[1]LI Qing,NIE Xiaofei,XIE Songhua,et al.Suitability Evaluation of Comprehensive Control Model of Soil and Water Loss in Southern Jiangxi Province Based on the Balance of Ecological and Production Functions[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(04):54-61+74.
Copy
Suitability Evaluation of Comprehensive Control Model of Soil and Water Loss in Southern Jiangxi Province Based on the Balance of Ecological and Production Functions
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
29
Number of periods:
2022 04
Page number:
54-61+74
Column:
Public date:
2022-06-20
- Title:
- Suitability Evaluation of Comprehensive Control Model of Soil and Water Loss in Southern Jiangxi Province Based on the Balance of Ecological and Production Functions
- Keywords:
- southern region of Jiangxi Province; ecological protection type; efficient development type; suitability evaluation
- CLC:
- S157
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- To identify the key factors influencing the suitable model of comprehensive soil erosion control and to carry out targeted comprehensive control of water and soil loss in different regions, the natural environment and socio-economic conditions affecting the selection of soil and water loss control model were simultaneously considered, and the study on the suitability evaluation of the comprehensive management model of soil and water loss in southern Jiangxi based on the balance between ecological and production functions was carried out by using the methods of expert scoring, analytic hierarchy process, fuzzy mathematics and spatial analysis. The results were as follows. The evaluation index system of regional comprehensive control mode of soil and water loss composed of 22 evaluation indexes was constructed. 18 counties(cities and districts)in southern Jiangxi were successfully divided into three types of suitable areas for comprehensive control mode of soil and water loss: tending to ecological protection type, tending to efficiency development type, and type with ecological protection and high-efficiency development both suitable, and targeted countermeasures and suggestions for regional comprehensive control were finally put forward. The current situation of soil erosion, main functional area orientation, ability of local soil and water loss control, topography and agricultural population were the key factors affecting the suitability of the comprehensive control model of ecological protection soil and water loss. The current situation of regional development and utilization, soil fertility, regional convenience, terrain, agricultural population and agricultural development were the key factors affecting the suitability of efficient soil and water loss control model. By weighing the ecological and production functions, the key influencing factors of the comprehensive control model of soil and water loss can be selected, and the suitable control model in each administrative region can be identified, which can provide scientific basis for targeted soil and water loss.
- References:
-
[1] 梁音,张斌,潘贤章,等.南方红壤丘陵区水土流失现状与综合治理对策[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(1):22-27.
[2] 闫妍,胡宝清,侯满福,等.广西岩溶区县域石漠化治理模式适宜性评价[J].广西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2017,35(4):145-153.
[3] 代富强.水土保持技术的适宜性评价[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(12):8-12.
[4] 代富强,刘刚才.紫色土丘陵区典型水土保持措施的适宜性评价[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(4):23-30.
[5] Liu G, Dai F, Nan L, et al. Assessing the suitability of soil and water conservation practices in Southwestern China[J]. Land Use Policy,2013,30(1):319-327.
[6] 刘纪根,张平仓,喻惠花.水土流失治理率综合评价指标体系框架研究[J].长江科学院院报,2008,25(3):82-85.
[7] 刘刚才,游翔,张建辉,等.紫色土丘陵区陡坡荒地水土保持措施的适宜性初探[J].山地学报,2008,26(6):714-720.
[8] 刘刚才,张建辉,杜树汉,等.关于水土保持措施适宜性的评价方法[J].中国水土保持科学,2009,7(1):108-111.
[9] 张玉斌,王昱程,郭晋.水土保持措施适宜性评价的理论与方法初探[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(1):47-55.
[10] 聂斌斌,蔡强国,綦俊谕,等.水土保持生态自然修复适宜性研究综述[J].中国水土保持科学,2010,8(4):114-120.
[11] 姚应龙.水土保持措施适宜性评价空间决策支持系统研究[D].福州:福州大学,2015.
[12] 陈雪,蔡强国,王学强.典型黑土区坡耕地水土保持措施适宜性分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(5):44-49.
[13] 邸利,张富,黄海霞,等.安家沟小流域水土保持措施的配置研究[J].资源环境与发展,2009(4):6-9.
[14] 徐伟铭,陆在宝,肖桂荣.基于遗传算法的水土保持措施空间优化配置[J].中国水土保持科学,2016,14(6):114-124.
[15] 池永宽.石漠化治理中农草林草空间优化配置技术与示范[D].贵阳:贵州师范大学,2015.
[16] 郭帅,赵宏霞,张光灿,等.沂蒙山区水土保持生态修复适宜性等级评价及分区[J].中国水土保持,2012(2):50-52.
[17] 张秦岭,李占斌,王星.陕西省丹汉江流域重点水土保持工程适宜性评价[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2014,42(10):225-234.
[18] 欧阳志云,王如松,符贵南.生态位适宜度模型及其在土地利用适宜性评价中的应用[J].生态学报,1996,16(2):113-120.
[19] 蒋佳佳,邵景安,谭少军,等.重庆两江新区低丘缓坡开发建设生态适宜性评价[J].地理研究,2019,38(6):1403-1419.
[20] Ouyang Z, Jason W, Wang R. Ecological niche suitability model with an application in Taojiang land use planning[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences,1994,6(4):449-456.
[21] 莫明浩,谢颂华,聂小飞,等.南方红壤区水土流失综合治理模式研究:以江西省为例[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(4):207-213.
[22] 史志华,王玲,刘前进,等.土壤侵蚀:从综合治理到生态调控[J].中国科学院院刊,2018,33(2):198-205.
[23] 汪邦稳,方少文,杨勤科.赣南地区水土流失评价模型及其影响因子获取方法研究[J].中国水土保持,2011(12):16-19.
[24] Li Z, Ning K, Chen J, et al. Soil and water conservation effects driven by the implementation of ecological restoration projects: Evidence from the red soil hilly region of China in the last three decades[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,260:121109.
[25] Lü Z, Yan D, Qin T, et al. A system framework for spatial allocation of soil management practices(SMPs)in river basins[J]. Soil and Tillage Research,2021,209:104929.
[26] 乔梅,王继军,李玥,等.水土保持技术选择的主要驱动要素分析[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(2):132-138.
[27] Wang L, Yan H, Wang X W, et al. The potential for soil erosion control associated with socio-economic development in the hilly red soil region, southern China[J]. Catena,2020,194:104678.
[28] 李秋艳,蔡强国,方海燕,等.长江上游紫色土地区不同坡度坡耕地水保措施的适宜性分析[J].资源科学,2009(12):2157-2163.
[29] Huang X, Fang N, Shi Z, et al. Decoupling the effects of vegetation dynamics and climate variability on watershed hydrological characteristics on a monthly scale from subtropical China[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment,2019,279:14-24.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2022-06-20