PDF Download

[1]FENG Kangli,LIU Xiaopeng,WEI Yuxi,et al.Measurement of Poverty Alleviation Sustainability and Influencing Factors Identification in Regional Villages Out of Deep Poverty[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(04):347-354,364.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.023.]

Copy

Measurement of Poverty Alleviation Sustainability and Influencing Factors Identification in Regional Villages Out of Deep Poverty

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 30 Number of periods: 2023 04 Page number: 347-354,364 Column: Public date: 2023-06-10

Title:: Measurement of Poverty Alleviation Sustainability and Influencing Factors Identification in Regional Villages Out of Deep Poverty

Author(s):: FENG Kangli¹, LIU Xiaopeng^1,2, WEI Yuxi¹, CUI Yunxia¹, JIANG Chunmei¹; (1.School of Geographical Science and Planning, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China; 2.Ningxia Rural Revitalization Strategy Research Center, Yinchuan 750021, China)

Keywords:: poverty alleviation sustainability; villages out of deep poverty; Xiji County

CLC:: F323.8

DOI:: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.04.023.

Abstract:: [Objective] The aims of this study are to measure poverty alleviation sustainability and identify obstacles in villages out of deep poverty scientifically, so as to provide practical support for achieving the consolidation of poverty alleviation achievements and the effective connection of rural revitalization. [Methods] This study constructed an index system for measuring poverty alleviation sustainability from five dimensions: natural environment, economic conditions, social capital, human resources and development opportunities. Taking villages out of deep poverty in Xiji County as the case area, this study measured poverty alleviation sustainability, identified influencing factors in villages out of deep poverty in 2021 by using methods such as methods for measuring poverty alleviation sustainability and the barrier model. [Results] The overall poverty alleviation sustainability was not high and there were differences in different geographical environments. The types of poverty alleviation sustainability differentiation could be identified as single dimensional constraint to sustainability, double dimensional constraint to sustainability and multi-dimensional constraint to sustainability. Number of new business entities and consumer business premises, rural collective economic income, average number of livestock breeding, number of e-commerce distribution points, rural dwelling quality index, amplitude relief were the main factors that affected poverty alleviation sustainability. [Conclusion] The poverty alleviation sustainability of the study village area out of poverty needs to be improved and there are multiple risks of returning to poverty. In the future, the reconstruction of return-to-poverty prevention and control strategies under different constraint and risk types should be strengthened based on regional characteristics.

References:: [1] 周扬,李寻欢.贫困地理学的基础理论与学科前沿[J].地理学报,2021,76(10):2407-2424.
[2] 丁建军,冷志明.区域贫困的地理学分析[J].地理学报,2018,73(2):232-247.
[3] 胡原,曾维忠.深度贫困地区何以稳定脱贫:基于可持续生计分析框架的现实思考[J].当代经济管理,2019,41(12):7-12.
[4] 郭倩,廖和平,王子羿,等.秦巴山区村域稳定脱贫测度及返贫防控风险识别:以重庆市城口县为例[J].地理科学进展,2021,40(2):232-244.
[5] 刘愿理,廖和平,李靖,等.后2020时期农户相对贫困测度及机理分析:以重庆市长寿区为例[J].地理科学进展,2020,39(6):960-971.
[6] 李寻欢,周扬,陈玉福.区域多维贫困测量的理论与方法[J].地理学报,2020,75(4):753-768.
[7] Brown P, James D. Educational expansion, poverty reduction and social mobility: Reframing the debate[J]. International Journal of Educational Research, 2020, 100: 101537.
[8] Keane M, Thakur R. Health care spending and hidden poverty in India[J]. Research in Economics, 2018,72(4): 435-451.
[9] Churchill S A, Smyth R. Transport poverty and subjective wellbeing[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2019, 124: 40-54.
[10] 王艳慧,钱乐毅,陈烨烽,等.生态贫困视角下的贫困县多维贫困综合度量[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(8):2677-2686.
[11] Zhou L, Xiong L Y. Natural topographic controls on the spatial distribution of poverty-stricken counties in China[J]. Applied Geography, 2018, 90:282-292.
[12] 刘小鹏,李永红,王亚娟,等.县域空间贫困的地理识别研究:以宁夏泾源县为例[J].地理学报,2017,72(3):545-557.
[13] 刘小鹏,苏胜亮,王亚娟,等.集中连片特殊困难地区村域空间贫困测度指标体系研究[J].地理科学,2014,34(4):447-453.
[14] 刘彦随,周扬,刘继来.中国乡村贫困化地域分异特征及其精准扶贫策略[J].中国科学院院刊,2016,31(3):269-278.
[15] 刘小鹏,李伟华,王鹏,等.发展地理学视角下欠发达地区贫困的地方分异与治理[J].地理学报,2019,74(10):2108-2122.
[16] Liu Y H, Xu Y. A geographic identification of multidimensional poverty in rural China under the framework of sustainable livelihoods analysis[J]. Applied Geography, 2016,73:62-76.
[17] 姜德华,张耀光,杨柳,等.中国贫困地区类型划分及开发研究提要报告[J].地理研究,1988,7(3):1-16.
[18] 张明珠,孟梅.农地转出对精准脱贫户多维贫困的缓解效应:基于倾向得分匹配的实证分析[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(4):384-389.
[19] 冯应斌,龙花楼.基于乡村人口转移和乡村道路建设的空间贫困破解机理及其对策研究:以贵州省为例[J].地理研究,2019,38(11):2606-2623.
[20] 罗玉杰,李会琴,侯林春,等.可持续生计视角下乡村旅游地返贫风险识别及预警机制构建:以湖北省恩施州W村为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2022,36(2):186-193.
[21] 尚海洋,宋妮妮.返贫风险、生计抵御力与规避策略实践:祁连山国家级自然保护区内8县的调查与分析[J].干旱区地理,2021,44(6):1784-1795.
[22] 凌经球.论可持续脱贫[J].桂海论丛,2007(2):42-45.
[23] 胡原,曾维忠.稳定脱贫的科学内涵、现实困境与机制重构:基于可持续生计-脆弱性-社会排斥分析框架[J].四川师范大学学报:社会科学版,2019,46(5):121-128.
[24] 王富珍,周国华,唐承丽,等.基于可持续生计分析框架的山区县域脱贫稳定性评价[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(2):270-277.
[25] 戴琼瑶,刘家强,唐代盛.我国直过民族脱贫人口稳定脱贫指数及政策含义:以独龙族为例[J].人口研究,2019,43(6):75-89.
[26] 檀学文,白描.论高质量脱贫的内涵、实施难点及进路[J].新疆师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2021,42(2):29-40,2.
[27] 冯家臻,赖作莲,梁裕晨.关于建立和完善深度贫困县稳定脱贫长效机制的调研与思考[J].新西部,2018(34):69-73.
[28] 郑秉文.“后2020”时期建立稳定脱贫长效机制的思考[J].宏观经济管理,2019(9):17-25.
[29] 程静.西吉县县内生态移民村韧性及其影响机制研究[D].银川:宁夏大学,2021.
[30] 汤青.可持续生计的研究现状及未来重点趋向[J].地球科学进展,2015,30(7):823-833.
[31] 苏胜亮,高明,徐锦娟,等.宁夏海原县生态脆弱性与经济贫困空间耦合关系[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(3):327-333.
[32] 谭雪兰,王振凯,余航菱,等.基于农户视角的脱贫类型划分与路径研究:以新晃侗族自治县84个出列村为例[J].自然资源学报,2022,37(2):396-407.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2023-06-10