
- Keywords:
- ecosystem services; mining area; well-being effect; perceived change
- CLC:
- X826
- DOI:
- 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.040.
- Abstract:
- [Objective] Exploring changes in ecosystem services in mining area and effect on residents' well-being is of great significance for ecological protection and high-quality development in the region. [Methods] Taking the Sanchuan River Basin of the Loess Plateau as an example, we used questionnaire survey method to analyze the change trend of residents' perception of ecosystem services in the past ten years, and used a variety of mathematical statistical methods to identify the differences in the perceptions of respondents with different socioeconomic characteristics on the well-being effect of ecosystem services, and to uncover key factors affecting residents' well-being. [Results] Residents perceived that the decline types in overall ecosystem services were wood supply, air purification, water supply and food supply, and the increase types were water conservation, aesthetic landscape, leisure and entertainment, disaster regulation and water and soil conservation. The well-being effect of ecosystem services was closely related to the socioeconomic characteristics of the interviewed residents. The well-being levels of respondents with different socioeconomic characteristics were significantly different. In addition, Kruskal-Wallis test and multiple comparisons showed that residents' gender, age, income source and education level were significantly related to the well-being effect of ecosystem services(p<0.05), and there were significant differences among groups. Redundancy analysis showed that supply services and income were the main types of ecosystem services and key factors that affected residents' well-being. [Conclusion] It is recommended that the government formulates a comprehensive ecological economic development policy, focuses on changes in supply services, coordinates the coordinated development of multiple types of ecosystem services, and explores multiple sources of income to help the long-term development of ecosystem services in the mining area.
- References:
-
[1] Zhang Z F, Wang M W, Xu Z, et al. The influence of Community Sports Parks on residents' subjective well-being: A case study of Zhuhai City, China[J]. Habitat International, 2021,117:102439.
[2] Rey-Valette H, Blayac T, Salles J M. Evaluating the contribution of nature to well-being: The case of ecosystem services related to fish-farming ponds in France[J]. Ecological Economics, 2022,191:107217.
[3] Daily G C. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 1997.
[4] 傅伯杰,周国逸,白永飞,等.中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全[J].地球科学进展,2009,24(6):571-576.
[5] Summers J K, Smith L M, Case J L, et al. A review of the elements of human well-being with an emphasis on the contribution of ecosystem services[J]. Ambio, 2012,41(4):327-340.
[6] 杨莉,甄霖,李芬,等.黄土高原生态系统服务变化对人类福祉的影响初探[J].资源科学,2010,32(5):849-855.
[7] 张继飞,邓伟,朱昌丽,等.岷江上游生态系统服务与居民福祉的空间关联及其动态特征[J].山地学报,2017,35(3):388-398.
[8] 柳冬青,张金茜,巩杰,等.陇中黄土丘陵区土地利用强度—生态系统服务—人类福祉时空关系研究:以安定区为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(2):637-648.
[9] 熊鹰,侯珂伦,郑偲睿,等.基于结构方程模型的南方丘陵山地农户福祉与生态系统服务关系:以广东省乐昌市为例[J].热带地理,2020,40(5):843-855.
[10] Ma L, Qin Y T, Zhang H, et al. Improving well-being of farmers using ecological awareness around protected areas: Evidence from Qinling region, China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021,18(18):9792.
[11] Daw T, Brown K, Rosendo S, et al. Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: The need to disaggregate human well-being[J]. Environmental Conservation, 2011,38(4):370-379.
[12] 王大尚,郑华,欧阳志云.生态系统服务供给、消费与人类福祉的关系[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(6):1747-1753.
[13] Hu L, Wu J, Li H P. The coupling relationship between ecosystem services and residents' income and its impact factors: A case study of the Lashihai basin in Lijiang, Yunan[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(18):6402-6411.
[14] 徐建英,王清,魏建瑛.卧龙自然保护区生态系统服务福祉贡献评估:当地居民的视角[J].生态学报,2018,38(20):7348-7358.
[15] 霍冉,鲁博,徐向阳,等.基于当地居民感知视角的煤炭资源型城市生态系统服务福祉效应研究:以新泰市为例[J].中国土地科学,2019,33(9):101-110.
[16] 霍冉,徐向阳,高俊莲,等.煤炭资源型城市生态系统服务空间特征及其与居民福祉关系[J].土壤通报,2020,51(1):31-39.
[17] King M F, Renó V F, Novo E M L M. The concept, dimensions and methods of assessment of human well-being within a socioecological context: A literature review[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2014,116(3):681-698.
[18] Chan K M A, Guerry A D, Balvanera P, et al. Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement[J]. Bioscience, 2012,62(8):744-756.
[19] 刘家根,黄璐,严力蛟.生态系统服务对人类福祉的影响:以浙江省桐庐县为例[J].生态学报,2018,38(5):1687-1697.
[20] 史广,刘立文,杨艳.黄土高原三川河流域生态环境的时空变化特征[J].河北农业科学,2016,20(4):72-77.
[21] Smith C, Clay P. Measuring subjective and objective well-being: Analyses from five marine commercial fisheries[J]. Human Organization, 2010,69(2):158-168.
[22] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment(MA). Ecosystems and Human Well-being[M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 2005.
[23] Iftekhar M S, Takama T. Perceptions of biodiversity, environmental services, and conservation of planted mangroves: A case study on Nijhum Dwip Island, Bangladesh[J]. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 2008,16(2):119-137.
[24] Hartter J. Resource use and ecosystem services in a forest park landscape[J]. Society and Natural Resources, 2010,23(3):207-223.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2023-06-10