PDF Download

[1]LI Wenhui,ZHOU Xing,ZHONG Jinling.Spatiotemporal Differentiation Characteristics of Ecological Protection and High-Quality Development in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(02):165-174,185.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.045]

Copy

Spatiotemporal Differentiation Characteristics of Ecological Protection and High-Quality Development in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 30 Number of periods: 2023 02 Page number: 165-174,185 Column: Public date: 2023-03-10

Title:: Spatiotemporal Differentiation Characteristics of Ecological Protection and High-Quality Development in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region

Author(s):: LI Wenhui, ZHOU Xing, ZHONG Jinling; (School of Natural Resources and Surveying and Mapping, Nanning Normal University, Nanning 530100, China)

Keywords:: ecological protection; high-quality development; coupling coordination; sustainable development; Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region

CLC:: F061.5; X22

DOI:: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.045

Abstract:: The spatiotemporal coupling relationship between ecological protection and high-quality development in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region was examined in order to provide new ideas and basis for regional sustainable development, we used the TOPSIS model to calculate the 2010—2019 Guangxi ecological protection and high-quality development index, and used the coupling coordination degree model and the spatial autocorrelation model to analyze the level of coordination, temporal and spatial evolution and agglomeration effect of the two. The results show that:(1)the level of ecological protection in Guangxi showed a fluctuating growth trend; cities with high levels of ecological protection are mainly located in northeastern Guangxi, while cities with low levels of ecological protection concentrated in the central and southern coastal cities, ‘middle area' is mainly located in western Guangxi. Transition to a global type;(2)the level of high-quality development in Guangxi had undergone an evolutionary process of ‘accelerating growth, steady optimization, improving quality and efficiency', with the index rose from 0.256 to 0.622, showing a spatially similar ‘+' shaped belt development pattern;(3)Guangxi's ecological protection and high-quality development coordination level continued to improve, gradually transited to the primary and intermediate coordination stage, the coordination type of each city had experienced a gradient improvement stage of ‘endangered-barely, barely coordinated, coordinated-primary, intermediate coordination', forming a high and low development trend of ‘one core, three secondary and three belts';(4)the Moran's I index of inter-city coordination in Guangxi was negative and showed a downward trend, showing negative correlation distribution characteristics, difference between cities continued to increase, and Yulin, Nanning, Liuzhou, Guilin City had become a regional high-value polarization main areas. Applying the ‘Five-sphere integrated' development concept to economic development and continuing to promote ecological governance and restoration is the key to promote the high-level coordination of ecological protection and high-quality development.

References:: [1] 沈亚平,张庆轩.西部民族地区经济社会发展的破局与选择[J].宁夏社会科学,2017(5):74-78.
[2] Shafik N, Bandyopadhyay S. Economic growth and environmental quality: Time series and cross-country evidence[R]. Washington D C: the World Bank, 1992.
[3] Egli H. Are cross-country studies of the Environmental Kuznets Curve misleading? New evidence from time series data for Germany[R]. Greifswald:University of Greifswald, 2001.
[4] Sander J, Kamel L, Argyris K, et al. A generic bio-economic farm model for environmenral and economic assessment of agricultural sysyems[J]. Environ. Manage, 2010,46(6):862-877.
[5] Yoo I T, Kim I. Free trade agreements for the environment? Regional economic integration and environmental cooperation in East Asia[J]. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2016,16(5):721-738.
[6] Hein L, Koppen C S, Ierland E C, et al. Temporal scales, ecosystem dynamics, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystems services[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2016,21:109-119.
[7] 杨文杰,吴悦颖,海热提,等.北京市环境污染水平和经济增长关系的计量模型[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(4):763-770.
[8] 江鑫,颜廷武.基于EKC的连片特困地区经济发展与生态环境协调关系分析:以云南省昭通市为例[J].经济社会体制比较,2016(3):31-39.
[9] 张瑞萍.生态环境与经济增长协调发展研究综述[J].经济问题探索,2016(12):179-183.
[10] 刘德光,屈小爽.中国旅游经济与生态环境协调发展度测算及区域差异分析[J].广东财经大学学报,2016,31(4):89-96.
[11] 罗林,周应书,沈有信.岩溶贫困山区人口、经济与生态的和谐性熵变及调控[J].人口与经济,2009(5):70-76.
[12] 孙小涛,周忠发,陈全.重点生态功能区人口—经济—生态环境耦合协调发展探讨:以贵州省沿河县为例[J].重庆师范大学学报:自然科学版,2017,34(4):127-134.
[13] 马亚亚,刘国彬,张超,等.陕北安塞县生态与经济系统耦合协调发展[J].生态学报,2019,39(18):6840-6849.
[14] 任保平,李禹墨.新时代我国高质量发展评判体系的构建及其转型路径[J].陕西师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2018,47(3):105-113.
[15] 廖军华.新时代我国经济高质量发展的理论要义与实践路径[J].贵州社会科学,2021(6):131-138.
[16] 化祥雨,金祥荣,吕海萍,等.高质量发展耦合协调时空格局演化及影响因素:以浙江省县域为例[J].地理科学,2021,41(2):223-231.
[17] 崔丹,卜晓燕,徐祯,等.中国资源型城市高质量发展综合评估及影响机理[J].地理学报,2021,76(10):2489-2503.
[18] 钟锦玲,周兴,李文辉.广西高质量发展与土地资源可持续利用的耦合协调性[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(3):247-257.
[19] 乔美华.环境规制、空间溢出与经济高质量发展:基于中国省级面板空间杜宾模型的经验研究[J].生态经济,2021,37(4):147-155.
[20] 雒占福,李兰,高旭,等.基于生态城市理念的兰州—西宁城市群高质量发展与生态环境耦合协调研究[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(2):276-284.
[21] 刘琳轲,梁流涛,高攀,等.黄河流域生态保护与高质量发展的耦合关系及交互响应[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(1):176-195.
[22] 韦福巍,黄荣娟,朱慧芳.省级区域旅游产业—社会经济—生态环境耦合协调度空间相关性研究:以广西为例[J].西北师范大学学报:自然科学版,2017,53(4):116-123.
[23] 熊小菊,廖春贵,胡宝清.广西西江流域经济—社会—生态系统协调发展研究[J].人民长江,2019,50(4):86-93.
[24] 贾清显,朱芳阳.多重机遇叠加下广西生态经济系统可持续发展情景模拟研究[J].生态经济,2017,33(12):83-86.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2023-03-10