[1]PANG Xiaofei,LU Rucheng,ZHANG Liguo,et al.Study on Coordination and Zoning Optimization of Land Use Based on Production-living-ecological Functions in Border Areas of Guangxi[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(02):294-302.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.049]
Copy
Study on Coordination and Zoning Optimization of Land Use Based on Production-living-ecological Functions in Border Areas of Guangxi
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
30
Number of periods:
2023 02
Page number:
294-302
Column:
Public date:
2023-03-10
- Title:
- Study on Coordination and Zoning Optimization of Land Use Based on Production-living-ecological Functions in Border Areas of Guangxi
- Keywords:
- production-living-ecological function; coordination and trade-off; niche breadth model; zone optimization; border areas of Guangxi
- CLC:
- F301.2
- DOI:
- 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.049
- Abstract:
- In order to explore the interactive relationship between the multi-functional land use in the border area, the spatial-temporal evolution and coordination/trade-off relation characteristics of the production-living-ecological function of land use in the border areas of Guangxi from 2000 to 2018 were analyzed based on niche breadth, coupling coordination degree and balancing strength model, and optimization suggestions for different zones were put forward. The results show that:(1)the production-living-ecological function in border areas of Guangxi presented significant spatial-temporal differentiation characteristics, the niche breadth of ecological function was mainly in expansion, presenting a gradient pattern of higher level in the southeast and lower level in the northwest; the niche breadth of living functgion was in expansion after shrinking; the niche breadth of ecological function tended to shrink, presenting a spatial layout of double highs and multiple flats;(2)the areas for land use with functional coupling coordination were divided into the areas on the verge of malcoordination and the barely coordinaed areas, in general, the areas were gradually evolved into the latter from the former, the latter mainly covered the areas which were with moderately propserpous economy, while the former clustered in the mountainous areas with fragille ecological environment in the west; Fangcheng District was with low pairwise functional tradeoff intensity, and the Naopo County and Longzhou County were with high trade-off intensity;(3)the whole area could be divided into low coordination area, production-living function dominant area, production-ecological function dominant area, ecology-living function dominant area, production function dominant area, ecological function dominant area, living function dominant area, the corresponding suggestions were provided. The interactive relationship between the production-living-ecological function of land use in the border areas of Guangxi is developing in a coordinated manner as a whole, and the follow-up development should focus on ecological priority.
- References:
-
[1] 江东,林刚,付晶莹.“三生空间”统筹的科学基础与优化途径探析[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(5):1085-1101.
[2] 刘继来,刘彦随,李裕瑞.中国“三生空间”分类评价与时空格局分析[J].地理学报,2017,72(7):1290-1304.
[3] 李欣,方斌,殷如梦,等.江苏省县域“三生”功能时空变化及协同/权衡关系[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(11):2363-2377.
[4] 邹利林,李裕瑞,刘彦随,等.基于要素视角的耕地“三生”功能理论建构与实证研究[J].地理研究,2021,40(3):839-855.
[5] 李晓青,刘旺彤,谢亚文,等.多规合一背景下村域三生空间划定与实证研究[J].经济地理,2019,39(10):146-152.
[6] 林树高,陆汝成,刘少坤,等.基于“三生”空间的广西边境地区土地利用格局及多功能演变[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(5):265-274.
[7] 高雁鹏,徐筱菲.辽宁省特色小镇三生功能评价及等级分布研究[J].规划师,2018,34(5):132-136.
[8] 王全喜,孙鹏举,刘学录,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区“三生”空间的功能权衡与协同时空格局分析:以武山县为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(11):122-130.
[9] 邹艳,张绍良,谢译诣,等.徐州市三生空间分布格局与时空演化特征分析[J].测绘科学,2020,45(7):154-162.
[10] 隋虹均,宋戈,张红梅.松嫩平原北部粮食主产区克山县三生空间识别[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(19):264-271,323.
[11] 方莹,王静,孔雪松,等.耕地利用多功能权衡关系测度与分区优化:以河南省为例[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(11):57-64.
[12] 苏浩,吴次芳.基于“三生”功能的黑土区耕地资源价值影响因素分析:以黑龙江省克山县为例[J].中国土地科学,2020,34(9):77-85.
[13] 康庆,郭青霞,丁一,等.山西省“三生”功能协同/权衡关系分析[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(5):1195-1207.
[14] 王晓萌,潘佩佩,王晓旭,等.基于土地利用的河北省生态系统服务权衡/协同关系研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2021,37(1):80-88.
[15] 刘超,许月卿,卢新海.生态脆弱贫困区土地利用多功能权衡/协同格局演变与优化分区:以张家口市为例[J].经济地理,2021,41(1):181-190.
[16] 朱从谋,李武艳,杜莹莹,等.浙江省耕地多功能价值时空变化与权衡—协同关系[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(14):263-272.
[17] 高艳丽,李红波,侯蕊.汉江流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系演变[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(7):1619-1630.
[18] 张一达,刘学录,任君,等.基于耕地多功能权衡与协同分析的耕地利用转型研究:以北京市为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(6):25-33.
[19] Zhou De, Xu Jianchun, Lin Zhulu. Conflict or coordination? Assessing land use multi-functionalization using production-living-ecology analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,577:136-147.
[20] 张路路,郑新奇,孟超,等.湖南省土地多功能耦合协调度时空分异[J].中国土地科学,2019,33(3):85-94.
[21] 姜磊,柏玲,吴玉鸣.中国省域经济、资源与环境协调分析:兼论三系统耦合公式及其扩展形式[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(5):788-799.
[22] Bradford J B, D'Amato A W. Recognizing trade-offs in multi-objective land management[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2012,10(4):210-216.
[23] 王成,唐宁.重庆市乡村三生空间功能耦合协调的时空特征与格局演化[J].地理研究,2018,37(6):1100-1114.
[24] 牛海鹏.基于生态位理论的耕地数量相对变化研究:以焦作市为例[J].地域研究与开发,2006(6):112-117.
[25] 王璐,陈英,强妮,等.兰州市土地利用经济生态位测度[J].干旱区资源与环境,2009,23(12):15-20.
[26] 祝萍,刘鑫,郑瑜晗,等.北方重点生态功能区生态系统服务权衡与协同[J].生态学报,2020,40(23):8694-8706.
[27] 任国平,刘黎明,李洪庆,等.乡村景观多功能权衡—协同关系时空格局研究:以上海市青浦区为例(英文)[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2021,12(2):225-240.
[28] 金贵,王占岐,姚小薇,等.国土空间分区的概念与方法探讨[J].中国土地科学,2013,27(5):48-53.
[29] 金贵,邓祥征,张倩,等.武汉城市圈国土空间综合功能分区[J].地理研究,2017,36(3):541-552.
[30] 念沛豪,蔡玉梅,谢秀珍,等..基于生态位理论的湖南省国土空间综合功能分区[J].资源科学,2014,36(9):1958-1968.
[31] 李裕瑞,王婧,刘彦随,等.中国“四化”协调发展的区域格局及其影响因素[J].地理学报,2014,69(2):199-212.
[32] 闵义岚,陈艳,李录堂.陕西省10市“土地—经济—环境”耦合协调关系[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(6):420-428,436.
[33] Zhong L,Wang J, Zhang X, et al. Effects of agricultural land consolidation on ecosystem services: Trade-offs and synergies[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020,264:121412.
[34] 张中秋,劳燕玲,何彩珍,等.土地利用多功能机制及其耦合协调时空分异:以广西为例[J].农业资源与环境学报,2021,38(2):317-331.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2023-03-10