PDF Download

[1]GUAN Yu,CHEN Ying,YE Jing,et al.Multidimensional Evaluation and Utilization Division of Cultivated Land Quality[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(03):334-343+350.

Copy

Multidimensional Evaluation and Utilization Division of Cultivated Land Quality

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 29 Number of periods: 2022 03 Page number: 334-343+350 Column: Public date: 2022-04-20

Title:: Multidimensional Evaluation and Utilization Division of Cultivated Land Quality

Author(s):: GUAN Yu¹, CHEN Ying¹, YE Jing², LIU Jing², MEN Mingxin¹; (1.College of Land and Resources, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, Hebei 071000, China; 2.College of Resources and Environmental Science, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, Hebei 071000, China)

Keywords:: cultivated land quality; space-function-environment; multidimensional evaluation; zoning of cultivated land use; Huanghua

CLC:: F301.2

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Cultivated land use zoning has a guiding significance for the orderly development and utilization of the future regional space. The multidimensional analytical evaluation of cultivated land quality is an important way to expand the traditional evaluation theory of cultivated land quality and is the key to ensure the implementation of the zoning work. Taking the unified quality concept of ‘Trinity' as the theoretical basis and taking Huanghua, Hebei Province as the research area, we constructed a three-dimensional analytical evaluation framework of cultivated land quality integrated with ‘space-function-environment', and characterized the spatial correlation of three-dimensional quality by Spearman rank correlation coefficient and G^* hot spot analysis tool. Finally, based on the above results, we carried out the cultivated land utilization zoning, and put forward the suggestions of differentiated management. The results showed that:(1)there were spatial differences in the cultivated land quality fractions in various dimensions in Huanghua; the high-value areas mainly distributed in the west and north of Huanghua, while the low-value areas mainly distributed in the southwest of Huanghua;(2)there was a strong spatial correlation effect between the cultivated land quality in various dimensions in Huanghua; there was a strong trade-off relationship between natural environment and social environment; spatial characteristics showed a strong cooperative relationship with scale and material production function; the distribution pattern of cold hot spots in different dimensions might be similar, but there might be spatial conflicts in the same dimension;(3)Huanghua was divided into five areas, namely production advantage protection area, leisure agriculture development area, economies of scale improvement area, fallow improvement area and potential function mining area. the characteristics of each cultivated land utilization area were different, so the cultivated land utilization and management should be carried out according to local conditions. These results of this study have practical significance for enhancing the operability of cultivated land utilization zoning, and can provide reference for optimizing the protection path of cultivated land utilization.

References:: [1] Liu Y, Fang F, Li Y. Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making[J]. Land Use Policy, 2014,40:6-12.
[2] 孙瑞,金晓斌,项晓敏,等.土地整治对耕地细碎化影响评价指标适用性分析[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(13):279-287.
[3] 赵晓东,王静,郭柏枢,等.滨海地区建设用地扩张、利用效率及脱钩关系:以江苏省大丰区为例[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(5):340-348.
[4] 韩明璋.面向综合产能提升的滨海盐碱地整治效果评价[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学,2020.
[5] 张超,乔敏,郧文聚,等.耕地数量、质量、生态三位一体综合监管体系研究[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(1):1-6.
[6] 钟海燕,赵小敏,黄宏胜.土地利用分区与主体功能区协调的实证研究:以环鄱阳湖区为例[J].经济地理,2011,31(9):1523-1527,1551.
[7] 陈文广,孔祥斌,廖宇波,等.黄土高原区耕地质量评价:以陕西省延川县为例[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(2):375-381.
[8] 卫新东,宋林韩,王筛妮,等.黄河西岸陕西各县市耕地质量时空变化特征及其分异规律[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(2):326-334.
[9] Doran J W, Zeiss M R. Soil health and sustainability:managing the biotic component of soil quality[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2000,15(1):3-11.
[10] Fine A K, Van E H M, Schindelbeck R R. Statistics, scoring functions, and regional analysis of a comprehensive soil health database[J]. Soil Society of America Journal, 2017,81(3):589-601.
[11] 宋戈,刘燕妮,张文琦,等.基于可改良限制因子的耕地质量等别提升潜力研究[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(14):261-269.
[12] 高璐璐,张超,吕雅慧,等.耕地健康产能多要素评价体系构建与应用[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(5):215-222.
[13] 张小丹,吴克宁,赵瑞,等.县域耕地健康产能评价[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(3):294-300.
[14] 赵瑞,吴克宁,张小丹,等.粮食主产区耕地健康产能评价:以河南省温县为例[J].中国土地科学,2019,33(2):67-75.
[15] 温良友,张青璞,孔祥斌,等.基于产能与健康综合评价的北京大兴区耕地整治分区[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(22):79-89.
[16] 朱从谋,李武艳,杜莹莹,等.浙江省耕地多功能价值时空变化与权衡—协同关系[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(14):263-272.
[17] 康甜甜.基于灰靶模型的宜兴市耕地质量评价[D].南京:南京农业大学,2016.
[18] 曾荣,赵荣,梁勇. AHP-灰色关联度分析法的耕地质量评价:以湖北省襄阳市为例[J].测绘科学,2018,43(8):90-96.
[19] 马瑞明,马仁会,韩冬梅,等.基于多层级指标的省域耕地质量评价体系构建[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(16):249-257.
[20] 范胜龙,邱凌婧,茹凯丽,等.基于BP神经网络和支持向量机的农用地分等方法研究[J].中国农业大学学报,2018,23(12):138-148.
[21] 单美.耕地健康评价及其应用研究[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学,2015.
[22] 刘洋,余建新,向冬蕾,等.基于局部空间自相关的思茅区耕地利用保护综合分区[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(1):183-188,196.
[23] 邵雅萍.基于“空间—功能—环境”的耕地质量评价及其关系研究[D].杭州:浙江财经大学,2019.
[24] 邵雅静,员学锋.基于限制因子分析的耕地质量提升潜力分区[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(8):2442-2449.
[25] 张红梅,宋戈,王思琢.基于“质量—产出—效率”的辽宁省耕地利用分区[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(13):234-242.
[26] 辛芸娜,范树印,孔祥斌,等.四重质量维度下的县域耕地质量评价方法研究[J].资源科学,2018,40(4):737-747.
[27] 高建岗,黄锐.基于耕地质量指数和空间自相关的苏南地区耕地保护分区[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(3):213-218.
[28] Bouma J. A procedure to derive land quality indicators for sustainable agricultural production[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 1998,85(1):103-110.
[29] 孔祥斌,刘灵伟,秦静.基于农户土地利用行为的北京大兴区耕地质量评价[J].地理学报,2008,63(8):856-868.
[30] 张蚌蚌,孔祥斌,郧文聚,等.我国耕地质量与监控研究综述[J].中国农业大学学报,2015,20(2):216-222.
[31] 沈仁芳,陈美军,孔祥斌,等.耕地质量的概念和评价与管理对策[J].土壤学报,2012,49(6):1210-1217.
[32] 王凤春.土壤重金属和养分的空间变异分析及其评价研究:以北京大兴区为例[D].北京:首都师范大学,2009.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2022-04-20