[1]WEI Shaoyin,LU Rucheng,LIN Xiaonan,et al.Cross-Sensitivity Analysis of Ecological Service Function in Guangxi Border Region Based on Land Use Transition[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(03):308-316.
Copy
Cross-Sensitivity Analysis of Ecological Service Function in Guangxi Border Region Based on Land Use Transition
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
29
Number of periods:
2022 03
Page number:
308-316
Column:
Public date:
2022-04-20
- Title:
- Cross-Sensitivity Analysis of Ecological Service Function in Guangxi Border Region Based on Land Use Transition
- Keywords:
- land use transformation; ecosystem services; improved cross sensitivity coefficient; Guangxi border area
- CLC:
- F301.2
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- In order to reveal the impact of land use transformation on ecological service function in border areas and promote the high-quality development of regional ecological environment and social economy, based on three periods of land use remote sensing monitoring data in border areas of Guangxi in 2000, 2010 and 2018, the dynamic evolution of land use transformation and ecosystem service values during 18 years were identified, and the degree of sensitivity of ecosystem service values to land use transformation in border areas of Guangxi was explored in combination with improved cross-sensitivity coefficients. The results show that:(1)land transformation in Guangxi border areas from 2000 to 2018 was flat in the early stage and dramatic in the late stage, and the transfer of arable land to construction land and water area was the main transformation driver;(2)the ecosystem service value showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing from 2000 to 2018, and the high values of land-average ecosystem service value mainly concentrated in Fangcheng District, southern Ningming County and the area with superior ecological background in the southern part of Napo County, while low values of land-average ecosystem service value occurred in the northern part of Ningming County, Longzhou County, Daxin County, and the central urban area of Jingxi City where the ecosystem was weaker in karst;(3)the mutual transformation of arable land, forest land, water area and other land types were sensitive to the impact of ecosystem service function, among which the most sensitive was the transformation between forest land and construction land, and the transformation between grassland, unused land and other land types lacked sensitivity;(4)the spatial evolutionary differentiation of ecological sensitivity was significant; the high ecological sensitivity of arable land and construction land mainly distributed in Dongxing City, Ningming County, Longzhou County and Jingxi City, and the high ecological sensitivity of forest land and construction land mainly distributed in Fangcheng District and the main urban area of Dongxing City, Pingxiang City, and the important trade export corridors in the northern part of Jingxi City. The results can provide scientific guidance for optimizing the spatial pattern of border territory and improving the ecological service function.
- References:
-
[1] 龙花楼.论土地利用转型与土地资源管理[J].地理研究,2015,34(9):1607-1618.
[2] 龙花楼.论土地利用转型与乡村转型发展[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(2):131-138.
[3] Grainger A. The forest transition:an alternative approach[J]. Area, 1995,27(3):242-251.
[4] 龙花楼,李秀彬.长江沿线样带土地利用格局及其影响因子分析[J].地理学报,2001,56(4):417-425.
[5] 姚尧,李江风,杨媛媛.长江中游城市群城市建设用地利用社会经济功能转型与协调性评价研究[J].地域研究与开发,2018,37(5):128-133.
[6] 徐梦瑶,张正峰.乡村产业振兴背景下京津冀地区乡村工业用地转型[J].经济地理,2020,40(5):174-182.
[7] 龙花楼,陈坤秋.基于土地系统科学的土地利用转型与城乡融合发展[J].地理学报,2021,76(2):295-309.
[8] 李明珍,李阳兵,冉彩虹.土地利用转型背景下的乡村景观格局演变响应:基于草堂溪流域的样带分析[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(9):2283-2298.
[9] 石小伟,冯广京, YI Yang,等.浙中城市群土地利用格局时空演变特征与生态风险评价[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(5):242-251.
[10] 高星,刘泽伟,李晨曦,等.基于“三生空间”的雄安新区土地利用功能转型与生态环境效应研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(20):7113-7122.
[11] 陈琼,张镱锂,刘峰贵,等.黄河流域河源区土地利用变化及其影响研究综述[J].资源科学,2020,42(3):446-459.
[12] 宋小青,申雅静,王雄,等.耕地利用转型中的生物灾害脆弱性研究[J].地理学报,2020,75(11):2362-2379.
[13] 宋家鹏,陈松林.福建省土地利用隐性形态与土地生态安全耦合协调分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(4):301-307.
[14] Costanza R, d'Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387(6630):253-260.
[15] Stephen C Farber, Robert Costanza, Matthew A Wilson. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002,41(3):375-392.
[16] 王景升,李文华,任青山,等.西藏森林生态系统服务价值[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(5):831-841.
[17] 孙新章,周海林,谢高地.中国农田生态系统的服务功能及其经济价值[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2007,17(4):55-60.
[18] Daily G C. Nature's services:societal dependence on natural ecosystems [M]. Washington DC: Island Press,1997.
[19] 宋洁,温璐,王凤歌,等.乌兰布和沙漠生态系统服务价值时空动态[J].生态学报,2021,41(6):2201-2211.
[20] 李龙,吴大放,王芳,等.中国快速城市化区域生态系统服务价值预测及权衡研究:以佛山市为例[J].生态学报,2020,40(24):9023-9036.
[21] 胡其玉,陈松林.基于生态系统服务供需的厦漳泉地区生态网络空间优化[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(2):342-355.
[22] 金贵,邓祥征,赵晓东,等.2005—2014年长江经济带城市土地利用效率时空格局特征[J].地理学报,2018,73(7):1242-1252.
[23] 李益敏,管成文,郭丽琴,等.基于生态敏感性分析的江川区土地利用空间格局优化配置[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(20):267-276.
[24] 普拉提·莫合塔尔,海米提·依米提.土地利用变化下的生态系统服务敏感性研究:以克里雅绿洲为例[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(11):1849-1858.
[25] 刘永强,龙花楼.长江中游经济带土地利用转型时空格局及其生态服务功能影响[J].经济地理,2017,37(11):161-170.
[26] 黎励,毛蒋兴,陆汝成.边境地区土地利用时空格局的分形动态研究:以广西崇左市为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(5):204-209.
[27] 张晓琳,金晓斌,范业婷,等.1995—2015年江苏省土地利用功能转型特征及其协调性分析[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(4):689-706.
[28] 谢高地,张彩霞,张昌顺,等.中国生态系统服务的价值[J].资源科学,2015,37(9):1740-1746.
[29] 谢高地,肖玉,甄霖,等.我国粮食生产的生态服务价值研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2005,13(3):10-13.
[30] 朱清,毛召锋.土地利用转型过程及其对区域生态质量的影响分析:以巢湖市为例[J].测绘与空间地理信息,2019,42(11):58-62.
[31] 路昌,韩笑,韩会芹.山东省土地利用转型与生态服务功能交叉敏感性研究[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(10):223-231.
[32] 刘少坤,林树高,王嘉佳,等.1980—2018年中越边境带广西段土地利用变化及驱动力[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(1):290-299.
[33] 林树高,陆汝成,刘少坤,等.基于“三生”空间的广西边境地区土地利用格局及多功能演变[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(5):265-274.
[34] 王永琪,马姜明.基于县域尺度珠江—西江经济带广西段土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(21):7826-7839.
[35] 罗盛锋,闫文德.广西北部湾沿岸地区生态系统服务价值变化及其驱动力[J].生态学报,2018,38(9):3248-3259.
[36] 周兴,童新华,华璀,等.广西生态环境敏感性综合评价及其空间分布[J].广西师范学院学报:自然科学版,2006,23(S1):1-8.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2022-04-20