PDF Download

[1]HA Yuanqi,YU Lihong,WANG Wenxiong.Influence of Llivelihood Capital on Famers’ Effective Participation in Rural Land Consolidation—A Case Study of 9 Counties, Cities, Districs in Hubei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(03):339-346.

Copy

Influence of Llivelihood Capital on Famers’ Effective Participation in Rural Land Consolidation—A Case Study of 9 Counties, Cities, Districs in Hubei Province

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 26 Number of periods: 2019 03 Page number: 339-346 Column: Public date: 2019-04-12

Title:: Influence of Llivelihood Capital on Famers’ Effective Participation in Rural Land Consolidation—A Case Study of 9 Counties, Cities, Districs in Hubei Province

Author(s):: HA Yuanqi¹, YU Lihong², WANG Wenxiong¹; 1. College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
2. School of Economics, South-Central University For Nationalities, Wuhan 430074, China

Keywords:: rural land consolidation; farmers’effective participation; livelihood capital; canonical correlation analysis

CLC:: F301.2

DOI:: -

Abstract:: This study assessed the effective participation of farmers in farmland renovation projects in 9 counties cities and districts of Hubei Province. The factors of livelihood capital that affect farmers’ effective participation were analyzed. The TOPSIS method was used to calculate the comprehensive value of farmers’ effective participation and their livelihood capital. The impact of the livelihood capital on the effective participation of farmers was analyzed with the typical correlation model. The results showed that the natural capital, human capital and physical capital of famers in plain project mode area were better than those in hill project area, while farmers’ effective participation in plain mode area was higher than that in hill mode area; the overall livelihood capital decreased in the sequence:non-farmers (0.367 8) > highly-diversified farmers(0.352 7) > agricultural business farmers (0.351 4) > lowly-diversified farmers(0.311 3), the level of farmers’ effective participation decreased in the order agricultural business farmers(0.448 5) > lowly-diversified farmers(0.425 4) > highly-diversified farmers(0.402 9) > non-farmers(0.402 4); natural capital, social capital and financial capital respectively posed the decreasing significant effect on farmers’ participation in farmland reclamation projects in hill mode area with respect of participation scope and participation subjects, while human capital, social capital, financial capital and physical capital respectively posed the significant effect on farmers’ participation in farmland reclamation projects in plain mode area with respect of participation scope, participation depth, and participation channel; social capital, natural capital and human capital respectively posed the decreasing significant effect on farmers’ participation scope and participation validity of agricultural business farmers; in addition, financial capital, social capital and human capital posed the decreasing significant effect on farmers’ participation subject, participation scope and participation validity of lowly-diversified farmers; furthermore, financial capital, physical capital and social capital posed the decreasing significant effect on highly-diversified farmers; moreover, social capital and financial capital had significant effect on farmers’ participation scope, participation validity, participation subject and participation depth of non-agriculture farmers. There were significant regional differences and individual differences in the impact of livelihood capital on the effective participation of farmers.

References:: [1] 汪文雄.农地整治项目农民有效参与的实证研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(7):128-137.
[2] 吴九兴.农地整理项目农民参与现状及其原因分析:基于湖北省部分县区的问卷调查[J].华中农业大学学报:社会科学版,2013(1):65-71.
[3] 赵微,周惠,杨钢桥,等.农民参与农地整理项目建后管护的意愿与行为转化研究:以河南邓州的调查为例[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(3):55-62.
[4] 吴九兴,杨钢桥.农地整理项目农民参与行为的机理研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(2):102-110.
[5] 杨昭熙,杨钢桥,汪文雄,等.社会资本视域下农民参与农地整治项目的行为机理[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(3):288-294,300.
[6] 李祎琛,吴诗嫚.农地整治项目规划设计阶段农户参与度影响因素研究:基于博弈论视角[J].中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(4):69-74.
[7] 汪文雄,李敏,余利红,等.农地整治项目农民有效参与的测度及其诊断:以湖北省为例[J].资源科学,2015,37(4):671-679.
[8] DFID. Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets[J]. Dfid, 2007.
[9] 王沛沛,许佳君.生计资本对水库移民创业的影响分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(2):150-156.
[10] 张洪,张燕.基于加权TOPSIS法的旅游资源区际竞争力比较研究:以长江三角洲为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2010,19(5):500-505.
[11] 谢晋,蔡银莺.创新实践地区农户参与农田保护补偿政策成效的生计禀赋影响:苏州及成都的实证比较[J].资源科学,2016,38(11):2082-2094.
[12] 李伯华,刘艳,张安录,等.城市边缘区不同类型农户对宅基地流转的认知与响应:以衡阳市酃湖乡两个典型村为例[J].资源科学,2015,37(4):654-662.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01