PDF Download

[1]CHEN Xiangbiao,DING Wenrong.Spatial-temporal Evolution and Trade-off Synergy Relationships of Ecosystem Services in Karst Area of Shilin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(02):285-293.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.043]

Copy

Spatial-temporal Evolution and Trade-off Synergy Relationships of Ecosystem Services in Karst Area of Shilin

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 30 Number of periods: 2023 02 Page number: 285-293 Column: Public date: 2023-03-10

Title:: Spatial-temporal Evolution and Trade-off Synergy Relationships of Ecosystem Services in Karst Area of Shilin

Author(s):: CHEN Xiangbiao, DING Wenrong; (Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China)

Keywords:: ecosystem services; temporal and spatial evolution; trade-off and synergy; spatial autocorrelation; Shilin karst areas

CLC:: X171

DOI:: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.043

Abstract:: The karst area is one of the most fragile natural ecosystems on the earth. To clarify the temporal and spatial changes of ecosystem services and the trade-offs synergy is of great significance to the decision-making of ecological governance in this area and the improvement of people's livelihood and well-being. Based on the equivalent factor method, correlation coefficient and spatial autocorrelation, the spatial and temporal evolution of stone forest ecosystem services from 2000 to 2020 and the trade-off synergy relationship were quantitatively analyzed. The results showed that:(1)the value of ecosystem services continued to increase from 2.047 billion in 2000 to 2.182 billion in 2020, with an increase rate of 6.60%; the spatial distribution pattern of ecosystem services was relatively stable; the high-grade areas mainly distributed in water areas and hilly and mountainous areas with high vegetation coverage, and the low-grade areas concentrated in areas with relatively concentrated construction land and serious karst rocky desertification;(2)the ecosystem service value sensitivity index of each land use type was less than 1, indicating that the stone forest ecosystem service value was inelastic to the revised ecological service value coefficient, and the research results were credible;(3)during the study period, the synergy relationship was the dominant relationship between stone forest ecosystem services, with a synergy rate of 68.60%; the trade-off relationship mainly existed in the relationships between food production, maintenance of nutrient circulation and other subsystems, with a trade-off rate of 29.75%;(4)quantitatively, the four types of ecosystem services all had significant spatial positive autocorrelation, and spatially, the trade-offs and synergy between different ecosystem service pairs were significantly heterogeneous. These research results can provide a reference for Shilin to optimize the spatial pattern of the land and provide a reference for ecological protection and restoration.

