PDF Download

[1]GUO Xiuli,LI Wangping,SUN Guojun,et al.Analysis of Livelihood Capital and Its Coupling Coordination Degree of Farmers in Ecologically Vulnerable Alpine Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(06):330-335,343.

Copy

Analysis of Livelihood Capital and Its Coupling Coordination Degree of Farmers in Ecologically Vulnerable Alpine Areas

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 29 Number of periods: 2022 06 Page number: 330-335,343 Column: Public date: 2022-10-20

Title:: Analysis of Livelihood Capital and Its Coupling Coordination Degree of Farmers in Ecologically Vulnerable Alpine Areas

Author(s):: GUO Xiuli¹, LI Wangping², SUN Guojun¹,ZHANG Liping¹; (1.Gansu University of Political Science and Law, Lanzhou 730070, China; 2.Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China)

Keywords:: farmers; livelihood capital; coupling and coordination; Xiahe County

CLC:: F323.8

DOI:: -

Abstract:: In order to reduce the livelihood vulnerability of farmers and promote the restoration of regional ecological environment, we selected the Xiahe County, which located in northeastern edge of the Tibetan Plateau, as the study area. Based on the survey data of peasant households, we used the entropy method and coupling coordination degree model to measure and compare the livelihood capital and coupling coordination degree of peasant households, and explored the factors affecting the livelihood capital and its allocation. The results show that:(1)The overall livelihood capital of farmers is low, in which the human capital is the highest with minimum differences, but the loss of human capital is serious. The financial capital is the lowest with the maximum difference.(2)Compared with the livelihood capital of different types of farmers, the human capital, financial capital and social capital of developed farmers are better than those of basic and capital-deficient farmers.(3)The degree of coupling coordination of household livelihood capital is generally low, and the farmers mainly belong to the basic coordination level. Comparatively, the livelihood capital coupling coordination degree of developed farmers is highest, the livelihood capital coupling coordination degree of basic farmers is higher, and the livelihood capital coupling coordination degree of capital-deficit farmers is the lowest and all of them are zero. Regional human geographical environment, ecological protection and poverty control policy are the important factors that affect farmers' livelihood capital and its allocation. Therefore, tapping the human capital potential of farmers, improving their financial capital, and changing the utilisation mode of natural capital are effective measures to reduce livelihood vulnerability and maintain regional ecological security of the alpine ecologically fragile area.

References:: [1] 张芳芳,赵雪雁.我国农户生计转型的生态效应研究综述[J].生态学报,2015,35(10):3157-3164.
[2] 杨伦,刘某承,闵庆文,等.农户生计策略转型及对环境的影响研究综述[J].生态学报,2019,39(21):8172-8182.
[3] 赵雪雁,李巍,杨培涛,等.生计资本对甘南高原农牧民生计活动的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(4):111-118.
[4] 伍艳.贫困山区农户生计资本对生计策略的影响研究:基于四川省平武县和南江县的调查数据[J].农业经济问题,2016,37(3):88-94,112.
[5] 郭秀丽,周立华,陈勇,等.典型沙漠化地区农户生计资本对生计策略的影响:以内蒙古自治区杭锦旗为例[J].生态学报,2017,37(20):6963-6972.
[6] 郭秀丽,杨彬如.高寒牧区农户的生计风险及应对策略:以甘南州夏河县为例[J].草业科学,2020,37(10):2142-2151.
[7] 许汉石,乐章.生计资本、生计风险与农户的生计策略[J].农业经济问题,2012,33(10):100-105.
[8] 翟黎明,夏显力,吴爱娣.政府不同介入场景下农地流转对农户生计资本的影响:基于PSM-DID的计量分析[J].中国农村经济,2017(2):2-15.
[9] 李聪,刘若鸿,许晏君.易地扶贫搬迁、生计资本与农户收入不平等:来自陕南的证据[J].农业技术经济,2019(7):52-67.
[10] 王君涵,李文,冷淦潇,等.易地扶贫搬迁对贫困户生计资本和生计策略的影响:基于8省16县的3期微观数据分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(10):143-153.
[11] 郭秀丽,周立华,陈勇,等.生态政策作用下农户生计资本与生计策略的关系研究:以内蒙古自治区杭锦旗为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(11):34-41.
[12] 李小云,董强,饶小龙,等.农户脆弱性分析方法及其本土化应用[J].中国农村经济,2007(4).32-39.
[13] 任威,熊康宁,盈斌,等.喀斯特地区不同地貌下农户生计脆弱性影响因子评估:以贵州花江、撒拉溪研究区为例[J].生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(4):442-449.
[14] 赵雪雁,介永庆,何小风,等.多重压力下重点生态功能区农户的生计适应性研究:以甘南黄河水源补给区为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(1):140-149.
[15] 张强.2010—2015年甘南州夏河县草地植被动态变化分析[J].环境研究与监测,2017,30(2):5-8.
[16] 张峰,石军伟,陈鹏.甘肃夏河县发生地震武警甘肃总队高效救援[J].中国减灾,2019(23):10.
[17] 夏河县统计局.2018年夏河县国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].(2019-05-19)[2022-07-10].
[18] Kay S. Measuring Destitution: Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches in the Analysis of Survey Data[R]. IDS Working Paper 217, 2003.
[19] 徐爽,胡业翠.农户生计资本与生计稳定性耦合协调分析:以广西金桥村移民安置区为例[J].经济地理,2018,38(3):142-148,164.
[20] 马国璇,周忠发,朱昌丽,等.农户生计资本与生计稳定性耦合协调分析:以花江示范区峡谷村为例[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(3):230-237.
[21] 郭秀丽,杨彬如.贫困民族地区农户生计策略选择分析:以甘南州夏河县为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(11):252-258.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2022-10-20