PDF Download

[1]ZHANG Yang,LI Peng,MA Wendong,et al.Research on the Response of Soil Erosion to Land Use Change in Xiliugou Watershed of the Upper Yellow River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(05):70-76,84.

Copy

Research on the Response of Soil Erosion to Land Use Change in Xiliugou Watershed of the Upper Yellow River

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 29 Number of periods: 2022 05 Page number: 70-76,84 Column: Public date: 2022-08-20

Title:: Research on the Response of Soil Erosion to Land Use Change in Xiliugou Watershed of the Upper Yellow River

Author(s):: ZHANG Yang¹, LI Peng^2,3, MA Wendong⁴, ZHANG Xu^2,3, GUO Jiajia^2,3, PAN Jinjin^2,3; (1.Agriculture Rural and Water Bureau, Administration Committee of Xi'an International Trade & Logistics Park, Xi'an 710026, China; 2.State Key Laboratory Base of Eco-hydraulic Engineering in Arid Area, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China; 3.Key Laboratory National Forestry Administration on Ecological Hydrology and Disaster Prevention in Arid Regions, Xi'an 710048, China; 4.Soil and Water Conservation Workstation in Chenggu County, Chenggu, Shaanxi 723200, China)

Keywords:: soil erosion; land use; soil loss correction model; source area of coarse sediment

CLC:: S157

DOI:: -

Abstract:: To scientifically understand the impact of land use changes on watershed soil erosion, based on the changes in land use and the corresponding changes in soil erosion intensity in the Xiliugou watershed of the upper reaches of the Yellow River in 1980 and 2015, we studied the impact of land-use changes on soil erosion in the watershed. The results show that:(1)the converted areas of three main land use types of grassland, woodland, and cultivated land in the Xiliugou decreased in the order: grassland>forest land>cultivated land. The cultivated land was mainly converted into grassland, most of the forestland was converted to unused land, and most of the grassland was converted into cultivated land and unused land;(2)the average soil erosion modulus of Xiliugou watershed in 1980 and 2015 were 1 946.56 and 1 873.55 t/(km²·a), respectively, of which grassland had the largest soil erosion modulus, followed by forestland, and the amount of soil erosion mainly came from grassland;(3)In the past 35 years, slight erosion and mild erosion dominated in Xiliugou watershed, and the degree of soil erosion showed a downward trend on the whole; specifically, part of the area of grassland was transformed into forestland and cultivated land by 4.47 and 17.54 km², respectively, indicating that the change of land use structure was an inevitable factor affecting the change of soil erosion in Xiliugou watershed. The research results are expected to provide references for soil erosion control in the small watershed of the upper reaches of the Yellow River.

References:: [1] 田卫堂, 胡维银, 李军, 等. 我国水土流失现状和防治对策分析[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(4):204-209.
[2] 杨昆,邓熙,李学灵,等.梯级开发对河流生态系统和景观影响研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(5):1359-1367.
[3] 曾瑞,李榜晏,朱立波,等.黄土高原地形地貌研究与海绵城市建设[J].绿色科技,2017(1):74-80.
[4] 张骁,赵文武,刘源鑫.遥感技术在土壤侵蚀研究中的应用述评[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(2):228-238.
[5] 王芸,刘文兆,李怀有,等.黄土高塬沟壑区砚瓦川流域水沙关系及其对流域治理的响应[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1403-1413.
[6] 吴磊,马孝义.黄土高原水土流失型非点源污染过程模拟研究进展[J].中国科技论文,2015,10(13):1497-1506.
[7] 王计平,杨磊,卫伟,等.黄土丘陵区景观格局对水土流失过程的影响:景观水平与多尺度比较[J].生态学报,2011,31(19):5531-5541.
[8] 马亚亚,王杰,张超,等.基于CSLE模型的陕北纸坊沟流域土壤侵蚀评价[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(6):95-102.
[9] 喻锋,李晓兵,王宏.生态安全条件下土地利用格局优化:以皇甫川流域为例[J].生态学报,2014,34(12):3198-3210.
[10] 庄建琦,葛永刚.土壤侵蚀对土地利用和降雨变化响应和空间分布特征:以金沙江一级支流小江流域为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2012,21(3):288-295.
[11] 李成志,连晋姣,陈洪松,等.喀斯特地区县域土壤侵蚀估算及其对土地利用变化的响应[J].中国水土保持科学,2017,15(5):39-47.
[12] Zhang S, Fan W, Li Y, et al. The influence of changes in land use and landscape patterns on soil erosion in a watershed[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,574:34-45.
[13] 冉大川,张栋,焦鹏,等.西柳沟流域近期水沙变化归因分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2016,30(5):143-149.
[14] Renard K G, Foster G R, Weesies G A, et al. Predicting soil erosion by water:a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation(RUSLE)[R]. Agricultural Handbook, 1997.
[15] Renard K G, Freimund J R. Using monthly precipitation data to estimate the R-factor in the revised USLE[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1994,157:287-306.
[16] 刘刚,李鹏,张旭,等.西安市水土流失空间分布特征与管控空间划分[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):91-97.
[17] McCool D K, Brown L C, Foster G R, et al. Revised slope steepness factor for the Universal Soil Loss Equation[J]. Transactions of the Asae, 1987,30(5):1387-1396.
[18] 黄金良,洪华生,张路平,等.基于GIS和USLE的九龙江流域土壤侵蚀量预测研究[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(5):75-79.
[19] 王文娟,张树文,李颖,等.基于GIS和USLE的三江平原土壤侵蚀定量评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2008,22(9):112-117.
[20] 水利部. SL 190-2007土壤侵蚀分类分级标准[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2007:8-9.
[21] 杨吉山,史学建,侯素珍,等.2016年“8·17”暴雨西柳沟土壤侵蚀产沙量分析[J].人民黄河,2020,42(1):82-85,90.
[22] 王金花,李占斌,张荣刚,等.水蚀风蚀交错区流域景观格局变化及水沙响应关系[J].中国水土保持科学,2016,14(3):68-75.
[23] 章影,廖畅,姜庆虎,等.丹江口库区土壤侵蚀对土地利用变化的响应[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(1):104-111,2.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2022-08-20