PDF Download

[1]ZHAO Shoulu,LI Shihua,XU Xinhui,et al.Production-Life-Ecological Space Pattern Optimization of the Urban Agglomeration in Central Yunnan Based on Coupled MOP and FLUS Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(04):322-328.

Copy

Production-Life-Ecological Space Pattern Optimization of the Urban Agglomeration in Central Yunnan Based on Coupled MOP and FLUS Model

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 29 Number of periods: 2022 04 Page number: 322-328 Column: Public date: 2022-06-20

Title:: Production-Life-Ecological Space Pattern Optimization of the Urban Agglomeration in Central Yunnan Based on Coupled MOP and FLUS Model

Author(s):: ZHAO Shoulu¹, LI Shihua², XU Xinhui¹, LI Yingxin³, YANG Wenxian³, QIU Lidan³; (1.School of Earth Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China; 2.Yunnan Provincial Geomatics Centre, Kunming 650034, China; 3.College of Tourism and Geographic Sciences, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China)

Keywords:: production-life-ecological space; MOP-FLUS model; spatial layout optimization; landscape index analysis; central Yunnan urban agglomeration

CLC:: P967; F205

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Production space, living space and ecological space are closely linked, which determines the highest evolution goal of land space. In order to coordinate the development of regional economy and society, we defined the land space by constructing the production-life-ecological space classification system in line with the reality of urban agglomeration development, and maximized the comprehensive benefits of the production-life-ecological space through MOP model based on the target conditions and scenario setting, the FLUS model was used to optimize the spatial layout of production-life-ecological space, and the landscape pattern index was used to analyze and evaluate the optimization results. The results show that the ecological benefits of giving priority to the development of production and living space are the lowest, the development of ecological space was restrained and the ecological environment was fragile while the process of urbanization was accelerated; the economic benefits of giving priority to meeting the development scenario of ecological space were the lowest; although the ecological environment was well protected, the area of production and living space was relatively small and fragmented, which was not conducive to regional economic development. The economic benefits of the production-life-ecological space spatial balanced and coordinated development scenario increased by 4.46%, the ecological benefits increased by 1.87%, and the spatial layout was balanced and unified. Therefore, this scenario can reasonably balance ecological construction and economic development, and has advantages in enriching ecological process and pattern structure. It can provide some reference for decision-making such as land spatial resource allocation and production-life-ecological space spatial optimization of urban agglomeration in Central Yunnan.

References:: [1] 何翔宇.市域“三生”空间划定与优化调控研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2020.
[2] 朱媛媛,余斌,曾菊新,等.国家限制开发区“生产-生活-生态”空间的优化:以湖北省五峰县为例[J].经济地理,2015,35(4):26-32.
[3] 王颖,刘学良,魏旭红,等.区域空间规划的方法和实践初探:从“三生空间”到“三区三线”[J].城市规划学刊,2018(4):65-74.
[4] 杨惠.“三生”空间适宜性评价及优化路径研究:以扬中市为例[D].南京:南京师范大学,2018
[5] 扈万泰,王力国,舒沐晖.城乡规划编制中的“三生空间”划定思考[J].城市规划,2016,40(5):21-26
[6] 孙丽娜,董爱晶,宫月.基于三生空间的乡村土地利用空间布局优化研究:以黑龙江省明水县永兴镇为例[J].中国农学通报,2020,36(35):156-164.
[7] 孔卫鹏.资源型城市“三生”空间划定及优化研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2020.
[8] 杨露,颉耀文,宗乐丽,等.基于多目标遗传算法和FLUS模型的西北农牧交错带土地利用优化配置[J].地球信息科学学报,2020,22(3):568-579.
[9] 王培俊,孙煌,华宝龙,等.福州市滨海地区生态系统服务价值评估与动态模拟[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(3):249-257.
[10] 李曦彤,马晶,袁浩.基于GeoSOS-FLUS平台的吉林市城市扩展研究[J].长春工程学院学报:自然科学版,2019,20(3):47-51.
[11] 刘晓娟,黎夏,梁迅,等.基于FLUS-InVEST模型的中国未来土地利用变化及其对碳储量影响的模拟[J].热带地理,2019,39(3):397-409.
[12] 谢莹,匡鸿海,吴晶晶,等.基于CLUE-S模型的重庆市渝北区土地利用变化动态模拟[J].长江流域资源与环境,2016,25(11):1729-1737.
[13] Bone C, Dragicevic S, White R. Modelling-in-the-middle: bridging the gap between agent-based modelling and muti-objective decision-making for land use change [J].International Journal of Geographical Information Science,2011,25(5):717-737.
[14] 郭欢欢,李波,侯鹰,等.元胞自动机和多主体模型在土地利用变化模拟中的应用[J].地理科学进展,2011,30(11):1336-1344.
[15] 丁美辰,蔡卓.基于ANN-CA的中小城市空间拓展分析:以福建平和县为例[J].沈阳建筑大学学报:社会科学版,2021,23(1):21-27.
[16] 林伊琳,赵俊三,陈国平,等.基于MCR-FLUS-Markov模型的区域国土空间格局优化[J].农业机械学报,2021,52(4):159-170,207.
[17] 曹帅,金晓斌,杨绪红,等.耦合MOP与GeoSOS:FLUS模型的县级土地利用结构与布局复合优化[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(6):1171-1185.
[18] Stewart T J, Janssen R. A multiobjective GIS: based land use planning algorithm[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2014, 46:25-34.
[19] 董张玉.基于GIS/RS与多目标蚁群算法的三江平原沼泽湿地空间格局优化[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院,2014.
[20] 许泉立,杨昆,王桂林,等.基于蚁群算法的洱海流域土地利用变化模拟[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(19):290-299,340.
[21] 龚媛.基于MO-PSO模型的常州市土地利用优化配置研究[D].南京:南京大学,2016.
[22] 张泊平,吴国玺.人工蜂群算法及其在土地资源优化中的应用研究[J].成都信息工程学院学报,2012,27(6):589-593.
[23] 耿瑞雪.基于蚁群算法的土地利用空间优化配置研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2019.
[24] 谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
[25] Liu X P, Liang X, Li X, et al. A future land use simulation model(FLUS)for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2017,168:94-116.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2022-06-20