PDF Download

[1]LIU Yanzhong,SUN Rongze,CHEN Zhang,et al.Change of Ecological-Living-Industrial Land and Its Response to Ecosystem Service Value in Linxiang City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(06):303-310.

Copy

Change of Ecological-Living-Industrial Land and Its Response to Ecosystem Service Value in Linxiang City

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 26 Number of periods: 2019 06 Page number: 303-310 Column: Public date: 2019-10-17

Title:: Change of Ecological-Living-Industrial Land and Its Response to Ecosystem Service Value in Linxiang City

Author(s):: LIU Yanzhong¹, SUN Rongze¹, CHEN Zhang¹, CHEN Yong¹, ZHANG Zuo², LI Xiaolin³; 1. School of Resources and Environmental Engineering/Hubei Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Utilization and Agglomeration of Metallurgical Mineral Resources, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China;
2. College of Public Administration, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China;
3. Hubei Muyuan Technology Co., Ltd., Yichang, Hubei 443000, China

Keywords:: ecological-living-industrial land; ecosystem service value; value method; Linxiang City

CLC:: X171.1

DOI:: -

Abstract:: In view of the ambiguous relationship between land function and ecosystem service function in the study of ecosystem service value, we explored the response of ecosystem service value to the change of ecological-living-industrial land. An ecological-living-industrial land classification system was developed, and the adjusted equivalent factor valuation model of ecosystem service was used to analyze the impact of the ecological-living-industrial land use change on the ecosystem service value in Linxiang City from 2009 to 2016. The results showed that:(1) the total ecosystem service value in Linxiang City was decreasing year by year, the ecosystem service value of ecological land and ecological-industrial land decreased rapidly, and the ecosystem service value of industrial-ecological land and living-industrial land grew slowly; (2) the value of ecosystem service of these four types of lands was positively correlated with their change of land use area; the change of ecological land had the most obvious impact on ecosystem service value; (3) in different periods, the ecosystem service value of ecological-industrial land was always the highest, followed by ecological land, which accounted for more than 90% of the total ecosystem service value. This research indicated that the ecosystem service value was more responsive to the changes of ecological land use and ecological-industrial land. The study on rationally regulating the structure of the ecological-living-industrial land and protecting ecological functional land can provide the scientific basis and decision-making reference for ecosystem service protection, land use planning and management.

References:: [1] 李晓炜,侯西勇,邸向红,等.从生态系统服务角度探究土地利用变化引起的生态失衡:以莱州湾海岸带为例[J].地理科学,2016,36(8):1197-1204.
[2] 何玲,贾启建,李超,等.基于生态系统服务价值和生态安全格局的土地利用格局模拟[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(3):275-284.
[3] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Board. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment:Frameworks[M]. Washington DC, USA:World Resources Institute,2005.
[4] Costanza R, D’Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. World Environment,1997,387(6630):253-260.
[5] Ning Z H, Chambers R, Abdollahi K, et al. Modeling air pollutant removal, carbon storage, and CO² sequestration potential of urban forests in Scotlandville, Louisiana[J]. Forest Biogeosciences and Forestry, 2016,9(6):860-867.
[6] Sherrouse B C, Semmens D J. Social Values for Ecosystem Services, Version 3.0:Documentation and User Manual[Z]. Reston, Va, USA:Geological Survey, 2015.
[7] Tallis H T, Ricketts T, Guerry A D, et al. InVEST 2.1 Beta User’s Guide[Z]. Palo Alto, California, USA:Stanford, the Natural Capital Project, 2011.
[8] 欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(5):607-613.
[9] 李文华.生态系统服务功能价值评价的理论、方法与应用[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[10] 谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
[11] 谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919.
[12] 祖皮艳木·买买提,赛迪古丽·哈西木,玉米提·哈力克,等.1976-2011年博斯腾湖小湖区湿地生态系统服务价值变化分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(3):328-332,337.
[13] Yin J, Yin Z, Zhong H, et al. Monitoring urban expansion and land use/land cover changes of Shanghai metropolitan area during the transitional economy (1979-2009) in China[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2011,177(1/4):609-621.
[14] 杨锁华,胡守庚,瞿诗进.1990-2014年长江中游经济带生态系统服务价值时空变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(3):164-169.
[15] 肖强,肖洋,欧阳志云,等.重庆市森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].生态学报,2014,34(1):216-223.
[16] 陈明叶,刘素红,于连海,等.大清河阜平流域生态系统结构变化的服务价值响应研究[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(8):1376-1389.
[17] 王爽,丁建丽,王璐,等.基于遥感的艾比湖流域近20年生态服务价值对土地利用变化的响应[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(5):144-149.
[18] 王考,姚云峰,包金兰.县级尺度"三生"用地动态变化及其空间集聚特征[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(1):306-312,329.
[19] 刘彦随,刘玉,陈玉福.中国地域多功能性评价及其决策机制[J].地理学报,2011,66(10):1379-1389.
[20] 唐秀美,陈百明,路庆斌,等.北京市土地利用生态分类方法[J].生态学报,2011,31(14):3902-3909.
[21] 陈婧,史培军.土地利用功能分类探讨[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2005,41(5):536-540.
[22] 张红旗,许尔琪,朱会义.中国"三生用地"分类及其空间格局[J].资源科学,2015,37(7):1332-1338.
[23] 于莉,宋安安,郑宇,等."三生用地"分类及其空间格局分析:以昌黎县为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(2):89-96.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01