References:: [1] Daily G. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M]. Washington D C:Island Press, 1997.
[2] Costanza R, D'arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387(6630):253-260.
[3] 傅伯杰,张立伟.土地利用变化与生态系统服务:概念、方法与进展[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(4):441-446.
[4] Millennium ecosystem assessment(MA). Ecosystems and human well-being[M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 2005.
[5] 李双成,张才玉,刘金龙,等.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题[J].地理研究,2013,32(8):1379-1390.
[6] 王鹏涛,张立伟,李英杰,等.汉江上游生态系统服务权衡与协同关系时空特征[J].地理学报,2017,72(11):2064-2078.
[7] 彭建,胡晓旭,赵明月,等.生态系统服务权衡研究进展:从认知到决策[J].地理学报,2017,72(6):960-973.
[8] 戴尔阜,王晓莉,朱建佳,等.生态系统服务权衡/协同研究进展与趋势展望[J].地球科学进展,2015,30(11):1250-1259.
[9] 戴尔阜,王晓莉,朱建佳,等.生态系统服务权衡:方法、模型与研究框架[J].地理研究,2016,35(6):1005-1016.
[10] 郑德凤,郝帅,吕乐婷,等.三江源国家公园生态系统服务时空变化及权衡—协同关系[J].地理研究,2020,39(1):64-78.
[11] Brinkmann R, Parise M. Karst environments:problems, management, human impacts, and sustainability. An introduction to the special issue[J]. J. Cave Karst Stud., 2012,74(2):135-136.
[12] 宋贤威,高扬,温学发,等.中国喀斯特关键带岩石风化碳汇评估及其生态服务功能[J].地理学报,2016,71(11):1926-1938.
[13] Canedoli C, Ficetola G F, Corengia D, et al. Integrating landscape ecology and the assessment of ecosystem services in the study of karst areas[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2021:1-19.
[14] Goldscheider N, Chen Z, Auler A S, et al. Global distribution of carbonate rocks and karst water resources[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2020,28(5):1661-1677.
[15] 钱彩云,巩杰,张金茜,等.甘肃白龙江流域生态系统服务变化及权衡与协同关系[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):868-879.
[16] 韩会庆,苏志华.喀斯特生态系统服务研究进展与展望[J].中国岩溶,2017,36(3):352-358.
[17] 秦瑶,熊康宁,陈起伟,等.喀斯特地区生态系统服务变化及权衡协同关系[J].环境科学与技术,2021,44(9):228-236.
[18] Chen Ran, Wang Shijie, Bai Xiaoyong, et al. Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in southwestern China[J]. Environmental Engineering Science, 2020,37(10):669-678.
[19] Wang Xiaofeng, Zhang Xinrong, Feng Xiaoming, et al. Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Karst Area of China Driven by Grain-for-Green Program[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2020,30(1):101-114.
[20] Tian Yichao, Wang Shijie, Bai Xiaoyong, et al. Trade-offs among ecosystem services in a typical Karst watershed, SW China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016,566:1297-1308.
[21] 韩会庆,杨建强,陈思盈,等.喀斯特山区淡水生态系统服务权衡—协同关系的粒度效应[J].济南大学学报:自然科学版,2022(1):1-11
[22] 高江波,左丽媛,王欢.喀斯特峰丛洼地生态系统服务空间权衡度及其分异特征[J].生态学报,2019,39(21):7829-7839.
[23] 李玉辉,丁智强,吴晓月.基于Strahler面积—高程分析的云南石林县域喀斯特地貌演化的量化研究[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):973-985.
[24] 丁文荣,李玉辉.岩溶区植被覆盖变化与气候波动的相关性:以云南石林为例[J].水资源与水工程学报,2019,30(5):40-45,51.
[25] 谢高地,张彩霞,张昌顺,等.中国生态系统服务的价值[J].资源科学,2015,37(9):1740-1746.
[26] 杨强强,徐光来,李爱娟,等.青弋江流域生态系统服务评估与权衡研究[J].生态学报,2021,41(23):9315-9327.
[27] 谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
[28] 王航,秦奋,朱筠,等.土地利用及景观格局演变对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态学报,2017,37(4):1286-1296.
[29] 高振斌,王小莉,苏婧,等.基于生态系统服务价值评估的东江流域生态补偿研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2018,34(6):563-570.
[30] 邓元杰,侯孟阳,谢怡凡,等.退耕还林还草工程对陕北地区生态系统服务价值时空演变的影响[J].生态学报,2020,40(18):6597-6612.
[31] 兰紫橙,贾岚,程煜.闽江流域生态系统服务价值评估及权衡协同关系[J].生态学报,2020,40(12):3909-3920.
[32] 马勇,凌旋,童昀.格网尺度下典型旅游城市生态服务价值估算和时空分异特征:以三亚为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(19):7542-7554.
[33] 李龙,吴大放,王芳,等.中国快速城市化区域生态系统服务价值预测及权衡研究:以佛山市为例[J].生态学报,2020,40(24):9023-9036.
[34] 郭椿阳,高尚,周伯燕,等.基于格网的伏牛山区土地利用变化对生态服务价值影响研究[J].生态学报,2019,39(10):3482-3493.
[35] 李坤,邢小艺,李逸伦,等.石林风景区不同石漠化人工修复方式对木本植物群落组成及种群生态位的影响[J].生态学报,2020,40(13):4641-4650.
[36] 贺祥,姚尧.基于生态系统服务供需对喀斯特山区生态风险分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(5):202-212,220.
[37] 冯兆,彭建,吴健生.基于生态系统服务簇的深圳市生态系统服务时空演变轨迹研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(8):2545-2554.
[38] 韩增林,孟琦琦,闫晓露,等.近30年辽东湾北部区土地利用强度与生态系统服务价值的时空关系[J].生态学报,2020,40(8):2555-2566.
[39] 易武英,张建利,代丽华,等.典型喀斯特峰丛洼地生态系统生态服务功能价值评估:以贵州平塘县为例[J].湖南农业科学,2017(5):56-59.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2023-03-10